PreprintCited by 58Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Self-Sovereign Identity Solutions: The Necessity of Blockchain Technology

Open access
van Bokkem, Dirk, Hageman, Rico, Koning, Gijs, Nguyen, Luat, Zarin, Naqib·2019·arXiv

Abstract

With the advancement of technology and subsequently the age of digital information, online trustworthy identification has become increasingly more important. With respect to the various data breaches and privacy regulations, the current identity solutions are not fully optimized. In this paper, we will take a look at several Self-Sovereign Identity solutions which are already available. Some of them are built upon blockchain technology as this already provides decentralised persistent data and consensus. We will explore the emerging landscape of Self-Sovereign Identity solutions and dissect their implementations under multiple aspect criteria to determine the necessity of blockchain technology in this field. We conclude that blockchain technology is not explicitly required for a Self-Sovereign Identity solution but it is a good foundation to build up on, due to various technical advantages that the blockchain has to offer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1904.12816

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SSI can be best achieved by utilizing decentralized ledger technology (DLT), usually blockchain technology, decentralized identifiers (DID), and verifiable credentials (VC) standardized by The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).

    “However, it can be best achieved by utilizing decentralized ledger technology (DLT), usually blockchain technology [16], decentralized identifiers (DID) [4], and verifiable credentials (VC) [5] standardized by The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).”

    From Decentralized and Self-Sovereign Identity: Systematic Mapping Study (2021) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Introduction (p. 1) calls DLT promising for SSI, and the Conclusion (p. 7) says blockchain-based solutions meet more of the evaluation criteria on average. But the paper calls blockchain a good foundation, not the best way to achieve SSI, and explicitly says it is not necessary. The DID and VC portions have separate citations and are not assessed against this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SSI presents a paradigm shift, a shift in power and control, from identity and service providers to users, who must be central to the administration of identity and information flow during digital interactions.

    “SSI presents a paradigm shift, a shift in power and control, from identity and service providers to users, who must be central to the administration of identity and information flow during digital interactions [16][17].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [10][10] A. G. Nabi, 'Comparative study on identity management methods using blockchain,' Master's thesis, University of Zurich, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://files.ifi.uzh.ch/CSG/staff/Rafati/ID%20Management%20using%20BC-Atif-VA.pdf -
  2. [15][15] R Joosten, 'A conceptual analysis on sovrin,' 01 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323144927 A Conceptual Analysis on Sovrin -
  3. [24][24] M. Schanzenbach, G. Bramm, and J. Schutte, 'reclaimID: Secure, selfsovereign identities using name systems and attribute-based encryption,' in 2018 17th IEEE International Conference On Trust, Security And Privacy In Computing And Communications/ 12th IEEE International Conference On Big Data Science And Engineering (TrustCom/BigDataSE) . IEEE, Aug. 2018. [Identity Authentication.pdf](https://www.longfinance.net/media/documents/To_Be_To_Have_To_Know_Smart_Ledgers__Identity_Authentication.pdf)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Bokkem, D., Hageman, R., Koning, G., Nguyen, L., & Zarin, N.
Affiliations
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2940494670
Cited by
58
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
self-sovereign identity, blockchain, decentralized identity, online identity verification, data breaches, privacy, consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review