The DOI matches its DataCite record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications
Open accessAbstract
We present a class of efficient models called MobileNets for mobile and embedded vision applications. MobileNets are based on a streamlined architecture that uses depth-wise separable convolutions to build light weight deep neural networks. We introduce two simple global hyper-parameters that efficiently trade off between latency and accuracy. These hyper-parameters allow the model builder to choose the right sized model for their application based on the constraints of the problem. We present extensive experiments on resource and accuracy tradeoffs and show strong performance compared to other popular models on ImageNet classification. We then demonstrate the effectiveness of MobileNets across a wide range of applications and use cases including object detection, finegrain classification, face attributes and large scale geo-localization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Recent work has shown that low precision and mixed-precision quantization with INT4/INT8 works in practice [51,82,102,108,187,199,211,239,246,246,249,263,267,286].”
From A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference (2022) · cites this paper as [102]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Experimental tests showed that the SSD framework [82] has good performance compared to Faster R-CNN [84] and Region-based Fully Convolutional Network (R-FCN) [111] detectors.”
From A Systematic Review of Drone Based Road Traffic Monitoring System (2022) · cites this paper as [111]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This idea has been recently applied to object detection and fine-grain classification [143-145].”
From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [143]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Lightweight models, such as MobileNet [4] and ShuffleNet [5], although optimized in terms of computation and model size, are often inferior to full-size models in terms of detection accuracy.”
From Cloud-Edge Collaborative Defect Detection Based on Efficient Yolo Networks and Incremental Learning (2024) · cites this paper as [4]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, Qin et al. (2018) show how Depthwise 3x3 Convolutions comprised just 3.06% of an example network's Multiply-Add operations, while utilizing 82.86% of the total training time in the FPO-efficient MobileNet architecture Howard et al. (2017).”
From Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learning (2020) · cites this paper as Howard et al. (2017)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It obtains superior accuracy over the previous state-of-the-art models [8] with much fewer FLOPs.”
From ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design (2018) · cites this paper as [8]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“It is possible to address this with mixed-precision quantization [51,82,102,162,187,199,211,239,246,249,263,282,286].”
From A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference (2022) · cites this paper as [102]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Communication expansion: 1.73×-1.98×”
From Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [222]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“To solve this issue, Secure Aggregation protocol is proposed in [222] to achieve the robustness of tolerating up to one-third devices failing to timely process the local training or upload the updates.”
From Convergence of Edge Computing and Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [222]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“When equipped with Squeezeand-excitation (SE) module [8], the classification accuracy of ShuffleNet v2 is improved by 0.5% at the cost of certain loss in speed.”
From ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design (2018) · cites this paper as [8]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Our proposed CG block can be treated as the generalization of MobileNet unit. When f sur ( ∗ ) = 0 and f glo ( ∗ ) = 1 , our proposed CG block will degenerate to MobileNet unit.”
From CGNet: A Light-Weight Context Guided Network for Semantic Segmentation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“However, this design is not suitable for the proposed CG block, since the local feature and the surrounding context in CG block need to maintain channel independence. Additional experiments also verify this observation.”
From CGNet: A Light-Weight Context Guided Network for Semantic Segmentation (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
In the citing paper
“Recently, some computationally efficient networks like MobileNet have been proposed by leveraging depth-wise convolutions [65], point-wise convolutions [66], or binary operations [67].”
From Empowering things with intelligence: a survey of the progress, challenges, and opportunities in artificial intelligence of things (2021) · cites this paper as [65]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.01497 · Cited by 70,812
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
FaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering
Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., & Philbin, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298682 · Cited by 15,267
Self-citationInception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning
Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., & Alemi, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231 · Cited by 4,636
Compressing Neural Networks with the Hashing Trick
Chen, W., Wilson, J. T., Tyree, S., Weinberger, K. Q., & Chen, Y. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.04788 · Cited by 974
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- [3][3] F. Chollet. Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02357v2 , 2016. 1 - · arXiv
- [4][4] M. Courbariaux, J.-P. David, and Y. Bengio. Training deep neural networks with low precision multiplications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.7024 , 2014. 2 - · arXiv
- [5][5] S. Han, H. Mao, and W. J. Dally. Deep compression: Compressing deep neural network with pruning, trained quantization and huffman coding. CoRR, abs/1510.00149 , 2, 2015. 2 - · arXiv
- [6][6] J. Hays and A. Efros. IM2GPS: estimating geographic information from a single image. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , 2008. 7 -
