The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Euclid Definition Study Report
Abstract
Euclid is a space-based survey mission from the European Space Agency designed to understand the origin of the Universe's accelerating expansion. It will use cosmological probes to investigate the nature of dark energy, dark matter and gravity by tracking their observational signatures on the geometry of the universe and on the cosmic history of structure formation. The mission is optimised for two independent primary cosmological probes: Weak gravitational Lensing (WL) and Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO). The Euclid payload consists of a 1.2 m Korsch telescope designed to provide a large field of view. It carries two instruments with a common field-of-view of ~0.54 deg2: the visual imager (VIS) and the near infrared instrument (NISP) which contains a slitless spectrometer and a three bands photometer. The Euclid wide survey will cover 15,000 deg2 of the extragalactic sky and is complemented by two 20 deg2 deep fields. For WL, Euclid measures the shapes of 30-40 resolved galaxies per arcmin2 in one broad visible R+I+Z band (550-920 nm). The photometric redshifts for these galaxies reach a precision of dz/(1+z) < 0.05. They are derived from three additional Euclid NIR bands (Y, J, H in the range 0.92-2.0 micron), complemented by ground based photometry in visible bands derived from public data or through engaged collaborations. The BAO are determined from a spectroscopic survey with a redshift accuracy dz/(1+z) =0.001. The slitless spectrometer, with spectral resolution ~250, predominantly detects Ha emission line galaxies. Euclid is a Medium Class mission of the ESA Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 programme, with a foreseen launch date in 2019. This report (also known as the Euclid Red Book) describes the outcome of the Phase A study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The amount and complexity of data delivered by modern galaxy surveys has steadily increased over the past years.
“The amount and complexity of data delivered by modern galaxy surveys has been steadily increasing over the past years.”
From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Laureijs et al. 2011
New facilities will soon provide imaging and spectra of hundreds of millions of galaxies.
“New facilities will soon provide imaging and spectra of hundreds of millions of galaxies.”
From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Laureijs et al. 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Abdalla, F.B., et al. 2008, arXiv:0812.3831 · arXiv
- Albrecht, A., et al. 2009, arXiv:0901.0721 · arXiv
- Albrecht, A., et al. 2006, arXiv:0609.591
- Amendola, L., et al. 2010, arXiv:1008.1183 · arXiv
- Bernstein, G., & Cai, Y.-C. 2011, arXiv:1104.3862 · arXiv
- Blake, C., et al. 2011, arXiv:1105.2862 · arXiv
- Dobke et al.2010, arXiv/1008.4112
- Dupe, F.-X., et al. 2011, A&A, in press, arXiv:1010.2192 · arXiv
- Eisenstein, D. et al. 2011, preprint (arXiv:1101.1529 [astro-ph.CO]) · arXiv
- Kirk, D., et al. 2011, arXiv:1109.4536 · arXiv
- Kitching, T.D., Taylor, A.N. 2011, arXiv:1012.3479 · arXiv
- Kümmel, M., et al. 2010, The aXe Manual, ST-ECF Laureijs R., et al. 2009, ESA/SRE(2009)2; arXiv :0912,0914
- Leauthaud, A., et al. 2011, arXiv:1104.0928 · arXiv
- Lombriser, L., et al. 2010, arXiv:1003.3009 · arXiv
- Rassat, A., et al. 2008; arXiv:0810.0003 · arXiv
- Schlegel, et al. 2009, arXiv:0904.0468 · arXiv
- Semboloni, E., et al. 2011, arXiv:1105.1075 · arXiv
- Suzuki, N., et al. 2011, arXiv:1105.3470 · arXiv
- Treu, T., et al. 2011, arXiv:1104.5663 · arXiv
- van Daalen, M.P., et al. 2011, arXiv:1104.1174 · arXiv
- Voigt, L.M., et al. 2011, arXiv:1105.5595 · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Heymans, C., Tröster, T., Asgari, M., Blake, C., Hildebrandt, H., Joachimi, B., Kuijken, K., Lin, C.-A., Sánchez, A. G., van den Busch, J. L., et al. (2021) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039063 · Cited by 772
Self-citationCosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review
Kilbinger, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901 · Cited by 604
The effective field theory of dark energy
Gubitosi, G., Piazza, F., & Vernizzi, F. (2013) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/02/032 · Cited by 510
