The DOI matches its DataCite record.
A Physics Informed Machine Learning Approach for Reconstructing Reynolds Stress Modeling Discrepancies Based on DNS Data
Open accessAbstract
Turbulence modeling is a critical component in numerical simulations of industrial flows based on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations. However, after decades of efforts in the turbulence modeling community, universally applicable RANS models with predictive capabilities are still lacking. Recently, data-driven methods have been proposed as a promising alternative to the traditional approaches of turbulence model development. In this work we propose a data-driven, physics-informed machine learning approach for predicting discrepancies in RANS modeled Reynolds stresses. The discrepancies are formulated as functions of the mean flow features. By using a modern machine learning technique based on random forests, the discrepancy functions are first trained with benchmark flow data and then used to predict Reynolds stresses discrepancies in new flows. The method is used to predict the Reynolds stresses in the flow over periodic hills by using two training flow scenarios of increasing difficulties: (1) the flow in the same periodic hills geometry yet at a lower Reynolds number, and (2) the flow in a different hill geometry with a similar recirculation zone. Excellent predictive performances were observed in both scenarios, demonstrating the merits of the proposed method. Improvement of RANS modeled Reynolds stresses enabled by the proposed method is an important step towards predictive turbulence modeling, where the ultimate goal is to predict the quantities of interest (e.g., velocity field, drag, lift) more accurately by solving RANS equations with the Reynolds stresses obtained therefrom.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although this approach can be used with any generic RANS model to estimate its discrepancy, it does not alter the form of approximation used in obtaining τ RANS , since ∆ τ ML is learned independently of τ RANS .”
From Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“where τ RANS is obtained from a RANS model while ∆ τ ML is the model discrepancy that is estimated using a random forest model.”
From Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“recent work by Wang et al. [21] explored the use of machine learning methods to assist RANS models and reduce their discrepancies.”
From Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 733
Machine learning-augmented turbulence modeling for RANS simulations of massively separated flows
Volpiani, P. S., Meyer, M., Franceschini, L., Dandois, J., Renac, F., Martin, E., Marquet, O., & Sipp, D. (2021) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.6.064607 · Cited by 72
Artificial neural network approach to large-eddy simulation of compressible isotropic turbulence
Xie, C., Wang, J., Li, K., & Ma, C. (2019) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.99.053113 · Cited by 72
Self-citationEmbedding domain knowledge for machine learning of complex material systems
Childs, C. M., & Washburn, N. R. (2019) · MRS Communications · doi:10.1557/mrc.2019.90 · Cited by 72
Cruz, M. A., Thompson, R. L., Sampaio, L. E. B., & Bacchi, R. D. A. (2019) · Computers & Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.104258 · Cited by 71
Botarelli, T., Fanfani, M., Nesi, P., & Pinelli, L. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110347 · Cited by 78
Ströfer, C. A. M., Wu, J., Xiao, H., & Paterson, E. G. (2018) · Communications in Computational Physics · doi:10.4208/cicp.oa-2018-0035 · Cited by 76
Self-citationMachine learning-based e-commerce platform repurchase customer prediction model
Liu, C.-J., Huang, T.-S., Ho, P.-T., Huang, J.-C., & Hsieh, C.-T. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243105 · Cited by 70
RetractedFlexible cylinder flow-induced vibration
Ma, L., Lin, K., Fan, D., Wang, J., & Triantafyllou, M. S. (2022) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0078418 · Cited by 70
Self-citationKhan, M. I. H., Batuwatta-Gamage, C., Karim, A., & Gu, Y. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15249347 · Cited by 79
Learning stiff chemical kinetics using extended deep neural operators
Goswami, S., Jagtap, A. D., Babaee, H., Susi, B. T., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2023) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.116674 · Cited by 70
Holland, J. R., Baeder, J. D., & Duraisamy, K. (2019) · AIAA SciTech Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2019-1884 · Cited by 73
Improving the k–ω–γ–Ar transition model by the field inversion and machine learning framework
Yang, M., & Xiao, Z. (2020) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0008493 · Cited by 69
Using machine learning to detect the turbulent region in flow past a circular cylinder
Li, B., Yang, Z., Zhang, X., He, G., Deng, B., & Shen, L. (2020) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2020.725 · Cited by 68
Zhang, Z., Song, X., Ye, S., Wang, Y., Huang, C., An, Y., & Chen, Y. (2018) · Journal of Hydrodynamics · doi:10.1007/s42241-018-0156-9 · Cited by 64
