PreprintCited by 1,861Human Pose and Action RecognitionMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unsupervised Learning of Video Representations using LSTMs

Open access

Abstract

We use multilayer Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) networks to learn representations of video sequences. Our model uses an encoder LSTM to map an input sequence into a fixed length representation. This representation is decoded using single or multiple decoder LSTMs to perform different tasks, such as reconstructing the input sequence, or predicting the future sequence. We experiment with two kinds of input sequences - patches of image pixels and high-level representations ("percepts") of video frames extracted using a pretrained convolutional net. We explore different design choices such as whether the decoder LSTMs should condition on the generated output. We analyze the outputs of the model qualitatively to see how well the model can extrapolate the learned video representation into the future and into the past. We try to visualize and interpret the learned features. We stress test the model by running it on longer time scales and on out-of-domain data. We further evaluate the representations by finetuning them for a supervised learning problem - human action recognition on the UCF-101 and HMDB-51 datasets. We show that the representations help improve classification accuracy, especially when there are only a few training examples. Even models pretrained on unrelated datasets (300 hours of YouTube videos) can help action recognition performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1502.04681

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hochreiter, Sepp and Schmidhuber, J¨ urgen. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation , 9(8):1735-1780, 1997.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 1,005

Metadata

Authors
Srivastava, N., Mansimov, E., & Salakhutdinov, R.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
Pages
843-852
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116435618
Cited by
1,861
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 148 · 2022: 183 · 2021: 279 · 2020: 308 · 2019: 286 · 2018: 238 · 2017: 146 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 23
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Conference on Machine Learning
Funders
  • Raytheon Company
  • Nvidia
  • Samsung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
video representation learning, unsupervised learning, long short-term memory networks, LSTM encoder-decoder, video reconstruction, future frame prediction, perceptual features, feature visualization, human action recognition, transfer learning, few-shot learning, out-of-domain generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review