The DOI matches its DataCite record.
A Physics Informed Machine Learning Approach for Reconstructing Reynolds Stress Modeling Discrepancies Based on DNS Data
Open accessAbstract
Turbulence modeling is a critical component in numerical simulations of industrial flows based on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations. However, after decades of efforts in the turbulence modeling community, universally applicable RANS models with predictive capabilities are still lacking. Recently, data-driven methods have been proposed as a promising alternative to the traditional approaches of turbulence model development. In this work we propose a data-driven, physics-informed machine learning approach for predicting discrepancies in RANS modeled Reynolds stresses. The discrepancies are formulated as functions of the mean flow features. By using a modern machine learning technique based on random forests, the discrepancy functions are first trained with benchmark flow data and then used to predict Reynolds stresses discrepancies in new flows. The method is used to predict the Reynolds stresses in the flow over periodic hills by using two training flow scenarios of increasing difficulties: (1) the flow in the same periodic hills geometry yet at a lower Reynolds number, and (2) the flow in a different hill geometry with a similar recirculation zone. Excellent predictive performances were observed in both scenarios, demonstrating the merits of the proposed method. Improvement of RANS modeled Reynolds stresses enabled by the proposed method is an important step towards predictive turbulence modeling, where the ultimate goal is to predict the quantities of interest (e.g., velocity field, drag, lift) more accurately by solving RANS equations with the Reynolds stresses obtained therefrom.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although this approach can be used with any generic RANS model to estimate its discrepancy, it does not alter the form of approximation used in obtaining τ RANS , since ∆ τ ML is learned independently of τ RANS .”
From Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“where τ RANS is obtained from a RANS model while ∆ τ ML is the model discrepancy that is estimated using a random forest model.”
From Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“recent work by Wang et al. [21] explored the use of machine learning methods to assist RANS models and reduce their discrepancies.”
From Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 733
An iterative data-driven turbulence modeling framework based on Reynolds stress representation
Yin, Y., Shen, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, H., & Fu, S. (2022) · Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.taml.2022.100381 · Cited by 32
Hu, B., & McDaniel, D. (2023) · Mathematical and Computational Applications · doi:10.3390/mca28050102 · Cited by 32
Xie, C., Wang, J., Li, H., Wan, M., & Chen, S. (2020) · AIP Advances · doi:10.1063/1.5138681 · Cited by 32
Self-citationData-driven selection of constitutive models via rheology-informed neural networks (RhINNs)
Saadat, M., Mahmoudabadbozchelou, M., & Jamali, S. (2022) · Rheologica Acta · doi:10.1007/s00397-022-01357-w · Cited by 32
Robust Bayesian Calibration of a k−ε Model for Compressible Jet-in-Crossflow Simulations
Ray, J., Dechant, L., Lefantzi, S., Ling, J., & Arunajatesan, S. (2018) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j057204 · Cited by 32
Zhang, Q., Guo, X., Chen, X., Xu, C., & Liu, J. (2022) · International Journal of Modern Physics C · doi:10.1142/s0129183122501662 · Cited by 31
Hybrid modeling design patterns
Rudolph, M., Kurz, S., & Rakitsch, B. (2024) · Journal of Mathematics in Industry · doi:10.1186/s13362-024-00141-0 · Cited by 44
Prakash, A., Jansen, K. E., & Evans, J. A. (2022) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115457 · Cited by 31
Masclans, N., Vázquez-Novoa, F., Bernades, M., Badia, R. M., & Jofre, L. (2023) · International Journal of Thermofluids · doi:10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100448 · Cited by 37
Zhang, W., Xia, M., & Kou, J. (2025) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2025.101130 · Cited by 30
Frame-independent vector-cloud neural network for nonlocal constitutive modeling on arbitrary grids