Nikolaou, Z. M., Chrysostomou, C., Vervisch, L., & Cant, S. (2019) · Flow Turbulence and Combustion · doi:10.1007/s10494-019-00028-w · Cited by 71
Cremades, A., Hoyas, S., & Vinuesa, R. (2024) · International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2024.109662 · Cited by 74
Wang, J., Huang, J., Duan, L., & Xiao, H. (2018) · Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00162-018-0480-2 · Cited by 61
Self-citationXie, C., Li, K., Ma, C., & Wang, J. (2019) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.4.104605 · Cited by 61
Self-citationA deep learning framework for hydrogen-fueled turbulent combustion simulation
An, J., Wang, H., Liu, B., Luo, K. H., Qin, F., & He, G. Q. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.286 · Cited by 66
Gupta, R., & Jaiman, R. K. (2022) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0082741 · Cited by 61
Taghizadeh, S., Witherden, F., & Girimaji, S. S. (2020) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abadb3 · Cited by 59
Nonlinear wave evolution with data-driven breaking
Eeltink, D., Branger, H., Luneau, C., He, Y., Chabchoub, A., Kasparian, J., van den Bremer, T. S., & Sapsis, T. P. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30025-z · Cited by 60
Akolekar, H. D., Weatheritt, J., Hutchins, N. T., Sandberg, R. D., Laskowski, G. M., & Michelassi, V. (2018) · Journal of Turbomachinery · doi:10.1115/1.4041753 · Cited by 58
Huang, X. L. D., Yang, X. I. A., & Kunz, R. F. (2019) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.5129178 · Cited by 58
Guan, Y., Subel, A., Chattopadhyay, A., & Hassanzadeh, P. (2022) · Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/j.physd.2022.133568 · Cited by 58
Neural network models for the anisotropic Reynolds stress tensor in turbulent channel flow
Fang, R. M., Sondak, D., Protopapas, P., & Succi, S. (2019) · Journal of Turbulence · doi:10.1080/14685248.2019.1706742 · Cited by 55
Sandberg, R. D., & Zhao, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2022.108983 · Cited by 54
Nielsen, R. E., Papageorgiou, D., Nalpantidis, L., Jensen, B. T., & Blanke, M. (2022) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111579 · Cited by 55
Brener, B. P., Cruz, M. A., Thompson, R. L., & Anjos, R. P. (2021) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2021.148 · Cited by 54
A Taxonomic Survey of Physics-Informed Machine Learning
Ghosh, P., Pateras, J., & Rana, P. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13126892 · Cited by 52
Wang, S., Yan, L., Du, S., Li, S., & Chen, X. (2025) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/1361-6501/adcce4 · Cited by 58
A priori analysis on deep learning of subgrid-scale parameterizations for Kraichnan turbulence
Pawar, S. A., San, O., Rasheed, A., & Vedula, P. (2020) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 52
Improved deep learning method for accurate flow field reconstruction from sparse data
Zhang, J., Liu, J., & Huang, Z. (2023) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114902 · Cited by 53
The Cost-Accuracy Trade-Off in Operator Learning with Neural Networks
de Hoop, M. V., Huang, D. Z., Qian, E., & Stuart, A. M. (2022) · Journal of Machine Learning · doi:10.4208/jml.220509 · Cited by 100
Machine learning for energy-water nexus: challenges and opportunities
Zaidi, Chandola, Allen, Sanyal, Stewart, R., Bhaduri, & McManamay (2018) · Big Earth Data · doi:10.1080/20964471.2018.1526057 · Cited by 54
Pouquet, A. G., Rosenberg, D., Stawarz, J. E., & Marino, R. (2019) · Earth and Space Science · doi:10.1029/2018ea000432 · Cited by 56
Data-driven scalar-flux model development with application to jet in cross flow
Weatheritt, J., Zhao, Y., Sandberg, R. D., Mizukami, S., & Tanimoto, K. (2019) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118931 · Cited by 49
Prediction of turbulent channel flow using Fourier neural operator-based machine-learning strategy
Wang, Y., Li, Z., Yuan, Z., Peng, W., Liu, T., & Wang, J. (2024) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.9.084604 · Cited by 49
Self-citationA priori analysis on deep learning of subgrid-scale parameterizations for Kraichnan turbulence
Pawar, S., San, O., Rasheed, A., & Vedula, P. (2020) · Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00162-019-00512-z · Cited by 49
Multifidelity aerodynamic flow field prediction using random forest-based machine learning
Nagawkar, J. R., & Leifsson, L. (2022) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2022.107449 · Cited by 48
Bose, R., & Roy, A. M. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107483 · Cited by 53
Wu, J., Sun, R., Laizet, S., & Xiao, H. (2018) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2018.09.010 · Cited by 48
Self-citationModeling and scale-bridging using machine learning: nanoconfinement effects in porous media
Lubbers, N., Agarwal, A., Chen, Y., Son, S., Mehana, M. Z., Kang, Q., Karra, S., Junghans, C., Germann, T. C., & Viswanathan, H. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69661-0 · Cited by 51
An iterative machine-learning framework for RANS turbulence modeling
