Interpretable Machine Learning – A Brief History, State-of-the-Art and Challenges
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
XAI can help shed some light onto causality.
“Additionally, XAI can help to shed some light onto causality [18,46,67] although, there is a recognized need to go beyond causality/correlation to true “causability” [3].”
From Current Challenges and Future Opportunities for XAI in Machine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [67]
There is currently no consensus on how to evaluate how interpretable a model is, how correct an explanation is, or how to benchmark methods against each other.
“However, there is currently no consensus on how to evaluate how interpretable a model is, how correct an explanation is, or how to benchmark methods against each other [18,66,67].”
From Current Challenges and Future Opportunities for XAI in Machine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [67]
To close the gap between ML outputs and human explanations requires interdisciplinary work that studies how humans explain, formalizes the patterns in algorithmic forms, and explains outputs in a transparent, easy to interpret manner.
“To close the gap requires interdisciplinary work that studies how humans explain, formalizes the patterns in algorithmic forms, and explains outputs in a transparent, easy to interpret manner [67].”
From Current Challenges and Future Opportunities for XAI in Machine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [67]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538 · see citing works
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482 · see citing works
Estimating the Dimension of a Model
Schwarz, G. (1978) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176344136 · Cited by 47,033 · see citing works
Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine
Friedman, J. H. (2001) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1013203451 · Cited by 30,731 · see citing works
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874 · Cited by 23,707 · see citing works
Regularization and Variable Selection Via the Elastic Net
Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x · Cited by 20,957 · see citing works
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570 · see citing works
Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
Akaike, H. (1998) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15 · Cited by 18,384 · see citing works
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555 · see citing works
Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks
Zeiler, M. D., & Fergus, R. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53 · Cited by 15,839 · see citing works
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790942 · Cited by 13,597 · see citing works
Gauriat, C.-M., Pencolé, Y., Ribot, P., et al. (2024) · HAL · doi:10.4230/oasics.dx.2024.27 · Cited by 12,623 · see citing works
Shapley, L. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511528446.003 · Cited by 10,698 · see citing works
Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2870052 · Cited by 6,294 · see citing works
The mythos of model interpretability
Lipton, Z. C. (2018) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3233231 · Cited by 5,427 · see citing works
Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps
Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A., & Zisserman, A. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6034 · Cited by 5,370 · see citing works
Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences
Miller, T. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007 · Cited by 5,302 · see citing works
Random forests for classification in ecology
Cutler, D. R., Edwards, T. C., Beard, K. H., Cutler, A., Hess, K. T., Gibson, J., & Lawler, J. J. (2007) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-0539.1 · Cited by 4,950 · see citing works
The Strength of Weak Learnability
Schapire, R. E. (1990) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00116037 · Cited by 4,600 · see citing works
Axiomatic attribution for deep networks
Sundararajan, M., Taly, A., & Yan, Q. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.01365 · Cited by 4,087 · see citing works
Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution
Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A., Zeileis, A., & Hothorn, T. (2007) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-25 · Cited by 3,755 · see citing works
Conditional variable importance for random forests
Strobl, C., Boulesteix, A., Kneib, T., Augustin, T., & Zeileis, A. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-307 · Cited by 3,299 · see citing works
Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning
Doshi-Velez, F., & Kim, B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1702.08608 · Cited by 3,121 · see citing works
Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure
Altmann, A., Toloşi, L., Sander, O., & Lengauer, T. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq134 · Cited by 2,903 · see citing works
Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions
Štrumbelj, E., & Kononenko, I. (2014) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-013-0679-x · Cited by 2,286 · see citing works
Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning
Murdoch, W. J., Singh, C., Kumbier, K., Abbasi-Asl, R., & Yu, B. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900654116 · Cited by 2,167 · see citing works
Goldstein, A., Kapelner, A., Bleich, J., & Pitkin, E. (2015) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.2014.907095 · Cited by 1,861 · see citing works
Machine Learning Interpretability: A Survey on Methods and Metrics
Carvalho, D. V., Pereira, E. M., & Cardoso, J. S. (2019) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics8080832 · Cited by 1,842 · see citing works
Intelligible Models for HealthCare: Predicting Pneumonia Risk and Hospital 30-day Readmission
Caruana, R., Lou, Y., Gehrke, J., Koch, P., Sturm, M., & Elhadad, N. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2788613 · Cited by 1,685 · see citing works
Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions
Koh, P. W., & Liang, P. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.04730 · Cited by 1,514 · see citing works
Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensembles
Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G. G., & Lee, S.-I. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.03888 · Cited by 1,430 · see citing works
Multivariate Statistical Modelling Based on Generalized Linear Models
Fahrmeir, L., & Tutz, G. (1994) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0010-4 · Cited by 1,413 · see citing works
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106 · Cited by 1,388 · see citing works
Explaining nonlinear classification decisions with deep taylor decomposition
Montavon, G., Lapuschkin, S., Binder, A., Samek, W., & Müller, K.-R. (2017) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2016.11.008 · Cited by 1,357 · see citing works
Predictive learning via rule ensembles
Friedman, J. H., & Popescu, B. E. (2008) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/07-aoas148 · Cited by 1,315 · see citing works
Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps
Adebayo, J., Gilmer, J., Muelly, M., Goodfellow, I., Hardt, M., & Kim, B. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.03292 · Cited by 1,294 · see citing works
Techniques for interpretable machine learning
Du, M., Liu, N., & Hu, X. (2019) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3359786 · Cited by 1,268 · see citing works
Explaining machine learning classifiers through diverse counterfactual explanations
Mothilal, R. K., Sharma, A., & Tan, C. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372850 · Cited by 1,233 · see citing works
Survey and critique of techniques for extracting rules from trained artificial neural networks
Andrews, R., Diederich, J., & Tickle, A. B. (1995) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/0950-7051(96)81920-4 · Cited by 1,225 · see citing works
Fisher, A., Rudin, C., & Dominici, F. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.01489 · Cited by 1,165 · see citing works
The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900
Stigler, S. M. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,146 · see citing works
Distribution-Free Predictive Inference for Regression
Lei, J., G’Sell, M., Rinaldo, A., Tibshirani, R. J., & Wasserman, L. (2018) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2017.1307116 · Cited by 1,049 · see citing works
Olah, C., Mordvintsev, A., & Schubert, L. (2017) · Distill · doi:10.23915/distill.00007 · Cited by 880 · see citing works
Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networks
Zhang, Q., Wu, Y. N., & Zhu, S.-C. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00920 · Cited by 833 · see citing works
A Multidisciplinary Survey and Framework for Design and Evaluation of Explainable AI Systems
Mohseni, S., Zarei, N., & Ragan, E. D. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3387166 · Cited by 785 · see citing works
Model-Based Recursive Partitioning
Zeileis, A., Hothorn, T., & Hornik, K. (2008) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1198/106186008x319331 · Cited by 771 · see citing works
Letham, B., Rudin, C., McCormick, T. H., & Madigan, D. (2015) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/15-aoas848 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Linear Inversion of Band-Limited Reflection Seismograms
Santosa, F., & Symes, W. W. (1986) · SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing · doi:10.1137/0907087 · Cited by 737 · see citing works
Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretability
Poursabzi-Sangdeh, F., Goldstein, D. G., Hofman, J. M., Wortman Vaughan, J. W., & Wallach, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445315 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
iml: An R package for Interpretable Machine Learning
Molnar, C. (2018) · The Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.00786 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Self-citationNot Just a Black Box: Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation DifferencesPreprint
Shrikumar, A., Greenside, P., Shcherbina, A., & Kundaje, A. B. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.01713 · Cited by 704 · see citing works
Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence
Samek, W., & Müller, K. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28954-6_1 · Cited by 650 · see citing works
A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models
Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Giannotti, F., & Pedreschi, D. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3236009 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Extracting Tree-Structured Representations of Trained Networks
Craven, M. W., & SHAVLIK, J. W. (1995) · Neural Information Processing Systems · Cited by 583 · see citing works
Comprehensible classification models
Freitas, A. A. (2014) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/2594473.2594475 · Cited by 575 · see citing works
Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review
Wei, P., Lü, Z., & Song, J. (2015) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.018 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Metrics for explainable AI: challenges and prospects
Hoffman, R. R., Mueller, S. T., Klein, G., & Litman, J. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.04608 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Models
Wexler, J., Pushkarna, M., Bolukbasi, T., WATTENBERG, M. P., Viégas, F. B., & Wilson, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2019.2934619 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification
Ustun, B., Spangher, A., & Liu, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287566 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Causality for Machine Learning
Schölkopf, B. (2022) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3501714.3501755 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
High-Dimensional Variable Selection for Survival Data
Ishwaran, H., Kogalur, U. B., Gorodeski, E. Z., Minn, A. J., & Lauer, M. S. (2010) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08622 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Fürnkranz, J., Gamberger, D., & Lavrač, N. (2012) · Cognitive Technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75197-7 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Huysmans, J., Dejaeger, K., Mues, C., Vanthienen, J., & Baesens, B. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.003 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
