CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 44Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsMotor Control and AdaptationMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Deep neuroethology of a virtual rodent

Open access
Merel, Josh, Aldarondo, Diego, Marshall, Jesse, Tassa, Yuval, Wayne, Greg, Ölveczky, Bence·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1911.09451arXiv 1911.09451
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Parallel developments in neuroscience and deep learning have led to mutually productive exchanges, pushing our understanding of real and artificial neural networks in sensory and cognitive systems. However, this interaction between fields is less developed in the study of motor control. In this work, we develop a virtual rodent as a platform for the grounded study of motor activity in artificial models of embodied control. We then use this platform to study motor activity across contexts by training a model to solve four complex tasks. Using methods familiar to neuroscientists, we describe the behavioral representations and algorithms employed by different layers of the network using a neuroethological approach to characterize motor activity relative to the rodent's behavior and goals. We find that the model uses two classes of representations which respectively encode the task-specific behavioral strategies and task-invariant behavioral kinematics. These representations are reflected in the sequential activity and population dynamics of neural subpopulations. Overall, the virtual rodent facilitates grounded collaborations between deep reinforcement learning and motor neuroscience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1911.09451

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Abbas Abdolmaleki, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Yuval Tassa, Remi Munos, Nicolas Heess, and Martin Riedmiller. Maximum a posteriori policy optimisation. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018.
  2. C Yu Albert and Daniel Margoliash. Temporal hierarchical control of singing in birds. Science , 273 (5283):1871-1875, 1996.
  3. Andrea Banino, Caswell Barry, Benigno Uria, Charles Blundell, Timothy Lillicrap, Piotr Mirowski, Alexander Pritzel, Martin J Chadwick, Thomas Degris, Joseph Modayil, et al. Vector-based navigation using grid-like representations in artificial agents. Nature , 557(7705):429, 2018.
  4. Joshua D Berke, Jason T Breck, and Howard Eichenbaum. Striatal versus hippocampal representations during win-stay maze performance. Journal of neurophysiology , 101(3):1575-1587, 2009.
  5. Gordon J Berman, Daniel M Choi, William Bialek, and Joshua W Shaevitz. Mapping the stereotyped behaviour of freely moving fruit flies. Journal of The Royal Society Interface , 11(99):20140672, 2014.
  6. Hillel J Chiel and Randall D Beer. The brain has a body: adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment. Trends in neurosciences , 20(12):553-557, 1997.
  7. Mark M Churchland, John P Cunningham, Matthew T Kaufman, Justin D Foster, Paul Nuyujukian, Stephen I Ryu, and Krishna V Shenoy. Neural population dynamics during reaching. Nature , 487 (7405):51, 2012.
  8. Christopher J Cueva and Xue-Xin Wei. Emergence of grid-like representations by training recurrent neural networks to perform spatial localization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.07770 , 2018. · arXiv
  9. Ashesh K Dhawale, Steffen BE Wolff, Raymond Ko, and Bence P ¨ Olveczky. The basal ganglia can control learned motor sequences independently of motor cortex. bioRxiv , pp. 827261, 2019.
  10. Lasse Espeholt, Hubert Soyer, Remi Munos, Karen Simonyan, Volodymyr Mnih, Tom Ward, Yotam Doron, Vlad Firoiu, Tim Harley, Iain Dunning, et al. IMPALA: Scalable distributed deep-rl with importance weighted actor-learner architectures. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pp. 1406-1415, 2018.
  11. Richard HR Hahnloser, Alexay A Kozhevnikov, and Michale S Fee. An ultra-sparse code underliesthe generation of neural sequences in a songbird. Nature , 419(6902):65, 2002.
  12. Nicolas Heess, TB Dhruva, Srinivasan Sriram, Jay Lemmon, Josh Merel, Greg Wayne, Yuval Tassa, Tom Erez, Ziyu Wang, Ali Eslami, et al. Emergence of locomotion behaviours in rich environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.02286 , 2017. · arXiv
  13. Norman C Heglund and C Richard Taylor. Speed, stride frequency and energy cost per stride: how do they change with body size and gait? Journal of Experimental Biology , 138(1):301-318, 1988.
  14. Sepp Hochreiter and J¨ urgen Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural computation , 9(8): 1735-1780, 1997.
  15. Auke Jan Ijspeert, Alessandro Crespi, Dimitri Ryczko, and Jean-Marie Cabelguen. From swimming to walking with a salamander robot driven by a spinal cord model. Science , 315(5817):14161420, 2007.
  16. John F Kalaska. From intention to action: motor cortex and the control of reaching movements. In Progress in Motor Control , pp. 139-178. Springer, 2009.
  17. Kohitij Kar, Jonas Kubilius, Kailyn Schmidt, Elias B Issa, and James J DiCarlo. Evidence that recurrent circuits are critical to the ventral streams execution of core object recognition behavior. Nature neuroscience , 22(6):974, 2019.
  18. Risa Kawai, Timothy Markman, Rajesh Poddar, Raymond Ko, Antoniu L Fantana, Ashesh K Dhawale, Adam R Kampff, and Bence P ¨ Olveczky. Motor cortex is required for learning but not for executing a motor skill. Neuron , 86(3):800-812, 2015.
