The DOI matches its DataCite record; 63 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learned in Translation: Contextualized Word Vectors
Open accessAbstract
Computer vision has benefited from initializing multiple deep layers with weights pretrained on large supervised training sets like ImageNet. Natural language processing (NLP) typically sees initialization of only the lowest layer of deep models with pretrained word vectors. In this paper, we use a deep LSTM encoder from an attentional sequence-to-sequence model trained for machine translation (MT) to contextualize word vectors. We show that adding these context vectors (CoVe) improves performance over using only unsupervised word and character vectors on a wide variety of common NLP tasks: sentiment analysis (SST, IMDb), question classification (TREC), entailment (SNLI), and question answering (SQuAD). For fine-grained sentiment analysis and entailment, CoVe improves performance of our baseline models to the state of the art.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The increase of 4.7% with ELMo is also significantly larger then the 1.8% improvement from adding CoVe to a baseline model (McCann et al., 2017).”
From Deep Contextualized Word Representations (2018) · cites this paper as McCann et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For tasks where direct comparisons are possible, ELMo outperforms CoVe (McCann et al., 2017), which computes contextualized representations using a neural machine translation encoder.”
From Deep Contextualized Word Representations (2018) · cites this paper as McCann et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · cited 2×
“[2016] propose to combine text representations with visual representations extracted by a pretrained residual network [He et al., 2016].”
BackgroundMethodVery Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition
Simonyan, K., & Zisserman, A. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.1556 · Cited by 114,148 · cited 1×
“Qi et al. [2016] propose a CNN-based object tracking framework, which uses hierarchical features from a pretrained CNN (VGG-19 by Simonyan and Zisserman [2014]).”
MethodImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333 · cited 1×
“In computer vision, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) pretrained on ImageNet [Krizhevsky et al., 2012, Deng et al., 2009] have become the de facto initialization for more complex and deeper models.”
MethodSelf-citationGlove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071 · cited 14×
“The MT-LSTM is used to compute a sequence of hidden states h = MT-LSTM ( GloVe ( w x )) .”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationRich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.81 · Cited by 32,684 · cited 1×
“Girshick et al. [2014] show that using a pretrained CNN to extract features from region proposals improves object detection and semantic segmentation models.”
MethodBatch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818 · cited 1×
“…representation for all inputs. x pool = max( X | y ); mean( X | y ); min( X | y ); x self (15) We feed this joined representation through a three-layer, batch-normalized [Ioffe and Szegedy, 2015] maxout network [Goodfellow et al., 2013] to produce a probability distribution over possible classes.”
MethodEfficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766 · cited 1×
“Sutskever et al. [2014] investigate sequence-to-sequence models that consist of a neural network encoder and decoder for machine translation.”
BackgroundNeural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate
Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.0473 · Cited by 16,213 · cited 1×
“Bahdanau et al. [2015] propose the augmenting sequence to sequence models with an attention mechanism that gives the decoder access to the encoder representations of the input sequence at each step of sequence generation.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Q. Chen, X.-D. Zhu, Z.-H. Ling, S. Wei, and H. Jiang. Enhancing and combining sequential and tree LSTM for natural language inference. CoRR , abs/1609.06038, 2016. · arXiv
- A. L. Maas, R. E. Daly, P. T. Pham, D. Huang, A. Y. Ng, and C. Potts. Learning word vectors for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies , pages 142-150, Portland, Oregon, USA, June 2011. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P11-1015 .
- H. T. Madabushi and M. Lee. High accuracy rule-based question classification using question syntax and semantics. In COLING , 2016.
- V. Nair and G. E. Hinton. Rectified linear units improve restricted Boltzmann machines. In ICML , 2010.
- L. Sha, B. Chang, Z. Sui, and S. Li. Reading and thinking: Re-read LSTM unit for textual entailment recognition. In COLING , 2016.
- Y. Yu, W. Zhang, K. Hasan, M. Yu, B. Xiang, and B. Zhou. End-to-end reading comprehension with dynamic answer chunk ranking. ICLR , 2017.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
“For tasks where direct comparisons are possible, ELMo outperforms CoVe (McCann et al., 2017), which computes contextualized representations using a neural machine translation encoder.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTransformers: State-of-the-Art Natural Language Processing
Wolf, T., Debut, L., Sanh, V., Chaumond, J., Delangue, C., Moi, A., Cistac, P., Rault, T., Louf, R., Funtowicz, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-demos.6 · Cited by 8,741
“Model pretraining (McCann et al., 2017; Howard and Ruder, 2018; Peters et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2018) allows models to be trained on generic corpora and subsequently be easily adapted to specific tasks with strong performance.”
BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining
Lee, J., Yoon, W., Kim, S., Kim, D., Kim, S., So, C. H., & Kang, J. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz682 · Cited by 7,218
“For instance, ELMo (Peters et al. , 2018) uses a bidirectional language model while CoVe (McCann et al. , 2017) uses machine translation to embed context information into word representations.”
MethodUniversal Language Model Fine-tuning for Text Classification
Howard, J., & Ruder, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1031 · Cited by 4,100
Pre-trained models for natural language processing: A survey
Qiu, X., Sun, T., Xu, Y., Shao, Y., Dai, N., & Huang, X. (2020) · Science China Technological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11431-020-1647-3 · Cited by 1,591
“[126] pre-trained a deep LSTM encoder from an attentional sequence-to-sequence model with machine translation (MT).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHow to Fine-Tune BERT for Text Classification?
Sun, C., Qiu, X., Xu, Y., & Huang, X. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32381-3_16 · Cited by 1,534
“, 2017) and machine translation (McCann et al., 2017).”
InfluentialPre-trained models: Past, present and future
Han, X., Zhang, Z., Ding, N., Gu, Y., Liu, X., Huo, Y., Qiu, J., Yao, Y., Zhang, A., Zhang, L., et al. (2021) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.08.002 · Cited by 994
“Although some supervised pre-training methods like CoVE have achieved promising results on NLP tasks, it is nearly impossible to annotate a textual dataset as large as ImageNet, considering annotating textual data is far more complex than annotating images.”
MethodEvaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization
Kryscinski, W., McCann, B., Xiong, C., & Socher, R. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.750 · Cited by 669
“…(Cho et al., 2014; Sutskever et al., 2014; Bahdanau et al., 2015; Vinyals et al., 2015; Vaswani et al., 2017), pre-training and transfer learning (McCann et al., 2017; Peters et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2018), and availability of large-scale supervised datasets (Sandhaus, 2008; Nallapati et…”
BackgroundSelf-citationTaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Data
Yin, P., Neubig, G., Yih, W.-T., & Riedel, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.745 · Cited by 487
“These models allow us to capture the syntax and semantics of text via representations learned in an unsupervised manner, before fine-tuning the model to downstream tasks (Melamud et al., 2016; McCann et al., 2017; Peters et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019b; Yang et al., 2019; Goldberg, 2019).”
MethodPointCLIP: Point Cloud Understanding by CLIP
Zhang, R., Guo, Z., Zhang, W., Li, K., Miao, X., Cui, B., Qiao, Y., Gao, P., & Li, H. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00836 · Cited by 538
“Also in natural language processing, representations pre-trained on web-crawled corpus via Mask Language Model [10] achieves leading performance on machine translation [38] and natural language inference [8].”
BackgroundDissecting Contextual Word Embeddings: Architecture and Representation
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Yih, W.-T. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1179 · Cited by 434
“In addition to biLM-based representations, McCann et al. (2017) learned contextualized vectors with a neural machine translation system (CoVe).”
MethodNeural Machine Translation: A Review
Stahlberg, F. (2020) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.12007 · Cited by 495
“A newly emerging type of contextualized word embeddings (Peters et al., 2017; McCann et al., 2017) is gaining popularity in various fields of NLP.”
BackgroundMassively Multilingual Neural Machine Translation
Aharoni, R., Johnson, M., & Firat, O. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1388 · Cited by 402
“duce the performance degradation when increasing the number of languages, or using such models for multilingual transfer learning (McCann et al., 2017; Eriguchi et al., 2018; Artetxe and Schwenk, 2018).”
BackgroundSemi-Supervised Sequence Modeling with Cross-View Training
Clark, K., Luong, M.-T., Manning, C. D., & Le, Q. V. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1217 · Cited by 368
“Pre-training on other tasks such as machine translation has also been studied (McCann et al., 2017).”
Exploring Pre-trained Language Models for Event Extraction and Generation
Yang, S., Feng, D., Qiao, L., Kan, Z., & Li, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1522 · Cited by 376
“McCann et al. (2017) exploits language model pre-trained on supervised translation corpus in the target task.”
MethodFrom Word To Sense Embeddings: A Survey on Vector Representations of Meaning
Camacho-Collados, J., & Pilehvar, M. T. (2018) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.11259 · Cited by 393
“…been evaluated in a wide range of NLP tasks, including sentiment analysis, question answering and classification, textual entailment, semantic role labeling, reading comprehension, named entity extraction, and coreference resolution (Peters et al., 2018; Salant & Berant, 2018; McCann et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodExploiting BERT for End-to-End Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis
Li, X., Bing, L., Zhang, W., & Lam, W. P. (2019) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-5505 · Cited by 414
“We compare with Existing Models , including tailor-made E2E-ABSA models (Li et al., 2019a; Luo et al., 2019; He et al., 2019), and competitive LSTM-CRF sequence labeling models (Lample et al., 2016; Ma and Hovy, 2016; Liu et al., 2018).”
