PreprintCited by 974Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsStochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesNeural Networks and Applications

Compressing Neural Networks with the Hashing Trick

Open access
Chen, Wenlin, Wilson, James T., Tyree, Stephen, Weinberger, Kilian Q., Chen, Yixin·2015·arXiv

Abstract

As deep nets are increasingly used in applications suited for mobile devices, a fundamental dilemma becomes apparent: the trend in deep learning is to grow models to absorb ever-increasing data set sizes; however mobile devices are designed with very little memory and cannot store such large models. We present a novel network architecture, HashedNets, that exploits inherent redundancy in neural networks to achieve drastic reductions in model sizes. HashedNets uses a low-cost hash function to randomly group connection weights into hash buckets, and all connections within the same hash bucket share a single parameter value. These parameters are tuned to adjust to the HashedNets weight sharing architecture with standard backprop during training. Our hashing procedure introduces no additional memory overhead, and we demonstrate on several benchmark data sets that HashedNets shrink the storage requirements of neural networks substantially while mostly preserving generalization performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1504.04788

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structured update and sketched update can enhance communication efficiency when clients upload updates to server.

    “In addition, structured update, sketched update can help enhance the communication efficiency when clients uploading updates to the server as well.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, W., Wilson, J. T., Tyree, S., Weinberger, K. Q., & Chen, Y.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2015
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172166488
Cited by
974
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 167 · 2019: 159 · 2018: 184 · 2017: 114 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
neural network compression, parameter sharing, model size reduction, memory-efficient deep learning, mobile devices, parameter redundancy, hash functions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review