  19. Seyed-Mahdi Khaligh-Razavi and Nikolaus Kriegeskorte. Deep supervised, but not unsupervised, models may explain it cortical representation. PLoS computational biology , 10(11):e1003915, 2014.
  20. Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Honglak Lee, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. Similarity of neural network representations revisited. CoRR , abs/1905.00414, 2019. · arXiv
  21. Nikolaus Kriegeskorte and J¨ orn Diedrichsen. Peeling the onion of brain representations. Annual Review of Neuroscience , 42(1):407-432, 2019.
  22. Yuri Lazebnik. Can a biologist fix a radio? Or, what I learned while studying apoptosis. Cancer cell , 2(3):179-182, 2002.
  23. Timothy P Lillicrap and Stephen H Scott. Preference distributions of primary motor cortex neurons reflect control solutions optimized for limb biomechanics. Neuron , 77(1):168-179, 2013.
  24. Laurens van der Maaten and Geoffrey Hinton. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of machine learning research , 9(Nov):2579-2605, 2008.
  25. Josh Merel, Arun Ahuja, Vu Pham, Saran Tunyasuvunakool, Siqi Liu, Dhruva Tirumala, Nicolas Heess, and Greg Wayne. Hierarchical visuomotor control of humanoids. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019a.
  26. Josh Merel, Leonard Hasenclever, Alexandre Galashov, Arun Ahuja, Vu Pham, Greg Wayne, Yee Whye Teh, and Nicolas Heess. Neural probabilistic motor primitives for humanoid control. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019b.
  27. Jonathan A Michaels, Stefan Schaffelhofer, Andres Agudelo-Toro, and Hansj¨ org Scherberger. A neural network model of flexible grasp movement generation. bioRxiv , pp. 742189, 2019.
  28. Jonathan W Mink. The basal ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Progress in neurobiology , 50(4):381-425, 1996.
  29. John A Nyakatura, Kamilo Melo, Tomislav Horvat, Kostas Karakasiliotis, Vivian R Allen, Amir Andikfar, Emanuel Andrada, Patrick Arnold, Jonas Laustr¨ oer, John R Hutchinson, et al. Reverseengineering the locomotion of a stem amniote. Nature , 565(7739):351, 2019.
  30. Xue Bin Peng, Glen Berseth, and Michiel Van de Panne. Terrain-adaptive locomotion skills using deep reinforcement learning. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) , 35(4):81, 2016.
  31. Xue Bin Peng, Glen Berseth, KangKang Yin, and Michiel Van De Panne. DeepLoco: Dynamic locomotion skills using hierarchical deep reinforcement learning. ACMTransactions on Graphics (TOG) , 36(4):41, 2017.
  32. Pavel E Rueda-Orozco and David Robbe. The striatum multiplexes contextual and kinematic information to constrain motor habits execution. Nature neuroscience , 18(3):453, 2015.
  33. Simon Schmitt, Jonathan J Hudson, Augustin Zidek, Simon Osindero, Carl Doersch, Wojciech M Czarnecki, Joel Z Leibo, Heinrich Kuttler, Andrew Zisserman, Karen Simonyan, et al. Kickstarting deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.03835 , 2018. · arXiv
  34. HFrancis Song, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Aidan Clark, Hubert Soyer, Jack W Rae, Seb Noury, Arun Ahuja, Siqi Liu, Dhruva Tirumala, et al. V-MPO: On-Policy Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimization for Discrete and Continuous Control. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.12238 , 2019. · arXiv
  35. David Sussillo, Mark M Churchland, Matthew T Kaufman, and Krishna V Shenoy. A neural network that finds a naturalistic solution for the production of muscle activity. Nature neuroscience , 18(7): 1025, 2015.
  36. Yuval Tassa, Yotam Doron, Alistair Muldal, Tom Erez, Yazhe Li, Diego de Las Casas, David Budden, Abbas Abdolmaleki, Josh Merel, Andrew Lefrancq, Timothy Lillicrap, and Martin Riedmiller. DeepMind control suite. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.00690 , 2018. · arXiv
  37. Emanuel Todorov, Tom Erez, and Yuval Tassa. MuJoCo: A physics engine for model-based control. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , pp. 5026-5033. IEEE, 2012.
  38. Daniel LK Yamins, Ha Hong, Charles F Cadieu, Ethan A Solomon, Darren Seibert, and James J DiCarlo. Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 111(23):8619-8624, 2014.
  39. Guangyu Robert Yang, Madhura R Joglekar, H Francis Song, William T Newsome, and Xiao-Jing Wang. Task representations in neural networks trained to perform many cognitive tasks. Nature neuroscience , 22(2):297, 2019.
  40. Chengxu Zhuang, Jonas Kubilius, Mitra JZ Hartmann, and Daniel L Yamins. Toward goal-driven neural network models for the rodent whisker-trigeminal system. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , pp. 2555-2565, 2017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merel, J., Aldarondo, D., Marshall, J., Tassa, Y., Wayne, G., & Ölveczky, B.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1911.09451
arXiv
1911.09451
OpenAlex
W2989606769
Cited by
44
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1745303)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K99/R00)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
embodied control, motor control, neuroethology, deep reinforcement learning, behavioral representation, kinematics, neural population dynamics, artificial neural networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review