Zhou, X., Han, J., & Xiao, H. (2021) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2021.114211 · Cited by 30
Self-citationWang, L., Zhang, H., Wang, C., Tao, J., Lan, X., Sun, G., & Feng, J. (2024) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12101417 · Cited by 29
A Novel Algebraic Stress Model with Machine-Learning-Assisted Parameterization
Jiang, C., Mi, J., Laima, S., & Li, H. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13010258 · Cited by 29
Artificial neural network approach for turbulence models: A local framework
Xie, C., Xiong, X., & Wang, J. (2021) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.6.084612 · Cited by 29
Self-citationLiu, Y., Cao, W., Zhang, W., & Xia, Z. (2022) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0076273 · Cited by 29
Li, J., Tang, D., Yi, C., & Yan, C. Y. (2022) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0086785 · Cited by 29
Wu, C., Wang, S., Zhang, X., & He, G. (2023) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2023.108542 · Cited by 29
Adaptive physics-informed neural operator for coarse-grained non-equilibrium flows
Zanardi, I., Venturi, S., & Panesi, M. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41039-y · Cited by 28
Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Design and Manufacturing: Status and Challenges
Pan, L., Li, G., Zhu, T., Liu, D., Wang, Y., & Lu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4070100 · Cited by 34
Machine-learning-based non-Newtonian fluid model with molecular fidelity
Lei, H., Wu, L., & Weinan, E. (2020) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.102.043309 · Cited by 28
Akolekar, H. D., Zhao, Y., Sandberg, R. D., & Pacciani, R. (2021) · Journal of Turbomachinery · doi:10.1115/1.4051417 · Cited by 28
Wang, Z., Xian, W., Li, Y., & Xu, H. (2023) · Computational Mechanics · doi:10.1007/s00466-023-02328-5 · Cited by 28
Tang, H., Wang, Y., Wang, T., Tian, L., & Qian, Y. (2023) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0149547 · Cited by 28
Eigenvector perturbation methodology for uncertainty quantification of turbulence models
Thompson, R. L., Mishra, A., Iaccarino, G., Edeling, W. N., & Sampaio, L. E. B. (2019) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.4.044603 · Cited by 27
Evaluation of machine learning algorithms for predictive Reynolds stress transport modeling
Panda, J. P., & Warrior, H. V. (2022) · Acta Mechanica Sinica · doi:10.1007/s10409-022-09001-w · Cited by 27
A new dynamic stall prediction framework based on symbiosis of experimental and simulation data
Wang, X., Kou, J., & Zhang, W. (2021) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0075083 · Cited by 28
Integrating Deep Learning and Hydrodynamic Modeling to Improve the Great Lakes Forecast
Xue, P., Wagh, A., Ma, G., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Liu, T., & Huang, C. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14112640 · Cited by 28
Zhao, F., & Hung, D. L. S. (2022) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119633 · Cited by 28
Data-driven turbulence model for unsteady cavitating flow
Zhang, Z., Wang, J., Huang, R., Qiu, R., Chu, X., Ye, S., Wang, Y., & Liu, Q. (2022) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0134992 · Cited by 27
Self-citationPhysics-integrated Neural Differentiable (PiNDiff) Model for Composites Manufacturing
Akhare, D., Luo, T., & Wang, J. (2022) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2023.115902 · Cited by 27
Self-citationLearning about structural errors in models of complex dynamical systems
Wu, J., Levine, M. E., Schneider, T., & Stuart, A. M. (2024) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113157 · Cited by 30
Self-citationRay, J., Lefantzi, S., Arunajatesan, S., & Dechant, L. (2017) · ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4037557 · Cited by 26
Berrone, S., & Oberto, D. (2022) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0104605 · Cited by 26
Interpretable deep learning for prediction of Prandtl number effect in turbulent heat transfer
Kim, H., Kim, J., & Lee, C. (2023) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2022.1069 · Cited by 26
Flame reconstruction of hydrogen fueled-scramjet combustor based on multi-source information fusion
Guo, M., Chen, H., Tian, Y., Zhang, Y., Tong, S., Zhong, F., Le, J., & Zhang, H. (2023) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.311 · Cited by 25
Stoffer, R., van Leeuwen, C. M., Podareanu, D., Codreanu, V., Veerman, M., Janssens, M., Hartogensis, O., & van Heerwaarden, C. C. (2021) · Geoscientific model development · doi:10.5194/gmd-14-3769-2021 · Cited by 28
Integrating Expert ODEs into Neural ODEs: Pharmacology and Disease Progression
Qian, Z., Zame, W. R., Fleuren, L. M., Elbers, P., & van der Schaar, M. (2021) · Pure Amsterdam UMC · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.02875 · Cited by 25
Recurrent neural network for end-to-end modeling of laminar-turbulent transition
Zafar, M. I., Choudhari, M. M., Paredes, P., & Xiao, H. (2021) · Data-Centric Engineering · doi:10.1017/dce.2021.11 · Cited by 25
Self-citationGeneralization enhancement of artificial neural network for turbulence closure by feature selection
Zhu, L., Zhang, W., & Tu, G. (2022) · Advances in Aerodynamics · doi:10.1186/s42774-021-00088-5 · Cited by 27
Deep Learning Parameterization of the Tropical Cyclone Boundary Layer
Wang, L., & Tan, Z. (2023) · Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · doi:10.1029/2022ms003034 · Cited by 26
Combining direct and indirect sparse data for learning generalizable turbulence models
Zhang, X., Xiao, H., Luo, X., & He, G. (2023) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112272 · Cited by 25
Self-citationApplication of Artificial Neural Networks to Stochastic Estimation and Jet Noise Modeling
Tenney, A. S., Glauser, M., Ruscher, C. J., & Berger, Z. P. (2020) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/1.j058638 · Cited by 25
Machine-Learnt Turbulence Closures for Low-Pressure Turbines With Unsteady Inflow Conditions
Akolekar, H. D., Sandberg, R. D., Hutchins, N. T., Michelassi, V., & Laskowski, G. M. (2019) · Journal of Turbomachinery · doi:10.1115/1.4043907 · Cited by 24
Xu, M., Cheng, H., & Ji, B. (2021) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109058 · Cited by 24
González, D., García‐González, A., Francisco Chinesta, C., & Cueto, E. (2020) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma13102319 · Cited by 24
A physics-informed neural network for turbulent wake simulations behind wind turbines
Azhar Gafoor, C. T. P., Boya, S. K., Jinka, R., Gupta, A., Tyagi, A., Sarkar, S., & Subramani, D. (2025) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0245113 · Cited by 23
Application of two-branch deep neural network to predict bubble migration near elastic boundaries
Ma, X., Wang, C., Huang, B., & Wang, G. (2019) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.5111620 · Cited by 23
Error estimates for deep learning methods in fluid dynamics
Biswas, A., Tian, J., & Ulusoy, S. (2022) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/s00211-022-01294-z · Cited by 24
Xie, X., Wang, X., Zhao, P., Hao, Y., Xie, R., & Liu, H. (2022) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.125907 · Cited by 23
Zhang, T., Chen, J., Zeng, F.-Z., Tang, D., & Yan, C. Y. (2023) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0137819 · Cited by 23
Data-driven turbulence anisotropy in film and effusion cooling flows
Ellis, C. D., & Xia, H. (2023) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0166685 · Cited by 23
Machine Learning for Clouds and Climate
Beucler, T., Ebert‐Uphoff, I., Rasp, S., Pritchard, M. S., & Gentine, P. (2023) · Geophysical monograph · doi:10.1002/9781119700357.ch16 · Cited by 61
Uncertainty Quantification of Spalart–Allmaras Turbulence Model Coefficients for Compressor Stall
He, X. G., Zhao, F., & Vahdati, M. (2021) · Journal of Turbomachinery · doi:10.1115/1.4050438 · Cited by 22
Detection of Diseases Using Machine Learning Image Recognition Technology in Artificial Intelligence
Huang, J., Li, J., Li, Z., Zhu, Z., Shen, C., Qi, G., & Yu, G. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/5658641 · Cited by 25
RetractedData-driven wall modeling for turbulent separated flows
Dupuy, D., Odier, N., & Lapeyre, C. (2023) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2023.112173 · Cited by 23
Tang, D., Zeng, F., Zhang, T., Yi, C., & Yan, C. Y. (2023) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0154063 · Cited by 22
