The DOI matches its DataCite record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks
Open accessAbstract
Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets) are commonly developed at a fixed resource budget, and then scaled up for better accuracy if more resources are available. In this paper, we systematically study model scaling and identify that carefully balancing network depth, width, and resolution can lead to better performance. Based on this observation, we propose a new scaling method that uniformly scales all dimensions of depth/width/resolution using a simple yet highly effective compound coefficient. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method on scaling up MobileNets and ResNet. To go even further, we use neural architecture search to design a new baseline network and scale it up to obtain a family of models, called EfficientNets, which achieve much better accuracy and efficiency than previous ConvNets. In particular, our EfficientNet-B7 achieves state-of-the-art 84.3% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet, while being 8.4x smaller and 6.1x faster on inference than the best existing ConvNet. Our EfficientNets also transfer well and achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on CIFAR-100 (91.7%), Flowers (98.8%), and 3 other transfer learning datasets, with an order of magnitude fewer parameters. Source code is at https://github.com/tensorflow/tpu/tree/master/models/official/efficientnet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In general, the analyses show that the YOLO family [52,71,104,112] of network architectures and MobileNet and its derivative-based [40,53] and EfficientNet-Lite [56] backbones are very suitable for deployment with a lower number of parameters while retaining higher performance.”
From A survey on deep learning-based monocular spacecraft pose estimation: Current state, limitations and prospects (2023) · cites this paper as [56]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“EfficientNets [37] are a family of image classification models, which achieve state-of-the-art accuracy, yet being an order-ofmagnitude smaller and faster than previous models.”
From Improving Generalization of Deepfake Detection With Data Farming and Few-Shot Learning (2022) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“EfficientNet is a family of DL models that are scaled to balance network depth, width, and input data resolution to achieve an optimal performance-training time trade-off.”
From Benchmarking and scaling of deep learning models for land cover image classification (2023) · cites this paper as Tan and Le, 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Previous works [50, 15] have shown that layers in residual networks exhibit a large amount of redundancy, and that almost any individual layer can be removed after training without hurting performance.”
From Understanding Robustness of Transformers for Image Classification (2021) · cites this paper as [50]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“EfficientNet performs obviously better than ResNet, especially in anomaly detection.”
From A Unified Model for Multi-Class Anomaly Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [41]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the top-5 winning solutions of DFDC, all of them were image-based detection methods. Three of the five methods used EfficientNet (Tan and Le 2019) as the backbone model.”
From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Tan and Le 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The compound scaling method is the core innovation in the EfficientNet architecture using single scalar factor ϕ to uniformly scale all three dimensions such as depth, width and resolution given in the Equation is analysed in the paper27.”
From Image adaptive encryption using EfficientNet B3 feature guided multi scroll chaotic map with modulo controlled pseudo parallel processing (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The EfficientNet-B3 is implemented in this algorithm because of its scaling capabilities in the depth, width and input resolution of the input data, and it has efficient compromise between the accuracy and computational resources utilized27.”
From Image adaptive encryption using EfficientNet B3 feature guided multi scroll chaotic map with modulo controlled pseudo parallel processing (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“EfficientNets on the other hand perform Compound Scaling, i.e. scale simultaneously all three dimensions, depth, width, and image resolution, while maintaining a balance between all dimensions of the network.”
From Benchmarking and scaling of deep learning models for land cover image classification (2023) · cites this paper as Tan and Le, 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We deploy in our benchmark the original model in Tan and Le (2019), which introduces a new baseline CNN architecture called EfficientNet-B0.”
From Benchmarking and scaling of deep learning models for land cover image classification (2023) · cites this paper as Tan and Le, 2019
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Finally, we also observe that the recently introduced EfficientNets [39] achieve better efficiency than previous commonly used backbones.”
From EfficientDet: Scalable and Efficient Object Detection (2019) · cites this paper as [39]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For both Efficient ViT and Convolutional Cross ViT, we use an EfficientNet-B0 [29] that is pre-trained on ImageNet as a feature extractor, as per the original paper.”
From WaveConViT: Wavelet-Based Convolutional Vision Transformer for Cross-Manipulation Deepfake Video Detection (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The performance of these methods is outstanding, but they depend on pre-trained models such as ResNet [7] VGG [8] and EfficientNet [9] .”
From Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [9]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The success of EfficientNet [24] shows that we can obtain a model with better complexity/accuracy tradeoffs by scaling the model along different dimensions.”
From DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsification (2021) · cites this paper as [24]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“To further improve the quantizer, more recent work [78,234,258] formulates non-uniform quantization as an optimization problem.”
From A Survey of Quantization Methods for Efficient Neural Network Inference (2022) · cites this paper as [234]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Some of the latest approaches demonstrate encouraging accuracy, especially, if they are trained and evaluated on the same datasets [1], [2].”
From Improving Generalization of Deepfake Detection With Data Farming and Few-Shot Learning (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“This problem was clearly shown during the Facebook's Deepfake Detection Challenge 2 , when the top approaches of the competition have consistently shown a much lower error on the public validation set compared to the error on the secret test set, which contained unseen data and deepfakes generated using undisclosed methods.”
