Cited by 331Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsRobot Manipulation and LearningSpeech and dialogue systems

REVERIE: Remote Embodied Visual Referring Expression in Real Indoor Environments

Open access
Qi, Yuankai, Wu, Qi, Anderson, Peter, Wang, Xin, Wang, William Yang, Shen, Chunhua, van den Hengel, Anton·2020·2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

One of the long-term challenges of robotics is to enable robots to interact with humans in the visual world via natural language, as humans are visual animals that communicate through language. Overcoming this challenge requires the ability to perform a wide variety of complex tasks in response to multifarious instructions from humans. In the hope that it might drive progress towards more flexible and powerful human interactions with robots, we propose a dataset of varied and complex robot tasks, described in natural language, in terms of objects visible in a large set of real images. Given an instruction, success requires navigating through a previously-unseen environment to identify an object. This represents a practical challenge, but one that closely reflects one of the core visual problems in robotics. Several state-of-the-art vision-and-language navigation, and referring-expression models are tested to verify the difficulty of this new task, but none of them show promising results because there are many fundamental differences between our task and previous ones. A novel Interactive Navigator-Pointer model is also proposed that provides a strong baseline on the task. The proposed model especially achieves the best performance on the unseen test split, but still leaves substantial room for improvement compared to the human performance. Repository: https://github.com/YuankaiQi/REVERIE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01000

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SimpleBEV adopts a BEV-based multi-scale fusion strategy, strengthening depth perception and maintaining stable overall detection performance.

    “SimpleBEV [260], adopting a BEV-based multi-scale fusion strategy, strengthens depth perception and maintains stable overall detection performance.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qi, Y., Wu, Q., Anderson, P., Wang, X., Wang, W. Y., Shen, C., & van den Hengel, A.
Affiliations
  • Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
  • Australian Centre for Robotic Vision (AU)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-06
Pages
9979-9988
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034578524
Cited by
331
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 3
FWCI
11.68
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
embodied navigation, human-robot interaction, natural language instructions, vision-and-language navigation, unknown environments, indoor environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review