The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning
Open accessAbstract
Semi-supervised learning has proven to be a powerful paradigm for leveraging unlabeled data to mitigate the reliance on large labeled datasets. In this work, we unify the current dominant approaches for semi-supervised learning to produce a new algorithm, MixMatch, that works by guessing low-entropy labels for data-augmented unlabeled examples and mixing labeled and unlabeled data using MixUp. We show that MixMatch obtains state-of-the-art results by a large margin across many datasets and labeled data amounts. For example, on CIFAR-10 with 250 labels, we reduce error rate by a factor of 4 (from 38% to 11%) and by a factor of 2 on STL-10. We also demonstrate how MixMatch can help achieve a dramatically better accuracy-privacy trade-off for differential privacy. Finally, we perform an ablation study to tease apart which components of MixMatch are most important for its success.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved Techniques for Training GANs
Salimans, T., Goodfellow, I., Zaremba, W., Cheung, V., Radford, A., & Chen, X. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.03498 · Cited by 6,965
Self-citationKeeping the neural networks simple by minimizing the description length of the weights
Hinton, G. E., & van Camp, D. (1993) · Proceedings of the sixth annual conference on Computational learning theory - COLT '93 · doi:10.1145/168304.168306 · Cited by 994
Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability
BRIER, G. W. (1950) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078%3c0001:vofeit%3e2.0.co;2 · cited 1×
“(4) (the multiclass Brier score [5]) because, unlike the cross-entropy, it is bounded and less sensitive to incorrect predictions.”
Background
Cited by
Bootstrap Your Own Latent: A New Approach to Self-Supervised Learning
Grill, J.-B., Strub, F., Altché, F., Tallec, C., Richemond, P. H., Buchatskaya, E., Doersch, C., Pires, B. A., Guo, Z. D., Azar, M. G., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07733 · Cited by 3,846
FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidence
Sohn, K., Berthelot, D., Li, C.-L., Zhang, Z., Carlini, N., Cubuk, E. D., Kurakin, A., Zhang, H., & Raffel, C. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.07685 · Cited by 2,892
Self-citationA survey on semi-supervised learning
van Engelen, J. E., & Hoos, H. H. (2020) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-019-05855-6 · Cited by 2,666
Self-Training With Noisy Student Improves ImageNet Classification
Xie, Q., Luong, M.-T., Hovy, E., & Le, Q. V. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01070 · Cited by 2,393
Shortcut learning in deep neural networks
Geirhos, R., Jacobsen, J.-H., Michaelis, C., Zemel, R., Brendel, W., Bethge, M., & Wichmann, F. A. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-00257-z · Cited by 2,224
Fink, O., Wang, Q., Svensén, M., Dersin, P., Lee, W.-J., & Ducoffe, M. (2020) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103678 · Cited by 549
Low-N protein engineering with data-efficient deep learning
Biswas, S., Khimulya, G., Alley, E. C., Esvelt, K. M., & Church, G. M. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01100-y · Cited by 422
Unsupervised Domain Adaptation of Object Detectors: A Survey
Oza, P., Sindagi, V. A., VS, V., & Patel, V. M. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3217046 · Cited by 313
Recent advances in surface defect inspection of industrial products using deep learning techniques
Zheng, X., Zheng, S., Kong, Y., & Chen, J. (2021) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-021-06592-8 · Cited by 287
Yang, D., Xu, Z., Li, W., Myronenko, A., Roth, H. R., Harmon, S., Xu, S., Turkbey, B., Turkbey, E., Wang, X., et al. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.101992 · Cited by 279
Contrastive Learning with Stronger Augmentations
Wang, X., & Qi, G.-J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3203630 · Cited by 266
A Survey on Semi-, Self- and Unsupervised Learning for Image Classification
Schmarje, L., Santarossa, M., Schroder, S.-M., & Koch, R. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3084358 · Cited by 246
A Taxonomy of Attacks on Federated Learning
Jere, M. S., Farnan, T., & Koushanfar, F. (2021) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msec.2020.3039941 · Cited by 217
Steel Surface Defect Recognition: A Survey
Wen, X., Shan, J., He, Y., & Song, K. (2022) · Coatings · doi:10.3390/coatings13010017 · Cited by 210
A Cookbook of Self-Supervised Learning
Balestriero, R., Ibrahim, M., Sobal, V., Morcos, A., Shekhar, S., Goldstein, T., Bordes, F., Bardes, A., Mialon, G., Tian, Y., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.12210 · Cited by 182
“Important early methods in this category include MixMatch [Berthelot et al., 2019], which chooses pseudolabels by averaging outputs of a network on several different random augmentations of the training images, resulting in labels that are augmentation invariant.”
