Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 9

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adding Gradient Noise Improves Learning for Very Deep Networks

Neelakantan, Arvind, Vilnis, Luke, Le, Quoc V., Sutskever, Ilya, Kaiser, Lukasz, Kurach, Karol, Martens, James·2015·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1511.06807arXiv 1511.06807
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Deep feedforward and recurrent networks have achieved impressive results in many perception and language processing applications. This success is partially attributed to architectural innovations such as convolutional and long short-term memory networks. The main motivation for these architectural innovations is that they capture better domain knowledge, and importantly are easier to optimize than more basic architectures. Recently, more complex architectures such as Neural Turing Machines and Memory Networks have been proposed for tasks including question answering and general computation, creating a new set of optimization challenges. In this paper, we discuss a low-overhead and easy-to-implement technique of adding gradient noise which we find to be surprisingly effective when training these very deep architectures. The technique not only helps to avoid overfitting, but also can result in lower training loss. This method alone allows a fully-connected 20-layer deep network to be trained with standard gradient descent, even starting from a poor initialization. We see consistent improvements for many complex models, including a 72% relative reduction in error rate over a carefully-tuned baseline on a challenging question-answering task, and a doubling of the number of accurate binary multiplication models learned across 7,000 random restarts. We encourage further application of this technique to additional complex modern architectures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1511.06807

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Bahdanau, Dzmitry, Cho, Kyunghyun, and Bengio, Yoshua. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. ICLR, 2014.
  2. Bousquet, Olivier and Bottou, Léon. The tradeoffs of large scale learning. In NIPS, 2008.
  3. Cho, Kyunghyun, Van Merriënboer, Bart, Gulcehre, Caglar, Bahdanau, Dzmitry, Bougares, Fethi, Schwenk, Holger, and Bengio, Yoshua. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder- decoder for statistical machine translation. In EMNLP, 2014.
  4. Choromanska, Anna, Henaff, Mikael, Mathieu, Michaël, Arous, Gérard Ben, and LeCun, Yann. The loss surfaces of multilayer networks. In AISTATS, 2015.
  5. Dean, Jeffrey, Corrado, Greg, Monga, Rajat, Chen, Kai, Devin, Matthieu, Mao, Mark, Senior, An- drew, Tucker, Paul, Yang, Ke, Le, Quoc V, et al. Large scale distributed deep networks. In NIPS, 2012.
  6. Duchi, John, Hazan, Elad, and Singer, Yoram. Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. JMLR, 2011.
  7. Glorot, Xavier and Bengio, Yoshua. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In Proc. AISTATS, pp. 249-256, 2010.
  8. Graves, Alex. Practical variational inference for neural networks. In NIPS, 2011.
  9. Graves, Alex. Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arxiv:1308.0850, 2013. · arXiv
  10. Hinton, Geoffrey and Roweis, Sam. Stochastic neighbor embedding. In NIPS, 2002.
  11. Kaiser, Lukasz and Sutskever, Ilya. Neural GPUs learn algorithms. In Arxiv, 2015.
  12. Krizhevsky, Alex, Sutskever, Ilya, and Hinton, Geoffrey E. ImageNet classification with deep con- volutional neural networks. In NIPS, 2012.
  13. Kurach, Karol, Andrychowicz, Marcin, and Sutskever, Ilya. Neural random access machine. In Arxiv, 2015.
  14. Nair, Vinod and Hinton, Geoffrey. Rectified linear units improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines. In ICML, 2010.
  15. Neelakantan, Arvind, Le, Quoc V., and Sutskever, Ilya. Neural Programmer: Inducing latent pro- grams with gradient descent. In Arxiv, 2015.
  16. Pascanu, Razvan, Mikolov, Tomas, and Bengio, Yoshua. On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. Proc. ICML, 2013.
  17. Peng, Baolin, Lu, Zhengdong, Li, Hang, and Wong, Kam-Fai. Towards neural network-based rea- soning. arXiv preprint arxiv:1508.05508, 2015. · arXiv
  18. Robbins, Herbert and Monro, Sutton. A stochastic approximation method. The annals of mathemat- ical statistics, 1951.
  19. Srivastava, Nitish, Hinton, Geoffrey, Krizhevsky, Alex, Sutskever, Ilya, and Salakhutdinov, Ruslan. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. JMLR, 2014.
  20. Srivastava, Rupesh Kumar, Greff, Klaus, and Schmidhuber, Jürgen. Training very deep networks. NIPS, 2015.
  21. Sukhbaatar, Sainbayar, Szlam, Arthur, Weston, Jason, and Fergus, Rob. End-to-end memory net- works. In NIPS, 2015.
  22. Sussillo, David and Abbott, L.F. Random walks: Training very deep nonlinear feed-forward net- works with smart initialization. Arxiv, 2014.
  23. Sutskever, Ilya, Martens, James, Dahl, George, and Hinton, Geoffrey. On the importance of initial- ization and momentum in deep learning. In ICML, 2013.
  24. Sutskever, Ilya, Vinyals, Oriol, and Le, Quoc V. Sequence to sequence learning with neural net- works. In NIPS, 2014.
  25. Welling, Max and Teh, Yee Whye. Bayesian learning via stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics. In ICML, 2011.
  26. Weston, Jason, Chopra, Sumit, and Bordes, Antoine. Memory networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.3916, 2014. · arXiv

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Neelakantan, A., Vilnis, L., Le, Q. V., Sutskever, I., Kaiser, L., Kurach, K., & Martens, J.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1511.06807
arXiv
1511.06807
References
8
Type
Preprint
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.