PreprintCited by 2,264Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsNeural Networks and ApplicationsStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques

Empirical Evaluation of Rectified Activations in Convolutional Network

Open access
Xu, Bing, Wang, Naiyan, Chen, Tianqi, Li, Mu·2015·arXiv

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the performance of different types of rectified activation functions in convolutional neural network: standard rectified linear unit (ReLU), leaky rectified linear unit (Leaky ReLU), parametric rectified linear unit (PReLU) and a new randomized leaky rectified linear units (RReLU). We evaluate these activation function on standard image classification task. Our experiments suggest that incorporating a non-zero slope for negative part in rectified activation units could consistently improve the results. Thus our findings are negative on the common belief that sparsity is the key of good performance in ReLU. Moreover, on small scale dataset, using deterministic negative slope or learning it are both prone to overfitting. They are not as effective as using their randomized counterpart. By using RReLU, we achieved 75.68\% accuracy on CIFAR-100 test set without multiple test or ensemble.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1505.00853

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Girshick, Ross, Donahue, Jeff, Darrell, Trevor, and Malik, Jitendra. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In CVPR , pp. 580-587, 2014.
  2. Glorot, Xavier, Bordes, Antoine, and Bengio, Yoshua. Deep sparse rectifier networks. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. JMLR W&CP Volume , volume 15, pp. 315-323, 2011.
  3. He, Kaiming, Zhang, Xiangyu, Ren, Shaoqing, and Sun, Jian. Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition. In ECCV , pp. 346-361, 2014.
  4. Ioffe, Sergey and Szegedy, Christian. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03167 , 2015. · arXiv
  5. Krizhevsky, Alex and Hinton, Geoffrey. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. Computer Science Department, University of Toronto, Tech. Rep , 1(4):7, 2009.
  6. Krizhevsky, Alex, Sutskever, Ilya, and Hinton, Geoffrey E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In NIPS , pp. 1097-1105, 2012.
  7. Lin, Min, Chen, Qiang, and Yan, Shuicheng. Network in network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.4400 , 2013. · arXiv
  8. Maas, Andrew L, Hannun, Awni Y, and Ng, Andrew Y. Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models. In ICML , volume 30, 2013.
  9. Nair, Vinod and Hinton, Geoffrey E. Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines. In ICML , pp. 807-814, 2010.
  10. Russakovsky, Olga, Deng, Jia, Su, Hao, Krause, Jonathan, Satheesh, Sanjeev, Ma, Sean, Huang, Zhiheng, Karpathy, Andrej, Khosla, Aditya, Bernstein, Michael, Berg, Alexander C., and Fei-Fei, Li. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision (IJCV) , 2015. doi: 10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Srivastava, Nitish, Hinton, Geoffrey, Krizhevsky, Alex, Sutskever, Ilya, and Salakhutdinov, Ruslan. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The Journal of Machine Learning Research , 15(1):1929-1958, 2014.
  12. Sun, Yi, Wang, Xiaogang, and Tang, Xiaoou. Deeply learned face representations are sparse, selective, and robust. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.1265 , 2014. · arXiv
  13. Szegedy, Christian, Liu, Wei, Jia, Yangqing, Sermanet, Pierre, Reed, Scott, Anguelov, Dragomir, Erhan, Dumitru, Vanhoucke, Vincent, and Rabinovich, Andrew. Going deeper with convolutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.4842 , 2014. · arXiv
  14. Wang, Naiyan, Li, Siyi, Gupta, Abhinav, and Yeung, Dit-Yan. Transferring rich feature hierarchies for robust visual tracking. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.04587 , 2015. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, B., Wang, N., Chen, T., & Li, M.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1921523184
Cited by
2,264
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 247 · 2023: 307 · 2022: 270 · 2021: 438 · 2020: 348 · 2019: 289 · 2018: 136 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 7
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
Keywords
leaky ReLU, convolutional neural networks, image classification, overfitting, negative slope, sparsity, CIFAR-100

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review