Cited by 279COVID-19 diagnosis using AIDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

Federated semi-supervised learning for COVID region segmentation in chest CT using multi-national data from China, Italy, Japan

Open access
Yang, Dong, Xu, Ziyue, Li, Wenqi, Myronenko, Andriy, Roth, Holger R., Harmon, Stephanie, Xu, Sheng, Turkbey, Baris +12 more·2021·Medical Image Analysis

Abstract

The recent outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to urgent needs for reliable diagnosis and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The current guideline is using RT-PCR for testing. As a complimentary tool with diagnostic imaging, chest Computed Tomography (CT) has been shown to be able to reveal visual patterns characteristic for COVID-19, which has definite value at several stages during the disease course. To facilitate CT analysis, recent efforts have focused on computer-aided characterization and diagnosis with chest CT scan, which has shown promising results. However, domain shift of data across clinical data centers poses a serious challenge when deploying learning-based models. A common way to alleviate this issue is to fine-tune the model locally with the target domains local data and annotations. Unfortunately, the availability and quality of local annotations usually varies due to heterogeneity in equipment and distribution of medical resources across the globe. This impact may be pronounced in the detection of COVID-19, since the relevant patterns vary in size, shape, and texture. In this work, we attempt to find a solution for this challenge via federated and semi-supervised learning. A multi-national database consisting of 1704 scans from three countries is adopted to study the performance gap, when training a model with one dataset and applying it to another. Expert radiologists manually delineated 945 scans for COVID-19 findings. In handling the variability in both the data and annotations, a novel federated semi-supervised learning technique is proposed to fully utilize all available data (with or without annotations). Federated learning avoids the need for sensitive data-sharing, which makes it favorable for institutions and nations with strict regulatory policy on data privacy. Moreover, semi-supervision potentially reduces the annotation burden under a distributed setting. The proposed framework is shown to be effective compared to fully supervised scenarios with conventional data sharing instead of model weight sharing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2021.101992

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Federated learning provides an alternative paradigm for accurate and generalizable machine learning by only sharing numerical model updates from decentralized data.

    “Federated ML (FL) provides an alternative paradigm for accurate and generalizable ML, by only sharing numerical model updates.”
  • Federated learning has shown promise in recent medical imaging applications, including COVID-19 analysis.

    “FL has already shown promise in recent medical imaging applications40–43, including in COVID-19 analysis8,44,45.”
  • Seven reviewed papers [21], [24], [25], [27], [28], [31], [32] used data samples between 2,109 and 6,284.

    “Next, within the 10,000 sample range, seven papers [21], [24], [25], [27], [28], [31] and [32] used data samples between 2,109 and 6,284 and this number is quite good.”
  • Only four of the 17 reviewed papers considered non-IID data along with IID data, and the remaining 13 did not discuss it.

    “Our results show only four papers (we did not find sufficient explanation from [26] and [21]) considered non-IID type along with IID data and the rest 13 did not talk about the content.”
  • Yang et al. [21] presented a federated semi-supervised learning method with sufficient experimental details.

    “A federated semi-supervised learning”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Li L. Qin L. Xu Z. Yin Y. Wang X. Kong B. Bai J. Lu Y. Fang Z. Song Q. Artificial intelligence distinguishes covid-19 from community acquired pneumonia on chest ct Radiology 2020 200905 32191588 PMC7233473
  2. Shi F. Wang J. Shi J. Wu Z. Wang Q. Tang Z. He K. Shi Y. Shen D. Review of artificial intelligence techniques in imaging data acquisition, segmentation and diagnosis for covid-19 IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2020 32305937

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, D., Xu, Z., Li, W., Myronenko, A., Roth, H. R., Harmon, S., Xu, S., Turkbey, B., Turkbey, E., Wang, X., Zhu, W., Carrafiello, G., Patella, F., Cariati, M., Obinata, H., Mori, H., Tamura, K., An, P., Wood, B. J., & Xu, D.
Affiliations
  • Nvidia (United States) (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Ospedale San Paolo (IT)
  • Self-Defense Forces Central Hospital (JP)
  • Hubei University of Medicine (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xu, Ziyue
  • Xu, Sheng
  • Xu, Daguang
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
70
Pages
101992
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3127057363
Cited by
279
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 1
FWCI
26.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1ZIACL040015, 1ZIDBC011242)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
federated learning, semi-supervised learning, COVID-19 pandemic, chest CT, lung segmentation, domain shift, cross-country data, data privacy, annotation burden reduction
MeSH terms
Supervised Machine Learning, COVID-19, China, Humans, Italy, Japan, Tomography, X-Ray Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review