The DOI matches its DataCite record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehension
Open accessAbstract
We show that relation extraction can be reduced to answering simple reading comprehension questions, by associating one or more natural-language questions with each relation slot. This reduction has several advantages: we can (1) learn relation-extraction models by extending recent neural reading-comprehension techniques, (2) build very large training sets for those models by combining relation-specific crowd-sourced questions with distant supervision, and even (3) do zero-shot learning by extracting new relation types that are only specified at test-time, for which we have no labeled training examples. Experiments on a Wikipedia slot-filling task demonstrate that the approach can generalize to new questions for known relation types with high accuracy, and that zero-shot generalization to unseen relation types is possible, at lower accuracy levels, setting the bar for future work on this task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We demonstrate empirically that orthogonalized updates significantly outperform naive sequential editing on standard benchmarks (CounterFact [8], zsRE [9]), particularly as the number of edits scales from 1 to 1000.”
From Subspace Collisions in Knowledge Editing: Orthogonal Low-Rank Updates for Scalable, Stable Model Edits (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Standard benchmarks for knowledge editing include: • CounterFact [8]: A dataset of counterfactual edits where models must update their predictions for specific facts. • zsRE [9]: A zero-shot relation extraction dataset adapted for knowledge editing evaluation.”
From Subspace Collisions in Knowledge Editing: Orthogonal Low-Rank Updates for Scalable, Stable Model Edits (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine ComprehensionPreprint
Seo, M. J., Kembhavi, A., Farhadi, A., & Hajishirzi, H. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01603 · Cited by 1,698
Self-citationKnowledge-Based Weak Supervision for Information Extraction of Overlapping Relations
Hoffmann, R., Zhang, C., Ling, X., Zettlemoyer, L., & Weld, D. S. (2011) · Cited by 878
Self-citationRepresenting Text for Joint Embedding of Text and Knowledge Bases
Toutanova, K., Chen, D., Pantel, P., Poon, H., Choudhury, P., & Gamon, M. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1174 · Cited by 827
SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05250 · Cited by 678
Relation Extraction with Matrix Factorization and Universal Schemas
Riedel, S., Yao, L., McCallum, A., & Marlin, B. M. (2013) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · Cited by 570
Wikidata: a new platform for collaborative data collection
Vrandečić, D. (2012) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/2187980.2188242 · Cited by 528
Large-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networks
Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02075 · Cited by 528
Dynamic Coattention Networks For Question AnsweringPreprint
Xiong, C., Zhong, V., & Socher, R. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01604 · Cited by 504
Injecting Logical Background Knowledge into Embeddings for Relation Extraction
Rocktäschel, T., Singh, S., & Riedel, S. (2015) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/n15-1118 · Cited by 281
Question-Answer Driven Semantic Role Labeling: Using Natural Language to Annotate Natural Language
He, L., Lewis, M., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1076 · Cited by 197
Self-citationWikiReading: A Novel Large-scale Language Understanding Task over Wikipedia
Hewlett, D., Lacoste, A., Jones, L., Polosukhin, I., Fandrianto, A., Han, J. J., Kelcey, M., & Berthelot, D. (2016) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1145 · Cited by 130
Learning Recurrent Span Representations for Extractive Question AnsweringPreprint
Lee, K., Salant, S., Kwiatkowski, T., Parikh, A. P., Das, D., & Berant, J. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01436 · Cited by 118
Multi-Perspective Context Matching for Machine ComprehensionPreprint
Wang, Z., Mi, H., Hamza, W., & Florian, R. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.04211 · Cited by 109
Effective Crowd Annotation for Relation Extraction
Liu, A., Soderland, S., Bragg, J., Lin, C. H., Ling, X., & Weld, D. S. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1104 · Cited by 68
Seed-Based Event Trigger Labeling: How far can event descriptions get us?
Bronstein, O., Dagan, I., Li, Q., Ji, H., & Frank, A. (2015) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/p15-2061 · Cited by 47
Generalizing to Unseen Entities and Entity Pairs with Row-less Universal Schema
Verga, P. W., Neelakantan, A., & McCallum, A. (2017) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/e17-1058 · Cited by 41
Learning to Answer Questions from Wikipedia Infoboxes
Morales, A., Premtoon, V., Avery, C., Felshin, S., & Katz, B. (2016) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1199 · Cited by 16
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Michele Banko, Michael J. Cafarella, Stephen Soderland, Matt Broadhead, and Oren Et- zioni. 2007. Open information extraction from the web. In Proceedings of the 20th Interna- tional Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence.
- Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Fran- cisco, CA, USA, IJCAI'07, pages 2670-2676. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1625275.1625705. 7 http://nlp.cs.washington.edu/zeroshot
- Thomas Demeester, Tim Rocktäschel, and Sebas- tian Riedel. 2016. Lifted rule injection for re- lation embeddings. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, Austin, Texas, pages 1389-1399. https://aclweb.org/anthology/D16-1146.
- Karl Moritz Hermann, Tomáš Kočiský, Edward Grefenstette, Lasse Espeholt, Will Kay, Mustafa Suleyman, and Phil Blunsom. 2015. Teach- ing machines to read and comprehend. In Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems. http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.03340. · arXiv
- Makoto Miwa and Mohit Bansal. 2016. End-to-end re- lation extraction using lstms on sequences and tree structures. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, pages 1105- 1116. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P16-1105.
- Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. 2014. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, Doha, Qatar, pages 1532-1543. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D14-1162.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
Lester, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Constant, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.243 · Cited by 3,096
Know What You Don’t Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD
Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2124 · Cited by 2,240
Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-trained Language Models: A Survey
Min, B., Ross, H., Sulem, E., Veyseh, A. P. B., Nguyen, T. H., Sainz, O., Agirre, E., Heintz, I., & Roth, D. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3605943 · Cited by 1,387
code2vec: Learning distributed representations of code
Alon, U., Zilberstein, M., Levy, O., & Yahav, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3290353 · Cited by 962
Self-citationFinetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners
Wei, J., Bosma, M., Zhao, V. Y., Guu, K., Yu, A. W., Lester, B., Du, N., Dai, A. M., & Le, Q. V. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.01652 · Cited by 1,101
Metadata
- Authors
- Levy, O., Seo, M., Choi, E., & Zettlemoyer, L.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 333-342
- arXiv
- 1706.04115
- OpenAlex
- W2624677889
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 21
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1252835, 1562364)
- Nvidia
- Tencent
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0019, FA8750)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-16-1-, W911NF)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- zero-shot relation extraction, reading comprehension, natural language queries, distant supervision, zero-shot learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