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to data calibration
Amon, A., Gruen, D., Troxel, M. A., MacCrann, N., Dodelson, S., Choi, A., Doux, C., Secco, L. F., Samuroff, S., Krause, E., et al. (2022) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.023514 · Cited by 437
Self-citationTHE POPULATION OF GALAXY–GALAXY STRONG LENSES IN FORTHCOMING OPTICAL IMAGING SURVEYS
Collett, T. E. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/811/1/20 · Cited by 354
Schawinski, K., Zhang, C., Zhang, H., Fowler, L., & Santhanam, G. K. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx008 · Cited by 246
The many flavours of photometric redshifts
Salvato, M., Ilbert, O., & Hoyle, B. (2018) · Nature Astronomy · doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0478-0 · Cited by 234
CMU DeepLens: deep learning for automatic image-based galaxy–galaxy strong lens finding
Lanusse, F., Ma, Q., Li, N., Collett, T. E., Li, C.-L., Ravanbakhsh, S., Mandelbaum, R., & Póczos, B. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1665 · Cited by 191
Galaxy Zoo: probabilistic morphology through Bayesian CNNs and active learning
Walmsley, M., Smith, L., Lintott, C., Gal, Y., Bamford, S., Dickinson, H., Fortson, L., Kruk, S., Masters, K., Scarlata, C., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2816 · Cited by 160
The strong gravitational lens finding challenge
Metcalf, R. B., Meneghetti, M., Avestruz, C., Bellagamba, F., Bom, C. R., Bertin, E., Cabanac, R., Courbin, F., Davies, A., Decencière, E., et al. (2019) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832797 · Cited by 152
Self-citationCosmoGAN: creating high-fidelity weak lensing convergence maps using Generative Adversarial Networks
Mustafa, M., Bard, D., Bhimji, W., Lukić, Z., Al-Rfou, R., & Kratochvil, J. M. (2019) · Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology · doi:10.1186/s40668-019-0029-9 · Cited by 127
“[7], [8], [9]) therefore hinges critically on the success of underlying simulations.”
BackgroundMorpheus: A Deep Learning Framework for the Pixel-level Analysis of Astronomical Image Data
Hausen, R., & Robertson, B. E. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab8868 · Cited by 110
The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys
Huertas-Company, M., & Lanusse, F. (2023) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2022.55 · Cited by 102
Spectroscopic needs for imaging dark energy experiments
Newman, J. A., Abate, A., Abdalla, F. B., Allam, S., Allen, S. W., Ansari, R., Bailey, S., Barkhouse, W. A., Beers, T. C., Blanton, M. R., et al. (2015) · Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2014.06.007 · Cited by 98
Self-citationIdentifying galaxy mergers in observations and simulations with deep learning
Pearson, W. J., Wang, L., Trayford, J. W., Petrillo, C. E., & van der Tak, F. F. S. (2019) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935355 · Cited by 90
Self-supervised Representation Learning for Astronomical Images
Hayat, M. A., Stein, G., Harrington, P., Lukić, Z., & Mustafa, M. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abf2c7 · Cited by 79
Curvature constraints from large scale structure
Dio, E. D., Montanari, F., Raccanelli, A., Durrer, R., Kamionkowski, M., & Lesgourgues, J. (2016) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/06/013 · Cited by 61
Deep generative models for galaxy image simulations
Lanusse, F., Mandelbaum, R., Ravanbakhsh, S., Li, C.-L., Freeman, P., & Póczos, B. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1214 · Cited by 53
Zoobot: Adaptable Deep Learning Models for Galaxy Morphology
Walmsley, M., Allen, C., Aussel, B., Bowles, M., Gregorowicz, K., Slijepcevic, I. V., Lintott, C. J., Scaife, A. M. M., Jabłońska, M., Karchev, K., et al. (2023) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.05312 · Cited by 45
Quantifying Non-parametric Structure of High-redshift Galaxies with Deep Learning
Tohill, C., Ferreira, L., Conselice, C. J., Bamford, S. P., & Ferrari, F. (2021) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac033c · Cited by 34
Wilde, J., Serjeant, S., Bromley, J. M., Dickinson, H., Koopmans, L. V. E., & Metcalf, R. B. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac562 · Cited by 31