From Improving Generalization of Deepfake Detection With Data Farming and Few-Shot Learning (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The largest to-date database that was generated by Facebook [7] for the Deepfake Detection Challenge has a strict license and was not made publicly available outside of the challenge, so, we had to exclude it from this study.”
From Improving Generalization of Deepfake Detection With Data Farming and Few-Shot Learning (2022) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“ScanNet [238], through its 2.5 million RGB-D frames across 1,513 scenes, utilizes crowdsourced annotations to provide a large-scale, high-quality dataset for semantic segmentation and 3D modeling.”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [238]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“It was applied in the DFDC, and the AUC-ROC score that it received was 0.9974 (Tan and Le 2019).”
From Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as Tan and Le 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“These results indicate that a pure Transformer backbone ( i.e. , PVT) without convolutions can also be easily plugged in dense prediction models ( e.g. , RetinaNet [39], Mask R-CNN [21], and Semantic FPN [32]), and obtain high-quality results.”
From Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutions (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.243 · Cited by 48,566
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
Hu, J., Shen, L., & Sun, G. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00745 · Cited by 35,667
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939
He, K., Gkioxari, G., Dollar, P., & Girshick, R. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.322 · Cited by 29,137
MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottlenecks
Sandler, M., Howard, A., Zhu, M., Zhmoginov, A., & Chen, L.-C. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00474 · Cited by 28,755
Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift
Ioffe, S., & Szegedy, C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.03167 · Cited by 27,818
Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images
Krizhevsky, A. (2024) · doi:10.57702/zp44cu3g · Cited by 23,889
Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions
Chollet, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.195 · Cited by 20,380
MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applications
Howard, A. G., Zhu, M., Chen, B., Kalenichenko, D., Wang, W., Weyand, T., Andreetto, M., & Adam, H. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.04861 · Cited by 19,015
Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networks
Xie, S., Girshick, R., Dollar, P., Tu, Z., & He, K. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.634 · Cited by 12,465
Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localization
Zhou, B., Khosla, A., Lapedriza, A., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.319 · Cited by 11,428
ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devices
Zhang, X., Zhou, X., Lin, M., & Sun, J. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00716 · Cited by 9,982
ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Design
Ma, N., Zhang, X., Zheng, H.-T., & Sun, J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_8 · Cited by 7,356
Zagoruyko, S., & Komodakis, N. (2016) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2016 · doi:10.5244/c.30.87 · Cited by 7,244
Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognition
Zoph, B., Vasudevan, V., Shlens, J., & Le, Q. V. (2018) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00907 · Cited by 6,875
Self-citationSqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model size
Iandola, F. N., Han, S., Moskewicz, M. W., Ashraf, K., Dally, W. J., & Keutzer, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.07360 · Cited by 6,201
Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Zoph, B., & Le, Q. V. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.01578 · Cited by 5,705
Self-citationInception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learning
Szegedy, C., Ioffe, S., Vanhoucke, V., & Alemi, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11231 · Cited by 4,636
AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Strategies From Data
Cubuk, E. D., Zoph, B., Mané, D., Vasudevan, V., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00020 · Cited by 4,445
Self-citationGaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)
Hendrycks, D., & Gimpel, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.08415 · Cited by 3,537
Automated Flower Classification over a Large Number of Classes
Nilsback, M.-E., & Zisserman, A. (2008) · 2008 Sixth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icvgip.2008.47 · Cited by 3,442
MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobile
Tan, M., Chen, B., Pang, R., Vasudevan, V., Sandler, M., Howard, A., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00293 · Cited by 3,416
Self-citationSearching for activation functions
Ramachandran, P., Zoph, B., & Le, Q. V. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1710.05941 · Cited by 2,335
Self-citationSigmoid-Weighted Linear Units for Neural Network Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learning
Elfwing, S., Uchibe, E., & Doya, K. (2018) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2017.12.012 · Cited by 2,119
Food-101 – Mining Discriminative Components with Random Forests
Bossard, L., Guillaumin, M., & Gool, L. V. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10599-4_29 · Cited by 2,105
Deep Networks with Stochastic Depth
Huang, G., Sun, Y., Liu, Z., Sedra, D., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_39 · Cited by 2,104
Progressive Neural Architecture Search
Liu, C., Zoph, B., Neumann, M., Shlens, J., Wei, H., Li, L.-J., Fei-Fei, L., Yuille, A., Huang, J., & Murphy, K. P. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01246-5_2 · Cited by 1,975
ProxylessNAS: Direct Neural Architecture Search on Target Task and HardwarePreprint
Cai, H., Zhu, L., & Han, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.00332 · Cited by 1,821
Parkhi, O., Vedaldi, A., Zisserman, A., & Jawahar, C. V. (2012) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6248092 · Cited by 1,702
AMC: AutoML for Model Compression and Acceleration on Mobile Devices
He, Y., Lin, J., Liu, Z., Wang, H., Li, L.-J., & Han, S. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_48 · Cited by 1,400
Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?
