PreprintCited by 81Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsLow-power high-performance VLSI designNumerical Methods and Algorithms

Deep Convolutional Neural Network Inference with Floating-point Weights and Fixed-point Activations

Open access
Lai, Liangzhen, Suda, Naveen, Chandra, Vikas·2017·arXiv

Abstract

Deep convolutional neural network (CNN) inference requires significant amount of memory and computation, which limits its deployment on embedded devices. To alleviate these problems to some extent, prior research utilize low precision fixed-point numbers to represent the CNN weights and activations. However, the minimum required data precision of fixed-point weights varies across different networks and also across different layers of the same network. In this work, we propose using floating-point numbers for representing the weights and fixed-point numbers for representing the activations. We show that using floating-point representation for weights is more efficient than fixed-point representation for the same bit-width and demonstrate it on popular large-scale CNNs such as AlexNet, SqueezeNet, GoogLeNet and VGG-16. We also show that such a representation scheme enables compact hardware multiply-and-accumulate (MAC) unit design. Experimental results show that the proposed scheme reduces the weight storage by up to 36% and power consumption of the hardware multiplier by up to 50%.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1703.03073

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lai, L., Suda, N., & Chandra, V.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2595614461
Cited by
81
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Numerical Methods and Algorithms
Keywords
mixed precision, low-precision arithmetic, embedded devices, power consumption, hardware accelerator design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review