PreprintCited by 18Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsHuman Pose and Action RecognitionGait Recognition and Analysis

IMUTube: Automatic Extraction of Virtual on-body Accelerometry from Video for Human Activity Recognition

Open access
Kwon, Hyeokhyen, Tong, Catherine, Haresamudram, Harish, Gao, Yan, Abowd, Gregory D., Lane, Nicholas D., Ploetz, Thomas·2020·arXiv

Abstract

The lack of large-scale, labeled data sets impedes progress in developing robust and generalized predictive models for on-body sensor-based human activity recognition (HAR). Labeled data in human activity recognition is scarce and hard to come by, as sensor data collection is expensive, and the annotation is time-consuming and error-prone. To address this problem, we introduce IMUTube, an automated processing pipeline that integrates existing computer vision and signal processing techniques to convert videos of human activity into virtual streams of IMU data. These virtual IMU streams represent accelerometry at a wide variety of locations on the human body. We show how the virtually-generated IMU data improves the performance of a variety of models on known HAR datasets. Our initial results are very promising, but the greater promise of this work lies in a collective approach by the computer vision, signal processing, and activity recognition communities to extend this work in ways that we outline. This should lead to on-body, sensor-based HAR becoming yet another success story in large-dataset breakthroughs in recognition.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2006.05675

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent approaches addressing the lack of annotated datasets extract virtual movement data from modalities such as mocap and videos, which contain a large number of participants and a diverse set of actions and environments.

    “Recent approaches addressing the lack of annotated datasets involve extraction of virtual movement data from modalities such as mocap [37, 72] and videos [44], which contain a large number of participants and diverse set of actions and environments.”

    From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [44]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 99 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwon, H., Tong, C., Haresamudram, H., Gao, Y., Abowd, G. D., Lane, N. D., & Ploetz, T.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3034646170
Cited by
14
References
99
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
human activity recognition, on-body sensors, inertial measurement unit, accelerometry, labeled data scarcity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review