The many Shapley values for model explanationPreprint
Sundararajan, M., & Najmi, A. (2019) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.08474 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Distilling a neural network into a soft decision tree
Frosst, N., & Hinton, G. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.09784 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Explainable Agents and Robots: Results from a Systematic Literature Review
Anjomshoae, S., Najjar, A., Calvaresi, D., & Främling, K. (2019) · Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.65109/kczb5817 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Variable importance in binary regression trees and forests
Ishwaran, H. (2012) · Cited by 379 · see citing works
THEORIA MOTUS CORPORUM COELESTIUM IN SECTIONIBUS CONICIS SOLEM AMBIENTIUM
Gauss, C. F. (2011) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139058285.001 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
Variable importance in binary regression trees and forests
Ishwaran, H. (2007) · Electronic Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1214/07-ejs039 · Cited by 367 · see citing works
DALEX: Explainers for Complex Predictive Models in R
Biecek, P. (2020) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3670939 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretability
Nori, H., Jenkins, S., Koch, P., & Caruana, R. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.09223 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Supersparse linear integer models for optimized medical scoring systems
Ustun, B., & Rudin, C. D. (2015) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-015-5528-6 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Multi-Objective Counterfactual Explanations
Dandl, S., Molnar, C., Binder, M., & Bischl, B. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58112-1_31 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Self-citationExplainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Review
Vilone, G., & Longo, L. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.00093 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Nouvelles méthodes pour la détermination des orbites des comètes
Legendre, A. M. (1970) · doi:10.3931/e-rara-35115 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning ModelsPreprint
Apley, D. W., & Zhu, J. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.08468 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Rulematrix: Visualizing and understanding classifiers with rules
Ming, Y., Qu, H., & Bertini, E. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2864812 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Visualizing the Feature Importance for Black Box Models
Casalicchio, G., Molnar, C., & Bischl, B. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10925-7_40 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Self-citationExplainability in human–agent systems
Rosenfeld, A., & Richardson, A. (2019) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-019-09408-y · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measures
Kumar, I. E., Venkatasubramanian, S., Scheidegger, C., & Friedler, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.11097 · Cited by 228 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The change from unconditional to conditional permutation changes the respective interpretation method [78,7], or, in worst case, can break it [57,113,62].”
BackgroundGeneralized Functional ANOVA Diagnostics for High-Dimensional Functions of Dependent Variables
Hooker, G. (2007) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1198/106186007x237892 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problem
Janzing, D., Minorics, L., & Blöbaum, P. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.13413 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
A new variable importance measure for random forests with missing data
Hapfelmeier, A., Hothorn, T., Ulm, K., & Strobl, C. (2012) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/s11222-012-9349-1 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Fast Calibrated Additive Quantile Regression
Fasiolo, M., Wood, S. N., Zaffran, M., Nedellec, R., & Goude, Y. (2020) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2020.1725521 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
The Dangers of Post-hoc Interpretability: Unjustified Counterfactual Explanations
Laugel, T., Lesot, M.-J., Marsala, C., Renard, X., & Detyniecki, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2019/388 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Interpretable Predictions of Tree-based Ensembles via Actionable Feature Tweaking
Tolomei, G., Silvestri, F., Haines, A., & Lalmas, M. (2017) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098039 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
A Simple and Effective Model-Based Variable Importance MeasurePreprint
Greenwell, B., Boehmke, B. C., & McCarthy, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.04755 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Scalable Visualization Methods for Modern Generalized Additive Models
Fasiolo, M., Nedellec, R., Goude, Y., & Wood, S. N. (2019) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.2019.1629942 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
(2015) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Gade, K., Geyik, S. C., Kenthapadi, K., Mithal, V., & Taly, A. (2019) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3292500.3332281 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Sill, J. (1997) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 139 · see citing works
vip: Variable Importance Plots
Greenwell, B., & Boehmke, B. (2018) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.vip · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Interpreting Blackbox Models via Model ExtractionPreprint
Bastani, O., Kim, C., & Bastani, H. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.08504 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Molnar, C., König, G., Bischl, B., & Casalicchio, G. (2023) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-022-00901-9 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationALIME: Autoencoder Based Approach for Local Interpretability
