The DOI matches its DataCite record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehension
Open accessAbstract
We show that relation extraction can be reduced to answering simple reading comprehension questions, by associating one or more natural-language questions with each relation slot. This reduction has several advantages: we can (1) learn relation-extraction models by extending recent neural reading-comprehension techniques, (2) build very large training sets for those models by combining relation-specific crowd-sourced questions with distant supervision, and even (3) do zero-shot learning by extracting new relation types that are only specified at test-time, for which we have no labeled training examples. Experiments on a Wikipedia slot-filling task demonstrate that the approach can generalize to new questions for known relation types with high accuracy, and that zero-shot generalization to unseen relation types is possible, at lower accuracy levels, setting the bar for future work on this task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We demonstrate empirically that orthogonalized updates significantly outperform naive sequential editing on standard benchmarks (CounterFact [8], zsRE [9]), particularly as the number of edits scales from 1 to 1000.”
From Subspace Collisions in Knowledge Editing: Orthogonal Low-Rank Updates for Scalable, Stable Model Edits (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Standard benchmarks for knowledge editing include: • CounterFact [8]: A dataset of counterfactual edits where models must update their predictions for specific facts. • zsRE [9]: A zero-shot relation extraction dataset adapted for knowledge editing evaluation.”
From Subspace Collisions in Knowledge Editing: Orthogonal Low-Rank Updates for Scalable, Stable Model Edits (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine ComprehensionPreprint
Seo, M. J., Kembhavi, A., Farhadi, A., & Hajishirzi, H. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01603 · Cited by 1,698
Self-citationKnowledge-Based Weak Supervision for Information Extraction of Overlapping Relations
Hoffmann, R., Zhang, C., Ling, X., Zettlemoyer, L., & Weld, D. S. (2011) · Cited by 878
Self-citationRepresenting Text for Joint Embedding of Text and Knowledge Bases
Toutanova, K., Chen, D., Pantel, P., Poon, H., Choudhury, P., & Gamon, M. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1174 · Cited by 827
SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Text
Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., & Liang, P. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05250 · Cited by 678
Relation Extraction with Matrix Factorization and Universal Schemas
Riedel, S., Yao, L., McCallum, A., & Marlin, B. M. (2013) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · Cited by 570
Wikidata: a new platform for collaborative data collection
Vrandečić, D. (2012) · The Web Conference · doi:10.1145/2187980.2188242 · Cited by 528
Large-scale Simple Question Answering with Memory Networks
Bordes, A., Usunier, N., Chopra, S., & Weston, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.02075 · Cited by 528
Dynamic Coattention Networks For Question AnsweringPreprint
Xiong, C., Zhong, V., & Socher, R. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01604 · Cited by 504
Injecting Logical Background Knowledge into Embeddings for Relation Extraction
Rocktäschel, T., Singh, S., & Riedel, S. (2015) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.3115/v1/n15-1118 · Cited by 281
Question-Answer Driven Semantic Role Labeling: Using Natural Language to Annotate Natural Language
He, L., Lewis, M., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2015) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1076 · Cited by 197
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Michele Banko, Michael J. Cafarella, Stephen Soderland, Matt Broadhead, and Oren Et- zioni. 2007. Open information extraction from the web. In Proceedings of the 20th Interna- tional Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence.
- Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Fran- cisco, CA, USA, IJCAI'07, pages 2670-2676. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1625275.1625705. 7 http://nlp.cs.washington.edu/zeroshot
- Thomas Demeester, Tim Rocktäschel, and Sebas- tian Riedel. 2016. Lifted rule injection for re- lation embeddings. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, Austin, Texas, pages 1389-1399. https://aclweb.org/anthology/D16-1146.
- Karl Moritz Hermann, Tomáš Kočiský, Edward Grefenstette, Lasse Espeholt, Will Kay, Mustafa Suleyman, and Phil Blunsom. 2015. Teach- ing machines to read and comprehend. In Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems. http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.03340. · arXiv
- Makoto Miwa and Mohit Bansal. 2016. End-to-end re- lation extraction using lstms on sequences and tree structures. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, pages 1105- 1116. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P16-1105.
- Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. 2014. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, Doha, Qatar, pages 1532-1543. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D14-1162.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuning
Lester, B., Al-Rfou, R., & Constant, N. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.243 · Cited by 3,096
Know What You Don’t Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD
Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2124 · Cited by 2,240
Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-trained Language Models: A Survey
Min, B., Ross, H., Sulem, E., Veyseh, A. P. B., Nguyen, T. H., Sainz, O., Agirre, E., Heintz, I., & Roth, D. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3605943 · Cited by 1,387
code2vec: Learning distributed representations of code
Alon, U., Zilberstein, M., Levy, O., & Yahav, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3290353 · Cited by 962
Self-citationFinetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners
Wei, J., Bosma, M., Zhao, V. Y., Guu, K., Yu, A. W., Lester, B., Du, N., Dai, A. M., & Le, Q. V. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.01652 · Cited by 1,101
Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Dai, Y., Sun, J., Wang, M., & Wang, H. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.10997 · Cited by 876
QuAC: Question Answering in Context
Choi, E., He, H., Iyyer, M., Yatskar, M., Yih, W.-T., Choi, Y., Liang, P., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1241 · Cited by 714
Self-citationA Unified MRC Framework for Named Entity Recognition
Li, X., Feng, J., Meng, Y., Han, Q., Wu, F., & Li, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.519 · Cited by 697
A Survey of Zero-Shot Learning: Settings, Methods, and Applications
Wang, W., Zheng, V. W., Yu, H., & Miao, C. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3293318 · Cited by 528
Benchmarking Zero-shot Text Classification: Datasets, Evaluation and Entailment Approach
Yin, W., Hay, J., & Roth, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1404 · Cited by 537
Unified Structure Generation for Universal Information Extraction
Lu, Y., Liu, Q., Dai, D., Xiao, X., Lin, H., Han, X., Sun, L., & Wu, H. R. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.395 · Cited by 520
Welbl, J., Stenetorp, P., & Riedel, S. (2018) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00021 · Cited by 474
Event Extraction by Answering (Almost) Natural Questions
Du, X., & Cardie, C. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.49 · Cited by 459
COMET: Commonsense Transformers for Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction
Bosselut, A., Rashkin, H., Sap, M., Malaviya, C., Celikyilmaz, A., & Choi, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1470 · Cited by 904
Hybrid Attention-Based Prototypical Networks for Noisy Few-Shot Relation Classification
Gao, T., Han, X., Liu, Z., & Sun, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016407 · Cited by 396
A Comprehensive Survey on Automatic Knowledge Graph Construction
Zhong, L., Wu, J. X., Li, Q., Peng, H., & Wu, X. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3618295 · Cited by 494
Entity-Relation Extraction as Multi-Turn Question Answering
Li, X., Yin, F., Sun, Z., Li, X., Yuan, A., Chai, D., Zhou, M., & Li, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1129 · Cited by 431
DocRED: A Large-Scale Document-Level Relation Extraction Dataset
Yao, Y., Ye, D., Li, P., Han, X., Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Liu, Z., Huang, L., Zhou, J., & Sun, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1074 · Cited by 550
KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Tasks
Petroni, F., Piktus, A., Fan, A., Lewis, P., Yazdani, M., De Cao, N., Thorne, J., Jernite, Y., Karpukhin, V., Maillard, J., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.200 · Cited by 357
Event Extraction as Machine Reading Comprehension
Liu, J., Chen, Y., Liu, K., Bi, W., & Liu, X. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.128 · Cited by 326
♫ MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Composition
Trivedi, H., Balasubramanian, N., Khot, T., & Sabharwal, A. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00475 · Cited by 283
