CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 173Speech and dialogue systemsRobot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in Robotics

Vision-and-dialog navigation

Open access
Thomason, Jesse, Murray, Michael, Cakmak, Maya, Zettlemoyer, Luke·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1907.04957arXiv 1907.04957
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Robots navigating in human environments should use language to ask for assistance and be able to understand human responses. To study this challenge, we introduce Cooperative Vision-and-Dialog Navigation, a dataset of over 2k embodied, human-human dialogs situated in simulated, photorealistic home environments. The Navigator asks questions to their partner, the Oracle, who has privileged access to the best next steps the Navigator should take according to a shortest path planner. To train agents that search an environment for a goal location, we define the Navigation from Dialog History task. An agent, given a target object and a dialog history between humans cooperating to find that object, must infer navigation actions towards the goal in unexplored environments. We establish an initial, multi-modal sequence-to-sequence model and demonstrate that looking farther back in the dialog history improves performance. Sourcecode and a live interface demo can be found at https://cvdn.dev/

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1907.04957

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integrating visual input, language processing, and spatial reasoning lets robots follow natural language instructions, navigate to visual goals, or perform goal-directed tasks with greater flexibility and adaptability.

    “By integrating visual input, language processing, and spatial reasoning, robots can now follow natural language instructions, navigate toward visual goals, or perform goal-directed navigation tasks with greater flexibility and adaptability”

    From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [127]

    The Introduction (p. 1) and Conclusions (p. 8) describe agents using visual context and dialog to navigate toward a goal in simulated environments; the Experiments (p. 8) report better navigation performance when agents use more dialog history. The paper does not establish that physical robots can now perform the full range of claimed tasks, or demonstrate greater flexibility and adaptability beyond the specific navigation improvements tested. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [2][2] J. Y. Chai, Q. Gao, L. She, S. Yang, S. Saba-Sadiya, and G. Xu. Language to action: Towards interactive task learning with physical agents. In IJCAI , 2018. -
  2. [3][3] J. Thomason, A. Padmakumar, J. Sinapov, N. Walker, Y. Jiang, H. Yedidsion, J. Hart, P. Stone, and R. J. Mooney. Improving grounded natural language understanding through human-robot dialog. In ICRA , 2019. -
  3. [4][4] M. Murnane, M. Breitmeyer, F. Ferraro, C. Matuszek, and D. Engel. Learning from humanrobot interactions in modeled scenes. In SIGGRAPH , 2019. -
  4. [5][5] T. Williams, F. Yazdani, P. Suresh, M. Scheutz, and M. Beetz. Dempster-shafer theoretic resolution of referential ambiguity. Autonomous Robots , 43(2):389-414, 2019. -
  5. [7][7] P. Anderson, Q. Wu, D. Teney, J. Bruce, M. Johnson, N. S¨ underhauf, I. Reid, S. Gould, and A. van den Hengel. Vision-and-Language Navigation: Interpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environments. In CVPR , 2018. -
  6. [8][8] M. MacMahon, B. Stankiewicz, and B. Kuipers. Walk the talk: Connecting language, knowledge, and action in route instructions. In AAAI , 2006. -
  7. [9][9] D. L. Chen and R. J. Mooney. Learning to interpret natural language navigation instructions from observations. In AAAI , 2011. -
  8. [10][10] V. Blukis, D. Misra, R. A. Knepper, and Y. Artzi. Mapping navigation instructions to continuous control actions with position visitation prediction. In CoRL , 2018. -
  9. [11][11] H. Chen, A. Suhr, D. Misra, N. Snavely, and Y. Artzi. Touchdown: Natural language navigation and spatial reasoning in visual street environments. In CVPR , 2019. -
  10. [12][12] A. Das, S. Datta, G. Gkioxari, S. Lee, D. Parikh, and D. Batra. Embodied question answering. In CVPR , 2018. -
  11. [13][13] D. Gordon, A. Kembhavi, M. Rastegari, J. Redmon, D. Fox, and A. Farhadi. IQA: Visual question answering in interactive environments. In CVPR , 2018. -
  12. [14][14] J. Johnson, B. Hariharan, L. van der Maaten, L. Fei-Fei, C. Lawrence Zitnick, and R. Girshick. CLEVR: A diagnostic dataset for compositional language and elementary visual reasoning. In CVPR , 2017. -
  13. [16][16] D. A. Hudson and C. D. Manning. GQA: A new dataset for real-world visual reasoning and compositional question answering. CVPR , 2019. -
  14. [17][17] R. Zellers, Y. Bisk, A. Farhadi, and Y. Choi. From recognition to cognition: Visual commonsense reasoning. In CVPR , 2019. -
  15. [18][18] S. Kottur, J. M. Moura, D. Parikh, D. Batra, and M. Rohrbach. CLEVR-Dialog: A diagnostic dataset for multi-round reasoning in visual dialog. In NAACL , 2019. -
  16. [19][19] A. Das, S. Kottur, K. Gupta, A. Singh, D. Yadav, J. M. Moura, D. Parikh, and D. Batra. Visual Dialog. In CVPR , 2017. -
  17. [23][23] S. Reddy, D. Chen, and C. D. Manning. CoQa: A conversational question answering challenge. TACL , 7, 2019. -
  18. [24][24] K. Nguyen, D. Dey, C. Brockett, and B. Dolan. Vision-based navigation with language-based assistance via imitation learning with indirect intervention. In CVPR , 2019. -
  19. [25][25] K. Nguyen and H. Daum´ e III. Help, Anna! Visual Navigation with Natural Multimodal Assistance via Retrospective Curiosity-Encouraging Imitation Learning. In EMNLP , 2019. -
  20. [26][26] H. de Vries, K. Shuster, D. Batra, D. Parikh, J. Weston, and D. Kiela. Talk the walk: Navigating new york city through grounded dialogue. arXiv , 2018. -
  21. [27][27] M. Marge, S. Nogar, C. Hayes, S. Lukin, J. Bloecker, E. Holder, and C. Voss. A research platform for multi-robot dialogue with humans. In NAACL , 2019. -
  22. [29][29] L. Stoia, D. M. Shockley, D. K. Byron, and E. Fosler-Lussier. SCARE: a Situated Corpus with Annotated Referring Expressions. In LREC , 2008. -
  23. [30][30] K. Eberhard, H. Nicholson, S. K¨ ubler, S. Gunderson, and M. Scheutz. The Indiana 'Cooperative Remote Search Task' (CReST) Corpus. In LREC , 2010. -
  24. [32][32] V. Jain, G. Magalhaes, A. Ku, A. Vaswani, E. Ie, and J. Baldridge. Stay on the path: Instruction fidelity in vision-and-language navigation. ACL , 2019. -
  25. [34][34] Z. Wang and M. E. Taylor. Improving reinforcement learning with confidence-based demonstrations. In IJCAI , 2017. -
  26. [35][35] J. Thomason, D. Gordon, and Y. Bisk. Shifting the Baseline: Single Modality Performance on Visual Navigation & QA. In NAACL , 2019. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomason, J., Murray, M., Cakmak, M., & Zettlemoyer, L.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1907.04957
arXiv
1907.04957
OpenAlex
W2959918500
Cited by
173
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Keywords
human-robot interaction, cooperative navigation, dialogue history, shortest path planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review