- [7][7] J. Hays and A. Efros. Large-Scale Image Geolocalization. In J. Choi and G. Friedland, editors, Multimodal Location Estimation of Videos and Images . Springer, 2014. 6, 7 -
- [9][9] G. Hinton, O. Vinyals, and J. Dean. Distilling the knowledge in a neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.02531 , 2015. 2, 7 - · arXiv
- [10][10] J. Huang, V. Rathod, C. Sun, M. Zhu, A. Korattikara, A. Fathi, I. Fischer, Z. Wojna, Y . Song, S. Guadarrama, et al. Speed/accuracy trade-offs for modern convolutional object detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.10012 , 2016. 7 - · arXiv
- [11][11] I. Hubara, M. Courbariaux, D. Soudry, R. El-Yaniv, and Y. Bengio. Quantized neural networks: Training neural networks with low precision weights and activations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.07061 , 2016. 2 - · arXiv
- [12][12] F. N. Iandola, M. W. Moskewicz, K. Ashraf, S. Han, W. J. Dally, and K. Keutzer. Squeezenet: Alexnet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and¡ 1mb model size. arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.07360 , 2016. 1, 6 - · arXiv
- [13][13] S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03167 , 2015. 1, 3, 7 - · arXiv
- [14][14] M. Jaderberg, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman. Speeding up convolutional neural networks with low rank expansions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.3866 , 2014. 2 - · arXiv
- [15][15] Y. Jia, E. Shelhamer, J. Donahue, S. Karayev, J. Long, R. Girshick, S. Guadarrama, and T. Darrell. Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.5093 , 2014. 4 - · arXiv
- [16][16] J. Jin, A. Dundar, and E. Culurciello. Flattened convolutional neural networks for feedforward acceleration. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.5474 , 2014. 1, 3 - · arXiv
- [17][17] A. Khosla, N. Jayadevaprakash, B. Yao, and L. Fei-Fei. Novel dataset for fine-grained image categorization. In First Workshop on Fine-Grained Visual Categorization, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , Colorado Springs, CO, June 2011. 6 -
- [18][18] J. Krause, B. Sapp, A. Howard, H. Zhou, A. Toshev, T. Duerig, J. Philbin, and L. Fei-Fei. The unreasonable effectiveness of noisy data for fine-grained recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06789 , 2015. 6 - · arXiv
- [19][19] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pages 1097-1105, 2012. 1, 6 -
- [20][20] V. Lebedev, Y. Ganin, M. Rakhuba, I. Oseledets, and V. Lempitsky. Speeding-up convolutional neural networks using fine-tuned cp-decomposition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6553 , 2014. 2 - · arXiv
- [21][21] W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, and S. Reed. Ssd: Single shot multibox detector. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.02325 , 2015. 7 - · arXiv
- [22][22] M. Rastegari, V. Ordonez, J. Redmon, and A. Farhadi. Xnornet: Imagenet classification using binary convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.05279 , 2016. 1, 2 - · arXiv
- [26][26] L. Sifre. Rigid-motion scattering for image classification . PhD thesis, Ph. D. thesis, 2014. 1, 3 -
- [27][27] K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 , 2014. 1, 6 - · arXiv
- [28][28] V. Sindhwani, T. Sainath, and S. Kumar. Structured transforms for small-footprint deep learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pages 3088-3096, 2015. 1 -
- [30][30] C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, V. Vanhoucke, and A. Rabinovich. Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1-9, 2015. 6 -
- [31][31] C. Szegedy, V. Vanhoucke, S. Ioffe, J. Shlens, and Z. Wojna. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.00567 , 2015. 1, 3, 4, 7 - · arXiv
- [32][32] B. Thomee, D. A. Shamma, G. Friedland, B. Elizalde, K. Ni, D. Poland, D. Borth, and L.-J. Li. Yfcc100m: The new data in multimedia research. Communications of the ACM , 59(2):64-73, 2016. 7 -
- [33][33] T. Tieleman and G. Hinton. Lecture 6.5-rmsprop: Divide the gradient by a running average of its recent magnitude. COURSERA: Neural Networks for Machine Learning , 4(2), 2012. 4 -
- [34][34] M. Wang, B. Liu, and H. Foroosh. Factorized convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.04337 , 2016. 1 - · arXiv
- [35][35] T. Weyand, I. Kostrikov, and J. Philbin. PlaNet - Photo Geolocation with Convolutional Neural Networks. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , 2016. 6, 7 -
- [36][36] J. Wu, C. Leng, Y. Wang, Q. Hu, and J. Cheng. Quantized convolutional neural networks for mobile devices. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.06473 , 2015. 1 - · arXiv
- [37][37] Z. Yang, M. Moczulski, M. Denil, N. de Freitas, A. Smola, L. Song, and Z. Wang. Deep fried convnets. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 1476-1483, 2015. 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
Hu, J., Shen, L., & Sun, G. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00745 · Cited by 35,667
MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks
Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., & Chen, L.-C. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00474 · Cited by 28,755
Self-citationCBAM: Convolutional Block Attention Module
Woo, S., Park, J., Lee, J.-Y., & Kweon, I. S. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1 · Cited by 25,853
Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions
Chollet, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.195 · Cited by 20,380
EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks
Tan, M., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.11946 · Cited by 17,072
Metadata
- Authors
- Howard, A. G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., & Adam, H.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1704.04861
- OpenAlex
- W2612445135
- Cited by
- 19,015
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 239 · 2025: 1584 · 2024: 2760 · 2023: 2911 · 2022: 2524 · 2021: 3414 · 2020: 2734 · 2019: 1927 · 2018: 833 · 2017: 74
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- MobileNet, depthwise separable convolution, lightweight neural networks, embedded vision, accuracy-latency trade-off, ImageNet classification, object detection, fine-grained classification, geolocation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