A Knowledge-Enhanced Pretraining Model for Commonsense Story Generation
Guan, J., Huang, F., Zhao, Z., Zhu, X., & Huang, M. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00302 · Cited by 243
Autoregressive Entity RetrievalPreprint
Cao, N. D., Izacard, G., Riedel, S., & Petroni, F. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.00904 · Cited by 384
MRQA 2019 Shared Task: Evaluating Generalization in Reading Comprehension
Fisch, A., Talmor, A., Jia, R., Seo, M., Choi, E., & Chen, D. (2019) · Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5801 · Cited by 254
Self-citationBidirectional Machine Reading Comprehension for Aspect Sentiment Triplet Extraction
Chen, S., Wang, Y., Liu, J., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i14.17500 · Cited by 217
Zero-Shot Transfer Learning for Event Extraction
Huang, L., Ji, H., Cho, K., Dagan, I., Riedel, S., & Voss, C. R. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1201 · Cited by 208
Event Extraction as Multi-turn Question Answering
Li, F., Peng, W., Chen, Y., Wang, Q., Pan, L., Lyu, Y., & Zhu, Y. T. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.73 · Cited by 191
PromptSource: An Integrated Development Environment and Repository for Natural Language Prompts
Bach, S., Sanh, V., Yong, Z. X., Webson, A., Raffel, C., Nayak, N. V., Sharma, A., Kim, T., Bari, M. S., Fevry, T., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-demo.9 · Cited by 178
MetaICL: Learning to Learn In Context
Min, S., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Hajishirzi, H. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.201 · Cited by 169
Self-citationQA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehension
Rogers, A., Gardner, M., & Augenstein, I. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3560260 · Cited by 213
A comprehensive survey on relation extraction: recent advances and new frontiers
Zhao, X., Deng, Y., Yang, M., Wang, L., Zhang, R., Cheng, H., Lam, W., Shen, Y., & Xu, R. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3674501 · Cited by 168
“For example, Levy et al. [86] first formulated the RE task as a question answering (QA) task, where the relations are defined by natural-language question templates.”
Neural Machine Reading Comprehension: Methods and Trends
Liu, S., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Wang, H., & Zhang, W. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9183698 · Cited by 160
CorefQA: Coreference Resolution as Query-based Span Prediction
Wu, W., Wang, F., Yuan, A., Wu, F., & Li, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.622 · Cited by 152
Read + Verify: Machine Reading Comprehension with Unanswerable Questions
Hu, M., Wei, F., Peng, Y., Huang, Z., Yang, N., & Li, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016529 · Cited by 147
Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023
Guo, K., Diefenbach, D., Gourru, A., & Gravier, C. (2023) · doi:10.1145/3543507 · Cited by 152
Learning and Evaluating General Linguistic IntelligencePreprint
Yogatama, D., d’Autume, C. D. M., Connor, J. T., Kočiský, T., Chrzanowski, M., Kong, L., Lazaridou, A., Wang, L., Yu, L., Dyer, C., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.11373 · Cited by 212
Interpretation of Natural Language Rules in Conversational Machine Reading
Saeidi, M., Bartolo, M., Lewis, P., Singh, S., Rocktäschel, T., Sheldon, M., Bouchard, G., & Riedel, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1233 · Cited by 141
Real-Time Open-Domain Question Answering with Dense-Sparse Phrase Index
Seo, M., Lee, J., Kwiatkowski, T., Parikh, A. P., Farhadi, A., & Hajishirzi, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1436 · Cited by 160
Self-citationGlobal-to-Local Neural Networks for Document-Level Relation Extraction
Wang, D., Hu, W. P., Cao, E., & Sun, W. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.303 · Cited by 146
One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddings
Su, H., Shi, W., Kasai, J., Wang, Y., Hu, Y., Mari Ostendorf, E., Yih, W.-T., Smith, N. A., Zettlemoyer, L., & Yu, T. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.71 · Cited by 190
Self-citationMachine Knowledge: Creation and Curation of Comprehensive Knowledge Bases