MethodInfluentialNguyen, D.-K., & Okatani, T. (2018) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00637 · Cited by 352
“It is worth noting that we initially used a pretrained twolayer Bi-LSTM that yields Context Vectors (CoVe) in [18], which we found does not contribute to performance.”
MethodThe language of proteins: NLP, machine learning & protein sequences
Ofer, D., Brandes, N., & Linial, M. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.03.022 · Cited by 365
“A CoVe model pretrained on translation was then used on other NLP tasks.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddings
Zhao, J., Wang, T., Yatskar, M., Cotterell, R., Ordóñez, V., & Chang, K.-W. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1064 · Cited by 367
“, 2014) and contextualized word embeddings (Peters et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2018; Radford et al., 2018; McCann et al., 2017; Radford et al., 2019) have led to huge performance improvement on many NLP tasks.”
BackgroundBeneath the Tip of the Iceberg: Current Challenges and New Directions in Sentiment Analysis Research
Poria, S., Hazarika, D., Majumder, N., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2020.3038167 · Cited by 362
“As seen in Figure 1, the recent works based on neural architectures (Le & Mikolov, 2014; Dai & Le, 2015; Johnson & Zhang, 2016; Miyato et al., 2017; McCann et al., 2017; Howard & Ruder, 2018; Xie et al., 2019; Thongtan & Phienthrakul, 2019) have dominated over traditional machine learning models (Maas et al.”
BackgroundFine-tuned Language Models for Text Classification.Preprint
Howard, J., & Ruder, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 357
Wieting, J., & Gimpel, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1042 · Cited by 356
“, 2014a,b) and words-in-context (McCann et al., 2017).”
Transformer based Deep Intelligent Contextual Embedding for Twitter sentiment analysis
Naseem, U., Razzak, I., Musiał, K., & Imran, M. A. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.06.050 · Cited by 311
A transformer-based approach to irony and sarcasm detection
Potamias, R. A., Siolas, G., & Stafylopatis, A. (2020) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-020-05102-3 · Cited by 328
“, [70,71,60]) it is argued that the”
A Review of Current Trends, Techniques, and Challenges in Large Language Models (LLMs)
Patil, R., & Gudivada, V. N. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14052074 · Cited by 355
“The dynamic embed-dings, such as C2V [15], CoVe [16], ELMo [17], ULMFiT [18], UNILM [19], etc., being context-sensitive, were able to address the polysemy aspect of words.”
BackgroundDetecting AI Trojans Using Meta Neural Analysis
Xu, X., Wang, Q., Li, H., Borisov, N., Gunter, C. A., & Li, B. (2021) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/sp40001.2021.00034 · Cited by 306
“Deep learning using Neural Networks (NNs) has achieved state-of-the-art performance in a wide variety of domains, including computer vision [30], speech recognition [21], machine translation [40], and game playing [47].”
BackgroundNeural Natural Language Inference Models Enhanced with External Knowledge
Chen, Q., Zhu, X., Ling, Z.-H., Inkpen, D. Z., & Wei, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1224 · Cited by 283
“(Parikh et al., 2016) 86.8 NTI (Yu and Munkhdalai, 2017b) 87.3 Re-read LSTM (Sha et al., 2016) 87.5 BiMPM (Wang et al., 2017) 87.5 DIIN (Gong et al., 2017) 88.0 BCN + CoVe (McCann et al., 2017) 88.1 CAFE (Tay et al., 2018) 88.5 ESIM (Chen et al., 2017a) 88.0 KIM (This paper) 88.6 Table 2: Accuracies of models on SNLI.”
InfluentialA Survey on Text Classification Algorithms: From Text to Predictions
Gasparetto, A., Marcuzzo, M., Zangari, A., & Albarelli, A. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13020083 · Cited by 305
Cross-lingual Transfer Learning for Multilingual Task Oriented Dialog
Schuster, S., Gupta, S., Shah, R., & Lewis, M. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1380 · Cited by 270
“[21], we train a neural machine translation model to translate from the low-resource language (Spanish or Thai) to English.”