Kornblith, S., Shlens, J., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00277 · Cited by 1,325
Self-citationFine-Grained Visual Classification of AircraftPreprint
Maji, S., Rahtu, E., Kannala, J., Blaschko, M. B., & Vedaldi, A. (2013) · HAL · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1306.5151 · Cited by 1,250
Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretraining
Mahajan, D., Girshick, R., Ramanathan, V., He, K., Paluri, M., Li, Y., Bharambe, A., & van der Maaten, L. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01216-8_12 · Cited by 1,224
GPipe: Efficient Training of Giant Neural Networks using Pipeline Parallelism
Huang, Y., Cheng, Y., Bapna, A., Firat, O., Chen, M. X., Chen, D., Lee, H., Ngiam, J., Le, Q. V., Wu, Y., et al. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.06965 · Cited by 1,180
Self-citationBridging Nonlinearities and Stochastic Regularizers with Gaussian Error Linear UnitsPreprint
Hendrycks, D., & Gimpel, K. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 753
The Expressive Power of Neural Networks: A View from the WidthPreprint
Zhou, L., Pu, H., Wang, F., Hu, Z., & Wang, L. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.02540 · Cited by 647
On the Expressive Power of Deep Neural NetworksPreprint
Raghu, M., Poole, B., Kleinberg, J. M., Ganguli, S., & Sohl‐Dickstein, J. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.05336 · Cited by 603
NetAdapt: Platform-Aware Neural Network Adaptation for Mobile Applications
Yang, T.-J., Howard, A., Chen, B., Zhang, X., Go, A., Sandler, M., Sze, V., & Adam, H. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01249-6_18 · Cited by 572
Neural Architecture OptimizationPreprint
Luo, R., Tian, F., Qin, T., Chen, E., & Liu, T. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.07233 · Cited by 541
SqueezeNext: Hardware-Aware Neural Network Design
Gholami, A., Kwon, K., Wu, B., Tai, Z., Yue, X., Jin, P., Zhao, S., & Keutzer, K. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2018.00215 · Cited by 350
Regularized Evolution for Image Classifier Architecture Search
Real, E., Aggarwal, A., Huang, Y., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33014780 · Cited by 328
Self-citationBirdsnap: Large-Scale Fine-Grained Visual Categorization of Birds
Berg, T., Liu, J., Lee, S. W., Alexander, M. L., Jacobs, D. W., & Belhumeur, P. N. (2014) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.259 · Cited by 313
PolyNet: A Pursuit of Structural Diversity in Very Deep Networks
Zhang, X., Li, Z., Loy, C. C., & Lin, D. (2017) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.415 · Cited by 266
ResNet with one-neuron hidden layers is a Universal ApproximatorPreprint
Lin, H., & Jegelka, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.10909 · Cited by 168
Domain Adaptive Transfer Learning with Specialist ModelsPreprint
Ngiam, J., Peng, D., Vasudevan, V., Kornblith, S., Le, Q. V., & Pang, R. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.07056 · Cited by 106
Self-citationCollecting a Large-scale Dataset of Fine-grained Cars
Krause, J., Deng, J., Stark, M. M., & Fei-Fei, L. (2013) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 100
On the Expressive Power of Overlapping Architectures of Deep LearningPreprint
Sharir, O., & Shashua, A. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.02065 · Cited by 22
Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretraining
Mahajan, D., Girshick, R., Ramanathan, V., He, K., Paluri, M., Li, Y., Bharambe, A., & van der Maaten, L. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.00932
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Han, S., Mao, H., and Dally, W. J. Deep compression: Compressing deep neural networks with pruning, trained quantization and huffman coding. ICLR , 2016.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows
Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., & Guo, B. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00986 · Cited by 35,534
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293
YOLOv7: Trainable Bag-of-Freebies Sets New State-of-the-Art for Real-Time Object Detectors
Wang, C.-Y., Bochkovskiy, A., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00721 · Cited by 13,198
“For example the scaling model of EfficientNet [69] considers the width, depth, and resolution.”
MethodYOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors
Wang, C.-Y., Bochkovskiy, A., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.02696 · Cited by 13,205
“For example the scaling model of EfficientNet [69] considers the width, depth, and resolution.”
MethodYOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection
Bochkovskiy, A., Wang, C.-Y., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.10934 · Cited by 10,307
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, M., & Le, Q. V.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- ORCID
- Le, Quoc V.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1905.11946
- OpenAlex
- W2946948417
- Cited by
- 17,072
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 193 · 2025: 2341 · 2024: 3966 · 2023: 3735 · 2022: 2876 · 2021: 2753 · 2020: 1075 · 2019: 123
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- EfficientNet, model scaling, convolutional neural networks, compound scaling, MobileNet, ResNet, neural architecture search, transfer learning, ImageNet, model efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
