CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 84Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research

The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Cosmological Constraints on Horndeski Gravity in Light of GW170817

Open access
Kreisch, C. D., Komatsu, E.·2017·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1712.02710arXiv 1712.02710
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The discovery of the electromagnetic counterpart to GW170817 severely constrains the tensor mode propagation speed, eliminating a large model space of Horndeski theory. We use the cosmic microwave background data from Planck and the joint analysis of the BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck, galaxy clustering data from the SDSS LRG survey, BOSS baryon acoustic oscillation data, and redshift space distortion measurements to place constraints on the remaining Horndeski parameters. We evolve the Horndeski parameters as power laws with both the amplitude and power law index free. We find a 95% CL upper bound on the present-day coefficient of the Hubble friction term in the cosmological propagation of gravitational waves is 2.38, whereas General Relativity gives 2 at all times. While an enhanced friction suppresses the amplitude of the reionization bump of the primordial B-mode power spectrum at $\ell < 10$, our result limits the suppression to be less than 0.8%. This constraint is primarily due to the scalar integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect in temperature fluctuations at low multipoles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1712.02710

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 84

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. G.W. Horndeski, Second-order scalar-tensor field equations in a four-dimensional space, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10 (1974) 363 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. E. Bellini and I. Sawicki, Maximal freedom at minimum cost: linear large-scale structure in general modifications of gravity, JCAP 07 (2014) 050 [arXiv:1404.3713] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Virgo, Fermi-GBM, INTEGRAL and LIGO Scientific collaborations, B.P. Abbott et al., Gravitational waves and gamma-rays from a binary neutron star merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A, Astrophys. J. 848 (2017) L13 [arXiv:1710.05834] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  4. M. Zumalacárregui and J. García-Bellido, Transforming gravity: from derivative couplings to matter to second-order scalar-tensor theories beyond the Horndeski Lagrangian, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 064046 [arXiv:1308.4685] [INSPIRE]. -19 - JCAP12(2018)030 · DOI
  5. L. Lombriser and A. Taylor, Breaking a dark degeneracy with gravitational waves, JCAP 03 (2016) 031 [arXiv:1509.08458] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. L. Lombriser and N.A. Lima, Challenges to self-acceleration in modified gravity from gravitational waves and large-scale structure, Phys. Lett. B 765 (2017) 382 [arXiv:1602.07670] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  7. J.M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalacárregui, Dark energy after GW170817: dead ends and the road ahead, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 251304 [arXiv:1710.05901] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  8. P. Creminelli and F. Vernizzi, Dark energy after GW170817 and GRB 170817A, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 251302 [arXiv:1710.05877] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  9. T. Baker, E. Bellini, P.G. Ferreira, M. Lagos, J. Noller and I. Sawicki, Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 251301 [arXiv:1710.06394] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  10. S. Arai and A. Nishizawa, Generalized framework for testing gravity with gravitational-wave propagation. II. Constraints on Horndeski theory, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 104038 [arXiv:1711.03776] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  11. C. Deffayet, O. Pujolàs, I. Sawicki and A. Vikman, Imperfect dark energy from kinetic gravity braiding, JCAP 10 (2010) 026 [arXiv:1008.0048] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  12. E. Bellini, A.J. Cuesta, R. Jimenez and L. Verde, Constraints on deviations from ΛCDM within Horndeski gravity, JCAP 02 (2016) 053 [Erratum ibid. 06 (2016) E01] [arXiv:1509.07816] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  13. D. Bettoni and M. Zumalacárregui, Kinetic mixing in scalar-tensor theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 104009 [arXiv:1502.02666] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  14. B. Hu, M. Raveri, N. Frusciante and A. Silvestri, Effective field theory of cosmic acceleration: an implementation in CAMB, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 103530 [arXiv:1312.5742] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  15. M. Raveri, B. Hu, N. Frusciante and A. Silvestri, Effective field theory of cosmic acceleration: constraining dark energy with CMB data, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 043513 [arXiv:1405.1022] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  16. A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby, Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models, Astrophys. J. 538 (2000) 473 [astro-ph/9911177] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  17. A. Lewis and S. Bridle, Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: a Monte Carlo approach, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 103511 [astro-ph/0205436] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  18. A. Gelman and D.B. Rubin, Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences, Statist. Sci. 7 (1992) 457. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2015 results. XIV. Dark energy and modified gravity, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A14 [arXiv:1502.01590] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  20. E.V. Linder, Challenges in connecting modified gravity theory and observations, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 023518 [arXiv:1607.03113] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  21. J. Gleyzes, Parametrizing modified gravity for cosmological surveys, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 063516 [arXiv:1705.04714] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  22. L. Amendola, G. Ballesteros and V. Pettorino, Effects of modified gravity on B-mode polarization, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 043009 [arXiv:1405.7004] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  23. M. Raveri, C. Baccigalupi, A. Silvestri and S.-Y. Zhou, Measuring the speed of cosmological gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 061501 [arXiv:1405.7974] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  24. V. Pettorino and L. Amendola, Friction in gravitational waves: a test for early-time modified gravity, Phys. Lett. B 742 (2015) 353 [arXiv:1408.2224] [INSPIRE]. JCAP12(2018)030 · DOI · Paper page
