CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 18Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical MechanicsStatistical Mechanics and Entropy

Entropy and the Typicality of Universes

Open access
Barbour, Julian, Koslowski, Tim, Mercati, Flavio·2015·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1507.06498arXiv 1507.06498
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The universal validity of the second law of thermodynamics is widely attributed to a finely tuned initial condition of the universe. This creates a problem: why is the universe atypical? We suggest that the problem is an artefact created by inappropriate transfer of the traditional concept of entropy to the whole universe. Use of what we call the relational $N$-body problem as a model indicates the need to employ two distinct entropy-type concepts to describe the universe. One, which we call entaxy, is novel. It is scale-invariant and decreases as the observable universe evolves. The other is the algebraic sum of the dimensionful entropies of branch systems (isolated subsystems of the universe). This conventional additive entropy increases. In our model, the decrease of entaxy is fundamental and makes possible the emergence of branch systems and their increasing entropy. We have previously shown that all solutions of our model divide into two halves at a unique `Janus point' of maximum disorder. This constitutes a common past for two futures each with its own gravitational arrow of time. We now show that these arrows are expressed through the formation of branch systems within which conventional entropy increases. On either side of the Janus point, this increase is in the same direction in every branch system. We also show that it is only possible to specify unbiased solution-determining data at the Janus point. Special properties of these `mid-point data' make it possible to develop a rational theory of the typicality of universes whose governing law, as in our model, dictates the presence of a Janus point in every solution. If our self-gravitating universe is governed by such a law, then the second law of thermodynamics is a necessary direct consequence of it and does not need any special initial condition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1507.06498

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Carroll and Chen's cosmological model and in the model of Barbour et al., the overwhelming majority of solutions have entropy increasing monotonically for t > τ and decreasing monotonically for t < τ.

    “In Carroll and Chen's cosmological model and in the model of Barbour et al., this is still true of the overwhelming majority of solutions.”

    From Is the hypothesis about a low entropy initial state of the Universe necessary for explaining the arrow of time? (2016) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Introduction (p. 3) says that the overwhelming majority of bound-cluster entropies increase in either direction away from the Janus point. But the paper does not say that entropy increases monotonically in the overwhelming majority of whole-universe solutions: it distinguishes branch-system entropy from the universe-wide quantity entaxy, which decreases away from the Janus point (Typicality of Solutions and Microstates, p. 22). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • In the cosmological models of Carroll and Chen and of Barbour, Koslowski, and Mercati, entropy S(t) increases monotonically with t (except for fluctuations) for t > τ and decreases monotonically with t for t < τ from some central time τ, so the thermodynamic arrow of time points away from τ.

    “Fact 1. The entropy S ( t ) increases monotonically with t (except for fluctuations) for t > τ and decreases monotonically with t for t < τ from some 'central time' τ ; thus, the (thermodynamic) arrow of time always points away from τ .”

    From Is the hypothesis about a low entropy initial state of the Universe necessary for explaining the arrow of time? (2016) · cites this paper as [6]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • In the models of Carroll and Chen and Barbour et al., most or all possible histories have an entropy curve S(t) that first decreases from +∞ to a minimum and then increases back to +∞, giving rise to a thermodynamic arrow of time in each of the two temporal regions.

    “In fact, in these models, most or all possible histories of the universe are such that the entropy curve S ( t ) as a function of time t first decreases (up to small fluctuations) from + ∞ to a minimum value and then increases back to + ∞ , thus giving rise to a thermodynamic arrow of time in each of the two temporal regions.”

    From Is the hypothesis about a low entropy initial state of the Universe necessary for explaining the arrow of time? (2016) · cites this paper as [6]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3][3] D. Z. Albert, Time and Chance . Harvard University Press, 2009. -
  2. [27][27] E. H. Lieb and J. Yngvason, 'A guide to entropy and the second law of thermodynamics,' in Statistical Mechanics , pp. 353-363. Springer, 2004. -
  3. [33][33] H. Reichenbach, The Direction of Time . University of California Press, 1971. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Barbour, J., Koslowski, T., & Mercati, F.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1507.06498
arXiv
1507.06498
OpenAlex
W1945454311
Cited by
18
References
33
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
Keywords
entropy, second law of thermodynamics, arrow of time, initial conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review