The DOI matches its DataCite record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding
Open accessAbstract
While supervised learning has enabled great progress in many applications, unsupervised learning has not seen such widespread adoption, and remains an important and challenging endeavor for artificial intelligence. In this work, we propose a universal unsupervised learning approach to extract useful representations from high-dimensional data, which we call Contrastive Predictive Coding. The key insight of our model is to learn such representations by predicting the future in latent space by using powerful autoregressive models. We use a probabilistic contrastive loss which induces the latent space to capture information that is maximally useful to predict future samples. It also makes the model tractable by using negative sampling. While most prior work has focused on evaluating representations for a particular modality, we demonstrate that our approach is able to learn useful representations achieving strong performance on four distinct domains: speech, images, text and reinforcement learning in 3D environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For example, Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC) [80,143] utilizes a contrastive future prediction task, and it was found that predicting one or two timesteps in the future is (too) easy and results in poor performance, whereas predicting multiple timesteps into the future is much more complex, and leads to very effective representations.”
From Past, Present, and Future of Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables: A Surveying Tutorial on a Still Challenging Task (2025) · cites this paper as [143]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Using this contrastive loss, self-supervised networks learn to make the representations similar for positive pairs, and dissimilar for negative pairs, and hence are able to cluster similar (or positive) samples together and push apart dissimilar (or negative) samples.”
From Detecting galaxy tidal features using self-supervised representation learning (2024) · cites this paper as Oord et al. 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It means that InfoNCE loss maximizes the agreement of two different augmented sequences' representations from the same sequence while minimizing the agreement with other negative sequences.”
From Contrastive Learning from Extremely Augmented Skeleton Sequences for Self-Supervised Action Recognition (2022) · cites this paper as Oord, Li, and Vinyals 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“We introduce the Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC) framework to human activity recognition, which captures the long-term temporal structure of sensor data streams.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As mentioned in [58], either 𝑐 𝑡 (the output of 𝑔 𝑒𝑛𝑐 ) or 𝑧 𝑡 (the output of 𝑔 𝑎𝑟 ) can be utilized as the representation.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The framework for data augmentation and batch formation plays a critical role in multi-view similarity learning [12,16,44,115], where we start by following the popular SimCLR [16] method.”
From MARs: Multi-view Attention Regularizations for Patch-based Feature Recognition of Space Terrain (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We note that this is a common setting for self-supervised contrastive learners with NCE objectives (Gutmann & Hyvärinen, 2010;Oord et al., 2018), including SimCLR (Chen et al., 2020) and SimCSE (Gao et al., 2021).”
From The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (2024) · cites this paper as Oord et al., 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The key insight behind this approach is that predicting just the next future timestep involves exploiting the local smoothness of the signal, whereas predicting multiple subsequent timesteps requires inferring the global structure of time-series data.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Haresamudram et al. [80] adapted Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC [143]) for HAR, emphasizing the importance of temporal structure in sensor data representation.”
From Past, Present, and Future of Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition Using Wearables: A Surveying Tutorial on a Still Challenging Task (2025) · cites this paper as [143]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Contrastive predictive coding (CPC) proposed by [109] provides a contrastive learning framework to perform the prediction task using InfoNCE loss.”
From Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects (2024) · cites this paper as [109]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It can be seen that CPC does not directly predict future observations x t + k . Instead, it tries to preserve the mutual information of c t and x t + k .”
From Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects (2024) · cites this paper as [109]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This contrastive loss, or InfoNCE loss (Oord et al. 2018), is minimised when the similarity is high for positive pairs and low for negative pairs.”
From Detecting galaxy tidal features using self-supervised representation learning (2024) · cites this paper as Oord et al. 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“To evaluate the performance of our TS-TCC model, we follow the standard linear benchmarking evaluation scheme [Oord et al. , 2018; Chen et al. , 2020]. Particularly, we train a linear classifier (single MLP layer) on top of a frozen self-supervised pretrained encoder model.”
From Time-Series Representation Learning via Temporal and Contextual Contrasting (2021) · cites this paper as Oord et al. , 2018
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Contrastive-based methods usually use a contrastive similarity metric, such as InfoNCE loss [109].”
From Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects (2024) · cites this paper as [109]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This results in representations that encode the high-level information between temporally separated parts of the time-series signal [58], thereby leading to improved downstream recognition performance.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC) [58], which is the focus of this work, performs contrastive learning over multiple future timestep predictions.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This framework has resulted in excellent representation learning performance across domains such as computer vision [12, 33, 35], natural language [49], speech recognition [6, 58] and time-series data [39].”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“If extra context from the past is useful for classification, then 𝑐 𝑡 can be used; else 𝑧 𝑡 may be more effective.”
From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“SimCLR aims to maximize the learned representation similarity between augmented views of the same input.”
From MARs: Multi-view Attention Regularizations for Patch-based Feature Recognition of Space Terrain (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Proposition 3. ∀f θ : X × Y → R + , I CPC ≤ log N.(43)”
From A Theory of Usable Information Under Computational Constraints (2020) · cites this paper as van den Oord et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · cited 1×
“More recent advancements in autoregressive modeling such as masked convolutional architectures [18, 19] or self-attention networks [20] could help improve results further.”
BackgroundImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · cited 1×
“These techniques made manually specified features largely redundant and have greatly improved state-of-the-art in several real-world applications [1, 2, 3].”
MethodAdam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946 · cited 1×
“We use the Adam optimizer [32] with a learning rate of 2e-4, and use 8 GPUs each with a minibatch of 8 examples from which the negative samples in the contrastive loss are drawn.”
MethodImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380 · cited 1×
“In our visual representation experiments we use the ILSVRC ImageNet competition dataset [34].”
MethodBatch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818 · cited 1×
“We did not use Batch-Norm [38].”
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568 · cited 2×
“In Word2Vec [9] neighbouring words are predicted using a contrastive loss.”
BackgroundLearning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766 · cited 1×
“These techniques made manually specified features largely redundant and have greatly improved state-of-the-art in several real-world applications [1, 2, 3].”
BackgroundSelf-citationFaceNet: A unified embedding for face recognition and clustering
Schroff, F., Kalenichenko, D., & Philbin, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298682 · Cited by 15,267 · cited 1×
“For example, the techniques proposed by [21, 22, 23] were based on triplet losses using a max-margin approach to separate positive from negative examples.”
MethodLayer NormalizationPreprint
Ba, J., Kiros, J., & Hinton, G. E. (2016) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06450 · Cited by 13,762 · cited 1×
“[41] is the same skip-thought model with layer normalization trained for 1M iterations. evaluate with 10-fold cross-validation for MR, CR, Subj, MPQA and use the train/test split for TREC.”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [12][12] Michael Gutmann and Aapo Hyvärinen. Noise-contrastive estimation: A new estimation principle for unnormalized statistical models. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 297-304, 2010. -
- [31][31] Daniel Povey, Arnab Ghoshal, Gilles Boulianne, Lukas Burget, Ondrej Glembek, Nagendra Goel, Mirko Hannemann, Petr Motlicek, Yanmin Qian, Petr Schwarz, et al. The kaldi speech recognition toolkit. In IEEE 2011 workshop on automatic speech recognition and understanding . IEEE Signal Processing Society, 2011. -
- [33][33] Laurens van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of machine learning research , 9(Nov):2579-2605, 2008. -
- [48][48] Sida Wang and Christopher D. Manning. Baselines and bigrams: Simple, good sentiment and topic classification. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers - Volume 2 , ACL '12, pages 90-94, 2012. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293
Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning
He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., & Girshick, R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00975 · Cited by 13,347
A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations
Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., & Hinton, G. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.05709 · Cited by 10,857
Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learning
Chen, X., & He, K. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01549 · Cited by 3,725
Bootstrap Your Own Latent: A New Approach to Self-Supervised Learning
Grill, J.-B., Strub, F., Altché, F., Tallec, C., Richemond, P. H., Buchatskaya, E., Doersch, C., Pires, B. A., Guo, Z. D., Azar, M. G., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07733 · Cited by 3,846
Metadata
- Authors
- Oord, A. V. D., Li, Y., & Vinyals, O.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2018
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1807.03748
- OpenAlex
- W4297808394
- Cited by
- 6,242
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 77 · 2025: 660 · 2024: 1288 · 2023: 1444 · 2022: 1043 · 2021: 1173 · 2020: 454 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Keywords
- contrastive predictive coding, unsupervised feature learning, autoregressive models, negative sampling, high-dimensional data, speech representation, image representation, text representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
