Connectome-constrained deep mechanistic networks predict neural responses across the fly visual system at single-neuron resolution
Open accessAbstract
We can now measure the connectivity of every neuron in a neural circuit, but we are still blind to other biological details, including the dynamical characteristics of each neuron. The degree to which connectivity measurements alone can inform understanding of neural computation is an open question. Here we show that with only measurements of the connectivity of a biological neural network, we can predict the neural activity underlying neural computation. We constructed a model neural network with the experimentally determined connectivity for 64 cell types in the motion pathways of the fruit fly optic lobe but with unknown parameters for the single neuron and single synapse properties. We then optimized the values of these unknown parameters using techniques from deep learning, to allow the model network to detect visual motion. Our mechanistic model makes detailed experimentally testable predictions for each neuron in the connectome. We found that model predictions agreed with experimental measurements of neural activity across 24 studies. Our work demonstrates a strategy for generating detailed hypotheses about the mechanisms of neural circuit function from connectivity measurements. We show that this strategy is more likely to be successful when neurons are sparsely connected—a universally observed feature of biological neural networks across species and brain regions.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The authors built a connectome-constrained, task-optimized deep mechanistic network of the fly optic lobe motion pathways using only measured connectivity and the task of optic flow computation. The model predicted neural tuning across many cell types and 24 experimental studies, and suggested TmY3 as a novel candidate motion detector.
Key findings
- A connectome-constrained DMN with 45,669 neurons, 1,513,231 connections, 65 cell types, and 721 hexagonal columns reduced the model to 734 free parameters; it was trained on optic flow from Sintel videos.
- The ensemble predicted ON/OFF segregation for 31 of 31 experimentally established cell types (median FRI, p = 4.7 × 10⁻¹⁰, binomial test); the best model correctly assigned 29 of 31 (p = 2.3 × 10⁻⁷).
- Task-optimized models predicted known direction selectivity and flash response indices better than random-parameter models (p = 2 × 10⁻¹¹ and p = 5.3 × 10⁻⁵, Mann-Whitney-U), and better task performance correlated with better T4/T5 direction selectivity predictions (p = 5.6 × 10⁻⁶, Wald test).
- The model proposed TmY3 as an ON-motion-selective neuron independent of T4/T5; this prediction has not yet been experimentally tested. In synthetic MNIST networks, sparse connectivity enabled accurate prediction from connectivity alone (median Pearson’s correlation 0.856 for 10% average connectivity), while dense networks were essentially uncorrelated unless noisy connection strengths were also known.
Methods
- The connectome was assembled from FIBSEM FIB-25 and FIB-19 datasets containing 1,801 neurons, with 830 hand-annotated column positions; a probabilistic expectation-maximization algorithm assigned remaining neurons and fused datasets into a coherent optic lobe connectome.
- The DMN used threshold-linear point-neuron dynamics with graded chemical synapses; free parameters were 65 time constants, 65 resting potentials, and 604 unitary synapse scaling factors, with CT1 modeled as two compartments, CT1(M10) and CT1(Lo1).
- Models were implemented in PyTorch and trained end-to-end with backpropagation through time on the Sintel optic flow task; 50 models were generated, and predictions were compared with experimental measurements from 24 studies. Synthetic feedforward MNIST networks with varying connectivity sparsity were used to test when connectomic constraints predict neural responses.
Limitations
- The paper states the reductionist model cannot account for electrical synapses, complex chemical synapse dynamics, or neuromodulation, and only considers motion detection among many visual computations.
- The paper notes that connectomic reconstructions can be noisy, some cell types lacked transmitter-phenotype data and used guessed signs, and the TmY3 motion prediction remains experimentally untested.
- Evident from the text: the model assumes perfect periodicity/translation invariance, uses simplified single-compartment point neurons except CT1, ignores neuronal superposition, covers only the central visual field of the right eye, and relies on an incomplete optic lobe reconstruction with some manually adjusted filters.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 53 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The model accurately predicts the direction selectivity of the T4 and T5 motion detector neurons.
“as well as the direction selectivity of the well-known T4 and T5 motion detector neurons”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Model predictions agreed with experimental measurements of neural activity across 24 studies.
“We found that model predictions agreed with experimental measurements of neural activity across 24 studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The model accurately predicts the segregation of the visual system into light increment (ON) and light decrement (OFF) channels.
“We found that our connectomeconstrained and task-optimized DMN accurately predicts the well-known segregation of the visual system into light increment (ON) and light decrement (OFF) channels”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the fourth cluster, TmY3 is not direction selective.
“In the fourth cluster (star marker), TmY3 is, again, not direction selective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Densely connected synthetic networks, where each neuron in a given layer connects to every neuron in the next layer, are essentially uncorrelated with their task- and connectome-constrained models constructed with known connectivity but unknown strength.
“We found that densely connected synthetic networks, where each neuron in a given layer connects to every neuron in the next layer, are essentially uncorrelated with their task-and connectome-constrained models constructed with known connectivity but unknown strength (Fig. 6b, Extended Data Fig. 9a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fig. 6b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Extended Data Fig. 9a
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
For connectome-constrained models constructed with known connectivity and a noisy estimate of connection strength, connectivity sparseness is not required for models to correlate with their corresponding synthetic network.
“For connectome-constrained models constructed with known connectivity and a noisy estimate of connection strength, we found that connectivity sparseness is not required for models to correlate with their corresponding synthetic network (Fig. 6b, Extended Data Fig. 9b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fig. 6b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Extended Data Fig. 9b
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Optimized stimuli for T4c and T5c contain both ON- and OFF-elements, suggesting an interplay between ON- and OFF-pathways.
“However, we find both ON-and OFF-elements in optimized stimuli, suggesting an interplay between ON-and OFF-pathways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Amongst models with the best task performance, TmY3, TmY4, and TmY18 are often ON-motion selective.
“Amongst models with the best task performance, TmY3, TmY4, and TmY18 are often ON-motion selective (Fig. 2c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Models with higher task performance predict the direction selectivity index of T4 and T5 cells and their inputs better.
“Models with higher task performance predict the direction selectivity index of T4 and T5 cells and their inputs better”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The combination of microscopic and macroscopic constraints enabled the construction of a large-scale computational model spanning many tens of cell types and tens of thousands of neurons.
“The combination of microscopic and macroscopic constraints enabled us to construct a large-scale computational model spanning many tens of cell types and tens of thousands of neurons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In our task-optimized deep network, every model neuron and synapse corresponds to a real neuron and synapse in the brain.
“In our task-optimized deep network, every model neuron and synapse corresponds to a real neuron and synapse in the brain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Direction selectivity in the two tuned clusters is associated with opposite preferred contrast tuning of Mi4 and Mi9 neurons which provide direct flanking inhibitory input to T4 neurons.
“We found that direction selectivity in the two tuned clusters is associated with opposite preferred contrast tuning of Mi4 and Mi9 neurons which provide direct flanking inhibitory input to T4 neurons (Fig. 4e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The model accurately predicts the ON- vs OFF-contrast selectivity of neurons involved in motion detection, including lamina monopolar cells L1-L5 and the direct input neurons to T4 and T5.
“Further, the model accurately predicts the ON-vs OFF-contrast selectivity of neurons involved in motion detection, including lamina monopolar cells (L1-L5), which anatomically separate the ON-and OFF-pathways 57 , and the direct input neurons to T4 and T5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
For many cell types, models predict strongly clustered neural responses.
“For many cell types, we found that models predict strongly clustered neural responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The models suggest that the transmedullary cell types TmY3, TmY4, TmY5a, TmY13, and TmY18 might be tuned to ON-motion.
“Our models also suggest the possibility that the transmedullary cell types, TmY3, TmY4, TmY5a, TmY13, and TmY18, might be tuned to ON-motion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The best-performing model correctly assigns 29 out of 31 cells into the correct tuning category.
“This is also the case for the best-performing model, which correctly assigns 29 out of 31 cells into the correct tuning category”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The median flash response index across the ensemble predicts the correct ON- and OFF-preferred contrast selectivity for 31 of the 31 cell types for which contrast selectivity has been experimentally established.
“The median flash response index (FRI) across the ensemble predicts the correct ON-and OFFpreferred contrast selectivity for 31 of the 31 cell types for which contrast selectivity has been experimentally established”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of 19 cell types estimated to receive asymmetric, multi-columnar inputs, only 12 are predicted to be motion selective by the ensemble.
“Based on their local spatial connectivity profiles, we estimated that 19 cell types receive asymmetric, multi-columnar inputs (Methods), but found that only 12 are predicted to be motion selective (p < 0.05, binomial test; Methods) by the ensemble”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The strongest input elements of TmY3 by number of synapses are L4, L5, Tm2, Tm3, Mi1, Mi9, and Mi4.
“In our connectome data, the strongest input elements of TmY3 by number of synapses are L4, L5, Tm2, Tm3, Mi1, Mi9, and Mi4 (Fig. 5c and d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ensemble correctly predicts the lack of motion tuning in the input neurons to T4 and T5 motion detector neurons (Mi1, Tm3, Mi4, Mi9, Tm1, Tm2, Tm4, Tm9, CT1).
“The ensemble also correctly predicts the lack of motion tuning in the input neurons to T4 and T5 motion detector neurons (Mi1, Tm3, Mi4, Mi9, Tm1, Tm2, Tm4, Tm9, CT1; see Methods, Supplemental Data).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the model ensemble, there are four distinct clusters for TmY3.
“In the model ensemble, we found four distinct clusters for TmY3 (Fig. 5a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The correlation between synthetic networks and their simulations drops smoothly as the connection density increases.
“The correlation between synthetic networks and their simulations drops smoothly as the connection density increases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Models with random parameter configurations but trained decoding networks consistently performed worse on the task than task-optimized models.
“models with random parameter configurations-but trained decoding networks-consistently performed worse on the task than task-optimized models”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The stimulus that elicits the strongest response in the T4c cell is a central OFF-disc followed by an ON-edge moving upwards, matching the preferred direction of the cell.
“We found that the stimulus that elicits the strongest response in the T4c cell is a central OFF-disc followed by an ON-edge moving upwards, matching the preferred direction of the cell.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Task-optimized models predict the known direction selectivity indices and flash response indices more accurately than random models.
“We found that taskoptimized models predict the known direction selectivity indices and flash response indices more accurately than random models”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The first model cluster most accurately captures the known contrast selectivity of all TmY3 input cells.
“We found that the first model cluster (Fig. 5a, circular marker), in which TmY3 is tuned to front-back or downards motion, most accurately captures the known contrast selectivity of all TmY3 input cells (Fig. 5e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the best-performing cluster, TmY3 responds to ON-edges from front to back or downwards.
