Cited by 35Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

GraphCPI: Graph Neural Representation Learning for Compound-Protein Interaction

Quan, Zhe, Guo, Yan, Lin, Xuan, Wang, Zhi-Jie, Zeng, Xiangxiang·2019·2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)

Abstract

Accurately predicting compound-protein interactions (CPIs) is of great help to increase the efficiency and reduce costs in drug development. Most of existing machine learning models for CPI prediction often represent compounds and proteins in one-dimensional strings, or use the descriptor-based methods. These models might ignore the fact that molecules are essentially structured by the chemical bond of atoms. However, in real-world scenarios, the topological structure information usually provides an overview of how the atoms are connected, and the local chemical context reveals the functionality of the protein sequence in CPI. These two types of information are complementary to each other and they are both important for modeling compounds and proteins. Motivated by this, this paper suggests an end-to-end deep learning framework called GraphCPI, which captures the structural information of compounds and leverages the chemical context of protein sequences for solving the CPI prediction task. Our framework can integrate any popular graph nerual networks for learning compounds, and it combines with a convolutional neural network for embedding sequences. We conduct extensive experiments based on two benchmark CPI datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that our proposed framework is feasible and also competitive, comparing against classic and state-of-the-art methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bibm47256.2019.8983267

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spatial transcriptomics data can be used to construct cell graphs, spatial gene expression graphs, gene co-expression networks, or molecular similarity graphs.

    “As a result, spatial transcriptomics data can be used to construct cell graphs [161], spatial gene expression graphs [162], gene co-expression networks, or molecular similarity graphs [35].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [162]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quan, Z., Guo, Y., Lin, X., Wang, Z.-J., & Zeng, X.
Affiliations
  • Hunan University (CN)
  • National Engineering Laboratory for Big Data Analysis and Applications,Beijing,China
Venue
2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-11
Pages
717-722
OpenAlex
W3004946973
Cited by
35
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.04
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
compound-protein interaction prediction, graph neural networks, protein sequence embeddings, convolutional neural networks, drug development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review