MethodFrom Zero to Hero: On the Limitations of Zero-Shot Language Transfer with Multilingual Transformers
Lauscher, A., Ravishankar, V., Vulić, I., & Glavaš, G. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.363 · Cited by 283
Li, C. (2019) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781351006620-6 · Cited by 257
Lessons from Natural Language Inference in the Clinical Domain
Romanov, A., & Shivade, C. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1187 · Cited by 249
“, 2013) and CoVe (McCann et al., 2017) did not show any gains.”
BackgroundMethodKhan, W., Daud, A. Y., Khan, K., Muhammad, S., & Haq, R. (2023) · Natural Language Processing Journal · doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100026 · Cited by 260
Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning with Diff Pruning
Guo, D., Rush, A., & Kim, Y. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.378 · Cited by 220
“Pretraining objectives include context prediction (Mikolov et al., 2013), autoencoding (Dai & Le, 2015), machine translation (McCann et al., 2017), and more recently, variants of language modeling (Peters et al., 2018; Radford et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2019) objectives.”
BackgroundA Survey of Text Representation and Embedding Techniques in NLP
Patil, R., Boit, S., Gudivada, V. N., & Nandigam, J. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3266377 · Cited by 276
“Reference [47] proposed context-Vectors (CoVe) derived from deep LSTM encoder of an attentional seq-to-seq model trained for machine translation task.”
MethodUnsupervised speech representation learning using WaveNet autoencoders
Chorowski, J., Weiss, R. J., Bengio, S., & van den Oord, A. (2019) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2019.2938863 · Cited by 325
“Likewise, in natural language processing, universal text representations can be extracted from networks trained for machine translation [32] or language inference [33], [34].”
BackgroundZhao, W., Wang, L., Shen, K., Jia, R., & Liu, J. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1014 · Cited by 240
“CoVe (McCann et al., 2017) pre-trained a encoder.”
Semantic Sentence Matching with Densely-Connected Recurrent and Co-Attentive Information
Kim, S., Kang, I.-H., & Kwak, N. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016586 · Cited by 217
Stochastic Answer Networks for Machine Reading Comprehension
Liu, X., Shen, Y., Duh, K., & Gao, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1157 · Cited by 205
“To avoiding over-fitting, we concatenate the output of a pre-trained 600-dimensional contextualized embedding 1 (McCann et al., 2017), which is trained on English-German machine translation dataset, with the aforementioned lexicon embeddings as the final input of contextual encoding layer.”
MethodA Survey of Sentiment Analysis Based on Transfer Learning
Liu, R., Shi, Y., Ji, C., & Jia, M. Q. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2925059 · Cited by 199
“Schematic diagram of the process about combining other tasks with the target task [48].”
MethodA Survey of Textual Emotion Recognition and Its Challenges
Deng, J., & Ren, F. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2021.3053275 · Cited by 214
“The works in [62] learn contextualized word vectors (CoVe) by training an encoder in the supervised machine translation system.”
BackgroundBackdoor Embedding in Convolutional Neural Network Models via Invisible Perturbation
Zhong, H., Liao, C., Squicciarini, A., Zhu, S., & Miller, D. J. (2020) · ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy (CODASPY) · doi:10.1145/3374664.3375751 · Cited by 332
“ral language processing (NLP) [35], automatic speech recognition (ASR) [1], etc.”
BackgroundSchuster, T., Ram, O., Barzilay, R., & Globerson, A. (2019) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1162 · Cited by 185
“While MUSE operates over token based embeddings, we are interested in aligning contextual embeddings, which have shown their benefits in several monolingual applications (Peters et al., 2018; McCann et al., 2017; Howard and Ruder, 2018; Radford et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2018).”
BackgroundAdversarial and Domain-Aware BERT for Cross-Domain Sentiment Analysis
Du, C., Sun, H., Wang, J., Qi, Q., & Liao, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.370 · Cited by 186
“The recent proposed feature-based approaches mainly focus on learning contextualized word representations such as CoVe (McCann et al., 2017) and ELMo (Peters et al.”
BackgroundA survey on deep learning for textual emotion analysis in social networks
Peng, S., Cao, L., Zhou, Y., Ouyang, Z., Yang, A., Li, X., Weijia Jia, B., & Yu, S. (2021) · Digital Communications and Networks · doi:10.1016/j.dcan.2021.10.003 · Cited by 204
Financial Sentiment Analysis: Techniques and Applications
Du, K., Xing, F., Mao, R., & Cambria, E. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3649451 · Cited by 215
“FISHQA has achieved an accuracy of 0.9446 and an F1-Score of 0.9449, followed by HAN, a model that adopts hierarchical networks with an attention mechanism of random initialization, having an accuracy of 0.9177 and an F1-Score of 0.9166.”