“In the best-performing cluster (circular marker) TmY3 responds to ON-edges from front to back or downwards (Fig. 5b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All three other clusters fail to consistently capture the OFF-selectivity of Mi9.
“In contrast, all three other clusters fail to consistently capture the OFF-selectivity of Mi9.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
TmY3 neurons do not receive inputs from other known motion selective neurons.
“Since TmY3 neurons do not receive inputs from other known motion selective neurons, we were intrigued by the possibility that it might directly compute a motion signal and possibly constitute a parallel pathway to the well-known T4 and T5 neurons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For motion selective T4 and T5 neurons, the spatiotemporal receptive fields are not separable in space and time.
“For the motion selective T4 and T5 neurons, the spatiotemporal receptive fields are not separable in space and time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The stimulus that elicits the strongest response in the T5c cell is a central ON-disc followed by an OFF-edge moving upwards in the preferred direction of the cell.
“Similarly, for the T5c cell, the stimulus that elicits the strongest response is a central ON-disc followed by an OFF-edge moving upwards in the preferred direction of the cell”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The large-scale mechanistic models accurately make detailed predictions of the neural responses of individual neurons to dynamic visual stimuli.
“We showed that such large-scale mechanistic models could accurately make detailed predictions of the neural responses of individual neurons to dynamic visual stimuli, revealing the mechanisms by which computations are performed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the motion pathways of the fruit fly visual system, this model correctly predicts many aspects of visual selectivity.
“We found that for the motion pathways of the fruit fly visual system, this model correctly predicts many aspects of visual selectivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Connectomic constraints and the assumption of spatial homogeneity reduce the model to 734 free parameters.
“Connectomic constraints, and our assumption of spatial homogeneity (i.e., the hexagonally convolutional structure of the network) result in a dramatic reduction to just 734 free parameters for this large network model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The circuitry across the entire visual field is perfectly periodic (spatial homogeneity/translation invariance across retinotopic space).
- Findingown data
Sparsely connected synthetic networks, where each neuron only connects to a small percentage of neurons, are well correlated with their task and connectome-constrained models, with a median Pearson's correlation of 0.856 for networks with 10% average connectivity.
“In contrast, sparsely connected synthetic networks, where each neuron only connects to a small percentage of neurons, are well correlated with their task and connectome-constrained models (median Pearson's correlation of 0.856 for networks with 10% average connectivity).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the second cluster, TmY3 is not direction selective.
“In contrast, in the second cluster (triangular marker), TmY3 is not direction selective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the third cluster, TmY3 is direction selective to ON-edges moving from the back to the front.
“In the third cluster (square marker) TmY3 is direction selective to ON-edges moving from the back to the front.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The scatter and gather operations approach is more efficient than using a single convolution operation or performing a separate convolution for each cell type.
“We found that this is more efficient than using a single convolution operation, or performing a separate convolution for each cell type, since each cell type has its own receptive field -some much larger than others -and the number of cells per type is relatively small.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For each 10% of the reference positions removed, on average, an additional 3.9% of neurons are not consistently estimated.
“For each 10% of the reference positions removed, on average, an additional 3.9% of neurons are not consistently estimated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
- Findingcitation
Spatiotemporal receptive fields for motion detector neurons agree with experimental measurements.
“Spatiotemporal receptive fields for motion detector neurons agree with experimental measurements 54 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] 2018, Simple integration of fast excitation and offset, delayed inhibition computes directional selectivity in Drosophila, Nature Neuroscience source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Connectome-constrained DMN models can be further constrained by sparse measurements of neural activity.
“but can be further constrained by sparse measurements of neural activity as we showed (Fig. 4)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fig. 4
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Ensembles of connectome-constrained task-optimized DMNs predict tuning properties.
“Figure 2: Ensembles of connectome-constrained task-optimized DMNs predict tuning properties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
Task-optimized DMNs predict more accurate direction selectivity indices than randomly parametrized models (P = 2 × 10^-11, Mann-Whitney-U).
“(a) Task-optimized DMNs (green) predict more accurate direction selectivity indices than randomly parametrized models (red) (P = 2 × 10 -11 , Mann-Whitney-U).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
The task error of 50 random DMNs collapses at 5.7 despite optimization of the decoders.
“(red) The task error of 50 random DMNs collapses at 5.7 despite optimization of the decoders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingnone given
Cluster 3 (T4c not tuned) all major input elements are ON-selective.
“For cluster 3 (T4c in DMN not tuned, square), all major input elements are ON-selective.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
Better task-performing models predict motion tuning neurons better.
“Extended Data Figure 6: Better task performing models predict motion tuning neurons better.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Dimensionality reduction on TmY3 responses to naturalistic stimuli reveals 4 clusters of DMNs with average task errors 5.298, 5.317, 5.328, and 5.331.
“(a) Dimensionality reduction on TmY3 responses to naturalistic stimuli reveals 4 clusters of DMNs with average task errors 5.298 (circle), 5.317 (triangle), 5.328 (square) and 5.331 (star).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
Task-optimizing 50 connectome-constrained DMNs yields different solutions for the biophysical parameters.
“(a) We task-optimized 50 connectome-constrained DMNs, yielding different solutions for the biophysical parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
Responses of T4c cells to naturalistic scenes reveal three distinct clusters.
“(b) Responses of T4c cells to naturalistic scenes reveal three distinct clusters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
For each individual cell type across 50 DMS, predictions for 29 out of 31 cell types are significant (P < 0.05, binomial).
“Additionally, we found for each individual cell type across 50 DMS that predictions for 29 out of 31 cell types are significant (P < 0.05, binomial).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The correlation of flash response index to binary known contrast preferences of 31 cell types did not significantly increase with better performing models.
“(magenta) While the models predicted the known contrast preferences generally well, the correlation of flash response index to the binary known contrast preferences of 31 cell types did not significantly increase with better performing models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Connectome-constrained DMN models generate meaningful predictions even in the complete absence of neural activity measurements.
“Connectome-constrained DMN models generate meaningful predictions even in the complete absence of neural activity measurements”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Models with random parameter configurations predict the known direction selectivity indices and flash response indices worse than task-optimized models.
“Extended Data Figure5: Models with random parameter configurations predict the known direction selectivity indices and flash response indices worse than task-optimized models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
The individual model predicts a large number of tuning properties for T4 and T5 cells and their inputs.
“Taken together, this individual model predicts a large number of tuning properties for the T4 and T5 cells and their inputs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
An unconstrained CNN with 414,666 parameters reaches a task error between 4.5 and 4.6.
“(blue) An unconstrained CNN with 414,666 parameters reaches a task error between 4.5 and 4.6 (here 5 models).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingcitation
Predictions of both direction and polarity of tuning from the DMN with best task performance agree with experimental measurements.
“Predictions of both direction and polarity of tuning agree with experimental measurements 62,64,100”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingnone given
For ON-motion stimuli, in cluster 1 DMNs T4c receives central depolarizing input from Mi1 and Tm3 and dorsal hyperpolarizing input from Mi4 and CT1(M10).
“For ON-motion stimuli, in these DMNs T4c receives central depolarizing input from Mi1 and Tm3 and dorsal hyperpolarizing input from Mi4 and CT1(M10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
ON-edge direction selectivity is strong in the first and the third cluster.
“ON-edge direction selectivity is strong in the first and the third cluster.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
The DMNs reveal three distinct solutions for T4c cells: upwards tuning, downwards tuning, or no motion tuning to ON-edges.
“(c) The DMNs reveal three distinct solutions for the T4c cells (which are known to be tuned to upwards ON-motion): (1) upwards tuning (cluster with lowest average task error of 5.297, circular marker in panel b), (2) downwards tuning (5.316 average error, triangular marker), or (3) no motion tuning to ON-edges (5.357 average error, square marker).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
Task-optimized DMNs predict more accurate flash response indices than randomly parametrized models (P = 5.3 × 10^-5, Mann-Whitney-U).
“(b) Task-optimized DMNs (green) predict more accurate flash response indices than randomly parametrized models (red) (P = 5.3 × 10 -5 , Mann-Whitney-U).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
A central OFF-disc followed by an ON-edge moving upwards elicits the strongest response in a T4c cell.
“A central OFF-disc followed by an ON-edge moving upwards elicits the strongest response in a T4c cell.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Switching Mi4 and Mi9 contrast preferences results in directionally opposite motion tuning solutions in T4.
“Switching Mi4 (known ON-contrast selective) and Mi9 (known OFF-contrast selective) contrast preferences results in directionally opposite motion tuning solutions in T4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
Models with random parameter configurations consistently performed worse on the task than task-optimized models.
“Extended Data Figure 4 : Models with random parameter configurations consistently performed worse on the task than task-optimized models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
The correlation between predicted direction selectivity index and binary known properties for T4 and T5 and their input cell types is higher for better performing models.
“(orange) When correlating the direction selectivity index of each model to the binary known properties for T4 and T5 and their input cell types, we find that this correlation is higher for better performing models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Spatial receptive fields of major motion detector input neurons revealed by single-ommatidium flashes are in agreement with experimental measurements.
“Spatial receptive fields of major motion detector input neurons revealed by single-ommatidium flashes are in agreement with experimental measurements 70,93 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
Across clusters, TmY3 shows different strengths of direction selectivity.
“Across clusters, TmY3 shows different strengths of direction selectivity (evaluated with moving edge stimuli).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
DMN with the best task error largely recapitulates known mechanism of motion computation.
“Figure 3: DMN with the best task error largely recapitulates known mechanism of motion computation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The task error of 50 DMNs distributes between 5.1 and 5.5 after optimization.
“(green) The task error of 50 DMNs distributes between 5.1 and 5.5 (a.u.) after optimization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingnone given
The input elements of TmY3 with the highest amount of synapses are L4, L5, Tm2, Tm3, Mi1, Mi9, and Mi4.
“(d) The input elements of TmY3 with the highest amount of synapses are L4, L5, Tm2, Tm3, Mi1, Mi9, and Mi4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Findingown data
A central ON-disc followed by an OFF-edge moving upwards elicits the strongest response in the central column T5c cell.
“A central ON-disc followed by an OFF-edge moving upwards elicits the strongest response in the central column T5c cell.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
After training the connectome simulations on the same handwritten digit classification task, sparser networks were able to recover function even from highly-perturbed network initializations.
“we found that sparser networks were able 1030 to recover function even from highly-perturbed network initializations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Half of the 65 cell types project less than 22.1 excitatory synapses and the other half from 22.1 to hundreds.