Liu, W., Fang, J. C., Rolfo, S., Moulinec, C., & Emerson, D. R. (2021) · International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2021.108822 · Cited by 48
Current gust forecasting techniques, developments and challenges
Sheridan, P. F. (2018) · Advances in science and research · doi:10.5194/asr-15-159-2018 · Cited by 47
Learning nonlocal constitutive models with neural networks
Zhou, X., Han, J., & Xiao, H. (2021) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2021.113927 · Cited by 47
Self-citationYang, Y., Tu, H., Song, L., Chen, L., Xie, D. Y., & Sun, J. (2021) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse9040376 · Cited by 47
Pawar, S. A., & San, O. (2021) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.6.050501 · Cited by 53
Data-driven turbulence modeling in separated flows considering physical mechanism analysis
Yan, C., Li, H., Zhang, Y., & Chen, H. (2022) · International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2022.109004 · Cited by 46
Morimoto, M., Fukami, K., Maulik, R., Vinuesa, R., & Fukagata, K. (2022) · Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/j.physd.2022.133454 · Cited by 51
Field inversion for data-augmented RANS modelling in turbomachinery flows
Ferrero, A., Iollo, A., & Larocca, F. (2020) · Computers & Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2020.104474 · Cited by 46
Physics-informed Dyna-style model-based deep reinforcement learning for dynamic control
Liu, X., & Wang, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2021.0618 · Cited by 45
Self-citationLe, D. K., & Yoon, J. Y. (2022) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2022.12.035 · Cited by 48
Wang, Z., & Zhang, W. (2023) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0136420 · Cited by 45
Differentiable hybrid neural modeling for fluid-structure interaction
Fan, X., & Wang, J. (2023) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112584 · Cited by 54
Self-citationDou, Y., Han, X., & Lin, P. (2025) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110547 · Cited by 45
From Deep to Physics-Informed Learning of Turbulence: DiagnosticsPreprint
King, R., Hennigh, O., Mohan, A. T., & Chertkov, M. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.07785 · Cited by 45
Non-intrusive model reduction of large-scale, nonlinear dynamical systems using deep learning
Gao, H., Wang, J., & Zahr, M. J. (2020) · Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/j.physd.2020.132614 · Cited by 44
Self-citationChen, X., Chen, R., Wan, Q., Xu, R., & Liu, J. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99037-x · Cited by 44
Huang, X., Cheng, C., & Zhang, X. (2021) · Defence Technology · doi:10.1016/j.dt.2020.12.002 · Cited by 43
Malley, S., Reina, C., Nacy, S. M., Gilles, J., Koohbor, B., & Youssef, G. (2022) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2022.103739 · Cited by 43
Zonal Eddy Viscosity Models Based on Machine Learning
Matai, R., & Durbin, P. A. (2019) · Flow Turbulence and Combustion · doi:10.1007/s10494-019-00011-5 · Cited by 43
Artificial neural network-based spatial gradient models for large-eddy simulation of turbulence
Wang, Y., Yuan, Z., Xie, C., & Wang, J. (2021) · AIP Advances · doi:10.1063/5.0053590 · Cited by 43
Self-citationMachine Learning for Optical Scanning Probe Nanoscopy
Chen, X., Xu, S., Shabani, S., Zhao, Y., Fu, M., Millis, A. J., Fogler, M. M., Pasupathy, A. N., Liu, M. K., & Basov, D. N. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202109171 · Cited by 43
Bayesian conditional diffusion models for versatile spatiotemporal turbulence generation
Gao, H., Han, X., Fan, X., Sun, L., Liu, L., Duan, L., & Wang, J. (2024) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117023 · Cited by 60
Self-citationTao, F., Liu, X., Du, H., & Yu, W. (2020) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j058765 · Cited by 42
Mahmoudabadbozchelou, M., Kamani, K. M., Rogers, S. A., & Jamali, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2202234119 · Cited by 42
On the explainability of machine-learning-assisted turbulence modeling for transonic flows
He, X. G., Tan, J., Rigas, G., & Vahdati, M. (2022) · International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2022.109038 · Cited by 41
Fluid Simulation on Neural Flow Maps
Deng, Y., Yu, H.-X., Zhang, D., Wu, J., & Zhu, B. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/3618392 · Cited by 41
Self-citationScientific machine learning for closure models in multiscale problems: A review
Sanderse, B., Stinis, P., Maulik, R., & Ahmed, S. E. (2024) · Foundations of Data Science · doi:10.3934/fods.2024043 · Cited by 94
Elhamod, M., Bu, J., Singh, C. N., Redell, M. D., Ghosh, A., Podolskiy, V. A., Lee, W., & Karpatne, A. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3530911 · Cited by 41
Srivastava, V., & Duraisamy, K. (2021) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.6.124602 · Cited by 40
Deep structured neural networks for turbulence closure modeling
McConkey, R., Yee, E., & Lien, F. (2022) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0083074 · Cited by 40
Fan, X., Akhare, D., & Wang, J. (2024) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117478 · Cited by 50