Self-citationIdentification of tidal features in deep optical galaxy images with convolutional neural networks
Sánchez, H. D., Martin, G., Damjanov, I., Buitrago, F., Huertas-Company, M., Bottrell, C., Bernardi, M., Knapen, J. H., Vega-Ferrero, J., Hausen, R., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad750 · Cited by 28
Wavelength-dependent PSFs and their impact on weak lensing measurements
Carlsten, S. G., Strauss, M. A., Lupton, R. H., Meyers, J. E., & Miyazaki, S. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1636 · Cited by 29
Pearce-Casey, R., Nagam, B. C., Wilde, J., Busillo, V., Ulivi, L., Andika, I. T., Manjón-García, A., Leuzzi, L., Matavulj, P., Serjeant, S., et al. (2025) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453152 · Cited by 18
Self-citationCañameras, R., Schuldt, S., Shu, Y., Suyu, S. H., Taubenberger, S., Andika, I. T., Bag, S., Inoue, K. T., Jaelani, A. T., Leal-Taixé, L., et al. (2024) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347072 · Cited by 19
Lemes-Perera, S., R. Alarcon, M., Caballero-Gil, P., & Serra-Ricart, M. (2026) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2026.101153 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Laureijs, R., Amiaux, J., Arduini, S., Auguères, J. L., Brinchmann, J., Cole, R., Cropper, M., Dabin, C., Duvet, L., Ealet, A., Garilli, B., Gondoin, P., Guzzo, L., Hoar, J., Hoekstra, H., Holmes, R., Kitching, T., Maciaszek, T., Mellier, Y., Pasian, F., Percival, W., Rhodes, J., Criado, G. S., Sauvage, M., Scaramella, R., Valenziano, L., Warren, S., Bender, R., Castander, F., Cimatti, A., Fèvre, O. L., Kurki-Suonio, H., Levi, M., Lilje, P., Meylan, G., Nichol, R., Pedersen, K., Popa, V., Lopez, R. R., Rix, H. W., Rottgering, H., Zeilinger, W., Grupp, F., Hudelot, P., Massey, R., Meneghetti, M., Miller, L., Paltani, S., Paulin-Henriksson, S., Pires, S., Saxton, C., Schrabback, T., Seidel, G., Walsh, J., Aghanim, N., Amendola, L., Bartlett, J., Baccigalupi, C., Beaulieu, J. P., Benabed, K., Cuby, J. G., Elbaz, D., Fosalba, P., Gavazzi, G., Helmi, A., Hook, I., Irwin, M., Kneib, J. P., Kunz, M., Mannucci, F., Moscardini, L., Tao, C., Teyssier, R., Weller, J., Zamorani, G., Osorio, M. R. Z., Boulade, O., Foumond, J. J., Di Giorgio, A., Guttridge, P., James, A., Kemp, M., Martignac, J., Spencer, A., Walton, D., Blümchen, T., Bonoli, C., Bortoletto, F., Cerna, C., Corcione, L., Fabron, C., Jahnke, K., Ligori, S., Madrid, F., Martin, L., Morgante, G., Pamplona, T., Prieto, E., Riva, M., Toledo, R., Trifoglio, M., Zerbi, F., Abdalla, F., Douspis, M., Grenet, C., Borgani, S., Bouwens, R., Courbin, F., Delouis, J. M., Dubath, P., Fontana, A., Frailis, M., Grazian, A., Koppenhöfer, J., Mansutti, O., Melchior, M., Mignoli, M., Mohr, J., Neissner, C., Noddle, K., Poncet, M., Scodeggio, M., Serrano, S., Shane, N., Starck, J. L., Surace, C., Taylor, A., Verdoes-Kleijn, G., Vuerli, C., Williams, O. R., Zacchei, A., Altieri, B., Sanz, I. E., Kohley, R., Oosterbroek, T., Astier, P., Bacon, D., Bardelli, S., Baugh, C., Bellagamba, F., Benoist, C., Bianchi, D., Biviano, A., Branchini, E., Carbone, C., Cardone, V., Clements, D., Colombi, S., Conselice, C., Cresci, G., Deacon, N., Dunlop, J., Fedeli, C., Fontanot, F., Franzetti, P., Giocoli, C., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gow, J., Heavens, A., Hewett, P., Heymans, C., Holland, A., Huang, Z., Ilbert, O., Joachimi, B., Jennins, E., Kerins, E., Kiessling, A., Kirk, D., Kotak, R., Krause, O., Lahav, O., van Leeuwen, F., Lesgourgues, J., Lombardi, M., Magliocchetti, M., Maguire, K., Majerotto, E., Maoli, R., Marulli, F., Maurogordato, S., McCracken, H., McLure, R., Melchiorri, A., Merson, A., Moresco, M., Nonino, M., Norberg, P., Peacock, J., Pello, R., Penny, M., Pettorino, V., Di Porto, C., Pozzetti, L., Quercellini, C., Radovich, M., Rassat, A., Roche, N., Ronayette, S., Rossetti, E., Sartoris, B., Schneider, P., Semboloni, E., Serjeant, S., Simpson, F., Skordis, C., Smadja, G., Smartt, S., Spano, P., Spiro, S., Sullivan, M., Tilquin, A., Trotta, R., Verde, L., Wang, Y., Williger, G., Zhao, G., Zoubian, J., & Zucca, E.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2011
- arXiv
- 1110.3193
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review