The DOI matches its DataCite record; 44 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Planning to Explore via Self-Supervised World Models
Open accessAbstract
Reinforcement learning allows solving complex tasks, however, the learning tends to be task-specific and the sample efficiency remains a challenge. We present Plan2Explore, a self-supervised reinforcement learning agent that tackles both these challenges through a new approach to self-supervised exploration and fast adaptation to new tasks, which need not be known during exploration. During exploration, unlike prior methods which retrospectively compute the novelty of observations after the agent has already reached them, our agent acts efficiently by leveraging planning to seek out expected future novelty. After exploration, the agent quickly adapts to multiple downstream tasks in a zero or a few-shot manner. We evaluate on challenging control tasks from high-dimensional image inputs. Without any training supervision or task-specific interaction, Plan2Explore outperforms prior self-supervised exploration methods, and in fact, almost matches the performances oracle which has access to rewards. Videos and code at https://ramanans1.github.io/plan2explore/
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, world models summarize general dynamics knowledge about the environment that, once learned, could be reused for a wide range of downstream tasks (Sekar et al., 2020).”
From DayDreamer: World Models for Physical Robot Learning (2022) · cites this paper as Sekar et al., 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M. L., & Moore, A. W. (1996) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.301 · Cited by 8,972
Stochastic Backpropagation and Approximate Inference in Deep Generative ModelsPreprint
Rezende, D. J., Mohamed, S., & Wierstra, D. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1401.4082 · Cited by 3,921
Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensembles
Lakshminarayanan, B., Pritzel, A., & Blundell, C. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.01474 · Cited by 3,666
On a measure of the information provided by an experiment
Lindley, D. V. (1956) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728069 · Cited by 1,509
Information-based objective functions for active data selection
MacKay, D. J. C. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.4.590 · Cited by 1,221
PILCO: A Model-Based and Data-Efficient Approach to Policy Search
Deisenroth, M. P., & Rasmussen, C. E. (2011) · Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database · Cited by 1,136
Intrinsic Motivation Systems for Autonomous Mental Development
Oudeyer, P.-Y., Kaplan, F., & Hafner, V. V. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/tevc.2006.890271 · Cited by 1,126
Deep Exploration via Bootstrapped DQNPreprint
Osband, I., Blundell, C., Pritzel, A., & Roy, B. V. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.04621 · Cited by 837
What is intrinsic motivation? A typology of computational approaches
Oudeyer, P.-Y. (2007) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/neuro.12.006.2007 · Cited by 811
Dyna, an Integrated Architecture for Learning, Planning, and Reacting
Sutton, R. S. (1991) · ACM SIGART Bulletin · doi:10.1145/122344.122377 · Cited by 777 · cited 1×
“World models summarize past experience into a representation of the environment that enables predicting imagined future sequences (Sutton, 1991; Watter et al., 2015; Ha & Schmidhuber, 2018).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Amos, B., Dinh, L., Cabi, S., Rothrl, T., Muldal, A., Erez, T., Tassa, Y., de Freitas, N., and Denil, M. Learning awareness models. In ICLR , 2018. 8
- Andrychowicz, M., Wolski, F., Ray, A., Schneider, J., Fong, R., Welinder, P., McGrew, B., Tobin, J., Abbeel, P., and Zaremba, W. Hindsight experience replay. In NIPS , 2017. 8
- Breiman, L. Bagging predictors. Machine learning , 24(2): 123-140, 1996. 4
- Burda, Y., Edwards, H., Pathak, D., Storkey, A., Darrell, T., and Efros, A. A. Large-scale study of curiosity-driven learning. ICLR , 2019. 8
- Gal, Y. Uncertainty in deep learning. University of Cambridge , 1:3, 2016. 4
- Haber, N., Mrowca, D., Wang, S., Fei-Fei, L. F., and Yamins, D. L. Learning to play with intrinsically-motivated, selfaware agents. In NeurIPS , 2018. 8
- Kingma, D. P. and Welling, M. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114 , 2013. 3 · arXiv
- Pathak, D., Agrawal, P., Efros, A. A., and Darrell, T. Curiosity-driven exploration by self-supervised prediction. In ICML , 2017. 1, 2, 6, 8, 11
- Pathak, D., Mahmoudieh, P., Luo, G., Agrawal, P., Chen, D., Shentu, Y., Shelhamer, E., Malik, J., Efros, A. A., and Darrell, T. Zero-shot visual imitation. In ICLR , 2018. 8
- Seung, H., Opper, M., and Sompolinsky, H. Query by committee. COLT , 1992. 8
- Watter, M., Springenberg, J., Boedecker, J., and Riedmiller, M. Embed to control: A locally linear latent dynamics model for control from raw images. In NIPS , 2015. 3
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Model-based Reinforcement Learning: A Survey
Moerland, T. M., Broekens, J., Plaat, A., & Jonker, C. M. (2023) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000086 · Cited by 871
Towards Continual Reinforcement Learning: A Review and Perspectives
Khetarpal, K., Riemer, M., Rish, I., & Precup, D. (2022) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.13673 · Cited by 224
Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning: From Single-Agent to Multiagent Domain
Hao, J., Yang, T., Tang, H., Bai, C., Liu, J., Meng, Z., Liu, P., & Wang, Z. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.06668 · Cited by 192
Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning: From Single-Agent to Multiagent Domain
Hao, J., Yang, T., Tang, H., Bai, C., Liu, J., Meng, Z., Liu, P., & Wang, Z. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2023.3236361 · Cited by 245
Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Model
Hao, S., Gu, Y., Ma, H., Hong, J., Wang, Z., Wang, D., & Hu, Z. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.507 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Sekar, R., Rybkin, O., Daniilidis, K., Abbeel, P., Hafner, D., & Pathak, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Google (United States) (US)
- Meta (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 8583-8592
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2005.05960
- OpenAlex
- W3025660841
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2025: 7 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- International Conference on Machine Learning
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1703319)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (1703319)
- Office of Naval Research (ONR-N00014, N00014-17-1, W911NF-17-2-0181, N00014-17-1-2093, ONR N00014-17-1-2093, N00014, N00014-17)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Keywords
- world models, planning, novelty seeking, few-shot adaptation, zero-shot transfer, sample efficiency, visual servoing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
