CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 172Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignWireless Body Area Networks

Neural Dust: An Ultrasonic, Low Power Solution for Chronic Brain-Machine Interfaces

Open access
Seo, Dongjin, Carmena, Jose M., Rabaey, Jan M., Alon, Elad, Maharbiz, Michel M.·2013·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1307.2196arXiv 1307.2196
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A major hurdle in brain-machine interfaces (BMI) is the lack of an implantable neural interface system that remains viable for a lifetime. This paper explores the fundamental system design trade-offs and ultimate size, power, and bandwidth scaling limits of neural recording systems built from low-power CMOS circuitry coupled with ultrasonic power delivery and backscatter communication. In particular, we propose an ultra-miniature as well as extremely compliant system that enables massive scaling in the number of neural recordings from the brain while providing a path towards truly chronic BMI. These goals are achieved via two fundamental technology innovations: 1) thousands of 10 - 100 μm scale, free-floating, independent sensor nodes, or neural dust, that detect and report local extracellular electrophysiological data, and 2) a sub-cranial interrogator that establishes power and communication links with the neural dust.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1307.2196

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neural dust technology currently employs thousands of independent free-floating 10-100 μm scale sensor nodes.

    “This technology currently employs thousands of independent free-floating 10–100 μm scale sensor nodes referred to as “neural dust.””

    From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Seo et al., 2013

    The System Concept (p. 1) describes neural dust as thousands of independent, free-floating 10–100 μm sensor nodes. But it says the authors “propose” this system; it does not establish that the technology currently employs those nodes. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Neural dust power transmission is accomplished ultrasonically, enabling low-efficiency (7%, 11.6 dB) links, yielding ∼500 μW of received power with a 1 mm2 interrogator.

    “Power transmission is accomplished ultrasonically to enable low-efficiency (7%, 11.6 dB) links, yielding ∼500 μW of received power (>107 higher than the ∼40 pW EM transmission available at a similar-size scale) with a 1 mm2 interrogator, which may eventually provide ∼10 μm sensing nodes.”

    From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Seo et al., 2013

    The Power Delivery section (p. 5) models an ultrasonic link for a 100 µm node embedded 2 mm into the brain and reports 7% efficiency and approximately 500 µW received with a 1 mm² interrogator. It gives the link efficiency as −11.6 dB, not the claim’s positive 11.6 dB; these are modeled results, not a demonstrated transmission. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Early 'neural dust' proposals for providing BCI access to specific human-brain regions had several inherent limitations.

    “Early “neural dust” proposals for providing BCI access to specific human–brain regions (e.g., neocortex) had several inherent limitations (Seo et al., 2013).”