Weikum, G., Dong, X. L., Razniewski, S., & Suchanek, F. M. (2021) · Foundations and Trends in Databases · doi:10.1561/1900000064 · Cited by 161
Recognizing Emotion Cause in Conversations
Poria, S., Majumder, N., Hazarika, D., Ghosal, D., Bhardwaj, R., Yu, S., Hong, P., Ghosh, R., Roy, A., Chhaya, N., et al. (2021) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-021-09925-7 · Cited by 139
LLMs4OL: Large Language Models for Ontology Learning
Giglou, H. B., D’Souza, J., & Auer, S. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-47240-4_22 · Cited by 212
(2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.632 · Cited by 115
How Context Affects Language Models' Factual Predictions
Petroni, F., Lewis, P., Piktus, A., Rocktäschel, T., Wu, Y., Miller, A. H., & Riedel, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.04611 · Cited by 154
Biomedical named entity recognition using BERT in the machine reading comprehension framework
Sun, C., Yang, Z., Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Lin, H., & Wang, J. (2021) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103799 · Cited by 131
Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer with Meta Learning
Nooralahzadeh, F., Bekoulis, G., Bjerva, J., & Augenstein, I. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.368 · Cited by 110
Dialogue-Based Relation Extraction
Yu, D., Sun, K., Cardie, C., & Yu, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.444 · Cited by 127
CrossFit: A Few-shot Learning Challenge for Cross-task Generalization in NLP
Ye, Q., Lin, B. Y., & Ren, X. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.572 · Cited by 154
Label Verbalization and Entailment for Effective Zero and Few-Shot Relation Extraction
Sainz, O., de Lacalle, O. L., Labaka, G., Barrena, A., & Agirre, E. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.92 · Cited by 119
Re2G: Retrieve, Rerank, Generate
Glass, M., Rossiello, G., Chowdhury, M. F. M., Naik, A., Cai, P., & Gliozzo, A. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.194 · Cited by 186
Editing Factual Knowledge in Language Models
De Cao, N., Aziz, W., & Titov, I. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.522 · Cited by 180
FCCA: Hybrid Code Representation for Functional Clone Detection Using Attention Networks
Hua, W., Sui, Y., Wan, Y., Liu, G., & Xu, G. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Reliability · doi:10.1109/tr.2020.3001918 · Cited by 103
Zero-shot learning for requirements classification: An exploratory study
Alhoshan, W., Ferrari, A., & Zhao, L. (2023) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107202 · Cited by 122
ZS-BERT: Towards Zero-Shot Relation Extraction with Attribute Representation Learning
Chen, C.-Y., & Li, C. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.272 · Cited by 107
Zero-Shot Question Generation from Knowledge Graphs for Unseen Predicates and Entity Types
Elsahar, H., Gravier, C., & Laforest, F. (2018) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1020 · Cited by 93
Paradigm Shift in Natural Language Processing
Sun, T., Liu, X.-Y., Qiu, X., & Huang, X. (2022) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-022-1331-6 · Cited by 103
Continual Learning of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
Shi, H., Xu, Z., Wang, H., Qin, W., Wang, W., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Ebrahimi, S., & Wang, H. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3735633 · Cited by 291
TORQUE: A Reading Comprehension Dataset of Temporal Ordering Questions
Qiang, N., Wu, H., Han, R., Peng, N., Gardner, M., & Roth, D. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.88 · Cited by 92
Representation Learning for Natural Language Processing
Liu, Z., Lin, Y., & Sun, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5573-2 · Cited by 103
Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models: A Survey
Wang, S., Zhu, Y., Liu, H., Zheng, Z., Chen, C., & Li, J. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3698590 · Cited by 79
Zero-shot Relation Classification as Textual Entailment
Obamuyide, A., & Vlachos, A. (2018) · Fact Extraction and VERification Workshop (FEVER) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5511 · Cited by 83
