PreprintCited by 47Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentMachine Learning and Algorithms

Observational Learning by Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Borsa, Diana, Piot, Bilal, Munos, Rémi, Pietquin, Olivier·2017·arXiv

Abstract

Observational learning is a type of learning that occurs as a function of observing, retaining and possibly replicating or imitating the behaviour of another agent. It is a core mechanism appearing in various instances of social learning and has been found to be employed in several intelligent species, including humans. In this paper, we investigate to what extent the explicit modelling of other agents is necessary to achieve observational learning through machine learning. Especially, we argue that observational learning can emerge from pure Reinforcement Learning (RL), potentially coupled with memory. Through simple scenarios, we demonstrate that an RL agent can leverage the information provided by the observations of an other agent performing a task in a shared environment. The other agent is only observed through the effect of its actions on the environment and never explicitly modeled. Two key aspects are borrowed from observational learning: i) the observer behaviour needs to change as a result of viewing a 'teacher' (another agent) and ii) the observer needs to be motivated somehow to engage in making use of the other agent's behaviour. The later is naturally modeled by RL, by correlating the learning agent's reward with the teacher agent's behaviour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1706.06617

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior work on emergent social learning in RL has only considered one iteration of information transmission from an expert to a student.

    “However, these works have only considered one iteration of information transmission from an expert to a student.”

    From Artificial Generational Intelligence: Cultural Accumulation in Reinforcement Learning (2024) · cites this paper as Borsa et al., 2017

    The Introduction (p. 2) describes this paper’s scenarios as involving a learner observing an expert, and the Conclusion (p. 8) describes an agent that learned from a teacher and could then act without one. This supports a single expert-to-student transmission in this study, but the paper does not establish that prior work generally considered only one iteration. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior work has successfully demonstrated emergent social learning in RL, showing that it helps agents solve hard exploration problems and adapt online to new tasks.

    “Prior work has successfully demonstrated emergent social learning in RL [Borsa et al., 2017, Ndousse et al., 2021, Bhoopchand et al., 2023], showing that it helps agents solve hard exploration problems and adapt online to new tasks.”
  • Machines can learn to seek and transmit information and can act as conversational and pedagogical agents, similar to teachers.

    “Besides serving as a persistent medium of cultural storage analogous to a book, machines can learn to seek and transmit information 79,81 and can act as conversational and pedagogical agents, similar to teachers 82 .”

    From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [81]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [4][4] Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural computation , 9(8):1735-1780, 1997. -
  2. [5][5] Junyoung Chung, Caglar Gulcehre, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. Gated feedback recurrent neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , 2015. -
  3. [6][6] Volodymyr Mnih, Adria Puigdomenech Badia, Mehdi Mirza, Alex Graves, Timothy Lillicrap, Tim Harley, David Silver, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. Asynchronous methods for deep reinforcement learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , 2016. -
  4. [16][16] S. Russell. Learning agents for uncertain environments. In Proceedings of the Conference on Learning Theory (COLT) , 1998. -
  5. [21][21] Stéphane Ross, Geoffrey J. Gordon, and J. Andrew Bagnell. A reduction of imitation learning and structured prediction to no-regret online learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on AI and Statistics (AISTATS) , 2011. -
  6. [24][24] Bilal Piot, Olivier Pietquin, and Matthieu Geist. Predicting when to laugh with structured classification. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH , 2014. -
  7. [26][26] Bradly C Stadie, Pieter Abbeel, and Ilya Sutskever. Third-person imitation learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2017. -
  8. [28][28] Bilal Piot, Matthieu Geist, and Olivier Pietquin. Boosted and reward-regularized classification for apprenticeship learning. In Proceedings of the 2014 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS) , 2014. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borsa, D., Piot, B., Munos, R., & Pietquin, O.
Affiliations
  • Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
Pages
1117-1124
ISSN
1548-8403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964014957
Cited by
47
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
3.06
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agents Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
observational learning, reinforcement learning, social learning, imitation, emergent learning, memory, reward function design, multi-agent learning, shared environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review