Shankaranarayana, S. M., & Runje, D. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33607-3_49 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Stakeholders in Explainable AI
Preece, A., Harborne, D., Braines, D., Tomsett, R., & Chakraborty, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.00184 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
OptiLIME: Optimized LIME Explanations for Diagnostic Computer AlgorithmsPreprint
Visani, G., Bagli, E., & Chesani, F. (2020) · International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.05714 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Please Stop Permuting Features: An Explanation and Alternatives.Preprint
Hooker, G., & Mentch, L. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 86 · see citing works
PALM: Machine Learning Explanations For Iterative Debugging
Krishnan, S., & Wu, E. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Human-In-the-Loop Data Analytics · doi:10.1145/3077257.3077271 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Quantifying Model Complexity via Functional Decomposition for Better Post-hoc Interpretability
Molnar, C., Casalicchio, G., & Bischl, B. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43823-4_17 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationEnriching Visual with Verbal Explanations for Relational Concepts – Combining LIME with Aleph
Rabold, J., Deininger, H., Siebers, M., & Schmid, U. (2020) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43823-4_16 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Measuring the stability of results from supervised statistical learning
Philipp, M., Rusch, T., Hornik, K., & Strobl, C. (2018) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.2018.1473779 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
AI Explainability 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Understanding Data and Machine Learning Models
Arya, V., Bellamy, R., Chen, P., Dhurandhar, A., Hind, M., Hoffman, S. C., Houde, S., Liao, Q. V., Luss, R., Mojsilović, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Assessing the Local Interpretability of Machine Learning ModelsPreprint
Slack, D., Friedler, S. A., Scheidegger, C., & Roy, C. D. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.03501 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
A Human-Grounded Evaluation Benchmark for Local Explanations of Machine LearningPreprint
Mohseni, S., Block, J. E., & Ragan, E. D. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.05075 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Rule extraction from neural networks — A comparative study
Augasta, M. G., & Kathirvalavakumar, T. (2012) · doi:10.1109/icprime.2012.6208380 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
MAGIX: Model Agnostic Globally Interpretable ExplanationsPreprint
Puri, N., Gupta, P., Agarwal, P., Verma, S., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.07160 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Locally Interpretable Models and Effects based on Supervised Partitioning (LIME-SUP)Preprint
Hu, L., Chen, J., Nair, V. N., & Sudjianto, A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.00663 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Hooker, G., Mentch, L., & Zhou, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.03151 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Rabold, J., Siebers, M., & Schmid, U. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99960-9_7 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Efficient nonparametric statistical inference on population feature importance using Shapley values
Williamson, B. D., & Feng, J. (2020) · PubMed · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.09481 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Pitfalls to Avoid when Interpreting Machine Learning ModelsPreprint
Molnar, C., König, G., Herbinger, J., Freiesleben, T., Dandl, S., Scholbeck, C. A., Casalicchio, G., Grosse‐Wentrup, M., & Bischl, B. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationPattern Recognition. ICPR International Workshops and Challenges
König, G., Molnar, C., Bischl, B., & Grosse‐Wentrup, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68787-8 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationQuetelet, A. (1827) · Nouveaux mémoires de l Académie royale des sciences et belles-lettres de Bruxelles · doi:10.3406/marb.1827.3345 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Hauenstein, S., Wood, S. N., & Dormann, C. F. (2017) · Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · doi:10.1080/03610918.2017.1315728 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
TIP: Typifying the Interpretability of ProceduresPreprint
Dhurandhar, A., Iyengar, V. S., Luss, R., & Shanmugam, K. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.02952 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Measuring Interpretability for Different Types of Machine Learning Models
Zhou, Q., Liao, F., Mou, C., & Wang, P. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04503-6_29 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
A study of data and label shift in the LIME frameworkPreprint
Rahnama, A. H. A., & Boström, H. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.14421 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Testing conditional independence in supervised learning algorithms
Watson, D. S., & Wright, M. N. (2021) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-021-06030-6 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
General Pitfalls of Model-Agnostic Interpretation Methods for Machine Learning ModelsPreprint
Molnar, C., König, G., Herbinger, J., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.04131 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationFreiesleben, T. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 10 · see citing works
audioLIME: Listenable Explanations Using Source SeparationPreprint
Haunschmid, V., Manilow, E., & Widmer, G. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.00582 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
MeLIME: Meaningful Local Explanation for Machine Learning ModelsPreprint
Botari, T., Hvilshøj, F., Izbicki, R., & de Carvalho, A. C. P. L. F. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.05818 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
On Feature Relevance Uncertainty: A Monte Carlo Dropout Sampling ApproachPreprint
