The DOI matches its DataCite record.
A Physics Informed Machine Learning Approach for Reconstructing Reynolds Stress Modeling Discrepancies Based on DNS Data
Open accessAbstract
Turbulence modeling is a critical component in numerical simulations of industrial flows based on Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations. However, after decades of efforts in the turbulence modeling community, universally applicable RANS models with predictive capabilities are still lacking. Recently, data-driven methods have been proposed as a promising alternative to the traditional approaches of turbulence model development. In this work we propose a data-driven, physics-informed machine learning approach for predicting discrepancies in RANS modeled Reynolds stresses. The discrepancies are formulated as functions of the mean flow features. By using a modern machine learning technique based on random forests, the discrepancy functions are first trained with benchmark flow data and then used to predict Reynolds stresses discrepancies in new flows. The method is used to predict the Reynolds stresses in the flow over periodic hills by using two training flow scenarios of increasing difficulties: (1) the flow in the same periodic hills geometry yet at a lower Reynolds number, and (2) the flow in a different hill geometry with a similar recirculation zone. Excellent predictive performances were observed in both scenarios, demonstrating the merits of the proposed method. Improvement of RANS modeled Reynolds stresses enabled by the proposed method is an important step towards predictive turbulence modeling, where the ultimate goal is to predict the quantities of interest (e.g., velocity field, drag, lift) more accurately by solving RANS equations with the Reynolds stresses obtained therefrom.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Although this approach can be used with any generic RANS model to estimate its discrepancy, it does not alter the form of approximation used in obtaining τ RANS , since ∆ τ ML is learned independently of τ RANS .”
From Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“where τ RANS is obtained from a RANS model while ∆ τ ML is the model discrepancy that is estimated using a random forest model.”
From Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“recent work by Wang et al. [21] explored the use of machine learning methods to assist RANS models and reduce their discrepancies.”
From Theory-Guided Data Science: A New Paradigm for Scientific Discovery from Data (2017) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–733 of 733
Realizability-constrained machine learning for turbulence closures in wake flows
Ansari, T., Mehta, P. H., & Akolekar, H. D. (2026) · International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2026.110698
A physics-informed neural network solver for RANS simulation of wind turbine wakes
Zhang, J. (2026) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/3224/3/032007
Liu, Z., Gong, Y., Chenshuo, X. U., Zhang, X., Wang, X., & Li, X. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6865307
Development of a Neural Network to Enhance Turbulence Modeling Based on Stereoscopic-PIV DataPreprint
FERNANDES, L. S., Thompson, R. L., Macedo, M. S. S., Brener, B. P., & Azevedo, F. S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9771936/v1
The Engineering Turbulence Problem and a Data-Driven Solution
Li, J. J. L., Kunz, R. F., Huang, G., & Yang, X. I. A. (2026) · AIAA AVIATION Forum · doi:10.2514/6.2026-4770
Self-scaling tensor basis neural network for Reynolds stress modeling of wall-bounded turbulence
Yuan, Z., & Li, Y. P. (2026) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0331514
Research on Turbulence Model Modification Method Based on Gene Expression Programming
Lou, Y., & Li, Z. (2025) · International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering (MEAE) · doi:10.1109/meae68077.2025.11558064
Canonical separated flows as transferable building blocks in data-driven turbulence modeling
Bao, C., Bin, Y., Yipeng, S. H. I., & Yang, X. I. A. (2026) · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics · doi:10.1016/j.cja.2026.104326
Huang, H., Li, W., Xie, Q., Wang, Z., Zhang, G., & Yu, P. (2026) · Ocean Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2026.126656
R, N. K., Amutha, S., Rachaveti, D., & Surendiran, B. (2026) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.70108
Generation and posterior inference of spatiotemporal turbulent flows using latent neural fields
Lu, Z., & Xiao, X. (2026) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0340524
CFD analysis of wing-Body configurations: Progress and challenges
Wang, S., Wang, S., ZHANG, M., & Deng, X. (2026) · Chinese Journal of Aeronautics · doi:10.1016/j.cja.2026.104379
A Random Forest Based Framework for Turbulence Anisotropy using Pope’s Tensor Formulation
Al‐Taweel, A., Iacob, I. E., & Ilie, M. (2026) · International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI) · doi:10.1109/ecai69016.2026.11613588
A hybrid modelling method for preliminary design of civil aircraft engine nacelles
Liu, H., Hu, C., & Yuan, X. (2026) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/3272/1/012014
Cavitation instabilities and control strategies: A physics-based unified review
Frikha, S., & Baccar, M. (2026) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0337205
Matyszczak, G. (2026) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms27156839 · Cited by 1
Synergizing transport-based generative models and latent geometry for stochastic closure modeling
Dong, X., Yang, H., & Wu, J. (2026) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2026.110341 · Cited by 1
Self-citationMohibullah, M., Dong, L., Rukaia, A. R., Rahaman, M., & Bacher, L. (2026) · Journal of Applied Geophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2026.106473
Li, Y., Li, J., Liu, X., Wang, J., Wang, B., & You, Q. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3728009
Self-citationPhysics-constrained machine learning for generalisable turbulence modelling across flow regimes
Luo, Q., Liu, H. J., Zhang, X., & He, G. (2026) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2026.11963
Pengcheng, Y., Chenhang, Y., Yao, S., Yue, H., Qiaogao, H., & Guang, P. (2026) · Acta Physica Sinica · doi:10.7498/aps.76.20260730
HASAN, M. B., Yu, M., & Oates, T. (2026) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids · doi:10.1002/fld.70097
Comparison of generative learning methods as turbulence surrogates
Drygala, C., Ross, E., Ghazijahani, M. S., Cierpka, C., di Mare, F., & Gottschalk, H. (2026) · Computational Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s44207-026-00017-8 · Cited by 9
Anonymous (2026) · Physical Review Fluids · doi:10.1103/rn1j-32n4
Mwanangombe, J., Sumbwanyambe, M., Poologanathan, K., Ikotun, B. D., & Simwanda, L. (2026) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2026.113051
Bridging physics and data: A review of machine learning approaches for turbulence closure modeling
Hu, J., & Yang, J. (2026) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0339930
Valero, M. M., & Meldi, M. (2026) · Data-Centric Engineering · doi:10.1017/dce.2026.10055
Physics-Guided Machine Learning for Frozen Soil Thermal Conductivity Prediction under Data Scarcity
Sun, H., Qi, J., & Wang, D. (2026) · Journal of Cold Regions Engineering · doi:10.1061/jcrgei.creng-1266
Physics-enhanced residual learning framework for high-fidelity reconstruction from sparse data
倪淑芝, Tong, Z.-X., Zhang, Y., Mi, J., & Zhu, J. (2026) · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2026.112684
A physics-oriented review of neural-network-based modeling for bluff-body flows
Tang, X., Zhang, J., & Zhu, H. (2026) · Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/5.0351690
Wolf, I., Bukovac, O., Kirinčić, M., & Blecich, P. (2026) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies14110701
Wheeldon, J., Mukhamedov, F. M., Tatar, S., & Ulusoy, S. (2026) · Journal of Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems · doi:10.1515/jiip-2026-0027
Wu, Y., Li, H., & Xie, J. (2026) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma19214570
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J.-X., Wu, J.-L., & Xiao, H.
- ORCID
- Xiao, Heng
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2016
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1606.07987
- OpenAlex
- W6891823180
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
- Keywords
- Reynolds stress model, RANS turbulence models, physics-informed machine learning, data-driven turbulence modeling, direct numerical simulation data, random forest, recirculation zone, low Reynolds number flow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