    From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Seo et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. [14]Alivisatos AP, et al. (2013) Nanotools for neuroscience and brain activity mapping. ACS Nano 7(3):1850-66.
  2. [15]Press Release: whitehouse.gov/infographics/brain-initiative (2013)
  3. [19]Zamft BM, Marblestone AH, Kording K, Schmidt D, Martin-Alarcon D, Tyo K, Boyden ES, Church G (2012). Measuring Cation Dependent DNA Polymerase Fidelity Landscapes by Deep Sequencing. PLoS One 7(8):1-10.
  4. [23]Marblestone AH, Zamft BM, Maguire YG, Shapiro MG, Cybulski T, Glaser JI, Stranges PB, Kalhor R, Dalrymple DA, Seo D, Alon E, Maharbiz MM, Carmena JM, Rabaey JM, Boyden ES, Church GM, Kording KP (2013) Physical Principles for Scalable Neural Recording. arXiv:1306.5709 [q-bio.NC] . · arXiv
  5. [24]Muller R, Gambini S, Rabaey JM (2012) A 0.013 mm 2 5 µ WDC-coupled neural signal acquisition IC with 0.5 V supply. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 47(1):232-43.
  6. [25]SeymourJP, Kipke DR (2006) Fabrication of polymer neural probes with sub-cellular features for reduced tissue encapsulation. IEEE EMBS Conf 4606-9.
  7. [27]Rabaey JM, et al. (2011) Powering and communicating with mm-size implants. IEEE DATE Conf 1-6.
  8. [28]Sodagar AM, Amiri P (2009) Capacitive coupling for power and data telemetry to implantable biomedical microsystems. IEEE EMBS Conf 411-4.
  9. [30]Yakovlev A, Kim S, Poon A (2012) Implantable biomedical devices: Wireless powering and communication. IEEE Comm Mag 50(4):152-9.
  10. [31]Clark GM (2003) Cochlear implants: fundamentals and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag .
  11. [32]IEEE (2006) C95.1-2005 IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz.
  12. [33]Salim A, Baldi A, Ziaie B (2003) Inductive link modeling and design guidelines for optimum power transfer in implantable wireless microsystems. IEEE EMBS Conf 3368-71.
  13. [34]Fotopoulou K, Flynn BW (2011) Wireless power transfer in loosely coupled links: Coil misalignment model. IEEE Trans Magnetics 47(2):416-30.
  14. [35]Ishida K, et al. (2013) Insole Pedometer With Piezoelectric Energy Harvester and 2 V Organic Circuits. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 48(1):255-64.
  15. [36]Wong SH, Kupnik M, Butts-Pauly K, Khuri-Yakub BT (2007) Advantages of Capacitive Micromachined Ultrasonics Transducers (CMUTs) for High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU). IEEE Ultrasonics Symp :1313-6.
  16. [37]Ozeri S, Shmilovitz D (2010) Ultrasonic transcutaneous energy transfer for powering implanted devices. Ultrasonics 50(6):556-66.
  17. [40]Hoskins PR, Martin K, Thrush A, editors (2010) Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physics and Equipment. New York: Cambridge University Press .
  18. [43]Tufail Y, Yoshihiro A, Pati S, Li MM, Tyler WJ (2011) Ultrasonic neuromodulation by brain stimulation with transcranial ultrasound. Nat Prot 6(9):1453-70.
  19. [44]King RL, Brown JR, Newsome WT, Butts-Pauly K (2012) Effective Parameters For Ultrasound-Induced In Vivo Neurostimulation. Ultrasound Med & Bio 39(2):312-31.
  20. [45]Foley JL, Little JW, Vaezy S (2007) Image-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for conduction block of peripheral nerves. Annals Biomed Engineering 35(1):10919.
  21. [46]Krasovitski B, Frenkel V, Shoham S, Kimmel E (2011) Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(8):1-6.
  22. [47]Tyler WJ, Tufail Y, Finsterwald M, Tauchmann ML, Olson EJ, Majestic C (2008) Remote excitation of neuronal circuits using low-intensity, low-frequency ultrasound. PLoS One 3(10):1-11.
  23. [50]Zhou, Y. (2011). High intensity focused ultrasound in clinical tumor ablation. World J Clin Oncol 2(1):8-27.
  24. [51]Shung KK, Cannata JM, Zhou QF (2007) Piezoelectric materials for high frequency medical imaging applications: A review. J Electroceram 19:139-45.
  25. [52]Zenner HP, et al. (2000) Human studies of a piezoelectric transducer and a microphone for a totally implantable electronic hearing device. Am J Otol 21(2):196-204.
  26. [53]Maleki T, Cao N, Song S, Kao C, Ko SA, Ziaie B (2011) An ultrasonically powered implantable micro-oxygen generator (IMOG). IEEE Trans BioE 58(11):3104-11.
  27. [54]Przybyla RJ, Shelton SE, Guedes A, Izyumin II, Kline MH, Horsley DA, Boser BE (2011) In-air rangefinding with an aln piezoelectric micromachined ultrasound transducer. IEEE Sensors J 11(11):2690-7.
  28. [55]Krimholtz R, Leedom DA, Matthaei GA (1970) New equivalent circuits for elementary piezoelectric transducers. Electronics Lett 6(13):398-9.
  29. [56]Roa-Prada S, Scarton HA, Saulnier GJ, Shoudy DA, Ashdown JD, Das PK, Gavens AJ (2013) An Ultrasonic Through-Wall Communication (UTWC) System Model. J Vib Acoust 135(1):1-12.
  30. [57]Holland R (1968). Resonant properties of piezoelectric ceramic rectangular parallelepipeds. J Acoust Soc Am 43(5):988-97.
  31. [60]Mills DM, Smith SW (2002) Multi-layered PZT/polymer composites to increase signal-to-noise ratio and resolution for medical ultrasound transducers part II: Thick film technology. IEEE Ultrasonics 49(7):1005-14.
  32. [64]Belitski A, et al. (2008) Low-frequency local field potentials and spikes in primary visual cortex convey independent visual information. J Neurosci 28(22):5696-709.
  33. [66]Du J, Blanche TJ, Harrison RR, Lester HA, Masmanidis SC (2011) Multiplexed, high density electrophysiology with nanofabricated neural probes. PLoS One 6(10):1-11.
  34. [67]Steyaert MSJ, Sansen WM, Zhongyuan C (1987) A micropower low-noise monolithic instrumentation amplifier for medical purposes. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 22(6):1163-8.
  35. [68]Weinstein R (2005) RFID: a technical overview and its application to the enterprise. IEEE IT Pro 27:33.
  36. [69]Finkenzeller K (2003) RFID Handbook: Fundamentals and Applications in Contactless Smart Cards and Identification. Wiley, New York .
  37. [70]Yazicioglu RF, Kim S, Torfs T, Kim H, Van Hoof C (2011) A 30 µ WAnalog Signal Processor ASIC for Portable Biopotential Signal Monitoring. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 46(1):209-23.
  38. [71]Fan Q, Huijsing J, Makinwa K (2012) A capacitively coupled chopper instrumentation amplifier with a ± 30V common-mode range, 160dB CMRR and 5 µ V offset. IEEE ISSCC 374-6.
  39. [72]Sanni A, Vilches A, Toumazou C (2012) Inductive and Ultrasonic Multi-Tier Interface for Low-Power, Deeply Implantable Medical Devices. IEEE Trans BioCAS 6(4):297308.
  40. [73]Otis B, Chee YH, Rabaey JM (2005) A 400 µ W-RX, 1.6 mW-TX super-regenerative transceiver for wireless sensor networks. IEEE ISSCC 396-7.
  41. [74]Proakis JG (2000) Digital Communication. McGraw-Hill .
  42. [75]Sillon N, Astier A, Boutry H, Di Cioccio L, Henry D, Leduc P (2008) Enabling technologies for 3D integration: From packaging miniaturization to advanced stacked ICs. IEEE Elect Dev Meeting 1-4.
  43. [76]Smith B, Kwok P, Thompson J, Mueller A, Racz L (2010) Demonstration of a Novel Hybrid Silicon-Resin High Density Interconnect (HDI) Substrate. IEEE Proc Elect Comp Tech Conf 816-21.
  44. [79]Lin Y, Li S, Ren Z, Nguyen CTC (2005) Low phase noise array-composite micromechanical wine-glass disk oscillator. IEEE Elec Dev Meeting 1-4.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seo, D., Carmena, J. M., Rabaey, J. M., Alon, E., & Maharbiz, M. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2013
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1307.2196
arXiv
1307.2196
OpenAlex
W2100602452
Cited by
172
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
Keywords
brain-computer interface, chronic neural recording, backscatter communication, implantable neural interfaces, low-power CMOS, extracellular electrophysiology, wireless power transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review