Lagrangian large eddy simulations via physics-informed machine learning
Tian, Y., Woodward, M., Stepanov, M., Fryer, C. L., Hyett, C., Livescu, D., & Chertkov, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2213638120 · Cited by 22
Nikolaou, Z. M., Chrysostomou, C., Minamoto, Y., & Vervisch, L. (2020) · Flow Turbulence and Combustion · doi:10.1007/s10494-020-00170-w · Cited by 25
Toward learning Lattice Boltzmann collision operators
Corbetta, A., Gabbana, A., Gyrya, V., Livescu, D., Prins, J., & Toschi, F. (2023) · The European Physical Journal E · doi:10.1140/epje/s10189-023-00267-w · Cited by 21
A Bi-fidelity ensemble kalman method for PDE-constrained inverse problems in computational mechanics
Gao, H., & Wang, J. (2021) · Computational Mechanics · doi:10.1007/s00466-021-01979-6 · Cited by 21
Self-citationPhysics-informed machine learning of the Lagrangian dynamics of velocity gradient tensor
Tian, Y., Livescu, D., & Chertkov, M. (2021) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.6.094607 · Cited by 21
A new data assimilation method of recovering turbulent mean flow field at high Reynolds numbers
Liu, Y., Zhang, W., & Xia, Z. (2022) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2022.107328 · Cited by 20
Wu, L., Cui, B., & Xiao, Z. (2022) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0104243 · Cited by 21
Amarloo, A., Cinnella, P., Iosifidis, A., Forooghi, P., & Abkar, M. (2023) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0160977 · Cited by 20
Machine-learning data-driven modeling of laminar-turbulent transition in compressor cascade
Li, Z., Ju, Y., & Zhang, C. (2023) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0164131 · Cited by 20
Constrained re-calibration of two-equation Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes models
Bin, Y., Hu, X., Li, J. J. L., Grauer, S. J., & Yang, X. I. A. (2024) · Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.taml.2024.100503 · Cited by 20
Liguori, A., Quintana, M., Fu, C., Miller, C. C., Frisch, J., & van Treeck, C. (2024) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114071 · Cited by 20
Bae, Y., Nam, K., & Kang, S. (2024) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2024.104122 · Cited by 21
Cai, J., Angeli, P., Martinez, J., Damblin, G., & Lucor, D. (2024) · Computers & Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2024.106246 · Cited by 19
Physics-informed neural network for cross-dynamics vehicle trajectory stitching
Long, K., Shi, X., & Li, X. (2024) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2024.103799 · Cited by 19
Enhancing geophysical flow machine learning performance via scale separation
Faranda, D., Vrac, M., Yiou, P., Pons, F., Hamid, A., Carella, G., Langué, C. G. N., Thao, S., & Gautard, V. (2021) · Nonlinear processes in geophysics · doi:10.5194/npg-28-423-2021 · Cited by 20
Dang, Z., & Ishii, M. (2022) · International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122919 · Cited by 19
McConkey, R., Yee, E., & Lien, F. (2022) · International journal of computational fluid dynamics · doi:10.1080/10618562.2022.2113520 · Cited by 21
A Survey on the Application of Machine Learning in Turbulent Flow Simulations
Majchrzak, M., Marciniak-Łukasiak, K., & Łukasiak, P. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16041755 · Cited by 19
Liu, W., Fang, J. C., Rolfo, S., Moulinec, C., & Emerson, D. R. (2023) · Computers & Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.105864 · Cited by 19
A coupled framework for symbolic turbulence models from deep-learning
Lav, C., Banko, A., Waschkowski, F., Zhao, Y., Elkins, C. J., Eaton, J. K., & Sandberg, R. D. (2023) · International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2023.109140 · Cited by 19
Physical interpretation of neural network-based nonlinear eddy viscosity models
Zhang, X., Xiao, H., Jee, S., & He, G. (2023) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2023.108632 · Cited by 19
Self-citationA tensor basis neural network-based turbulence model for transonic axial compressor flows
Ji, Z., & Du, G. (2024) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2024.109155 · Cited by 19
