CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 371Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningRobotic Locomotion and Control

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 53 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning to Adapt in Dynamic, Real-World Environments Through Meta-Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Nagabandi, Anusha, Clavera, Ignasi, Liu, Simin, Fearing, Ronald S., Abbeel, Pieter, Levine, Sergey, Finn, Chelsea·2018·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1803.11347arXiv 1803.11347
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Although reinforcement learning methods can achieve impressive results in simulation, the real world presents two major challenges: generating samples is exceedingly expensive, and unexpected perturbations or unseen situations cause proficient but specialized policies to fail at test time. Given that it is impractical to train separate policies to accommodate all situations the agent may see in the real world, this work proposes to learn how to quickly and effectively adapt online to new tasks. To enable sample-efficient learning, we consider learning online adaptation in the context of model-based reinforcement learning. Our approach uses meta-learning to train a dynamics model prior such that, when combined with recent data, this prior can be rapidly adapted to the local context. Our experiments demonstrate online adaptation for continuous control tasks on both simulated and real-world agents. We first show simulated agents adapting their behavior online to novel terrains, crippled body parts, and highly-dynamic environments. We also illustrate the importance of incorporating online adaptation into autonomous agents that operate in the real world by applying our method to a real dynamic legged millirobot. We demonstrate the agent's learned ability to quickly adapt online to a missing leg, adjust to novel terrains and slopes, account for miscalibration or errors in pose estimation, and compensate for pulling payloads.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1803.11347

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 55 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. B. Baker, O. Gupta, N. Naik, and R. Raskar. Designing neural network architectures using reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.02167 , 2016. · arXiv
  2. K. Chua, R. Calandra, R. McAllister, and S. Levine. Deep reinforcement learning in a handful of trials using probabilistic dynamics models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.12114 , 2018. · arXiv
  3. M. P. Deisenroth, G. Neumann, J. Peters, et al. A survey on policy search for robotics. Foundations and Trends R © in Robotics , 2(1-2):1-142, 2013.
  4. Y. Duan, J. Schulman, X. Chen, P. L. Bartlett, I. Sutskever, and P. Abbeel. Rl$ˆ2$: Fast reinforcement learning via slow reinforcement learning. CoRR , abs/1611.02779, 2016. · arXiv
  5. C. Finn, P. Abbeel, and S. Levine. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of deep networks. CoRR , abs/1703.03400, 2017. · arXiv
  6. T. Munkhdalai and H. Yu. Meta networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.00837 , 2017. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Nagabandi, A., Clavera, I., Liu, S., Fearing, R. S., Abbeel, P., Levine, S., & Finn, C.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2018
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1803.11347
arXiv
1803.11347
OpenAlex
W2903630557
Cited by
370
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
Keywords
meta-reinforcement learning, online adaptation, model-based reinforcement learning, meta-learning, dynamics model, sample efficiency, continuous control, legged robots, millirobots, terrain adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review