PreprintCited by 132Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

Planning to Explore via Self-Supervised World Models

Open access
Sekar, Ramanan, Rybkin, Oleh, Daniilidis, Kostas, Abbeel, Pieter, Hafner, Danijar, Pathak, Deepak·2020·arXiv

Abstract

Reinforcement learning allows solving complex tasks, however, the learning tends to be task-specific and the sample efficiency remains a challenge. We present Plan2Explore, a self-supervised reinforcement learning agent that tackles both these challenges through a new approach to self-supervised exploration and fast adaptation to new tasks, which need not be known during exploration. During exploration, unlike prior methods which retrospectively compute the novelty of observations after the agent has already reached them, our agent acts efficiently by leveraging planning to seek out expected future novelty. After exploration, the agent quickly adapts to multiple downstream tasks in a zero or a few-shot manner. We evaluate on challenging control tasks from high-dimensional image inputs. Without any training supervision or task-specific interaction, Plan2Explore outperforms prior self-supervised exploration methods, and in fact, almost matches the performances oracle which has access to rewards. Videos and code at https://ramanans1.github.io/plan2explore/

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2005.05960

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • World models summarize general dynamics knowledge about the environment that, once learned, could be reused for a wide range of downstream tasks.

    “Moreover, world models summarize general dynamics knowledge about the environment that, once learned, could be reused for a wide range of downstream tasks (Sekar et al., 2020).”

    From DayDreamer: World Models for Physical Robot Learning (2022) · cites this paper as Sekar et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Amos, B., Dinh, L., Cabi, S., Rothrl, T., Muldal, A., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., de Freitas, N., and Denil, M. Learning awareness models. In ICLR , 2018. 8
  2. Andrychowicz, M., Wolski, F., Ray, A., Schneider, J., Fong, R., Welinder, P., McGrew, B., Tobin, J., Abbeel, P., and Zaremba, W. Hindsight experience replay. In NIPS , 2017. 8
  3. Breiman, L. Bagging predictors. Machine learning , 24(2): 123-140, 1996. 4
  4. Burda, Y., Edwards, H., Pathak, D., Storkey, A., Darrell, T., and Efros, A. A. Large-scale study of curiosity-driven learning. ICLR , 2019. 8
  5. Gal, Y. Uncertainty in deep learning. University of Cambridge , 1:3, 2016. 4
  6. Ha, D. and Schmidhuber, J. World models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10122 , 2018. 3, 8 · arXiv
  7. Haber, N., Mrowca, D., Wang, S., Fei-Fei, L. F., and Yamins, D. L. Learning to play with intrinsically-motivated, selfaware agents. In NeurIPS , 2018. 8
  8. Kingma, D. P. and Welling, M. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114 , 2013. 3 · arXiv
  9. Pathak, D., Agrawal, P., Efros, A. A., and Darrell, T. Curiosity-driven exploration by self-supervised prediction. In ICML , 2017. 1, 2, 6, 8, 11
  10. Pathak, D., Mahmoudieh, P., Luo, G., Agrawal, P., Chen, D., Shentu, Y., Shelhamer, E., Malik, J., Efros, A. A., and Darrell, T. Zero-shot visual imitation. In ICLR , 2018. 8
  11. Seung, H., Opper, M., and Sompolinsky, H. Query by committee. COLT , 1992. 8
  12. Watter, M., Springenberg, J., Boedecker, J., and Riedmiller, M. Embed to control: A locally linear latent dynamics model for control from raw images. In NIPS , 2015. 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sekar, R., Rybkin, O., Daniilidis, K., Abbeel, P., Hafner, D., & Pathak, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Meta (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Pages
8583-8592
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025660841
Cited by
129
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Conference on Machine Learning
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1703319)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (1703319)
  • Office of Naval Research (ONR-N00014, N00014-17-1, W911NF-17-2-0181, N00014-17-1-2093, ONR N00014-17-1-2093, N00014, N00014-17)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
world models, planning, novelty seeking, few-shot adaptation, zero-shot transfer, sample efficiency, visual servoing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review