PreprintCited by 684Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsNumerical Methods and AlgorithmsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Fixed Point Quantization of Deep Convolutional Networks

Open access
Lin, Darryl D., Talathi, Sachin S., Annapureddy, V. Sreekanth·2015·arXiv

Abstract

In recent years increasingly complex architectures for deep convolution networks (DCNs) have been proposed to boost the performance on image recognition tasks. However, the gains in performance have come at a cost of substantial increase in computation and model storage resources. Fixed point implementation of DCNs has the potential to alleviate some of these complexities and facilitate potential deployment on embedded hardware. In this paper, we propose a quantizer design for fixed point implementation of DCNs. We formulate and solve an optimization problem to identify optimal fixed point bit-width allocation across DCN layers. Our experiments show that in comparison to equal bit-width settings, the fixed point DCNs with optimized bit width allocation offer >20% reduction in the model size without any loss in accuracy on CIFAR-10 benchmark. We also demonstrate that fine-tuning can further enhance the accuracy of fixed point DCNs beyond that of the original floating point model. In doing so, we report a new state-of-the-art fixed point performance of 6.78% error-rate on CIFAR-10 benchmark.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1511.06393

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lin et al. use SQNR to minimize fixed-point quantization error and mathematically assign bits to each layer, but mathematically minimizing errors does not necessarily lead to an accuracy reduction.

    “Lin et al. [26] use the signal-to-quantization-noise ratio (SQNR) to ensure that the error resulting from the xed-point quantization is minimized and mathematically assign the bits to each layer for the xed-point quantization. However, mathematically minimizing errors does not necessarily lead to an accuracy reduction.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, D. D., Talathi, S. S., & Annapureddy, V. S.
Affiliations
Qualcomm (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
Pages
2849-2858
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2286365479
Cited by
684
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 141 · 2019: 130 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 10
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Conference on Machine Learning
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Numerical Methods and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
fixed-point quantization, deep convolutional neural networks, bit-width allocation, quantizer design, model size reduction, fine-tuning, CIFAR-10, image classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review