“(right) Half of the 65 cell types project less than 22.1 excitatory synapses and the other half from 22.1 to hundreds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
- Interpretationown data
With only measurements of the connectivity of a biological neural network, one can predict the neural activity underlying neural computation.
“Here we show that with only measurements of the connectivity of a biological neural network, we can predict the neural activity underlying neural computation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The strategy of generating detailed hypotheses about neural circuit function from connectivity measurements is more likely to be successful when neurons are sparsely connected.
“We show that this strategy is more likely to be successful when neurons are sparsely connected-a universally observed feature of biological neural networks across species and brain regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
There is not usually a strong link between the connectivity of a neural network and its computational function.
“There is considerable evidence from computer science and neuroscience that there is not usually a strong link between the connectivity of a neural network and its computational function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26][27][28]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Universal function approximation theorems imply that the same computational task can be performed by many different networks with very different neural connectivity.
“Universal function approximation theorems for artificial neural networks [26][27][28] imply that the same computational task can be performed by many different networks with very different neural connectivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26][27][28]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Most previous studies using task-optimized deep neural networks have predominantly focused on modeling computations without such detailed connectomic measurements.
“In contrast, most previous studies using task-optimized deep neural networks have predominantly focused on modeling computations without such detailed connectomic measurements: in fly motion vision pathways 115, 116 and olfactory system 36 , in fish oculomotor system 117 in mammalian visual pathways 44,76,106,118 and prefrontal cortex 45 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Clamping the T4c neurons to their measured tuning properties is sufficient to correctly constrain the tuning of both Mi4 and Mi9 neurons.
“Here, 'clamping' the T4c neurons to their measured tuning properties (by only selecting models from the correct cluster) is sufficient to correctly constrain the tuning of both Mi4 and Mi9 neurons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This correspondence enables detailed experimentally testable predictions for each neuron.
“This correspondence enables detailed experimentally testable predictions for each neuron.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Our study provides a direct link between artificial neural networks and biological circuit models.
“Our study provides a direct link between artificial neural networks and biological circuit models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The model integrates connectivity across the entire network rather than simply focusing on local connectivity to determine which neurons are most likely to be motion selective.
“This suggests that our model integrates connectivity across the entire network, rather than simply focusing on local connectivity to determine which neurons are most likely to be motion selective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The models reveal the mechanisms by which computations are performed.
“revealing the mechanisms by which computations are performed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data
None of the input neurons to TmY3 are motion-selective.
“While none of these input neurons are motion-selective, the asymmetries in their connectivity to TmY3 might allow it to detect motion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In the absence of connectomic measurements, inferring type-to-type and spatial connectivity between all pairs of cell types would require estimating well over a million parameters.
“In the absence of connectomic measurements, if we had to infer the type-to-type as well as spatial connectivity between all pairs of cell types, we would instead have needed to estimate well over a million parameters (Methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
An ensemble of 50 models, all constrained with the same connectome and optimized to perform the same task, was generated.
“we generated an ensemble of 50 models, all constrained with the same connectome, and optimized to perform the same task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The authors constructed a neural network with neural connectivity measured at the microscopic scale.
“Here we constructed a neural network with neural connectivity measured at the microscopic scale.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
In the fly visual system model, connectomic measurements provide synapse count for each connection, which can inform the relative strength of a connection but not the absolute strength.
“In our model of the fly visual system, we have connectomic measurements of the synapse count for each connection, which can inform the relative strength of a connection, but not the absolute strength.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Models with accurate tuning correlate with lower task error.
“suggesting that models with accurate tuning correlate with lower task error (see also Extended Data Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Asymmetries in connectivity to TmY3 might allow it to detect motion.
“While none of these input neurons are motion-selective, the asymmetries in their connectivity to TmY3 might allow it to detect motion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The connectivity of a neural circuit together with knowledge of its computational task enables accurate predictions of the role played by individual neurons in the circuit in the computational task.
“Here we show that the connectivity of a neural circuit, together with knowledge of its computational task, enables accurate predictions of the role played by individual neurons in the circuit in the computational task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The study only considered the role of this circuit in detecting motion, which is but one of many computations performed by the visual system.
“Further, we only considered the role of this circuit in detecting motion, which is but one of many computations performed by the visual system 14,[111][112][113][114] .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
The reductionist model cannot account for the role played in this circuit by electrical synapses, complex chemical synapse dynamics, and neuromodulation.
“However our reductionist model cannot, for example, account for the role played in this circuit by electrical synapses 109 , complex chemical synapse dynamics 96 , and neuromodulation 110 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Knowledge of the connectome played a critical role in this success, in part by leading to a massive reduction in the number of free model parameters.
“Knowledge of the connectome played a critical role in this success, in part by leading to a massive reduction in the number of free model parameters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The DMN was constructed using only connectome and task constraints, without any measurements of neural activity.
“We used only connectome and task-constraints to construct our DMN, without any measurements of neural activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The model proposes TmY3 as a novel candidate motion detector independent of the well-known T4 and T5 motion pathways.
“Thus our model proposes TmY3 as a novel candidate motion detector independent of the well-known T4 and T5 motion pathways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In the model, T5c implements a similar motion tuning mechanism to OFF-edges as T4c to ON-edges.
“This suggests that in our model, T5c implements a similar motion tuning mechanism to OFF-edges as T4c to ON-edges.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] 2019, The computation of directional selectivity in the drosophila off motion pathway, Elife source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The asymmetries of the projective fields of TmY3 input elements could allow TmY3 to become motion selective.
“The asymmetries of their projective fields could allow TmY3 to become motion selective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Interpretationown data
DMNs suggest that TmY3 neurons compute motion independently of T4 and T5 neurons.
“Figure 5: DMNs suggest that TmY3 neurons compute motion independently of T4 and T5 neurons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
- Interpretationown data
Connectomic measurements can strongly constrain neural networks in circuits with sparse connectivity.
“Figure 6: Connectomic measurements can strongly constrain neural networks in circuits with sparse connectivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The individual units in the SCNs are interpreted as neurons with voltage.
- Study design and conductown data
The reconstruction quality was verified, concluding that even in the absence of 90% of the hand-annotations available, the majority of neurons in the circuit reconstruction could be accurately positioned.
“We verified the quality of our reconstruction, concluding that even in the absence of 90% of the hand-annotations available to us, we could accurately position the majority of the neurons in our circuit reconstruction (SI Table 1, SI Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites SI Table 1
Not checked in the free run.
- cites SI Figure 2
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
- Premisecitation
Connectome-constrained DMN models can be directly optimized to match measured neural activity.
“or even be directly optimized to match measured neural activity 120 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] Mi, L. et al. Connectome-constrained latent variable model of whole-brain neural activity. In International Conference on Learning Representations (2022). URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=CJzi3dRlJE-.
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The increase in local minima size with sparsity allows sparser simulated networks to converge even when initialized far from optimum.
“allowing sparser simulated networks to converge even 1033 when initialized far from optimum.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
CT1 terminals act as functionally independent units.
“because CT1 terminals were found to act as functionally independent units 70”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Lamina-wide-field neurons Lawf1 and Lawf2 do not occur in each individual column but more sparsely.
“Because lamina-wide-field neurons, Lawf1 and Lawf2, do not occur in each individual column but more sparsely”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [124] source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 44
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationON-impulses on the leading side of the receptive field of T4c lead to fast depolarization, whereas impulses on the trailing side lead to delayed hyperpolarization, matching experimental findings.
“ON-impulses on the leading side of the receptive field of the ON-contrast, upwards direction selective T4c cell lead to its fast depolarization, whereas impulses on the trailing side of the receptive field lead to a delayed hyperpolarization, again matching experimental findings 54 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] 2018, Simple integration of fast excitation and offset, delayed inhibition computes directional selectivity in Drosophila, Nature Neuroscience source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe connectome-constrained model comprises 45,669 neurons and 1,513,231 connections, across 65 cell types arranged in a hexagonal lattice consisting of 721 columns.
“In total, the connectome-constrained model comprises 45,669 neurons and 1,513,231 connections, across 65 cell types arranged in a hexagonal lattice consisting of 721 columns”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSynthetic networks that perform the same handwritten digit recognition task with near perfect accuracy use dramatically different connectivity and different mechanisms.
“While the synthetic networks all perform the same task with near perfect accuracy, they use dramatically different connectivity, and so use different mechanisms to perform the same task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the best task performing model, the four subtypes of T4 respond strongly to dark edges, and the four subtypes of T5 neurons to bright edges, moving in the four cardinal directions, in agreement with previous experimental findings.
“First, we found that in the best task performing model, the four subtypes of the T4 respond strongly to dark edges, and the four subtypes of the T5 neurons to bright edges, moving in the four cardinal directions, in agreement with previous experimental findings”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [54] 2018, Simple integration of fast excitation and offset, delayed inhibition computes directional selectivity in Drosophila, Nature Neuroscience source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [55] 2019, The computation of directional selectivity in the drosophila off motion pathway, Elife source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [62] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [64] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataModels with the correct direction selectivity for T4 neurons also predict the correct contrast selectivity for Mi4 and Mi9 neurons, and vice versa.
“Models with the correct direction selectivity for T4 neurons also predict the correct contrast selectivity for Mi4 and M9 neurons, and vice versa (Fig. 4f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningT5c OFF-impulse responses are inverted, resembling the T4c spatiotemporal receptive field.
“Because T5c is OFF-selective, its OFF-impulse responses are inverted, resembling the T4c spatiotemporal receptive field (Extended Data Fig. 7a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe model correctly predicts the spatial scale of the spatial receptive field for all major inputs to T4 and T5 neurons, and correctly predicts the preferred contrast for all but one of the major inputs to T4 and T5 neurons.
“We find that the model correctly predicts the spatial scale of the spatial receptive field for all major inputs to T4 and T5 neurons, and correctly predicts the preferred contrast for all but one of the major inputs to T4 and T5 neurons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTemporal response properties are correctly predicted for all except the Tm4 cell, which is incorrectly predicted to be ON-selective by its temporal receptive field.
“These temporal response properties are correctly predicted for all except the Tm4 cell in this model, which is incorrectly predicted to be ON-selective by its temporal receptive field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor T4c neurons, there are three clusters corresponding to qualitatively distinct responses: two clusters contain direction selective T4c cells with up- and down-selective cardinal tuning, and the third cluster is not direction tuned.
