CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 21Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and LearningDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Learning to Generalize Across Long-Horizon Tasks from Human Demonstrations

Open access
Mandlekar, Ajay, Xu, Danfei, Martín-Martín, Roberto, Savarese, Silvio, Fei-Fei, Li·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2003.06085arXiv 2003.06085
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Imitation learning is an effective and safe technique to train robot policies in the real world because it does not depend on an expensive random exploration process. However, due to the lack of exploration, learning policies that generalize beyond the demonstrated behaviors is still an open challenge. We present a novel imitation learning framework to enable robots to 1) learn complex real world manipulation tasks efficiently from a small number of human demonstrations, and 2) synthesize new behaviors not contained in the collected demonstrations. Our key insight is that multi-task domains often present a latent structure, where demonstrated trajectories for different tasks intersect at common regions of the state space. We present Generalization Through Imitation (GTI), a two-stage offline imitation learning algorithm that exploits this intersecting structure to train goal-directed policies that generalize to unseen start and goal state combinations. In the first stage of GTI, we train a stochastic policy that leverages trajectory intersections to have the capacity to compose behaviors from different demonstration trajectories together. In the second stage of GTI, we collect a small set of rollouts from the unconditioned stochastic policy of the first stage, and train a goal-directed agent to generalize to novel start and goal configurations. We validate GTI in both simulated domains and a challenging long-horizon robotic manipulation domain in the real world. Additional results and videos are available at https://sites.google.com/view/gti2020/ .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2003.06085

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The tasks MimicGen was demonstrated on have pose variation well beyond typical prior works using BC from human demos.

    “The tasks also have pose variation well beyond typical prior works using BC from human demos [1,3-7,30,33,55,56].”

    From MimicGen: A Data Generation System for Scalable Robot Learning using Human Demonstrations (2023) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Real World Robot Manipulation Experiments section (p. 7) describes two starting configurations for the PandaKitchen task, but does not quantify pose variation or compare it with prior behavioral-cloning work. Searches for “pose variation” and varying object positions found no passage establishing that comparison. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [3][3] Aude Billard, Sylvain Calinon, R¨ udiger Dillmann, and Stefan Schaal. Robot programming by demonstration. In Springer Handbook of Robotics , 2008. -
  2. [7][7] John Co-Reyes, YuXuan Liu, Abhishek Gupta, Benjamin Eysenbach, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. Selfconsistent trajectory autoencoder: Hierarchical reinforcement learning with trajectory embeddings. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning , volume 80 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 1009-1018, Stockholmsm¨ assan, Stockholm Sweden, 10-15 Jul 2018. PMLR. -
  3. [12][12] Benjamin Eysenbach, Abhishek Gupta, Julian Ibarz, and Sergey Levine. Diversity is all you need: Learning diverse skills without a reward function. In International Conference of Learning Representations , 2019. -
  4. [18][18] Dinesh Jayaraman, Frederik Ebert, Alexei A Efros, and Sergey Levine. Time-agnostic prediction: Predicting predictable video frames. In International Conference of Learning Representations , 2019. -
  5. [21][21] Thomas Kipf, Yujia Li, Hanjun Dai, Vinicius Zambaldi, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Edward Grefenstette, Pushmeet Kohli, and Peter Battaglia. Compile: Compositional imitation learning and execution. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , 2019. -
  6. [26][26] Corey Lynch, Mohi Khansari, Ted Xiao, Vikash Kumar, Jonathan Tompson, Sergey Levine, and Pierre Sermanet. Learning latent plans from play. In Conference on Robot Learning , 2019. -
  7. [33][33] St´ ephane Ross, Geoffrey J. Gordon, and J. Andrew Bagnell. A reduction of imitation learning and structured prediction to no-regret online learning. In AISTATS , 2010. -
  8. [35][35] Stuart Russell. Learning agents for uncertain environments. In Proceedings of the eleventh annual conference on Computational learning theory , pages 101-103, 1998. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Mandlekar, A., Xu, D., Martín-Martín, R., Savarese, S., & Fei-Fei, L.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2003.06085
arXiv
2003.06085
OpenAlex
W3010709437
Cited by
17
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
imitation learning, long-horizon tasks, trajectory intersection, multi-task learning, stochastic policies, robotic manipulation, offline learning, behavior composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review