MethodInfluentialVisualizing and Understanding the Effectiveness of BERT
Hao, Y., Dong, L., Wei, F., & Xu, K. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1424 · Cited by 217
“Pre-trained contextualized word representations learned from language modeling objectives, such as CoVe (McCann et al., 2017), ELMo (Peters et al., 2018), ULMFit (Howard and Ruder, 2018b), GPT (Radford et al., 2018, 2019), and BERT (Devlin et al., 2018), have shown strong performance on a variety…”
MethodIncorporating Context into Language Encoding Models for fMRI
Jain, S., & Huth, A. G. (2018) · doi:10.1101/327601 · Cited by 155
“Some previous natural language processing works use only the last layer (17; 12) while others use a linear combination across layers (18).”
BackgroundUnicoder: A Universal Language Encoder by Pre-training with Multiple Cross-lingual Tasks
Huang, H., Liang, Y., Duan, N., Gong, M., Shou, L., Jiang, D., & Zhou, M. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1252 · Cited by 179
“, 2018) and machine translation (McCann et al., 2017) have shown significant improvement on various natu-”
BackgroundMethodTrewartha, A., Walker, N., Huo, H., Lee, S.-H., Cruse, K., Dagdelen, J. M., Dunn, A., Persson, K. A., Ceder, G., & Jain, A. (2022) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2022.100488 · Cited by 181
Neural Machine Reading Comprehension: Methods and Trends
Liu, S., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Wang, H., & Zhang, W. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9183698 · Cited by 160
“[24] try to bring the benefit of transfer learning to NLP tasks.”
BackgroundThe NLP Cookbook: Modern Recipes for Transformer Based Deep Learning Architectures
Singh, S. K., & Mahmood, A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3077350 · Cited by 178
“Subsequent research works enhanced learning to capture contextualized word representations and transferred them to neural models [53],[54].”
BackgroundSIFRank: A New Baseline for Unsupervised Keyphrase Extraction Based on Pre-Trained Language Model
Sun, Y., Qiu, H., Zheng, Y., Wang, Z., & Zhang, C. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2965087 · Cited by 163
“[21] inputs the static word embeddings GloVe into the supervised neural machine translation task to get the context-based embeddings.”
MethodEfficient and Robust Question Answering from Minimal Context over Documents
Min, S., Zhong, V., Socher, R., & Xiong, C. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1160 · Cited by 150
“…the question by concate-nating 300 -dimensional Glove embeddings pre-trained on the 840B Common Crawl corpus (Pen-nington et al., 2014), 100 -dimensional character n-gram embeddings by Hashimoto et al. (2017), and 300 -dimensional contextualized embeddings pre-trained on WMT (McCann et al., 2017).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAnalysing Lexical Semantic Change with Contextualised Word Representations
Giulianelli, M., Tredici, M. D., & Fernández, R. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.365 · Cited by 184
“Recently, neural contextualised word representations have gained widespread use in NLP, thanks to deep learning models which learn usage-dependent representations while optimising tasks such as machine translation (CoVe; McCann et al., 2017) and language modelling (Dai and Le, 2015, ULMFiT; Howard and Ruder, 2018, ELM…”
BackgroundMethodLearning to Compose Task-Specific Tree Structures
Choi, J., Yoo, K. M., & Lee, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11975 · Cited by 25
“The authors of (McCann et al. 2017) stated that utilizing pretraining and character n-gram embeddings improves validation accuracy by 2.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSemantic Communication System Based on Semantic Slice Models Propagation
Chen, D., Liang, H., Xu, X., Han, S., Wang, B., & Zhang, P. (2022) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2022.3221948 · Cited by 149
“A big corpus-based pre-training model (PTM) has been used in a variety of NLP tasks [4], [5], [6], [7].”
MethodImproving BERT-Based Text Classification With Auxiliary Sentence and Domain Knowledge
Yu, S., Su, J., & Luo, D. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2953990 · Cited by 135
Cross-Lingual Natural Language Generation via Pre-Training
Chi, Z., Li, D., Wei, F., Wang, W., Mao, X.-L., & Huang, H. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6256 · Cited by 133
A Review of Text Corpus-Based Tourism Big Data Mining
Li, Q., Li, S., Zhang, S., Hu, J., & Hu, J. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9163300 · Cited by 145
“For example, contextual word vectors (CoVe) [29] capture contextual information by an encoder in an attentional seq-to-seq machine translation model; and embeddings from language model (ELMO) [30] extracts context-sensitive features from a bidirectional language model (biLM).”