“For T4c neurons for example, we found three clusters corresponding to qualitatively distinct responses of this cell type for naturalistic inputs: Two clusters contain models with direction selective T4c cells (Fig. 4b and c) with up-and down-selective cardinal tuning, respectively, whereas neurons in the third cluster are not direction tuned.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationTm3 and Tm4 have broad spatial receptive fields (two column radius, 11.6°), while Mi1, Mi4, Mi9, Tm1, Tm2, Tm9, and CT1 compartments in both medulla and lobula have narrow spatial receptive fields (single column radius, 5.8°).
“In agreement with experimental findings 70,93 , we find that Tm3 and Tm4 have broad spatial receptive fields (two column radius, 11.6 • ), while Mi1, Mi4, Mi9, Tm1, Tm2, Tm9, and CT1 compartments in both medulla and lobula have narrow spatial receptive fields (single column radius, 5.8 • ).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataT4c cells in DMNs in the first and second clusters are ON-motion direction selective, whereas those in the third cluster are not.
“T4c cells in DMNs in the first and second clusters (circular and triangular marker) are ON-motion direction selective, whereas those in the third cluster (square marker) are not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationTemporal receptive fields for inputs are in agreement with experimental measurements, with the exception of Tm4.
“Temporal receptive fields for inputs also are in agreement with experimental measurements 60,93 , with the exception of Tm4 (red cross).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe DMN correctly predicts narrow spatial receptive fields for Tm1, Tm2, Tm9, and CT1(Lo1), and a wide receptive field for Tm4.
“For major T5 inputs, the DMN correctly predicts narrow spatial receptive fields for Tm1, Tm2, Tm9, and CT1(Lo1), and a wide receptive field for Tm4.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSimulations constrained only with connectivity measurements correlate well only for low connectivities, while simulations constrained by measurements of both connectivity and connection strength correlate well across all average connectivity percentages.
“Simulations constrained only with connectivity measurements only correlate well for low connectivities (dark blue), while simulations constrained by measurements of both connectivity and connection strength correlate well across all average connectivity percentages (orange).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor ON-motion stimuli, in cluster 2 DMNs T4c receives central depolarizing input from Mi1 and Tm3, ventral hyperpolarizing input from Mi9 and dorsal hyperpolarizing input from CT1(M10).
“For ON-motion stimuli, in these DMNs, T4c receives central depolarizing input from Mi1 and Tm3, ventral hyperpolarizing input from Mi9 and dorsal hyperpolarizing input from CT1(M10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor ON-motion stimuli, in cluster 3 DMNs T4c receives central depolarizing input from Mi1 and Tm3, dorsal hyperpolarizing input from Mi4 and CT1(M10), and ventral hyperpolarizing input from Mi9.
“For ON-motion stimuli, in these DMNs, T4c receives central depolarizing input from Mi1 and Tm3, dorsal hyperpolarizing input from Mi4 and CT1(M10), and ventral hyperpolarizing input from Mi9.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor clusters in which TmY3 is motion selective, cluster 1 indicates ON-selectivity for Tm3, Mi1, and Mi4 cells, and OFF-selectivity for L4, Tm2, and Mi9 cells, in agreement with known selectivities.
“For clusters in which TmY3 is motion selective, cluster 1 (TmY3 tuning to downwards/front-to-back motion, circular marker) indicates ONselectivity for Tm3, Mi1, and Mi4 cells, and OFF-selectivity for L4, Tm2, and Mi9 cells, in agreement to the known selectivities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHalf of the 65 cell types receive input from 21 up to 200 cells, while the other half receives input from less than 21 cells.
“(b) (left) Half of the 65 cell types receive input from 21 up to 200 cells, while the other half receives input from less than 21 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHalf of the 65 cell types project onto more than six other cell types, while the other half projects onto less than six.
“(right) Half of the 65 cell types project onto more then six other cell types, while the other half projects onto less than six.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataModels generalized on optic flow computation after round about 250,000 iterations.
“Models generalized on optic flow computation after round about 250,000 iterations, yielding functional candidates for our fruit fly visual system models that we analyzed with respect to their tuning properties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster 2 (T4c downwards tuned) indicates Mi1, Tm3, Mi9, and CT1(M10) are ON-selective and Mi4 is OFF-selective.
“For cluster 2 (T4c in DMN downwards tuned, triangle), Mi1, Tm3, Mi9, and CT1(M10) are ON-selective and Mi4 is OFF-selective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAn integration time step smaller than 20 ms (i.e., a framerate of 50 Hz after resampling) did not yield qualitatively superior task performance nor more realistic tuning predictions.
“We did not find that an integration time step smaller than 20 ms, i.e. a framerate of 50 Hz after resampling, yielded qualitatively superior task performance nor more realistic tuning predictions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingown dataDirection selectivity index from neural responses to moving edges for the same 10 best models.
“(c) Direction selectivity index (DSI) from neural responses to moving edges (Methods, Equation 4) for the same 10 best models as in (b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHalf of the 65 cell types project output onto 20 up to 200 cells, while the other half projects output onto less than 20 cells.
“(right) Half of the 65 cell types project output onto 20 up to 200 cells, while the other half projects output onto less than 20 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCluster 1 (T4c upwards tuned) indicates ON-selectivity for Mi1, Tm3, Mi4, and CT1(M10), and OFF-selectivity for Mi9.
“Cluster 1 (T4c in DMN upwards tuned, circle) indicates ON-selectivity for Mi1, Tm3, Mi4, and CT1(M10), and OFF-selectivity for Mi9.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHalf of the connections are characterized by less than 1.6 synapses while the other half are characterized by 1.6 up to hundreds of synapses.
“(c) Half of the connections are characterized by less than 1.6 synapses while the other half are characterized by 1.6 up to hundreds of synapses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataON/OFF contrast selectivity indices for each cell type based on peak transient responses for flash stimuli for 10 best models.
“(b) ON-and OFF-contrast selectivity indices for each cell type based on peak transient responses for flash stimuli (Methods, Equation 3) for 10 models with best task performance (10 worst-performing models in Extended Data Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataEven just 10% (83 positions) of available ground truth was sufficient to robustly position the majority of the neurons (64.3%, 534 positions) into the correct columns, and annotate 48% (865 neurons) perfectly consistent.
“We found that even just 10% (83 positions) of the available ground truth was sufficient to robustly position the majority of the neurons (64.3%, 534 positions) into the correct columns, and annotate 48% (865 neurons) perfectly consistent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe best-performing DMN correctly predicts narrow spatial receptive fields for Mi1, Mi4, Mi9, and CT1(M10), and a wide receptive field for Tm3.
“For major T4 inputs, the best-performing DMN correctly predicts narrow spatial receptive fields for Mi1, Mi4, Mi9, and CT1(M10), and a wide receptive field for Tm3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe EM-datasets contain 1801 neurons (702 from FIB-25 and 1099 from FIB-19), with hand-annotated positions available for 830 of these neurons.
“In total, they contain 1801 neurons (702 from FIB-25 and 1099 from FIB-19), with hand-annotated positions available for 830 of these neurons (SI Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SI Figure 1
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHalf of the 65 cell types receive input from more than ten other cell types, while the other half receives input from less than ten.
“(a) (left) Half of the 65 cell types receive input from more than ten other cell types, while the other half receives input from less than ten.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationFast excitation and delayed, offset inhibition enable T4c to detect motion, in agreement with experimental measurements.
“Fast excitation and delayed, offset inhibition enable T4c to detect motion, in agreement with experimental measurements 54 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54] 2018, Simple integration of fast excitation and offset, delayed inhibition computes directional selectivity in Drosophila, Nature Neuroscience source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA pair of presynaptic and postsynaptic cell type is connected by 5.5 synapses in half of the cases and by more than 5.5 up to hundreds in the other half of the cases.
“(d) A pair of presynaptic and postsynaptic cell type is connected by 5.5 synapses in half of the cases and by more than 5.5 up to hundreds in the other half of the cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHalf of the 65 cell types receive inhibitory inputs from less than 39.2 synapses and the other half from 39.2 to hundreds.
“Half of the 65 cell types receive inhibitory inputs from less than 39.2 synapses and the other half from 39.2 to hundreds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHalf of the 65 cell types receive input from less than 93.6 synapses and the other half between 93.6 to 400 synapses.
“(e) (left) Half of the 65 cell types receive input from less than 93.6 synapses and the other half between 93.6 to 400 synapses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenWeak autapses in the hexagonal model did not affect the tuning predictions.
“this allowed for weak autapses in our hexagonal model that did not affect the tuning predictions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHalf of the 65 cell types project less than 55.9 synapses and the other half projects between 55.9 to 600 synapses.
“(right) Half of the 65 cell types project less than 55.9 synapses and the other half projects between 55.9 to 600 synapses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe reconstruction did not fully capture the asymmetry reported in [48] of the T5 anatomical receptive field of Tm9.
“We found that the reconstruction did not fully capture the asymmetry reported in 48 of the T5 anatomical receptive field of Tm9”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] 2019, Comparisons between the ON-and OFF-edge motion pathways in the Drosophila brain, Elife
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt least half of the 65 cell types project no inhibitory synapses and the rest project between zero to hundreds.
“At least half of the 65 cell types project no inhibitory synapses and the rest project between zero to hundreds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFor few T4 and T5 inputs, the number of input synapses reported in the literature [48] slightly deviated from our reconstruction.
“For few T4 and T5 inputs the number of input synapses reported in the literature 48 slightly deviated from our reconstruction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] 2019, Comparisons between the ON-and OFF-edge motion pathways in the Drosophila brain, Elife
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataHalf of the 65 cell types receive excitatory inputs from less than 52.3 synapses and the other half from 52.3 to hundreds.
“(f) Separating (e) into excitatory and inihibitory synapses, (left) we see that half of the 65 cell types receive excitatory inputs from less than 52.3 synapses and the other half from 52.3 to hundreds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationown dataA connectome-constrained, task-optimized deep mechanistic network constructed with experimentally determined connectivity for 64 cell types in the fly optic lobe motion pathways and unknown single-neuron and single-synapse parameters can predict neural responses at single-neuron resolution.
“We constructed a model neural network with the experimentally determined connectivity for 64 cell types in the motion pathways of the fruit fly optic lobe but with unknown parameters for the single neuron and single synapse properties.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Our mechanistic model makes detailed experimentally testable predictions for each neuron in the connectome.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn neuroscience, there have been competing proposals by theorists for neural circuit mechanisms of visual motion and for integration of eye velocity commands into eye position signals, with each proposal suggesting different neural connectivity.
“Similarly in neuroscience, there have been competing proposals by theorists for example, for the neural circuit mechanisms of the computation of visual motion 32,33 , and for the integration of eye velocity commands into eye position signals 34,35 , with each proposal suggesting different neural connectivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [32] Reichardt, W. Autocorrelation, a principle for evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system. Principles of sensory communications (1961).