  25. BICEP2 and Planck collaborations, P.A.R. Ade et al., Joint analysis of BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 101301 [arXiv:1502.00612] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Planck collaboration, N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods and robustness of parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A11 [arXiv:1507.02704] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  27. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2015 results. XV. Gravitational lensing, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A15 [arXiv:1502.01591] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  28. SDSS collaboration, M. Tegmark et al., Cosmological constraints from the SDSS luminous red galaxies, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 123507 [astro-ph/0608632] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  29. BOSS collaboration, L. Anderson et al., The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the data releases 10 and 11 galaxy samples, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 441 (2014) 24 [arXiv:1312.4877] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  30. A.J. Ross, L. Samushia, C. Howlett, W.J. Percival, A. Burden and M. Manera, The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main galaxy sample -I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z = 0.15, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 449 (2015) 835 [arXiv:1409.3242] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  31. F. Beutler et al., The 6dF galaxy survey: z ≈ 0 measurement of the growth rate and σ 8 , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 423 (2012) 3430 [arXiv:1204.4725] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  32. L. Samushia et al., The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measuring growth rate and geometry with anisotropic clustering, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 439 (2014) 3504 [arXiv:1312.4899] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  33. B. Hu, M. Raveri, N. Frusciante and A. Silvestri, EFTCAMB/EFTCosmoMC: numerical notes v3.0, arXiv:1405.3590 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  34. A. De Felice, N. Frusciante and G. Papadomanolakis, On the stability conditions for theories of modified gravity in the presence of matter fields, JCAP 03 (2017) 027 [arXiv:1609.03599] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  35. M. Zumalacárregui, E. Bellini, I. Sawicki, J. Lesgourgues and P.G. Ferreira, hi class: Horndeski in the Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System, JCAP 08 (2017) 019 [arXiv:1605.06102] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  36. A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi, Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion, JHEP 10 (2006) 014 [hep-th/0602178] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  37. D.A. Easson, I. Sawicki and A. Vikman, When matter matters, JCAP 07 (2013) 014 [arXiv:1304.3903] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  38. V. Salvatelli, F. Piazza and C. Marinoni, Constraints on modified gravity from Planck 2015: when the health of your theory makes the difference, JCAP 09 (2016) 027 [arXiv:1602.08283] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  39. J. Sakstein and B. Jain, Implications of the neutron star merger GW170817 for cosmological scalar-tensor theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 251303 [arXiv:1710.05893] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  40. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13 [arXiv:1502.01589] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  41. J. Renk, M. Zumalacarregui and F. Montanari, Gravity at the horizon: on relativistic effects, CMB-LSS correlations and ultra-large scales in Horndeski's theory, JCAP 07 (2016) 040 [arXiv:1604.03487] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  42. W. Lin and M. Ishak, Testing gravity theories using tensor perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 123011 [arXiv:1605.03504] [INSPIRE]. JCAP12(2018)030 · DOI
  43. H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 19 (1974) 716. · DOI · Paper page
  44. T. Giannantonio and E. Komatsu, Bayesian evidence of nonstandard inflation: isocurvature perturbations and running spectral index, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 023506 [arXiv:1407.4291] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  45. C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and L. Senatore, The effective field theory of inflation, JHEP 03 (2008) 014 [arXiv:0709.0293] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  46. G. Gubitosi, F. Piazza and F. Vernizzi, The effective field theory of dark energy, JCAP 02 (2013) 032 [arXiv:1210.0201] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  47. J.K. Bloomfield, É. É. Flanagan, M. Park and S. Watson, Dark energy or modified gravity? An effective field theory approach, JCAP 08 (2013) 010 [arXiv:1211.7054] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  48. J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois, F. Piazza and F. Vernizzi, Healthy theories beyond Horndeski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 211101 [arXiv:1404.6495] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  49. J. Gleyzes, D. Langlois, F. Piazza and F. Vernizzi, Exploring gravitational theories beyond Horndeski, JCAP 02 (2015) 018 [arXiv:1408.1952] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  50. C. Lin, S. Mukohyama, R. Namba and R. Saitou, Hamiltonian structure of scalar-tensor theories beyond Horndeski, JCAP 10 (2014) 071 [arXiv:1408.0670] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  51. J. Bloomfield, A simplified approach to general scalar-tensor theories, JCAP 12 (2013) 044 [arXiv:1304.6712] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  52. I. Sawicki and E. Bellini, Limits of quasistatic approximation in modified-gravity cosmologies, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 084061 [arXiv:1503.06831] [INSPIRE]. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Kreisch, C. D., & Komatsu, E.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (JP)
ORCID
Kreisch, C. D.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
Volume
2018
Issue
12
Pages
030-030
ISSN
1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1712.02710
arXiv
1712.02710
OpenAlex
W2774106213
Cited by
84
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1656466)
  • Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Keywords
Horndeski gravity, GW170817, gravitational wave propagation, integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect, scalar-tensor gravity, modified gravity, cosmological constraints, Planck CMB, galaxy clustering, baryon acoustic oscillations, redshift-space distortions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cosmological Constraints on Horndeski Gravity in Light of GW170817. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.1712.02710
The paper
Kreisch, C. D., & Komatsu, E. (2017). Cosmological Constraints on Horndeski Gravity in Light of GW170817. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1712.02710