Gaussian Transformer: A Lightweight Approach for Natural Language Inference
Guo, M., Zhang, Y., & Liu, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016489 · Cited by 130
“Besides training a neural model using only NLI datasets from scratch, approaches leveraging external resources (Chen et al. 2017a; Peters et al. 2018; Radford et al. 2018; McCann et al. 2017; Pan et al. 2018) emerged recently and further improved the performance of NLI.”
MethodDistilling Knowledge Learned in BERT for Text Generation
Chen, Y.-C., Gan, Z., Yu, C., Liu, J., & Liu, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.705 · Cited by 151
“Recently, CoVe (McCann et al., 2017) introduced (conditional) language models pre-trained on paired machine translation corpus.”
MethodVillegas-Morcillo, A., Makrodimitris, S., van Ham, R. C. H. J., Gomez, A. M., Sanchez, V., & Reinders, M. J. T. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa701 · Cited by 122
A Comparative Study on Word Embeddings in Deep Learning for Text Classification
Wang, C., Nulty, P., & Lillis, D. (2020) · International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval (NLPIR) · doi:10.1145/3443279.3443304 · Cited by 136
“Although there are many other well-developed neural network models, such as C-LSTM [36], bi-attentional classification network [20], etc.”
MethodInfluentialContextualized Weak Supervision for Text Classification
Mekala, D., & Shang, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.30 · Cited by 122
“CoVe (McCann et al., 2017) generates contextualized representations for a word based on pre-trained MT models, More recently, ELMo (Peters et al.”
MethodDynamic Meta-Embeddings for Improved Sentence Representations
Kiela, D., Wang, C., & Cho, K. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1176 · Cited by 131
“…representations have been used in neural machine translation as well, e.g. for learning contextual word vectors and applying them in other tasks (McCann et al., 2017) or for learning context-dependent representations to solve disambiguation problems in machine translation Choi et al. (2016).”
BackgroundSemEval-2018 Task 11: Machine Comprehension Using Commonsense Knowledge
Ostermann, S., Roth, M., Modi, A., Thater, S., & Pinkal, M. (2018) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/s18-1119 · Cited by 116
“Jiangnan (Xia, 2018) applies a BiLSTM over GloVe and CoVe embeddings (McCann et al., 2017) with an additional attention mechanism.”
MethodZhang, K., & Bowman, S. R. (2018) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5448 · Cited by 168
“These findings begin to shed light on why pretrained representations, like ELMo and CoVe, are so beneficial for neural language understanding models (Peters et al., 2018; McCann et al., 2017).”
BackgroundBERT Representations for Video Question Answering
Yang, Z., García, N., Chu, C., Otani, M., Nakashima, Y., & Takemura, H. (2020) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv45572.2020.9093596 · Cited by 111
“…encoder in an unsupervised way; in [35], sentiment tree banks and recursive neural tensor networks are used to represent language features; in [27], a LSTM encoder from attentional sequence-to-sequence model is used to contextualize word vectors; in [44], XL-Net, a generalized auto-regressive…”
MethodUER: An Open-Source Toolkit for Pre-training Models
Zhao, Z., Chen, H., Zhang, J., Zhao, X. W., Liu, T., Lu, W., Chen, X., Deng, H., Ju, Q., & Du, X. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-3041 · Cited by 107
“Table 1 lists 8 popular pre-training models and their main differences (Kiros et al., 2015; Lo-geswaran and Lee, 2018; McCann et al., 2017; Conneau et al., 2017; Peters et al., 2018; Howard and Ruder, 2018; Radford et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialChallenges and Opportunities of Text-Based Emotion Detection: A Survey
Maruf, A. A., Khanam, F., Haque, M. M., Jiyad, Z. M., Mridha, M. F., & Aung, Z. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3356357 · Cited by 126
“This method was developed by McCann et al. [140].”
MethodExtending a Parser to Distant Domains Using a Few Dozen Partially Annotated Examples
Joshi, V., Peters, M. E., & Hopkins, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1110 · Cited by 109
“The use of contextualized word representations (Peters et al., 2017; McCann et al., 2017) greatly reduces the amount of data needed to train linguistic models.”
BackgroundInvestigating Meta-Learning Algorithms for Low-Resource Natural Language Understanding Tasks
Dou, Z.-Y., Yu, K., & Anastasopoulos, A. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1112 · Cited by 102
“Recently, there is a trend of learning contextualized word embeddings (Dai and Le, 2015; McCann et al., 2017; Peters et al., 2018; Howard and Ruder, 2018).”
