CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 86Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsQuantum many-body systemsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Leading order corrections to the quantum extremal surface prescription

Open access
Akers, Chris, Penington, Geoff·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2008.03319arXiv 2008.03319
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We show that a naïve application of the quantum extremal surface (QES) prescription can lead to paradoxical results and must be corrected at leading order. The corrections arise when there is a second QES (with strictly larger generalized entropy at leading order than the minimal QES), together with a large amount of highly incompressible bulk entropy between the two surfaces. We trace the source of the corrections to a failure of the assumptions used in the replica trick derivation of the QES prescription, and show that a more careful derivation correctly computes the corrections. Using tools from one-shot quantum Shannon theory (smooth min- and max-entropies), we generalize these results to a set of refined conditions that determine whether the QES prescription holds. We find similar refinements to the conditions needed for entanglement wedge reconstruction (EWR), and show how EWR can be reinterpreted as the task of one-shot quantum state merging (using zero-bits rather than classical bits), a task gravity is able to achieve optimally efficiently.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2008.03319

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are other cases where non-replica-symmetric contributions to the path integral are important [14,38,64,65].

    “there are other cases where non-replica-symmetric contributions to the path integral are important [14,38,64,65].”

    From Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole (2021) · cites this paper as [38]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime, JHEP 01 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1408.3203] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. G. Penington, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox, JHEP 09 (2020) 002 [arXiv:1905.08255] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole, JHEP 12 (2019) 063 [arXiv:1905.08762] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  4. C. Akers, S. Leichenauer and A. Levine, Large Breakdowns of Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 126006 [arXiv:1908.03975] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  5. M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition, Cambridge University Press, U.S.A., 10th ed., (2011).
  6. R. Renner and R. Koenig, Universally composable privacy amplification against quantum adversaries, quant-ph/0403133. JHEP04(2021)062 · arXiv
  7. R. Renner, Security of quantum key distribution, quant-ph/0512258. · arXiv
  8. P. Hayden and G. Penington, Learning the Alpha-bits of Black Holes, JHEP 12 (2019) 007 [arXiv:1807.06041] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  9. G. Penington, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, arXiv:1911.11977 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  10. B. Czech, J.L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira and M. Van Raamsdonk, The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 155009 [arXiv:1204.1330] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  11. A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT, JHEP 04 (2015) 163 [arXiv:1411.7041] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  12. X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601 [arXiv:1601.05416] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  13. X. Dong and H. Wang, Enhanced corrections near holographic entanglement transitions: a chaotic case study, JHEP 11 (2020) 007 [arXiv:2006.10051] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  14. D. Marolf, S. Wang and Z. Wang, Probing phase transitions of holographic entanglement entropy with fixed area states, JHEP 12 (2020) 084 [arXiv:2006.10089] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  15. J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  16. A. Almheiri, X. Dong and B. Swingle, Linearity of Holographic Entanglement Entropy, JHEP 02 (2017) 074 [arXiv:1606.04537] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  17. D. Harlow, The Ryu-Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction, Commun. Math. Phys. 354 (2017) 865 [arXiv:1607.03901] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  18. P. Boes, J. Eisert, R. Gallego, M.P. Müller and H. Wilming, Von Neumann entropy from unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 210402 [arXiv:1807.08773] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  19. R. Renner and S. Wolf, Smooth Rényi entropy and applications, in International Symposium onInformation Theory, 2004. ISIT 2004. Proceedings, Chicago, IL, U.S.A., pp. 233, 27 June-2 July 2004 [DOI]. · DOI
  20. R. Konig, R. Renner and C. Schaffner, The operational meaning of min-and max-entropy, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 55 (2009) 4337. · DOI
  21. M. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim and A. Winter, Partial quantum information, Nature 436 (2005) 673. · DOI
  22. P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech. 0406 (2004) P06002 [hep-th/0405152] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  23. A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1304.4926] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  24. T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 074 [arXiv:1307.2892] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  25. X. Dong and A. Lewkowycz, Entropy, Extremality, Euclidean Variations, and the Equations of Motion, JHEP 01 (2018) 081 [arXiv:1705.08453] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  26. A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini, Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation, JHEP 05 (2020) 013 [arXiv:1911.12333] [INSPIRE]. JHEP04(2021)062 · DOI · Paper page
  27. C. Akers and P. Rath, Holographic Renyi Entropy from Quantum Error Correction, JHEP 05 (2019) 052 [arXiv:1811.05171] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  28. X. Dong, D. Harlow and D. Marolf, Flat entanglement spectra in fixed-area states of quantum gravity, JHEP 10 (2019) 240 [arXiv:1811.05382] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  29. N. Bao, G. Penington, J. Sorce and A.C. Wall, Beyond Toy Models: Distilling Tensor Networks in Full AdS/CFT, JHEP 11 (2019) 069 [arXiv:1812.01171] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  30. N. Bao, G. Penington, J. Sorce and A.C. Wall, Holographic Tensor Networks in Full AdS/CFT, arXiv:1902.10157 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  31. J.A. Mingo and A. Nica, Annular noncrossing permutations and partitions, and second-order asymptotics for random matrices, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2004 (2004) 1413 [math/0303312]. · arXiv
  32. X. Dong, The Gravity Dual of Renyi Entropy, Nature Commun. 7 (2016) 12472 [arXiv:1601.06788] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  33. M. Fannes, A continuity property of the entropy density for spin lattice systems, Commun. Math. Phys. 31 (1973) 291. · DOI
  34. P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter and Z. Yang, Holographic duality from random tensor networks, JHEP 11 (2016) 009 [arXiv:1601.01694] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  35. A.W. Harrow, The church of the symmetric subspace, arXiv:1308.6595. · arXiv
  36. M. Berta, M. Christandl and R. Renner, The quantum reverse shannon theorem based on one-shot information theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 306 (2011) 579. · DOI
  37. F. Dupuis, M. Berta, J. Wullschleger and R. Renner, One-shot decoupling, Commun. Math. Phys. 328 (2014) 251. · DOI
  38. C.-F. Chen, G. Penington and G. Salton, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction using the Petz Map, JHEP 01 (2020) 168 [arXiv:1902.02844] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  39. P. Hayden, M. Horodecki, A. Winter and J. Yard, A decoupling approach to the quantum capacity, Open Syst. Info. Dyn. 15 (2008) 7. · DOI · Paper page
  40. F. Dupuis, The decoupling approach to quantum information theory, arXiv:1004.1641. · arXiv
  41. H. Barnum and E. Knill, Reversing quantum dynamics with near-optimal quantum and classical fidelity, J. Math. Phys. 43 (2002) 2097. · DOI · Paper page
  42. M. Ohya and D. Petz, Quantum entropy and its use, Springer Science & Business Media (2004).
  43. J. Cotler, P. Hayden, G. Penington, G. Salton, B. Swingle and M. Walter, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction via Universal Recovery Channels, Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019) 031011 [arXiv:1704.05839] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  44. H.F. Jia and M. Rangamani, Petz reconstruction in random tensor networks, JHEP 10 (2020) 050 [arXiv:2006.12601] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  45. M. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim and A. Winter, Quantum State Merging and Negative Information, Commun. