The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Approximating the quantum approximate optimization algorithm with digital-analog interactions
Open accessAbstract
The quantum approximate optimisation algorithm was proposed as a heuristic method for solving combinatorial optimisation problems on near-term quantum computers and may be among the first algorithms to perform useful computations in the post-supremacy, noisy, intermediate scale era of quantum computing. In this work, we exploit the recently proposed digital-analog quantum computation paradigm, in which the versatility of programmable universal quantum computers and the error resilience of quantum simulators are combined to improve platforms for quantum computation. We show that the digital-analog paradigm is suited to the variational quantum approximate optimisation algorithm, due to its inherent resilience against coherent errors, by performing large-scale simulations and providing analytical bounds for its performance in devices with finite single-qubit operation times. We observe regimes of single-qubit operation speed in which the considered variational algorithm provides a significant improvement over non-variational counterparts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The digital-analog approach has been combined with VQA resulting in a digital-analog QAOA algorithm, where two-qubit gates have been replaced by analog blocks.
“The digital-analog approach has also been combined with VQA (see Sec. II) resulting in a digital-analog QAOA algorithm, where the two-qubit gates have been replaced by analog blocks (Headley et al. , 2020).”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Headley et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush, D. Bacon, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, R. Biswas, S. Boixo, F. G. S. L. Brandao, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, A. Dunsworth, E. Farhi, B. Foxen, A. Fowler et al., Nature (London) 574, 505 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- P. W. Shor, in Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (IEEE, New York, 1994), pp. 124-134.
- L. K. Grover, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (ACM, New York, 1996), pp. 212-219.
- J. Preskill, Quantum 2, 79 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- A. Peruzzo, J. McClean, P. Shadbolt, M.-H. Yung, X.-Q. Zhou, P. J. Love, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and J. L. O'Brien, Nat. Commun. 5, 4213 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, arXiv:1411.4028 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- S. Hadfield, Z. Wang, B. O'Gorman, E. G. Rieffel, D. Venturelli, and R. Biswas, Algorithms 12, 34 (2019). · DOI · Paper page
- E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, arXiv:1412.6062 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- B. Barak, A. Moitra, R. O'Donnell, P. Raghavendra, O. Regev, D. Steurer, L. Trevisan, A. Vijayaraghavan, D. Witmer, and J. Wright, arXiv:1505.03424 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- Z. Jiang, E. G. Rieffel, and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 95, 062317 (2017). · DOI
- J. S. Otterbach, R. Manenti, N. Alidoust, A. Bestwick, M. Block, B. Bloom, S. Caldwell, N. Didier, E. S. Fried, S. Hong, P. Karalekas, C. B. Osborn, A. Papageorge, E. C. Peterson, G. Prawiroatmodjo, N. Rubin, C. A. Ryan, D. Scarabelli, M. Scheer, E. A. Sete et al., arXiv:1712.05771 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- L. Lamata, A. Parra-Rodriguez, M. Sanz, and E. Solano, Adv. Phys. X 3, 1457981 (2018). · DOI
- A. Parra-Rodriguez, P. Lougovski, L. Lamata, E. Solano, and M. Sanz, Phys. Rev. A 101, 022305 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
- A. Martin, L. Lamata, E. Solano, and M. Sanz, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013012 (2020). · DOI
- I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
- E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser, arXiv:quant- ph/0001106.
- T. Albash and D. A. Lidar, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015002 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- J. Kempe, Contemp. Phys. 44, 307 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
- V. M. Kendon, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., Ser. A 364, 3407 (2006). · DOI
- S. Lloyd, Science 273, 1073 (1996). · DOI · Paper page
- D. Aharonov, W. van Dam, J. Kempe, Z. Landau, S. Lloyd, and O. Regev, arXiv:quant-ph/0405098. · arXiv
- A. Acín, I. Bloch, H. Buhrman, T. Calarco, C. Eichler, J. Eisert, D. Esteve, N. Gisin, S. J. Glaser, F. Jelezko, S. Kuhr, M. Lewenstein, M. F. Riedel, P. O. Schmidt, R. Thew, A. Wallraff, I. Walmsley, and F. K. Wilhelm, New J. Phys. 20, 080201 (2018). · DOI
- A. Martin, R. Ibarrondo, and M. Sanz, arXiv:2207.13528 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- A. Galicia, B. Ramon, E. Solano, and M. Sanz, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033103 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
- D. G. Cory, R. Laflamme, E. Knill, L. Viola, T. Havel, N. Boulant, G. Boutis, E. Fortunato, S. Lloyd, R. Martinez et al., Fortschr. Phys. 48, 875 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
- L. Viola, S. Lloyd, and E. Knill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4888 (1999). · DOI
- B. O'Gorman, W. J. Huggins, E. G. Rieffel, and K. B. Whaley, arXiv:1905.05118 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- P. K. Barkoutsos, G. Nannicini, A. Robert, I. Tavernelli, and S. Woerner, Quantum 4, 256 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
- S. Hadfield, arXiv:1805.03265 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- V. Akshay, H. Philathong, M. E. S. Morales, and J. Biamonte, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 090504 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
- R. M. Karp, Complexity of Computer Computations (Springer, Berlin, 1972), pp. 85-103.