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [33] source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [34] Seung, H. S. How the brain keeps the eyes still. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 13339–13344 (1996). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [35] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe model suggests that TmY3 might also detect motion.
“Our model further suggests that TmY3 might also detect motion, a prediction that has yet to be experimentally tested.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe authors required that at the macroscopic scale, the collective neural activity dynamics across the entire network result in an ethologically relevant computation.
“We also required that at the macroscopic scale, the collective neural activity dynamics across the entire network result in an ethologically relevant computation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTmY4 and TmY18 cells receive inputs from T4 cells, potentially inheriting their motion tuning.
“In contrast, TmY4 and TmY18 cells receive inputs from T4 cells, potentially inheriting their motion tuning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe ensemble suggests ON-motion sensitivity for TmY3, but different clusters disagree in their predictions for direction and contrast selectivity.
“Together, the ensemble suggests ON-motion sensitivity for TmY3, but different clusters disagree in their predictions for direction and contrast selectivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe decoding network cannot by itself detect motion and must rely on the temporal dynamics of the connectome-constrained network to compute motion-selective visual features.
“Importantly, the decoding network cannot by itself detect motion, which requires the comparison of current and past visual stimuli, but must instead rely on the temporal dynamics of the connectome-constrained network to compute motionselective visual features.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWhole nervous system connectome projects are nearing completion for the adult fruit fly.
“Whole nervous system connectome projects are nearing completion for the adult fruit fly 2,13”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThere has been early evidence, in small scale models and larger models of the fly motion pathways, that combining connectome and task constraints in a single model might prove successful.
“More recently, there has been tantalizing early evidence, in small scale models 46 and larger models 119 of the fly motion pathways, that our approach to combining connectome and taskconstraints in a single model might prove successful.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [46] 2021, Predicting individual neuron responses with anatomically constrained task optimization, Current Biology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [119] Tschopp, F. D. , Reiser, M. B. & Turaga, S. C. A Connectome Based Hexagonal Lattice Convolutional Network Model of the Drosophila Visual System. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.04793 (2018). URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.04793.1806.04793.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe authors ensured that subsamples from the same scene do not distribute across training and validation sets.
“We ensured that such subsamples from the same scene do not distribute across training and validation sets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenCreating 50 DMNs with random parameters and task-optimizing only their decoding network yields an upper bound for the task error of the task-optimized DMN and a lower bound for the accuracy of tuning predictions without task-optimization.
“We created 50 DMNs with random parameters (all sampled from Gaussians of different means and standard deviations), and task-optimized only their decoding network, yielding an upper bound for the task error of the task-optimized DMN and a lower bound for the accuracy of tuning predictions without task-optimization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe fly visual system likely falls in the region between the two curves, since measured synapse counts inform relative connection strengths between pairs of neurons for the same pair of cell types, but not absolute connection strength.
“The fly visual system likely falls in the region between the two curves, since measured synapse counts inform relative connection strengths between pairs of neurons for the same pair of cell types, but not absolute connection strength.”
- Also stated in: § Measuring · hedged
“The fly visual system likely falls in the region between the two curves, since measured synapse counts inform relative connection strengths between pairs of neurons for the same pair of cell types, but not absolute connection strength.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The individual units in the SCNs are interpreted as neurons with voltage.
- Also stated in: § Measuring · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWhole mouse brain connectome projects are now being discussed.
“and whole mouse brain connectome projects are now being discussed 121 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [121] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenEstimates of the spatial asymmetry of connectivity from existing connectomic reconstructions can be noisy.
“We note, however, that estimates of the spatial asymmetry of connectivity from existing connectomic reconstructions can be noisy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe authors verified the quality of their reconstruction as described in Supplementary Note 1.
“We verified the quality of our reconstruction as described in Supplementary Note 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningOnly neurons consistently annotated with both 100% and 90% of reference positions used were counted to estimate the number of synapses between cell types and columns, in order to prune neuron offsets with low confidences.
“Only the neurons consistently annotated with both 100% and 90% of reference positions used were counted to estimate the number of synapses between cell types and columns, in order to prune neuron offsets with low confidences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningOur modeling approach provides a discovery tool aimed at using connectomic measurements to generate detailed, experimentally testable hypotheses for the computational role of individual neurons.
“Our modeling approach provides a discovery tool, aimed at using connectomic measurements to generate detailed, experimentally testable hypotheses for the computational role of individual neurons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCluster 3 indicates ON-selectivity for Mi9 in contradiction to known selectivities and hence rules out the third TmY3 tuning solution.
“In contrast, cluster 3 (TmY3 tuning to upwards/back-to-front motion, square marker) indicates ONselectivity for Mi9 in contradiction to the known selectivities and hence ruling out the third TmY3 tuning solution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCluster analysis of DMN ensembles enables hypotheses generation and suggests experimental tests.
“Figure 4: Cluster analysis of DMN ensembles enables hypotheses generation and suggests experimental tests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataSparse networks have larger local minima.
“Sparse networks have larger local minima.”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
“we believe that 1032 the size of the simulations' local minima increase”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere are approximately 140 Lawf2 neurons per optic lobe, and each of approximately 700 columns is innervated by approximately 5 Lawf2 cells.
“(there are approx.140 Lawf2 neurons per optic lobe, and each of approx.700 columns is innervated by approx.5 Lawf2 cells 124 )”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [124] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe authors manually proofread filters on the hexagonal lattice and compared them to reported filters in the literature to ensure overall correspondence.
“We manually proofread filters on the hexagonal lattice and compared them to the reported filters in the literature to ensure overall correspondence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe ones filled in the convex hull are considered mostly false positives from the connectome reconstruction.
“Although these are considered mostly false positives from the connectome reconstruction 12”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
Not checked in the free run.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Neurons of the same cell type share the same neuron time constant and resting membrane potential.
“We assumed that neurons of the same cell type shared the same neuron time constant and resting membrane potential.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The circuitry across the entire visual field is perfectly periodic (spatial homogeneity/translation invariance across retinotopic space).
“We approximated the circuitry across the entire visual field as perfectly periodic 66,68 , and tiled this local connectivity architecture in hexagonal lattice across retinotopic space”
“our assumption of spatial homogeneity (i.e., the hexagonally convolutional structure of the network)”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The unitary synapse scaling and the sign of each synapse are the same across all pairs of neurons with the same pre- and postsynaptic cell type.
“The unitary synapse scaling and the sign of each synapse was the same across all pairs of neurons with the same pre-and postsynaptic cell type.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The synapse count between each pair of neurons is the same across all pairs of neurons with the same pre- and postsynaptic cell type and their relative location in retinotopic space.
“Likewise, the synapse count between each pair of neurons was the same across all pairs of neurons with the same pre-and postsynaptic cell type, and their relative location in retinotopic space.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter.
“Instead of parametrizing each individual synapse strength, we assume that synapse strength is proportional to synapse count from the connectome times a scalar for each filter, reducing the number of parameters to Q + 2T = 734 while providing enough capacity for the DMNs to yield realistic tuning to solve the task.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A convolutional RNN with shared filters between cells of the same postsynaptic type, shared time constants, and resting potential.
“Assuming a convolutional RNN with shared filters between cells of the same postsynaptic type, shared time constants, and resting potential, the amount of parameters reduces drastically to T 2 C + 2T = 3, 046, 355.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The same convolutional RNN but additionally convolutional filters are constrained to F = 5 visual columns.
“Further assuming the same convolutional RNN but additionally convolutional filters are constrained to F = 5 visual columns, i.e. the number of presynaptic input columns in hexagonal lattice is P = 3F (F + 1) + 1, the amount of parameters reduces to T 2 P + 2T = 384, 605.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Only Q = 604 connections between cell types exist in our connectome.
“Assuming as in our connectome only Q = 604 connections between cell types exist, this reduces the number of parameters further to QP + 2T = 55, 185.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, only one neuron per position is present.
“For columnar, spatially repeated neurons, we can also 978 assume that only one neuron per position is present.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The individual units in the SCNs are interpreted as neurons with voltage.
“We interpret the individual units in the SCN's as neurons with voltage”
The paper relies on this without support.
A multi-compartment model with bidirectional electrical synapses often resulted in oscillatory dynamics in earlier modeling attempts.
“Because a multi-compartment model with bidirectional electrical synapses resulted often in oscillatory dynamics in earlier modeling attempts”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An absence of information across columns has necessitated treating each column as identical in simulations of the optic lobe.
“An absence of information across columns, has necessitated treating each column as identical in simulations of the optic lobe115.”
From Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain (2023) · cites this paper as [115]
A neural network simulation of visual motion detection based on the wiring diagram of columnar circuits in the optic lobe has been created.
“A neural network simulation of visual motion detection based on the wiring diagram of columnar circuits in the optic lobe has been created115.”
From Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain (2023) · cites this paper as [115]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Flash-stimulus baseline duration differs
MinorThe methods specify one second of grey-screen stimulation before the flashes, whereas the Extended Data figure describes the flash-response measurements as following two seconds of grey input.
“The networks were initialized at an approximate steady state after 1s of grey-screen stimulation.Afterwards the flashes were presented for 1s.”
“both of approximately 35 • radius and presented for 1s after 2 seconds of grey input.”
T4 and T5 preferred edge contrasts are reversed
MinorThe results say T4 responds to dark edges and T5 to bright edges, but the figure caption identifies T4 as the ON-motion detector and T5 as the OFF-motion detector.
“the four subtypes of the T4 respond strongly to dark edges, and the four subtypes of the T5 neurons to bright edges”
“the ON-(T4) and OFF-(T5) motion detection pathways”
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126 · see citing works
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892 · see citing works
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01703 · Cited by 31,473 · see citing works
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Cios, K. J., & Shields, M. E. (1997) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(97)90018-7 · Cited by 22,089 · see citing works
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741 · see citing works
Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · Cited by 11,891 · see citing works
Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcasting
Shi, X., Chen, Z., Wang, H., Yeung, D.-Y., Wong, W.-K., & Woo, W.-C. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.04214 · Cited by 7,709 · see citing works
The structure of the nervous system of the nematode <i>Caenorhabditis elegans</i>
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1986) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056 · Cited by 5,589 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Volume electron microscopy can now be used to comprehensively measure the connectivity of every neuron in a neural circuit, and even entire nervous systems 7–24 .”
MethodDimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP
Becht, E., McInnes, L., Healy, J., Dutertre, C.-A., Kwok, I. W. H., Ng, L. G., Ginhoux, F., & Newell, E. W. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4314 · Cited by 5,358 · see citing works
Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it
Werbos, P. J. (1990) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.58337 · Cited by 4,879 · see citing works
Flownet: Learning optical flow with convolutional networks
Dosovitskiy, A., Fischer, P., Ilg, E., Hausser, P., Hazirbas, C., Golkov, V., Smagt, P. V. D., Cremers, D., & Brox, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.316 · Cited by 4,313 · see citing works
Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function
Cybenko, G. (1992) · Math. Control. Signals Syst. · doi:10.1007/bf02134016 · Cited by 3,475 · see citing works
Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/14819 · Cited by 3,309 · see citing works
A mesoscale connectome of the mouse brain
Oh, S. W., Harris, J. A., Ng, L., Winslow, B., Cain, N., Mihalas, S., Wang, Q., Lau, C., Kuan, L., Henry, A. M., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13186 · Cited by 2,612 · see citing works
Leshno, M., Lin, V. Y., Pinkus, A., & Schocken, S. (1993) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(05)80131-5 · Cited by 2,121 · see citing works
Performance-optimized hierarchical models predict neural responses in higher visual cortex
Yamins, D. L. K., Hong, H., Cadieu, C. F., Solomon, E. A., Seibert, D., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1403112111 · Cited by 1,924 · see citing works
A Naturalistic Open Source Movie for Optical Flow Evaluation
Butler, D. J., Wulff, J., Stanley, G. B., & Black, M. J. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33783-3_44 · Cited by 1,842 · see citing works
Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex
Yamins, D. L. K., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4244 · Cited by 1,621 · see citing works
The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina.
Barlow, H. B., & Levick, W. R. (1965) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007638 · Cited by 1,576 · see citing works
The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networks
Frankle, J., & Carbin, M. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.03635 · Cited by 1,529 · see citing works
A connectome and analysis of the adult Drosophila central brain
Scheffer, L. K., Xu, C. S., Januszewski, M., Lu, Z., Takemura, S.-Y., Hayworth, K. J., Huang, G. B., Shinomiya, K., Maitlin-Shepard, J., Berg, S., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.57443 · Cited by 1,128 · see citing works
Self-citationKriegeskorte, N. (2015) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035447 · Cited by 1,093 · see citing works
A Complete Electron Microscopy Volume of the Brain of Adult Drosophila melanogaster
Zheng, Z., Lauritzen, J. S., Perlman, E., Robinson, C. G., Nichols, M., Milkie, D., Torrens, O., Price, J., Fisher, C. B., Sharifi, N., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.019 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
Saturated Reconstruction of a Volume of Neocortex
Kasthuri, N., Hayworth, K. J., Berger, D. R., Schalek, R. L., Conchello, J. A., Knowles-Barley, S., Lee, D., Vázquez-Reina, A., Kaynig, V., Jones, T. R., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.054 · Cited by 1,044 · see citing works
Development of the Drosophila retina, a neurocrystalline lattice
Ready, D. F., Hanson, T. E., & Benzer, S. (1976) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/0012-1606(76)90225-6 · Cited by 1,030 · see citing works
Simulation physiologischer Regelkreise mit der objektorientierten Modellbibliothek “HumanLib”
Brunberg, A., Spillner, J. W., Autschbach, R., & Abel, D. (2011) · at - Automatisierungstechnik · doi:10.1524/auto.2011.0951 · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works
Connectomic reconstruction of the inner plexiform layer in the mouse retina
Helmstaedter, M., Briggman, K. L., Turaga, S. C., Jain, V., Seung, H. S., & Denk, W. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12346 · Cited by 997 · see citing works
Self-citationNeocognitron: A Self-Organizing Neural Network Model for a Mechanism of Visual Pattern Recognition
Fukushima, K., & Miyake, S. (1982) · Lecture Notes in Biomathematics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-46466-9_18 · Cited by 991 · see citing works
Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes
Cook, S. J., Jarrell, T. A., Brittin, C. A., Wang, Y., Bloniarz, A. E., Yakovlev, M. A., Nguyen, K. C. Q., Tang, L. T.-H., Bayer, E. A., Duerr, J. S., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1352-7 · Cited by 921 · see citing works
Neuromodulation of neuronal circuits: back to the future
Marder, E. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.010 · Cited by 904 · see citing works
Network anatomy and in vivo physiology of visual cortical neurons
Bock, D. D., Lee, W.-C. A., Kerlin, A., Andermann, M. L., Hood, G., Wetzel, A. W., Yurgenson, S., Soucy, E. R., Kim, H. S., & Reid, R. C. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09802 · Cited by 851 · see citing works
The optic lobe of Drosophila melanogaster. I. A Golgi analysis of wild-type structure
Fischbach, K.-F., & Dittrich, A. P. M. (1989) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/bf00218858 · Cited by 709 · see citing works
A visual motion detection circuit suggested by Drosophila connectomics
Takemura, S.-Y., Bharioke, A., Lu, Z., Nern, A., Vitaladevuni, S., Rivlin, P. K., Katz, W. T., Olbris, D. J., Plaza, S. M., Winston, P., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12450 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Self-citationDo Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?
Raghu, M., Unterthiner, T., Kornblith, S., Zhang, C., & Dosovitskiy, A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.08810 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Nern, A., Pfeiffer, B. D., & Rubin, G. M. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1506763112 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Self-citationFrom the connectome to brain function
Bargmann, C. I., & Marder, E. (2013) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2451 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Task representations in neural networks trained to perform many cognitive tasks
Yang, G. R., Joglekar, M. R., Song, H. F., Newsome, W. T., & Wang, X.-J. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-018-0310-2 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Churchill, A., Gutiérrez, G. D., Singer, R. A., Lorberbaum, D. S., Fischer, K. A., & Sussel, L. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.20010 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
How the brain keeps the eyes still
Seung, H. S. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.23.13339 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
The Connectome of a Decision-Making Neural Network
Jarrell, T. A., Wang, Y., Bloniarz, A. E., Brittin, C. A., Xu, M., Thomson, J. N., Albertson, D. G., Hall, D. H., & Emmons, S. W. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1221762 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Optomotorische Untersuchung des visuellen systems einiger Augenmutanten der Fruchtfliege Drosophila
Götz, K. (1964) · Kybernetik · doi:10.1007/bf00288561 · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Multiple models to capture the variability in biological neurons and networks
Marder, E., & Taylor, A. L. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2735 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Patterns of projection in the visual system of the fly. I. Retina-lamina projections
Braitenberg, V. (1967) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00235589 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Visual place learning in Drosophila melanogaster
Ofstad, T. A., Zuker, C. S., & Reiser, M. B. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10131 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Connectomes across development reveal principles of brain maturation
Witvliet, D., Mulcahy, B., Mitchell, J. K., Meirovitch, Y., Berger, D. R., Wu, Y., Liu, Y., Koh, W. X., Parvathala, R., Holmyard, D., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03778-8 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Hulse, B. K., Haberkern, H., Franconville, R., Turner-Evans, D. B., Takemura, S., Wolff, T., Noorman, M., Dreher, M., Dan, C., Parekh, R., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.12.08.413955 · Cited by 392 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Further, we only considered the role of this circuit in detecting motion, which is but one of many computations performed by the visual system 14,111–114 .”
BackgroundSelf-citationA directional tuning map of Drosophila elementary motion detectors
Maisak, M. S., Haag, J., Ammer, G., Serbe, E., Meier, M., Leonhardt, A., Schilling, T., Bahl, A., Rubin, G. M., Nern, A., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12320 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Self-citationA simple automatic derivative evaluation program
Wengert, R. E. (1964) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/355586.364791 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Whole-brain serial-section electron microscopy in larval zebrafish
Hildebrand, D. G. C., Cicconet, M., Torres, R., Choi, W., Quan, T. M., Moon, J., Wetzel, A. W., Champion, A. S., Graham, B. J., Randlett, O., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature22356 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Glia Accumulate Evidence that Actions Are Futile and Suppress Unsuccessful Behavior
Mu, Y., Bennett, D., Rubinov, M., Narayan, S., Yang, C.-T., Tanimoto, M., Mensh, B. D., Looger, L. L., & Ahrens, M. B. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.050 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
ON and OFF pathways in Drosophila motion vision
Joesch, M., Schnell, B., Raghu, S. V., Reiff, D. F., & Borst, A. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09545 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Memory without Feedback in a Neural Network
Goldman, M. S. (2009) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.012 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Borst, A., Haag, J., & Reiff, D. F. (2010) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153155 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Dense connectomic reconstruction in layer 4 of the somatosensory cortex
Motta, A., Berning, M., Boergens, K. M., Staffler, B., Beining, M., Loomba, S., Hennig, P., Wissler, H., & Helmstaedter, M. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay3134 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Visually mediated motor planning in the escape response of Drosophila
Card, G., & Dickinson, M. H. (2008) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.094 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Krapp, H. G., Hengstenberg, B., & Hengstenberg, R. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.79.4.1902 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
FlyWire: online community for whole-brain connectomics
Dorkenwald, S., McKellar, C. E., Macrina, T., Kemnitz, N., Lee, K., Lu, R., Wu, J., Popovych, S., Mitchell, E., Nehoran, B., et al. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01330-0 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Takemura, S.-Y., Xu, C. S., Lu, Z., Rivlin, P. K., Parag, T., Olbris, D. J., Plaza, S., Zhao, T., Katz, W. T., Umayam, L., et al. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1509820112 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Self-citationProcessing properties of ON and OFF pathways for Drosophila motion detection
Behnia, R., Clark, D. A., Carter, A. G., Clandinin, T. R., & Desplan, C. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13427 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Defining the Computational Structure of the Motion Detector in Drosophila
Clark, D. A., Bursztyn, L., Horowitz, M., Schnitzer, M. J., & Clandinin, T. R. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.023 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Subcellular Imaging of Voltage and Calcium Signals Reveals Neural Processing In Vivo
Yang, H. H., St-Pierre, F., Sun, X., Ding, X., Lin, M. Z., & Clandinin, T. R. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.031 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
A connectomic study of a petascale fragment of human cerebral cortex
Shapson-Coe, A., Januszewski, M., Berger, D. R., Pope, A., Wu, Y., Blakely, T., Schalek, R. L., Li, P. H., Wang, S., Maitin-Shepard, J., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.05.29.446289 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
Connectomic comparison of mouse and human cortex
Loomba, S., Straehle, J., Gangadharan, V., Heike, N., Khalifa, A., Motta, A., Ju, N., Sievers, M., Gempt, J., Meyer, H. S., et al. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abo0924 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Contributions of the 12 Neuron Classes in the Fly Lamina to Motion Vision
Tuthill, J. C., Nern, A., Holtz, S. L., Rubin, G. M., & Reiser, M. B. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.05.024 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Self-citationWiring Economy and Volume Exclusion Determine Neuronal Placement in the Drosophila Brain
Rivera-Alba, M., Vitaladevuni, S. N., Mishchenko, Y., Lu, Z., Takemura, S.-Y., Scheffer, L., Meinertzhagen, I. A., Chklovskii, D. B., & de Polavieja, G. G. (2011) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.022 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Self-citationInception loops discover what excites neurons most using deep predictive models