BackgroundConversational transfer learning for emotion recognition
Hazarika, D., Poria, S., Zimmermann, R., & Mihalcea, R. F. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.06.005 · Cited by 115
CharBERT: Character-aware Pre-trained Language Model
Ma, W., Cui, Y., Si, C., Liu, T., Wang, S., & Hu, G. (2020) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.4 · Cited by 127
“Early pre-trained language models (PLMs) like CoVe (McCann et al., 2017) and ELMo (Peters et al.”
Cross-Lingual BERT Transformation for Zero-Shot Dependency Parsing
Wang, Y., Che, W., Guo, J., Liu, Y., & Liu, T. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1575 · Cited by 101
“…the sense that they do not change with the context.2 Recently, contextualized word embeddings derived from large-scale pre-trained language models (McCann et al., 2017; Peters et al., 2017, 2018; ∗Email corresponding 1Our code is released at https://github.com/ WangYuxuan93/CLBT 2In this paper,…”
BackgroundTay, Y., Luu, A. T., & Hui, S. C. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1185 · Cited by 118
“However, for the sake of completeness, we still report their scores 2 (McCann et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2017a; Peters et al., 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialCan You Tell Me How to Get Past Sesame Street? Sentence-Level Pretraining Beyond Language Modeling
Wang, A., Hůla, J., Xia, P., Pappagari, R. R., McCoy, R. T., Patel, R., Kim, N., Tenney, I. F., Huang, Y., Yu, K., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1439 · Cited by 109
“More recent reusable sentence encoders such as CoVe (McCann et al., 2017) and GPT (Radford et al., 2018) instead represent sentences as sequences of vectors.”
MethodProbing What Different NLP Tasks Teach Machines about Function Word Comprehension
Kim, N., Patel, R., Poliak, A., Xia, P., Wang, A., McCoy, T., Tenney, I., Ross, A., Linzen, T., Durme, B. V., et al. (2019) · Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics · doi:10.18653/v1/s19-1026 · Cited by 92
“Varying these factors can significantly impact performance on a broad range of NLP tasks (McCann et al., 2017; Peters et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2019).”
BackgroundFrom Word Embeddings to Pre-Trained Language Models: A State-of-the-Art Walkthrough
Mars, M. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12178805 · Cited by 91
“Language pre-training has been highly successful, with state-of-the-art models such as GPT, BERT, XLNet, ERNIE, ELECTRA, and T5, among many others [8,19,20,23–25].”
MethodConversing by Reading: Contentful Neural Conversation with On-demand Machine Reading
Qin, L., Galley, M., Brockett, C., Liu, X., Gao, X., Dolan, B., Choi, Y., & Gao, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1539 · Cited by 100
“The aforementioned token vectors are concatenated with pre-trained 600-dimensional CoVe vectors (McCann et al., 2017), and then fed to a BiL- 2https://github.com/kevinduh/san_mrc Embedding FFN Bi-LSTM +CoVe Embedding FFN Bi-LSTM +CoVe Bi-LSTMSelf-Attn ... fell several meters…”
MethodInterpreting Recurrent and Attention-Based Neural Models: a Case Study on Natural Language Inference
Ghaeini, R., Fern, X., & Tadepalli, P. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1537 · Cited by 91
“Many of the top performing NLI models (Ghaeini et al., 2018b; Tay et al., 2018; Peters et al., 2018; McCann et al., 2017; Gong et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2017), are variants of the ESIM model (Chen et al.”
MethodShow Your Work: Improved Reporting of Experimental Results
Dodge, J., Gururangan, S., Card, D., Schwartz, R., & Smith, N. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1224 · Cited by 233
“2 we show the expected performance of the biattentive classification network (BCN; McCann et al., 2017) with three embedding approaches (GloVe only, GloVe + ELMo frozen, and GloVe”
BackgroundBetter Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialogue Systems with Contextualized Embeddings
Ghazarian, S., Wei, J. T.-Z., Galstyan, A., & Peng, N. (2019) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-2310 · Cited by 90
“consider word embeddings as a function of the word’s context in which the word is appeared (McCann et al., 2017; Peters et al., 2018; Radford et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2018).”
BackgroundImproved Word Sense Disambiguation Using Pre-Trained Contextualized Word Representations
Hadiwinoto, C., Ng, H. T., & Gan, W. C. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1533 · Cited by 91
“Recently, pre-trained contextualized word representations (Melamud et al., 2016; McCann et al., 2017; Peters et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2019) have been shown to improve downstream NLP tasks.”
BackgroundMethodPedestrian Detection With Autoregressive Network Phases
Brazil, G., & Liu, X. (2019) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00740 · Cited by 85
“Recurrent Networks: Recurrent networks are a powerful technique in many challenging procedural [11, 22] and temporal [4, 29, 31] computer vision problems.”
