CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 80Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.

Quantum Maximin Surfaces

Open access
Akers, Chris, Engelhardt, Netta, Penington, Geoff, Usatyuk, Mykhaylo·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1912.02799arXiv 1912.02799
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We formulate a quantum generalization of maximin surfaces and show that a quantum maximin surface is identical to the minimal quantum extremal surface, introduced in the EW prescription. We discuss various subtleties and complications associated to a maximinimization of the bulk von Neumann entropy due to corners and unboundedness and present arguments that nonetheless a maximinimization of the UV-finite generalized entropy should be well-defined. We give the first general proof that the EW prescription satisfies entanglement wedge nesting and the strong subadditivity inequality. In addition, we apply the quantum maximin technology to prove that recently proposed generalizations of the EW prescription to nonholographic subsystems (including the so-called "quantum extremal islands") also satisfy entanglement wedge nesting and strong subadditivity. Our results hold in the regime where backreaction of bulk quantum fields can be treated perturbatively in $G_{N}\hbar$, but we emphasize that they are valid even when gradients of the bulk entropy are of the same order as variations in the area, a regime recently investigated in new models of black hole evaporation in AdS/CFT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1912.02799

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to a maximin argument, one expects this to occur whenever the number of a priori independent quantum states that can exist inside a given bulk domain of dependence with fixed exterior geometry exceeds the area of the codimension-2 surface where the past and future boundaries of this domain of dependence intersect.

    “And due to a maximin argument [42,43], one expects this to occur whenever the number of a priori independent quantum states that can exist inside a given bulk domain of dependence with fixed exterior geometry exceeds the area of the codimension-2 surface where the past and future boundaries of this domain of dependence intersect; see also [110] for more on quantum maximin surfaces.”

    From Transcending the ensemble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information (2020) · cites this paper as [110]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 81 · Cited by 80

