PreprintCited by 206Time Series Analysis and ForecastingNeural Networks and ApplicationsTopic Modeling

Time2Vec: Learning a Vector Representation of Time

Open access
Kazemi, Seyed Mehran, Goel, Rishab, Eghbali, Sepehr, Ramanan, Janahan, Sahota, Jaspreet, Thakur, Sanjay, Wu, Stella, Smyth, Cathal +2 more·2019·arXiv

Abstract

Time is an important feature in many applications involving events that occur synchronously and/or asynchronously. To effectively consume time information, recent studies have focused on designing new architectures. In this paper, we take an orthogonal but complementary approach by providing a model-agnostic vector representation for time, called Time2Vec, that can be easily imported into many existing and future architectures and improve their performances. We show on a range of models and problems that replacing the notion of time with its Time2Vec representation improves the performance of the final model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1907.05321

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [4][4] Guillaume Bellec, Darjan Salaj, Anand Subramoney, Robert Legenstein, and Wolfgang Maass. Long short-term memory and learning-to-learn in networks of spiking neurons. In NeurIPS , 2018. -
  2. [6][6] Víctor Campos, Brendan Jou, Xavier Giró-i Nieto, Jordi Torres, and Shih-Fu Chang. Skip rnn: Learning to skip state updates in recurrent neural networks. In ICLR , 2018. -
  3. [8][8] Tian Qi Chen, Yulia Rubanova, Jesse Bettencourt, and David Duvenaud. Neural ordinary differential equations. In Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) , 2018. -
  4. [10][10] Edward Choi, Mohammad Taha Bahadori, Andy Schuetz, Walter F Stewart, and Jimeng Sun. Doctor AI: Predicting clinical events via recurrent neural networks. In Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference , pages 301-318, 2016. -
  5. [12][12] Daryl J Daley and David Vere-Jones. An introduction to the theory of point processes: volume II: general theory and structure . Springer Science & Business Media, 2007. -
  6. [36][36] Zachary C Lipton, David Kale, and Randall Wetzel. Directly modeling missing data in sequences with rnns: Improved classification of clinical time series. In Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference , pages 253-270, 2016. -
  7. [54][54] Corentin Tallec and Yann Ollivier. Can recurrent neural networks warp time? In International Conference on Learning Representation (ICLR) , 2018. -
  8. [55][55] Rakshit Trivedi, Hanjun Dai, Yichen Wang, and Le Song. Know-evolve: Deep temporal reasoning for dynamic knowledge graphs. In ICML , pages 3462-3471, 2017. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kazemi, S. M., Goel, R., Eghbali, S., Ramanan, J., Sahota, J., Thakur, S., Wu, S., Smyth, C., Poupart, P., & Brubaker, M.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2957988017
Cited by
206
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
Time2Vec, time embedding, event synchronization, asynchronous events, temporal modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review