Walker, E. Y., Sinz, F. H., Cobos, E., Muhammad, T., Froudarakis, E., Fahey, P. G., Ecker, A. S., Reimer, J., Pitkow, X., & Tolias, A. S. (2019) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0517-x · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Common circuit design in fly and mammalian motion vision
Borst, A., & Helmstaedter, M. N. (2015) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4050 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Abbott, L. F., Bock, D. D., Callaway, E. M., Denk, W., Dulac, C., Fairhall, A. L., Fiete, I., Harris, K. M., Helmstaedter, M., Jain, V., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.010 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Visual projection neurons mediating directed courtship in Drosophila
Ribeiro, I. M. A., Drews, M., Bahl, A., Machacek, C., Borst, A., & Dickson, B. J. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.020 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Modular Use of Peripheral Input Channels Tunes Motion-Detecting Circuitry
Silies, M., Gohl, D. M., Fisher, Y. E., Freifeld, L., Clark, D. A., & Clandinin, T. R. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.029 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Dense EM-based reconstruction of the interglomerular projectome in the zebrafish olfactory bulb
Wanner, A. A., Genoud, C., Masudi, T., Siksou, L., & Friedrich, R. W. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4290 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Comparisons between the ON- and OFF-edge motion pathways in the Drosophila brain
Shinomiya, K., Huang, G., Lu, Z., Parag, T., Xu, C. S., Aniceto, R., Ansari, N., Cheatham, N., Lauchie, S., Neace, E., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.40025 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Self-citationPhototransduction in Drosophila
Hardie, R., & Juusola, M. (2015) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2015.01.008 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Benefits of Pathway Splitting in Sensory Coding
Gjorgjieva, J., Sompolinsky, H., & Meister, M. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1032-14.2014 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Arenz, A., Drews, M. S., Richter, F. G., Ammer, G., & Borst, A. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.01.051 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Direct Observation of ON and OFF Pathways in the Drosophila Visual System
Strother, J. A., Nern, A., & Reiser, M. B. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.017 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationPeretz, A. S. (1994) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(94)90442-1 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Cell types and neuronal circuitry underlying female aggression in Drosophila
Schretter, C. E., Aso, Y., Robie, A. A., Dreher, M., Dolan, M.-J., Chen, N., Ito, M., Yang, T., Parekh, R., Branson, K. M., et al. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.58942 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Automated synapse-level reconstruction of neural circuits in the larval zebrafish brain
Svara, F., Förster, D., Kubo, F., Januszewski, M., dal Maschio, M., Schubert, P. J., Kornfeld, J., Wanner, A. A., Laurell, E., Denk, W., et al. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01621-0 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Orientation Selectivity Sharpens Motion Detection in Drosophila
Fisher, Y. E., Silies, M., & Clandinin, T. R. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.033 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Analyzing biological and artificial neural networks: challenges with opportunities for synergy?
Barrett, D. G. T., Morcos, A. S., & Macke, J. H. (2019) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2019.01.007 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationSerbe-Kamp, E., Meier, M., Leonhardt, A., & Borst, A. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.006 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
How fly neurons compute the direction of visual motion
Borst, A., Haag, J., & Mauss, A. S. (2019) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-019-01375-9 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Visualizing retinotopic half-wave rectified input to the motion detection circuitry of Drosophila
Reiff, D. F., Plett, J., Mank, M., Griesbeck, O., & Borst, A. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2595 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
AlQuraishi, M., & Sorger, P. K. (2021) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01283-4 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
A biophysical account of multiplication by a single neuron
Groschner, L. N., Malis, J. G., Zuidinga, B., & Borst, A. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04428-3 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Gruntman, E., Romani, S., & Reiser, M. B. (2018) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-017-0046-4 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuroMechFly, a neuromechanical model of adult Drosophila melanogaster
Lobato-Rios, V., Ramalingasetty, S. T., Özdil, P. G., Arreguit, J., Ijspeert, A. J., & Ramdya, P. (2022) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01466-7 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
GABAergic Lateral Interactions Tune the Early Stages of Visual Processing in Drosophila
Freifeld, L., Clark, D. A., Schnitzer, M. J., Horowitz, M., & Clandinin, T. R. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.024 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Schaeffer, R., Khona, M., & Fiete, I. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.08.07.503109 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Behavioral state modulates the ON visual motion pathway of <i>Drosophila</i>
Strother, J. A., Wu, S.-T., Rogers, E. M., Eliason, J. L. M., Wong, A. M., Nern, A., & Reiser, M. B. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1703090115 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationAsymmetry of Drosophila ON and OFF motion detectors enhances real-world velocity estimation
Leonhardt, A., Ammer, G., Meier, M., Serbe-Kamp, E., Bahl, A., & Borst, A. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4262 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Fisher, D., Olasagasti, I., Tank, D. W., Aksay, E. R. F., & Goldman, M. S. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.041 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Marder, E., Gutierrez, G. J., & Nusbaum, M. P. (2017) · Developmental Neurobiology · doi:10.1002/dneu.22410 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
A Class of Visual Neurons with Wide-Field Properties Is Required for Local Motion Detection
Fisher, Y. E., Leong, J. C. S., Šporar, K., Ketkar, M. D., Gohl, D. M., Clandinin, T. R., & Silies, M. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.018 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Wide-Field Feedback Neurons Dynamically Tune Early Visual Processing
Tuthill, J. C., Nern, A., Rubin, G. M., & Reiser, M. B. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.023 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationExtreme Compartmentalization in a Drosophila Amacrine Cell
Meier, M., & Borst, A. (2019) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.070 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Neuronal circuits integrating visual motion information in Drosophila melanogaster
Shinomiya, K., Nern, A., Meinertzhagen, I. A., Plaza, S. M., & Reiser, M. B. (2022) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.061 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural Circuit Components of the Drosophila OFF Motion Vision Pathway
Meier, M., Serbe-Kamp, E., Maisak, M. S., Haag, J., Dickson, B. J., & Borst, A. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.006 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Functional Specialization of Neural Input Elements to the Drosophila ON Motion Detector
Ammer, G., Leonhardt, A., Bahl, A., Dickson, B. J., & Borst, A. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.014 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Schaeffer, R., Khona, M., & Fiete, I. (2022) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/068431-1168 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Mathematical Equivalence of Two Common Forms of Firing Rate Models of Neural Networks
Miller, K. D., & Fumarola, F. (2011) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00221 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Evolving the olfactory system with machine learning
Wang, P. Y., Sun, Y., Axel, R., Abbott, L. F., & Yang, G. R. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.09.010 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Anatomical distribution and functional roles of electrical synapses in Drosophila
Ammer, G., Vieira, R. M., Fendl, S., & Borst, A. (2022) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.03.040 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Nonlinear circuits for naturalistic visual motion estimation
Fitzgerald, J. E., & Clark, D. A. (2015) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.09123 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
From deep learning to mechanistic understanding in neuroscience: the structure of retinal prediction
Tanaka, H., Nayebi, A., Maheswaranathan, N., McIntosh, L., Baccus, S. A., & Ganguli, S. (2019) · PubMed · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.06207 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Deep neuroethology of a virtual rodent
Merel, J., Aldarondo, D., Marshall, J., Tassa, Y., Wayne, G., & Ölveczky, B. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.09451 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
The computation of directional selectivity in the drosophila off motion pathway
Gruntman, E., Romani, S., & Reiser, M. B. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.50706 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationConnectomic features underlying diverse synaptic connection strengths and subcellular computation
Liu, T. X., Davoudian, P. A., Lizbinski, K. M., & Jeanne, J. M. (2022) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.11.056 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Curto, C., Degeratu, A., & Itskov, V. (2011) · Bulletin of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s11538-011-9678-9 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Ketkar, M. D., Gür, B., Molina-Obando, S., Ioannidou, M., Martelli, C., & Silies, M. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.74937 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
A connectome is not enough – what is still needed to understand the brain of<i>Drosophila</i>?
Scheffer, L. K., & Meinertzhagen, I. A. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.242740 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
The physiological basis for contrast opponency in motion computation in Drosophila
Ramos-Traslosheros, G., & Silies, M. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24986-w · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Predicting individual neuron responses with anatomically constrained task optimization
Mano, O., Creamer, M. S., Badwan, B. A., & Clark, D. A. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.090 · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…that our connectome-39 constrained and task-optimized DMN accurately predicts the well-known segregation of the visual system into light increment (ON) and light decrement (OFF) channels 46,57–61 , as well as the direction selectivity of the well-known T4 and T5 motion detector neurons 53,62–64 .”
BackgroundA Connectome Based Hexagonal Lattice Convolutional Network Model of the Drosophila Visual System
Tschopp, F. D., Reiser, M. B., & Turaga, S. C. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.04793 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationGeometric framework to predict structure from function in neural networks
Tirthabir Biswas, A., & Fitzgerald, J. E. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023255 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Neural mechanisms underlying sensitivity to reverse-phi motion in the fly
Leonhardt, A., Meier, M., Serbe, E., Eichner, H., & Borst, A. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189019 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Gruntman, E., Reimers, P., Romani, S., & Reiser, M. B. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.072 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationMotion Detection: Neuronal Circuit Meets Theory
Yonehara, K., & Roska, B. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.027 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Charting and navigating the space of solutions for recurrent neural networksPreprint
Turner, E., Dabholkar, K., & Barak, O. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.09356 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
NeuroMechFly, a neuromechanical model of adult Drosophila melanogasterPreprint
Ríos, V. L., Ramalingasetty, S. T., Özdil, P. G., et al. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.04.17.440214 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Fine-Grained System Identification of Nonlinear Neural Circuits
Bagherian, D., Gornet, J., Bernstein, J., Ni, Y.-L., Yue, Y., & Meister, M. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3447548.3467402 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Fine-Grained System Identification of Nonlinear Neural Circuits
Bagherian, D., Gornet, J., Bernstein, J., Ni, Y., Yue, Y., & Meister, M. (2021) · CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1101/2020.12.08.413955v3 · DOI
- Montufar, G. F. , Pascanu, R. , Cho, K. & Bengio, Y. On the number of linear regions of deep neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 27 (2014).