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. B. Czech, J.L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira and M. Van Raamsdonk, The gravity dual of a density matrix, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 155009 [arXiv:1204.1330] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. A.C. Wall, Maximin surfaces, and the strong subadditivity of the covariant holographic entanglement entropy, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 225007 [arXiv:1211.3494] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of bulk operators within the entanglement wedge in gauge-gravity duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601 [arXiv:1601.05416] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  4. A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT, JHEP 04 (2015) 163 [arXiv:1411.7041] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  5. D. Harlow, The Ryu-Takayanagi formula from quantum error correction, Commun. Math. Phys. 354 (2017) 865 [arXiv:1607.03901] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  6. F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill, Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence, JHEP 06 (2015) 149 [arXiv:1503.06237] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  7. P. Hayden and G. Penington, Learning the alpha-bits of black holes, JHEP 12 (2019) 007 [arXiv:1807.06041] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  8. C. Akers, S. Leichenauer and A. Levine, Large breakdowns of entanglement wedge reconstruction, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 126006 [arXiv:1908.03975] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  9. G. Penington, Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox, arXiv:1905.08255 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  10. A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole, JHEP 12 (2019) 063 [arXiv:1905.08762] [INSPIRE]. JHEP08(2020)140 · DOI · Paper page
  11. N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum extremal surfaces: holographic entanglement entropy beyond the classical regime, JHEP 01 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1408.3203] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  12. V. Iyer and R.M. Wald, Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 846 [gr-qc/9403028] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  13. S. Leichenauer, The quantum focusing conjecture has not been violated, arXiv:1705.05469 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  14. C. Akers, V. Chandrasekaran, S. Leichenauer, A. Levine and A. Shahbazi Moghaddam, Quantum null energy condition, entanglement wedge nesting, and quantum focusing, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 025011 [arXiv:1706.04183] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  15. A.C. Wall, Ten proofs of the generalized second law, JHEP 06 (2009) 021 [arXiv:0901.3865] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  16. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  17. V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  18. D. Marolf, A.C. Wall and Z. Wang, Restricted maximin surfaces and HRT in generic black hole spacetimes, JHEP 05 (2019) 127 [arXiv:1901.03879] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  19. M. Headrick and T. Takayanagi, A holographic proof of the strong subadditivity of entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 106013 [arXiv:0704.3719] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  20. R. Bousso, V. Chandrasekaran and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, From black hole entropy to energy-minimizing states in QFT, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 046001 [arXiv:1906.05299] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  21. R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Quantum focusing conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064044 [arXiv:1506.02669] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  22. P. Hayden, M. Headrick and A. Maloney, Holographic mutual information is monogamous, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 046003. · DOI · Paper page
  23. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao, The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry, JHEP 03 (2020) 149 [arXiv:1908.10996] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  24. G. Penington, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, arXiv:1911.11977 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  25. A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation, JHEP 05 (2020) 013 [arXiv:1911.12333] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  26. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J.E. Santos, Entanglement islands in higher dimensions, SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 001 [arXiv:1911.09666] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  27. R.M. Wald, General relativity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago U.S.A. (1984).
  28. N. Engelhardt and S. Fischetti, Surface theory: the classical, the quantum, and the holographic, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (2019) 205002 [arXiv:1904.08423] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  29. S.W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199 [Erratum ibid. 46 (1976) 206] [INSPIRE]. JHEP08(2020)140 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. 100N3-4 (1997) 61].
  31. P.C.W. Davies and S.A. Fulling, Radiation from a moving mirror in two-dimensional space-time conformal anomaly, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A A 348 (1976) 393 [INSPIRE].
  32. P.C.W. Davies, S.A. Fulling and W.G. Unruh, Energy momentum tensor near an evaporating black hole, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 2720 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  33. P.C.W. Davies and S.A. Fulling, Radiation from moving mirrors and from black holes, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A A 356 (1977) 237 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  34. J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  35. A.C. Wall, The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013) 165003 [Erratum ibid. 30 (2013) 199501] [arXiv:1010.5513] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  36. R. Bousso and N. Engelhardt, Generalized second law for cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 024025 [arXiv:1510.02099] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  37. X. Dong, Holographic entanglement entropy for general higher derivative gravity, JHEP 01 (2014) 044 [arXiv:1310.5713] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  38. R.X. Miao and W.Z. Guo, Holographic entanglement entropy for the most general higher derivative gravity, JHEP 08 (2015) 031 [arXiv:1411.5579]. · DOI
  39. J. Camps, Generalized entropy and higher derivative Gravity, JHEP 03 (2014) 070 [arXiv:1310.6659] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  40. X. Dong and A. Lewkowycz, Entropy, extremality, euclidean variations, and the equations of motion, JHEP 01 (2018) 081 [arXiv:1705.08453] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  41. X. Dong and D. Marolf, One-loop universality of holographic codes, JHEP 03 (2020) 191 [arXiv:1910.06329] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  42. D.V. Fursaev and S.N. Solodukhin, On one loop renormalization of black hole entropy, Phys. Lett. B 365 (1996) 51 [hep-th/9412020] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  43. G.J. Galloway, Maximum principles for null hypersurfaces and null splitting theorems, Annales Henri Poincaré 1 (2000) 543 [math/9909158] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  44. R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, J. Koeller, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Proof of the quantum null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 024017 [arXiv:1509.02542] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  45. J. Koeller and S. Leichenauer, Holographic proof of the quantum null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 024026 [arXiv:1512.06109] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  46. Z. Fu, J. Koeller and D. Marolf, The quantum null energy condition in curved space, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 225012 [Erratum ibid. 35 (2018) 049501] [arXiv:1706.01572] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  47. S. Balakrishnan, T. Faulkner, Z.U. Khandker and H. Wang, A general proof of the quantum null energy condition, JHEP 09 (2019) 020 [arXiv:1706.09432] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  48. S. Leichenauer, A. Levine and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Energy density from second shape variations of the von Neumann entropy, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 086013 [arXiv:1802.02584] [INSPIRE]. JHEP08(2020)140 · DOI
  49. S. Balakrishnan, V. Chandrasekaran, T. Faulkner, A. Levine and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Entropy variations and light ray operators from replica defects, arXiv:1906.08274 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  50. Z. Fu, J. Koeller and D. Marolf, Violating the quantum focusing conjecture and quantum covariant entropy bound in d ≥ 5 dimensions, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) 175006 [arXiv:1705.03161] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  51. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J. Maldacena, Islands outside the horizon, arXiv:1910.11077 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  52. R. Bousso, H. Casini, Z. Fisher and J. Maldacena, Proof of a quantum bousso bound, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 044002 [arXiv:1404.5635] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  53. R. Bousso, H. Casini, Z. Fisher and J. Maldacena, Entropy on a null surface for interacting quantum field theories and the Bousso bound, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 084030 [arXiv:1406.4545] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  54. J. Sorce, Holographic entanglement entropy is cutoff-covariant, JHEP 10 (2019) 015. · DOI
  55. S. Fischetti, D. Marolf and A.C. Wall, A paucity of bulk entangling surfaces: AdS wormholes with de Sitter interiors, Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 065011 [arXiv:1409.6754] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  56. R. Bousso and N. Engelhardt, Proof of a new area law in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 044031 [arXiv:1504.07660] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  57. N. Bao, S. Nezami, H. Ooguri, B. Stoica, J. Sully and M. Walter, The holographic entropy cone, JHEP 09 (2015) 130 [arXiv:1505.07839] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  58. A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?, JHEP 02 (2013) 062 [arXiv:1207.3123] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  59. A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, D. Stanford and J. Sully, An apologia for firewalls, JHEP 09 (2013) 018 [arXiv:1304.6483] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  60. C. Akers, N. Engelhardt and D. Harlow, Simple holographic models of black hole evaporation, JHEP 08 (2020) 032 [arXiv:1910.00972] [INSPIRE]. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Akers, C., Engelhardt, N., Penington, G., & Usatyuk, M.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Akers, Chris
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
2020
Issue
8
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1912.02799
arXiv
1912.02799
OpenAlex
W2994399582
Cited by
80
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (DEAC02-05CH11231, 1820912, 1752814, 1620059)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231, DE AC02 05CH11231, 1752814, DESC0019380, DESC0019127, DESC0018944, DE-AC02-)
  • Simons Foundation
  • Office of Science (DEAC02–05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02, 05CH11231, DESC0018944, DESC0019380)
  • High Energy Physics (DE-SC0019380, DEAC02--05CH11231)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, FA9550-16-1-0082, FA9550-16, DE-AC02-05CH11231, -16-1-, FA9550-16-1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
entanglement wedge, strong subadditivity, generalized entropy, von Neumann entropy, black hole evaporation, AdS/CFT correspondence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review