Cited by 65Speech and dialogue systemsTopic ModelingSentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

SODA: Million-scale Dialogue Distillation with Social Commonsense Contextualization

Open access
Kim, Hyunwoo, Hessel, Jack, Jiang, Liwei, West, Peter, Lu, Ximing, Yu, Youngjae, Zhou, Pei, Bras, Ronan +4 more·2023·Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

Abstract

Hyunwoo Kim, Jack Hessel, Liwei Jiang, Peter West, Ximing Lu, Youngjae Yu, Pei Zhou, Ronan Bras, Malihe Alikhani, Gunhee Kim, Maarten Sap, Yejin Choi. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.799

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerous studies have utilized LLMs to augment or synthesize large-scale dialogue benchmarks for assessing responses in everyday social interactions, multi-modal environments, and persona-aligned responses.

    “Consequently, numerous studies have started utilizing LLMs to augment or synthesize large-scale dialogue benchmarks for assessing responses in everyday social interactions (Kim et al., 2023), examining responses in multi-modal environment (Feng et al., 2023), and evaluating responses that align with specific persona (Jandaghi et al., 2023).”

    From Evaluating Very Long-Term Conversational Memory of LLM Agents (2024) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2023

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kate Crawford. 2021. Atlas of AI. Yale University Press. · DOI
  2. Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. 2019. Language Models are Unsupervised Multitask Learners. Ope- nAI blog, 1(8):9.
  3. David E Rumelhart. 1975. Notes on a schema for stories. In Representation and understanding, pages 211-236. Elsevier.
  4. Chujie Zheng, Sahand Sabour, Jiaxin Wen, and Min- lie Huang. 2023. AugESC: Large-scale data aug- mentation for emotional support conversation with pre-trained language models. In Findings of ACL.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, H., Hessel, J., Jiang, L., West, P., Lu, X., Yu, Y., Zhou, P., Bras, R., Alikhani, M., Kim, G., Sap, M., & Choi, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
Published
2023
Pages
12930-12949
OpenAlex
W4389519535
Cited by
63
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 1
FWCI
11.01
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • KAIST Institutional Repository (KAIST) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
  • Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N66001-19-2-4031, N66001-19)
  • Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (2022-)
  • Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Keywords
contextualization, dialogue summarization, knowledge distillation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review