Learning to Extract Attribute Value from Product via Question Answering: A Multi-task Approach
Wang, Q., Li, Y., Kanagal, B., Sanghai, S. K., Sivakumar, D., Shu, B., Yu, Z., & Elsas, J. (2020) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3394486.3403047 · Cited by 86
Zhao, T., Yan, Z., Cao, Y., & Li, Z. (2020) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2020/546 · Cited by 78
Neural reverse engineering of stripped binaries using augmented control flow graphs
David, Y., Alon, U., & Yahav, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · doi:10.1145/3428293 · Cited by 84
Investigating Prior Knowledge for Challenging Chinese Machine Reading Comprehension
Sun, K., Yu, D., Yu, D., & Cardie, C. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00305 · Cited by 94
Few-Shot Question Answering by Pretraining Span Selection
Ram, O., Kirstain, Y., Berant, J., Globerson, A., & Levy, O. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.239 · Cited by 95
Self-citationFrom Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrieval
Li, X., Jin, J., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, P., Zhu, Y., & Dou, Z. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3722552 · Cited by 172
Frisoni, G., Moro, G., & Carbonaro, A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3130956 · Cited by 76
Multi-style Generative Reading Comprehension
Nishida, K., Saito, I., Nishida, K., Shinoda, K., Otsuka, A., Asano, H., & Tomita, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1220 · Cited by 81
ATOM: Commit Message Generation Based on Abstract Syntax Tree and Hybrid Ranking
Liu, S., Gao, C., Chen, S., Nie, L. Y., & Liu, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2020.3038681 · Cited by 93
Learning Dense Representations of Phrases at Scale
Lee, J., Sung, M., Kang, J., & Chen, D. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.518 · Cited by 105
Generalizing Question Answering System with Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuning
Su, D., Xu, Y., Winata, G. I., Xu, P., Kim, H., Liu, Z., & Fung, P. (2019) · Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5827 · Cited by 76
DyKgChat: Benchmarking Dialogue Generation Grounding on Dynamic Knowledge Graphs
Tuan, Y.-L., Chen, Y.-N. (., & Lee, H.-Y. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1194 · Cited by 78
Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., Zhao, J., Wu, Y., Xu, J., & Li, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i16.17720 · Cited by 70
Universal Information Extraction as Unified Semantic Matching
Lou, J., Lu, Y., Dai, D., Jia, W., Lin, H., Han, X., Sun, L., & Wu, H. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i11.26563 · Cited by 87
WebFormer: The Web-page Transformer for Structure Information Extraction
Wang, Q., Fang, Y. Q., Ravula, A., Feng, F., Quan, X., & Liu, D. (2022) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3485447.3512032 · Cited by 80
DeepMet: A Reading Comprehension Paradigm for Token-level Metaphor Detection
Su, C., Fukumoto, F., Huang, X., Li, J., Wang, R., & Chen, Z. (2020) · Workshop on Figurative Language Processing (FigLang) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.figlang-1.4 · Cited by 67
Learning Knowledge Bases with Parameters for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems
Madotto, A., Cahyawijaya, S., Winata, G. I., Xu, Y., Liu, Z., Lin, Z., & Fung, P. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.215 · Cited by 64
Deep Neural Approaches to Relation Triplets Extraction: a Comprehensive Survey
Nayak, T. K., Majumder, N., Goyal, P., & Poria, S. (2021) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-021-09917-7 · Cited by 70
Differentiable Reasoning over a Virtual Knowledge BasePreprint
Dhingra, B., Zaheer, M., Balachandran, V., Neubig, G., Salakhutdinov, R., & Cohen, W. W. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.10640 · Cited by 77
True Few-Shot Learning with Prompts—A Real-World Perspective
Schick, T., & Schütze, H. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00485 · Cited by 81
Reading the Manual: Event Extraction as Definition Comprehension
Chen, Y., Chen, T., Ebner, S., White, A. S., & Durme, B. V. (2020) · Workshop on Structured Prediction for NLP (SPNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.spnlp-1.9 · Cited by 68