Haghiri, A., & Sandberg, R. D. (2020) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.5.064501 · Cited by 18
Physics-Informed Machine Learning Improves Detection of Head Impacts
Raymond, S., Cecchi, N. J., Alizadeh, H. V., Callan, A. A., Rice, E. N., Liu, Y., Zhou, Z., Zeineh, M., & Camarillo, D. B. (2022) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-022-02911-6 · Cited by 18
Brenner, O., Plogmann, J., Piroozmand, P., & Jenny, P. (2024) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117026 · Cited by 18
Akolekar, H. D., Weatheritt, J., Hutchins, N. T., Sandberg, R. D., Laskowski, G. M., & Michelassi, V. (2018) · ASME Turbo Expo: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition (GT) · doi:10.1115/gt2018-75447 · Cited by 18
Improvement of the SST γ-Reθt transition model for flows along a curved hydrofoil
Ye, C., Wang, C., Zi, D., Tang, Y., van Esch, B. P. M., & Wang, F. (2021) · Journal of Hydrodynamics · doi:10.1007/s42241-021-0044-6 · Cited by 18
Neural vortex method: From finite Lagrangian particles to infinite dimensional Eulerian dynamics
Xiong, S., He, X., Tong, Y., Deng, Y., & Zhu, B. (2023) · Computers & Fluids · doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.105811 · Cited by 18
Ma, H., Hu, X., Zhang, Y., Thuerey, N., & Haidn, O. J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.08119 · Cited by 18
Köhler, F., Munz, J., & Schäfer, M. (2020) · AIAA SciTech Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2020-1586 · Cited by 17
CFD of the Future: Year 2025 and Beyond
Runchal, A. K., & Rao, M. M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-2670-1_22 · Cited by 17
One neural network approach for the surrogate turbulence model in transonic flows
Zhu, L., Sun, X., Liu, Y., & Zhang, W. (2022) · Acta Mechanica Sinica · doi:10.1007/s10409-021-09057-z · Cited by 17
Volpiani, P. S., Bernardini, R. F., & Franceschini, L. (2022) · International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2022.109034 · Cited by 17
A divide-and-conquer machine learning approach for modeling turbulent flows
Man, A., Jadidi, M., Keshmiri, A., Yin, H., & Mahmoudi, Y. (2023) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0149750 · Cited by 17
A probabilistic, data-driven closure model for RANS simulations with aleatoric, model uncertainty
Agrawal, A. K., & Koutsourelakis, P. (2024) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2024.112982 · Cited by 17
Plogmann, J., Brenner, O., & Jenny, P. (2024) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.117052 · Cited by 17
Akhare, D., Chen, Z., Gulotty, R., Luo, T., & Wang, J. (2024) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-024-01307-5 · Cited by 17
Self-citationChen, C., & Wu, J. (2024) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113480 · Cited by 20
Self-citationVoet, L. J. A., Ahlfeld, R., Gaymann, A., Laizet, S., & Montomoli, F. (2020) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2020.07.056 · Cited by 17
Ren, J., Wang, H., Xing, J., Luo, K., & Fan, J. (2020) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0028877 · Cited by 18
Bai, Z., & Peng, L. (2021) · Advanced Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1186/s40323-021-00213-5 · Cited by 17
Fan, X., Liu, X., Wang, M., & Wang, J. (2025) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2025.118455 · Cited by 16
Self-citationA review on full-, zero-, and partial-knowledge based predictive models for industrial applications
Zampini, S., Parodi, G., Oneto, L., Coraddu, A., & Anguita, D. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.102996 · Cited by 22
Machine-Learning-Assisted Blending of Data-Driven Turbulence Models
Oulghelou, M., Cherroud, S., Merle, X., & Cinnella, P. (2025) · Flow Turbulence and Combustion · doi:10.1007/s10494-025-00661-8 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J.-X., Wu, J.-L., & Xiao, H.
- ORCID
- Xiao, Heng
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1606.07987
- OpenAlex
- W6891823180
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
- Keywords
- Reynolds stress model, RANS turbulence models, physics-informed machine learning, data-driven turbulence modeling, direct numerical simulation data, random forest, recirculation zone, low Reynolds number flow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review