Self-citationTurbulence closure modeling with machine learning: a foundational physics perspective
Girimaji, S. S. (2024) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ad6689 · Cited by 38
Kumar, A., Ridha, S., Narahari, M., & Ilyas, S. U. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115409 · Cited by 39
Data augmented turbulence modeling for three-dimensional separation flows
Yan, C., Zhang, Y., & Chen, H. (2022) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0097438 · Cited by 38
Reinforcement-learning-based actuator selection method for active flow control
Paris, R., Beneddine, S., & Dandois, J. (2023) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2022.1043 · Cited by 37
Data-driven discovery of turbulent flow equations using physics-informed neural networks
Yazdani, S., & Tahani, M. (2024) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0190138 · Cited by 37
Gorlé, C., Zeoli, S., Emory, M. A., Larsson, J., & Iaccarino, G. (2019) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.5086341 · Cited by 37
Flow Pattern Transition in Pipes Using Data-Driven and Physics-Informed Machine Learning
Quintino, A. M., da Rocha, D. L. L. N., da Fonseca, R., & Rodríguez, O. M. H. (2020) · Journal of Fluids Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4048876 · Cited by 37
Data-driven RANS closures for wind turbine wakes under neutral conditions
Steiner, J., Dwight, R. P., & Viré, A. (2021) · Computers & Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.105213 · Cited by 36
Soize, C., & Ghanem, R. (2021) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2021.113777 · Cited by 36
Ouyang, B., Zhu, L., & Luo, Z. (2021) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.17290 · Cited by 34
High Reynolds number airfoil turbulence modeling method based on machine learning technique
Sun, X., Cao, W., Liu, Y., Zhu, L., & Zhang, W. (2021) · Computers & Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.105298 · Cited by 36
Beucler, T., Ebert‐Uphoff, I., Rasp, S., Pritchard, M. S., & Gentine, P. (2021) · doi:10.1002/essoar.10506925.1 · Cited by 36
The Potential of Machine Learning to Enhance Computational Fluid Dynamics.Preprint
Vinuesa, R., & Brunton, S. L. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 36
Liu, Y., Hu, R., Kraus, A. R., Balaprakash, P., & Obabko, A. V. (2022) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111716 · Cited by 36
Machine learning for vortex induced vibration in turbulent flow
Bai, X., & Zhang, W. (2021) · Computers & Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.105266 · Cited by 35
Feature importance in neural networks as a means of interpretation for data-driven turbulence models
Mandler, H., & Weigand, B. (2023) · Computers & Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.105993 · Cited by 35
Recent progress in augmenting turbulence models with physics-informed machine learning
Zhang, X., Wu, J., Coutier-Delgosha, O., & Xiao, H. (2019) · Journal of Hydrodynamics · doi:10.1007/s42241-019-0089-y · Cited by 35
Self-citationData-driven RANS closures for three-dimensional flows around bluff bodies
Huijing, J. P., Dwight, R. P., & Schmelzer, M. (2021) · Computers & Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.104997 · Cited by 35
Assimilation of disparate data for enhanced reconstruction of turbulent mean flows
Zhang, X., Xiao, H., He, G., & Wang, S. (2021) · Computers & Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.104962 · Cited by 35
Self-citationZangeneh, R. (2021) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0072550 · Cited by 35
Xu, X., Waschkowski, F., Ooi, A. S. H., & Sandberg, R. D. (2022) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122557 · Cited by 35
Data-driven nonlinear K-L turbulent mixing model via gene expression programming method
Xie, H.-S., Zhao, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · Acta Mechanica Sinica · doi:10.1007/s10409-022-22315-x · Cited by 34
Liu, Y., Sun, X., & Dinh, N. T. (2019) · Nuclear Engineering and Design · doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110200 · Cited by 36
Convolutional neural network for transition modeling based on linear stability theory
Zafar, M. I., Xiao, H., Choudhari, M. M., Li, F., Chang, C., Paredes, P., & Venkatachari, B. S. (2020) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.5.113903 · Cited by 34
Self-citationDeep learning of the spanwise-averaged Navier–Stokes equations
Font, B., Weymouth, G. D., Nguyen, V.-T., & Tutty, O. R. (2021) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110199 · Cited by 34
Xuan, A., & Shen, L. (2023) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2023.154 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J.-X., Wu, J.-L., & Xiao, H.
- ORCID
- Xiao, Heng
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1606.07987
- OpenAlex
- W6891823180
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
- Keywords
- Reynolds stress model, RANS turbulence models, physics-informed machine learning, data-driven turbulence modeling, direct numerical simulation data, random forest, recirculation zone, low Reynolds number flow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
