CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 17Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsNeural Networks and Applications

Quantum deep learning

Open access
Wiebe, Nathan, Kapoor, Ashish, Svore, Krysta M.·2014·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1412.3489arXiv 1412.3489
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In recent years, deep learning has had a profound impact on machine learning and artificial intelligence. At the same time, algorithms for quantum computers have been shown to efficiently solve some problems that are intractable on conventional, classical computers. We show that quantum computing not only reduces the time required to train a deep restricted Boltzmann machine, but also provides a richer and more comprehensive framework for deep learning than classical computing and leads to significant improvements in the optimization of the underlying objective function. Our quantum methods also permit efficient training of full Boltzmann machines and multi-layer, fully connected models and do not have well known classical counterparts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1412.3489

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The inherent parallelism offered by quantum mechanics and recent QC results indicate a definite potential to outperform conventional computing systems.

    “The inherent parallelism offered by the fundamental concepts of quantum mechanics and the prospects demonstrated through recent results of QC technology clearly indicate a definite potential to outperform the conventional computing systems [28].”

    From Quantum Machine Learning for 6G Communication Networks: State-of-the-Art and Vision for the Future (2019) · cites this paper as [28]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [3]Yoshua Bengio. Learning deep architectures for ai. Foundations and trends R © in Machine Learning , 2(1):1-127, 2009.
  2. [5]Geoffrey E Hinton. Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence. Neural computation , 14(8):17711800, 2002.
  3. [7]Tijmen Tieleman. Training restricted boltzmann machines using approximations to the likelihood gradient. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning , pages 1064-1071. ACM, 2008.
  4. [8]Ruslan Salakhutdinov and Geoffrey E Hinton. Deep boltzmann machines. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 448-455, 2009.
  5. [9]Ilya Sutskever and Tijmen Tieleman. On the convergence properties of contrastive divergence. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 789-795, 2010.
  6. [16]Misha Denil and Nando De Freitas. Toward the implementation of a quantum rbm. In NIPS Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning Workshop , 2011.
  7. [20]Eric P Xing, Michael I Jordan, and Stuart Russell. A generalized mean field algorithm for variational inference in exponential families. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence , pages 583-591. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2002.
  8. [22]Esma A¨ ımeur, Gilles Brassard, and S´ ebastien Gambs. Machine learning in a quantum world. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence , pages 431-442. Springer, 2006.
  9. [26]Michael A Nielsen and Isaac L Chuang. Quantum computation and quantum information . Cambridge university press, 2010.
  10. [29]Esma A¨ ımeur, Gilles Brassard, and S´ ebastien Gambs. Quantum clustering algorithms. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on machine learning , pages 1-8. ACM, 2007.
  11. [32]Lov K Grover. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing , pages 212-219. ACM, 1996.
  12. [38]Miguel A Carreira-Perpinan and Geoffrey E Hinton. On contrastive divergence learning. In Proceedings of the tenth international workshop on artificial intelligence and statistics , pages 33-40. Citeseer, 2005.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Wiebe, N., Kapoor, A., & Svore, K. M.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2014
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1412.3489
arXiv
1412.3489
OpenAlex
W4394658668
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
quantum deep learning, quantum computing, restricted Boltzmann machine, objective function optimization, quantum neural networks, training time reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review