- F. Bacchus, J. Berg, M. Järvisalo, and R. Martins (Eds.), MaxSAT Evaluation 2020 Solver and Benchmark Descrip- tions, Department of Computer Science Report Series B , vol. B-2020-2 (Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, 2020).
- C. J. Ballance, T. P. Harty, N. M. Linke, M. A. Sepiol, and D. M. Lucas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 060504 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- N. M. Linke, D. Maslov, M. Roetteler, S. Debnath, C. Figgatt, K. A. Landsman, K. Wright, and C. Monroe, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 3305 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
- P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021318 (2019). · DOI
- T. Gonzalez-Raya, R. Asensio-Perea, A. Martin, L. C. Céleri, M. Sanz, P. Lougovski, and E. F. Dumitrescu, PRX Quantum 2, 020328 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
- P. Schauss, Quantum Sci. Technol. 3, 023001 (2018). · DOI
- J. P. Gaebler, T. R. Tan, Y. Lin, Y. Wan, R. Bowler, A. C. Keith, S. Glancy, K. Coakley, E. Knill, D. Leibfried, and D. J. Wineland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 060505 (2016). · DOI
- Y. Wang, M. Um, J. Zhang, S. An, M. Lyu, J.-N. Zhang, L.-M. Duan, D. Yum, and K. Kim, Nat. Photonics 11, 646 (2017). · DOI
- J. Zhang, G. Pagano, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, H. Kaplan, A. V. Gorshkov, Z.-X. Gong, and C. Monroe, Nature (London) 551, 601 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
- D. Porras and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 207901 (2004). · DOI · Paper page
- A. Pearson, A. Mishra, I. Hen, and D. A. Lidar, npj Quantum Inf. 5, 107 (2019). · DOI
- A. Callison, N. Chancellor, F. Mintert, and V. Kendon, New J. Phys. 21, 123022 (2019). · DOI
- J. G. Morley, N. Chancellor, S. Bose, and V. Kendon, Phys. Rev. A 99, 022339 (2019). · DOI
- S. Muthukrishnan, T. Albash, and D. A. Lidar, arXiv:1505.01249 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- J. R. McClean, J. Romero, R. Babbush, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, New J. Phys. 18, 023023 (2016). · DOI · Paper page
- J. R. McClean, S. Boixo, V. N. Smelyanskiy, R. Babbush, and H. Neven, Nat. Commun. 9, 4812 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- I. D. Kivlichan, C. Gidney, D. W. Berry, N. Wiebe, J. McClean, W. Sun, Z. Jiang, N. Rubin, A. Fowler, A. Aspuru-Guzik, H. Neven, and R. Babbush, Quantum 4, 296 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
- M. A. Nielsen and I. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quan- tum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000).
- P. García-Molina, A. Martin, and M. Sanz, arXiv:2107.12969 [quant-ph]. · arXiv
- W. Dür and H. J. Briegel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 180403 (2004). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 2,231
Metadata
- Authors
- Headley, D., Müller, T., Martin, A., Solano, E., Sanz, M., & Wilhelm, F. K.
- Affiliations
- Mercedes-Benz (Germany) (DE)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- University of the Basque Country (ES)
- Ikerbasque (ES)
- Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2002.12215
- OpenAlex
- W4307468269
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physical Review A (publishedVersion)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- BIRD (Basque Center for Applied Mathematics) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Eusko Jaurlaritza (MCIN / AEI / 10.13039/501100011033, KK-2021/00070, 820363, KK-2021, PID2021-125823NA-I00, RYC-2020-030503-I, IT1470- 22, 820505)
- European Regional Development Fund (MCIN/AEI/10, 10.13039/501100011033, 13039/501100011033, AEI/10.13039/501100011033, 501100011033, 899368, PID2021-125823NA-I00, IT1470-22, MCIN/ AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033)
- Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI//10.13039/501100011033/, 501100011033, by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, 10.13039/501100011033, MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501 100 011 033, 13039, .13039/501100011033, 10.13039, PID2021-125823NA-I00, AEI/10)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- quantum approximate optimization algorithm, variational quantum algorithms, combinatorial optimization, near-term quantum devices, coherent errors, quantum simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review