- Goodfellow, I. , Bengio, Y. & Courville, A. Deep learning (MIT press, 2016).
- Kornblith, S. , Norouzi, M. , Lee, H. & Hinton, G. Similarity of neural network representations revisited. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 3519–3529 (PMLR, 2019).
- Kingma, D. & Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICRL) (2014).
- Sandbrink, K. J. et al. Task-driven hierarchical deep neural network models of the proprioceptive pathway. bioRxiv (2020).
- Maheswaranathan, N. , Williams, A. , Golub, M. , Ganguli, S. & Sussillo, D. Universality and individuality in neural dynamics across large populations of recurrent networks. In Wallach, H. et al. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2019). URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/file/5f5d472067f77b5c88f69f1bcfda1e08-Paper.pdf.
- 10.1038/nn.4050 · DOI
- 2001, Approximation with artificial neural networks, Faculty of Sciences, Etvs Lornd University, Hungary, 24, 7
- Li, Y. , Yosinski, J. , Clune, J. , Lipson, H. & Hopcroft, J. E. Convergent learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations? In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2016).
- Raghu, M. , Gilmer, J. , Yosinski, J. & Sohl-Dickstein, J. Svcca: Singular vector canonical correlation analysis for deep learning dynamics and interpretability. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
- 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.014 · DOI · Paper page
- Mi, L. et al. Connectome-constrained latent variable model of whole-brain neural activity. In International Conference on Learning Representations (2022). URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=CJzi3dRlJE-.
- Chen, R. T. Q. , Rubanova, Y. , Bettencourt, J. & Duvenaud, D. K. Neural ordinary differential equa-tions. In Bengio, S. et al. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 31 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2018). URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2018/file/69386f6bb1dfed68692a24c8686939b9-Paper.pdf.
- Krizhevsky, A. , Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 1097–1105 (2012).
- Butler, D. J. , Wulff, J. , Stanley, G. B. & Black, M. J. A naturalistic open source movie for optical flow evaluation. In European conference on computer vision, 611–625 (Springer, 2012). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whole-brain annotation and multi-connectome cell typing of Drosophila
Schlegel, P., Yin, Y., Bates, A. S., Dorkenwald, S., Eichler, K., Brooks, P., Han, D. S., Gkantia, M., dos Santos, M., Munnelly, E. J., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07686-5 · Cited by 413 · see citing works
“It will also make numerous network analyses possible as well as substantially reduce the degrees of freedom in brain scale modelling 65,66 .”
BackgroundMethodEckstein, N., Bates, A. S., Champion, A., Du, M., Yin, Y., Schlegel, P., Lu, A. K.-Y., Rymer, T., Finley-May, S., Paterson, T., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.016 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Functional connectomics spanning multiple areas of mouse visual cortex
The MICrONS Consortium, Bae, J. A., Baptiste, M., Bishop, C. A., Bodor, A. L., Brittain, D., Buchanan, J., Bumbarger, D. J., Castro, M. A., Celii, B., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.07.28.454025 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Neuronal wiring diagram of an adult brain
Dorkenwald, S., Matsliah, A., Sterling, A. R., Schlegel, P., Yu, S.-C., McKellar, C. E., Lin, A., Costa, M., Eichler, K., Yin, Y., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.06.27.546656 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Eckstein, N., Bates, A. S., Champion, A., Du, M., Yin, Y., Schlegel, P., Lu, A. K.-Y., Rymer, T., Finley-May, S., Paterson, T., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.12.148775 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Schlegel, P., Yin, Y., Bates, A. S., Dorkenwald, S., Eichler, K., Brooks, P., Han, D. S., Gkantia, M., dos Santos, M., Munnelly, E. J., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.06.27.546055 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
A Drosophila computational brain model reveals sensorimotor processing
Shiu, P. K., Sterne, G. R., Spiller, N., Franconville, R., Sandoval, A., Zhou, J., Simha, N., Kang, C. H., Yu, S., Kim, J. S., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07763-9 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Mapping model units to visual neurons reveals population code for social behaviour
Cowley, B. R., Calhoun, A. J., Rangarajan, N., Ireland, E., Turner, M. H., Pillow, J. W., & Murthy, M. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07451-8 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
NeuroMechFly v2: simulating embodied sensorimotor control in adult Drosophila
Wang-Chen, S., Stimpfling, V. A., Lam, T. K. C., Özdil, P. G., Genoud, L., Hurtak, F., & Ramdya, P. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02497-y · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Elegans-AI: How the connectome of a living organism could model artificial neural networks
Bardozzo, F., Terlizzi, A., Simoncini, C., Lió, P., & Tagliaferri, R. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.127598 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Stürner, T., Brooks, P., Capdevila, L. S., Morris, B. J., Javier, A., Fang, S., Gkantia, M., Cachero, S., Beckett, I. R., Champion, A. S., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.06.04.596633 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Deistler, M., Kadhim, K. L., Pals, M., Beck, J., Huang, Z., Gloeckler, M., Lappalainen, J. K., Schröder, C., Berens, P., Gonçalves, P. J., et al. (2025) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-025-02895-w · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuronal “parts list” and wiring diagram for a visual systemPreprint
Matsliah, A., Yu, S.-C., Kruk, K., Bland, D., Burke, A., Gager, J., Hebditch, J., Silverman, B., Willie, K. P., Willie, R., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.12.562119 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
BIFROST: A method for registering diverse imaging datasets of the Drosophila brain
Brezovec, B. E., Berger, A. B., Hao, Y. A., Lin, A., Ahmed, O. M., Pacheco, D. A., Thiberge, S. Y., Murthy, M., & Clandinin, T. R. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2322687121 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Shiu, P. K., Sterne, G. R., Spiller, N., Franconville, R., Sandoval, A., Zhou, J., Simha, N., Kang, C. H., Yu, S., Kim, J. S., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.02.539144 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
“…Ohyama et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2018; Zheng et al., 2018; Meinertzhagen 2018; Bates et al., 2020; Schlegel, P. et al, 2020; Scheffer, L. K. et al., 2020; Marin et al., 2020; Dorkenwald et al., 2022; Lappalainen et al., 2023; Winding et al., 2023; Flywire.ai; forthcoming Flywire paper, 2023).”
BackgroundMechanosensory Control of Locomotion in Animals and Robots: Moving Forward
Dallmann, C. J., Dickerson, B. H., Simpson, J. H., Wyart, C., & Jayaram, K. (2023) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icad057 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Building and integrating brain-wide maps of nervous system function in invertebrates
Kramer, T. S., & Flavell, S. W. (2024) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2024.102868 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Cowley, B. R., Calhoun, A. J., Rangarajan, N., Turner, M. H., Pillow, J., & Murthy, M. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.07.18.500505 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Interneuron diversity and normalization specificity in a visual systemPreprint
Seung, H. S. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.04.03.587837 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Optimization in Visual Motion Estimation
Clark, D. A., & Fitzgerald, J. E. (2024) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-101623-025432 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Zebrafish brain atlases: a collective effort for a tiny vertebrate brain
Légaré, A., Lemieux, M., Desrosiers, P., & Koninck, P. D. (2023) · Neurophotonics · doi:10.1117/1.nph.10.4.044409 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Fiore, P., Terlizzi, A., Bardozzo, F., Lió, P., & Tagliaferri, R. (2025) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110274 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Broken time-reversal symmetry in visual motion detection
Wu, N., Zhou, B., Agrochão, M., & Clark, D. A. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2410768122 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Insights into vision from interpretation of a neuronal wiring diagramPreprint
Seung, H. S. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.11.15.567126 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Biologically informed cortical models predict optogenetic perturbations
Sourmpis, C., Petersen, C. C. H., Gerstner, W., & Bellec, G. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.106827.3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A Novel Semi-automated Proofreading and Mesh Error Detection Pipeline for Neuron ExtensionPreprint
Joyce, J., Chalavadi, R., Chan, J., Tanna, S., Xenes, D., Kuo, N. P., Rose, V. A., Matelsky, J., Kitchell, L. M., Bishop, C. A., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.10.20.563359 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Nourse, W. R. P., Szczecinski, N. S., & Quinn, R. D. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-38857-6_27 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Fly motion vision maximizes signal energy transfer between mechanical input and sensor output
Humbert, J. S., Krapp, H. G., Baeder, J. D., Badrya, C., Dawson, I. L., Huang, J., Hyslop, A. M., Jung, Y. S., Leroy, A., Lutkus, C., et al. (2026) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.adx7524 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Humbert, J. S., Krapp, H. G., Baeder, J. D., Badrya, C., Dawson, I. L., Huang, J., Hyslop, A. M., Jung, Y. S., Leroy, A., Lutkus, C., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.03.29.587347 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Biologically informed cortical models predict optogenetic perturbationsPreprint
Sourmpis, C., Petersen, C. C. H., Gerstner, W., & Bellec, G. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.106827 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Building a small brain with a simple stochastic generative modelPreprint
Richter, O., & Schneidman, E. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.07.01.601562
Biologically informed cortical models predict optogenetic perturbationsPreprint
Sourmpis, C., Petersen, C. C. H., Gerstner, W., & Bellec, G. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.106827.1
Connectome-driven neural inventory of a complete visual system
Nern, A., Loesche, F., Takemura, S.-Y., Burnett, L. E., Dreher, M., Gruntman, E., Hoeller, J., Huang, G. B., Januszewski, M., Klapoetke, N. C., et al. (2024) · doi:10.1101/2024.04.16.589741 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Lappalainen, J. K., Tschopp, F. D., Prakhya, S., McGill, M., Nern, A., Shinomiya, K., Takemura, S.-Y., Gruntman, E., Macke, J. H., & Turaga, S. C.
- Affiliations
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Turaga, Srinivas C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2023-03-13
- OpenAlex
- W6940891779
- Semantic Scholar
- e60c7fc662981feee2a3ebbc4a9dca4d700cadb1
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- German Neuroinformatics Node
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (206/4-1, EXC number 2064/1, 390727645)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Tübingen AI Center, FKZ: 01IS18039A, 01IS18039A, FKZ: 01IS18039A)
- International Max Planck Research School for Advanced Methods in Process and Systems Engineering
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Keywords
- connectome, neural response prediction, Drosophila visual system, single-neuron resolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review