Fabi, K., & Schneider, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3970395 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [42]42. Hall, M., Harborne, D., Tomsett, R., Galetic, V., Quintana-Amate, S., Nottle, A., Preece, A.: A systematic method to understand requirements for explainable AI(XAI) systems. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI 2019), Macau, China (2019)
- [45]45. Hastie, T.J., Tibshirani, R.J.: Generalized additive models, vol. 43. CRC press (1990)
- [55]55. Ishwaran, H., Kogalur, U.B., Gorodeski, E.Z., Minn, A.J., Lauer, M.S.: Highdimensional variable selection for survival data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 105 (489), 205-217 (2010)
- [60]60. K¨ onig, G., Molnar, C., Bischl, B., Grosse-Wentrup, M.: Relative feature importance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.08283 (2020) · arXiv
- [70]70. Ma, S., Tourani, R.: Predictive and causal implications of using Shapley value for model interpretation. In: Proceedings of the 2020 KDD Workshop on Causal Discovery. pp. 23-38. PMLR (2020)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Antoniadi, A. M., Du, Y., Guendouz, Y., Wei, L., Mazo, C., Becker, B. A., & Mooney, C. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11115088 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Evaluating the quality of machine learning explanations: a survey on methods and metrics
Zhou, J., Gandomi, A. H., Chen, F., & Holzinger, A. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10050593 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
A review of Earth Artificial Intelligence
Sun, Z., Sandoval, L., Crystal-Ornelas, R., Mousavi, S. M., Wang, J., Lin, C., Cristea, N., Tong, D., Carande, W. H., Ma, X., et al. (2022) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2022.105034 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Moustafa, N., Koroniotis, N., Keshk, M., Zomaya, A. Y., & Tari, Z. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3280465 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
A survey on aspect-based sentiment classification
Brauwers, G., & Frasincar, F. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3503044 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networks
Räuker, T., Ho, A., Casper, S., & Hadfield-Menell, D. (2023) · 2023 IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml54575.2023.00039 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
A machine learning model that outperforms conventional global subseasonal forecast models
Chen, L., Zhong, X., Li, H., Wu, J., Lu, B., Chen, D., Xie, S.-P., Wu, L., Chao, Q., Lin, C., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50714-1 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Explainability and causability in digital pathology
Plass, M., Kargl, M., Kiehl, T., Regitnig, P., Geißler, C., Evans, T., Zerbe, N., Carvalho, R., Holzinger, A., & Müller, H. (2023) · The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research · doi:10.1002/cjp2.322 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Directly Discriminatory Algorithms
Adams‐Prassl, J., Binns, R., & Kelly‐Lyth, A. (2023) · The Modern Law Review · doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12759 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
It is Not “Accuracy vs. Explainability”—We Need Both for Trustworthy AI Systems
Petkovic, D. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2023.3239921 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Interpretable generalized additive neural networks
Kraus, M., Tschernutter, D., Weinzierl, S., & Zschech, P. (2024) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2023.06.032 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
van Straaten, C., Whan, K., Coumou, D., van den Hurk, B., & Schmeits, M. (2022) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/mwr-d-21-0201.1 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
FuXi-Extreme: Improving extreme rainfall and wind forecasts with diffusion model
Zhong, X., Chen, L., Liu, J., Lin, C., Qi, Y., & Li, H. (2024) · Science China Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11430-023-1427-x · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: “Unexplainable” Legal and Ethical Challenges?
Lang, M., Bernier, A., & Knoppers, B. M. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2021.10.009 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Minot, J. R., Cheney, N., Maier, M., Elbers, D. C., Danforth, C. M., & Dodds, P. S. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare · doi:10.1145/3524887 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Toward a Theory of Causation for Interpreting Neural Code Models
Nader Palacio, D., Velasco, A., Cooper, N., Rodriguez, A., Moran, K., & Poshyvanyk, D. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2024.3379943 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Jahanshad, N., Lenzini, P., & Bijsterbosch, J. (2025) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-024-01938-8 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Stucky, B. (2025) · Nature and Science of Sleep · doi:10.2147/nss.s506461 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Colas, J. T., O’Doherty, J. P., & Grafton, S. T. (2024) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011950 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Molnar, C., Casalicchio, G., & Bischl, B.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Molnar, Christoph
- Venue
- Communications in Computer and Information Science
- Publisher
- Springer International Publishing
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 417-431
- ISSN
- 1865-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1865-0937
- OpenAlex
- W3093029790
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 124
- Citations by year
- 2026: 115 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 132 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 28.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Communications in computer and information science (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- model interpretability, model-agnostic explanation, deep learning interpretability, surrogate models, causal interpretation, uncertainty estimation, rule-based machine learning, regression models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review