MethodSECNLP: A survey of embeddings in clinical natural language processing
Kalyan, K. S., & Sangeetha, S. (2020) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103323 · Cited by 111
Tai, W. K., Kung, H. T., Dong, X., Comiter, M. Z., & Kuo, C. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.129 · Cited by 89
“Learning representations of natural languages is useful for a variety of NLP tasks (McCann et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2019).”
BackgroundZero-shot Relation Classification as Textual Entailment
Obamuyide, A., & Vlachos, A. (2018) · Fact Extraction and VERification Workshop (FEVER) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5511 · Cited by 83
“…as this would be akin to comparing a text classification model and a question answering model. ious approaches for leveraging knowledge from a set of source tasks to target tasks, such as recent transfer learning methods in natural language processing (Peters et al., 2018; McCann et al., 2017).”
BackgroundFrom static to dynamic word representations: a survey
Wang, Y., Hou, Y., Che, W., & Liu, T. (2020) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-020-01069-8 · Cited by 87
“In this line of work, McCann et al. [71] firstly proposed an inspiring context vector (CoVe) model where a deep long short-term memory (LSTM) encoder trained in a sequence-to-sequence machine translation (MT) model is used to generate contextualized embeddings which are then applied to a wide range…”
BackgroundMethodBERT is Not an Interlingua and the Bias of Tokenization
Singh, J., McCann, B., Socher, R., & Xiong, C. (2019) · Workshop on Deep Learning Approaches for Low-Resource NLP (DeepLo) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-6106 · Cited by 79
“Contextualized word embeddings like CoVe, ElMo, and BERT (McCann et al., 2017; Peters et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2018) improve a wide variety of natural language tasks (Wang et al., 2018; Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Socher et al., 2013; Conneau et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSelf-citationZero-Shot Cross-lingual Classification Using Multilingual Neural Machine TranslationPreprint
Eriguchi, A., Johnson, M., Fırat, O., Kazawa, H., & Macherey, W. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.04686 · Cited by 86
“They further report that the representations obtained from the NMT model are better than those obtained from LMs. McCann et al. (2017) showed that using the representations obtained from the encoder of an NMT system as context vectors in downstream NLP tasks significantly improves performance over using only unsupervis…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDeep transfer learning baselines for sentiment analysis in Russian
Smetanin, S., & Komarov, M. M. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102484 · Cited by 76
Electric Power Audit Text Classification With Multi-Grained Pre-Trained Language Model
Meng, Q., Song, Y., Mu, J., Lv, Y., Yang, J., Xu, L., Zhao, J., Ma, J., Yao, W., Wang, R., et al. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3240162 · Cited by 79
España-Bonet, C., Varga, A. C., Barrón‐Cedeño, A., & van Genabith, J. (2017) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2017.2764273 · Cited by 73
“Recently, the authors in [25] used the context vectors (CoVe) from a deep LSTM encoder in a bilingual NMT system to complement GloVe word vectors [26] and improve the performance on several tasks: sentiment analysis, question classification, entailment, and question answering.”
BackgroundZero-shot Cross-lingual Dialogue Systems with Transferable Latent Variables
Liu, Z., Shin, J., Xu, Y., Winata, G. I., Xu, P., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1129 · Cited by 67
“(McCann et al., 2017).”
MethodPale Transformer: A General Vision Transformer Backbone with Pale-Shaped Attention
Wu, S., Wu, T., Tan, H., & Guo, G. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i3.20176 · Cited by 73
“Inspired by the success of Transformer (Vaswani et al. 2017) on a wide range of tasks in natural language processing (NLP) (McCann et al. 2017; Howard and Ruder 2018), Vision Transformer (ViT) (Dosovitskiy et al. 2021) first employed a pure Transformer architecture for image classifi-cation, which…”
BackgroundAdvEntuRe: Adversarial Training for Textual Entailment with Knowledge-Guided Examples
Kang, D., Khot, T., Sabharwal, A., & Hovy, E. H. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1225 · Cited by 68
Dynamic Integration of Background Knowledge in Neural NLU SystemsPreprint
Weissenborn, D., Kočiský, T., & Dyer, C. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.02596 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- McCann, B., Bradbury, J., Xiong, C., & Socher, R.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 30
- Pages
- 6297-6308
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1708.00107
- OpenAlex
- W2740711318
- Semantic Scholar
- bc8fa64625d9189f5801837e7b133e7fe3c581f7
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2025: 14 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- coves, pre-trained word embeddings, machine translation, LSTM encoder, sentiment analysis, logical consequence, question answering, question classification, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review