MethodYan, R., Qu, L., Wei, Q., Huang, S.-C., Shen, L., Rubin, D. L., Xing, L., & Zhou, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2022.3233574 · Cited by 183
FocalMix: Semi-Supervised Learning for 3D Medical Image Detection
Wang, D., Zhang, Y., Zhang, K., & Wang, L. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00401 · Cited by 157
GPT3Mix: Leveraging Large-scale Language Models for Text Augmentation
Yoo, K. M., Park, D., Kang, J., Lee, S.-W., & Park, W. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.192 · Cited by 151
Automated Visual Defect Classification for Flat Steel Surface: A Survey
Luo, Q., Fang, X., Su, J., Zhou, J., Zhou, B., Yang, C., Liu, L., Gui, W., & Tian, L. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2020.3030167 · Cited by 148
Sheu, R.-K., & Pardeshi, M. S. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22208068 · Cited by 129
AI system engineering key challenges and lessons learned
Fischer, L., Ehrlinger, L., Geist, V., Ramler, R., Sobiezky, F., Zellinger, W., Brunner, D., Kumar, M., & Moser, B. (2020) · Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction · doi:10.3390/make3010004 · Cited by 71
“This way, data augmentation techniques are used to improve the model’s generalisation capabilities [25–28] and, also to mitigate adversarial vulnerability [25,29–31].”
MethodConsistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expert
Mozannar, H., & Sontag, D. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.01862 · Cited by 61
Constructing Ethical AI Based on the “Human-in-the-Loop” System
Chen, X., Wang, X., & Qu, Y. (2023) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems11110548 · Cited by 45
Self-Supervised Wasserstein Pseudo-Labeling for Semi-Supervised Image Classification
Taherkhani, F., Dabouei, A., Soleymani, S., Dawson, J., & Nasrabadi, N. M. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01209 · Cited by 45
Young, S., Gandhi, D., Tulsiani, S., Gupta, A., Abbeel, P., & Pinto, L. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.04899 · Cited by 42
Weak-to-Strong Generalization: Eliciting Strong Capabilities With Weak Supervision
Burns, C., Izmailov, P., Kirchner, J. H., Baker, B., Gao, L., Aschenbrenner, L., Chen, Y., Ecoffet, A., Joglekar, M., Leike, J., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.09390 · Cited by 34
Using Sparse Patch Annotation for Tumor Segmentation in Histopathological Images
Liu, Y., He, Q., Duan, H., Shi, H., Han, A., & He, Y. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22166053 · Cited by 10
S4RL: Surprisingly Simple Self-Supervision for Offline Reinforcement Learning
Sinha, S., Mandlekar, A., & Garg, A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.06326 · Cited by 5
Not All Labels Are Equal: Rationalizing The Labeling Costs for Training Object Detection
Elezi, I., Yu, Z., Anandkumar, A., Leal-Taixe, L., & Alvarez, J. M. (2021) · arXiv · Cited by 50
“In the work of [17] the authors use the inconsistency method of [18] to do AL.”
MethodDense FixMatch: a simple semi-supervised learning method for pixel-wise prediction tasks
Rabadán, M. M. I., Pieropan, A., Azizpour, H., & Maki, A. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.09919
AnomalyMatch: Discovering Rare Objects of Interest with Semi-supervised and Active Learning
Gómez, P., Ruhberg, L. E., Nardone, M. T., & O'Ryan, D. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.03509
“Early SSL algorithms, including Π -Model, Pseudo-Label, VAT, Mean Teacher, and UDA, effectively leveraged unlabelled data through consistency regularization and pseudo-labelling [18, 19, 20].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Berthelot, D., Carlini, N., Goodfellow, I., Papernot, N., Oliver, A., & Raffel, C.
- Venue
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1905.02249
- OpenAlex
- W2943865428
- Cited by
- 562
- References
- 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