Revisiting Large Language Models as Zero-shot Relation Extractors
Li, G., Wang, P., & Ke, W. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.459 · Cited by 96
Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Relation Classification with Limited Supervision
Obamuyide, A., & Vlachos, A. (2019) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1589 · Cited by 60
Learning from Task Descriptions
Weller, O., Lourie, N., Gardner, M., & Peters, M. E. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.105 · Cited by 67
Liu, J., Chen, Y., & Xu, J. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.214 · Cited by 61
QuAC : Question Answering in ContextPreprint
Choi, E., He, H., Iyyer, M., Yatskar, M., Yih, W.-T., Choi, Y., Liang, P., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.07036 · Cited by 209
Self-citationKnowledge-aware Zero-Shot Learning: Survey and Perspective
Chen, J., Geng, Y., Chen, Z., Horrocks, I. R., Pan, J. Z., & Chen, H. (2021) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2021/597 · Cited by 74
Zhang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2023) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11063-023-11266-5 · Cited by 61
CorpusBrain: Pre-train a Generative Retrieval Model for Knowledge-Intensive Language Tasks
Chen, J., Zhang, R., Guo, J., Liu, Y., Fan, Y., & Cheng, X. (2022) · Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/3511808.3557271 · Cited by 57
Prototypical Representation Learning for Relation ExtractionPreprint
Ding, N., Wang, X., Fu, Y., Xu, G., Wang, R., Xie, P., Shen, Y., Huang, F., Zheng, H.-T., & Zhang, R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.11647 · Cited by 64
Heterogeneous graph neural networks for noisy few-shot relation classification
Xie, Y., Xu, H., Jiao-e, L., Yang, C., & Gao, K. (2020) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2020.105548 · Cited by 54
Li, Y., Wang, Q., Yu, Z., Kulkarni, A., Sanghai, S. K., Shu, B., Elsas, J., & Kanagal, B. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3488560.3498377 · Cited by 73
Can We Edit Factual Knowledge by In-Context Learning?
Zheng, C., Li, L., Dong, Q., Fan, Y., Wu, Z., Xu, J., & Chang, B. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.296 · Cited by 54
SPARTA: Efficient Open-Domain Question Answering via Sparse Transformer Matching Retrieval
Zhao, T., Lu, X., & Lee, K. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.47 · Cited by 81
Towards Continual Knowledge Learning of Language Models
Jang, J., Ye, S., Yang, S., Shin, J., Han, J., Kim, G., Choi, S. J., & Seo, M. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.03215 · Cited by 49
“Experimental Result We first focus on the performance on zero-shot Relation Extraction (zsRE), which is measured on the dev set of 12 relations that are ensured to have no overlap with the 84 relations of the train set (Levy et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMulti-Task Retrieval for Knowledge-Intensive Tasks
Maillard, J., Karpukhin, V., Petroni, F., Yih, W.-T., Oğuz, B., Stoyanov, V., & Ghosh, G. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.89 · Cited by 67
Learning to Ask Unanswerable Questions for Machine Reading Comprehension
Zhu, H., Dong, L., Wei, F., Wang, W., Qin, B., & Liu, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1415 · Cited by 48
pair2vec: Compositional Word-Pair Embeddings for Cross-Sentence Inference
Joshi, M., Choi, E., Levy, O., Weld, D. S., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1362 · Cited by 50
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Levy, O., Seo, M., Choi, E., & Zettlemoyer, L.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- Pages
- 333-342
- arXiv
- 1706.04115
- OpenAlex
- W2624677889
- Cited by
- 482
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 21
- FWCI
- 17.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1252835, 1562364)
- Nvidia
- Tencent
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-13-2-0019, FA8750)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-16-1-, W911NF)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- zero-shot relation extraction, reading comprehension, natural language queries, distant supervision, zero-shot learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
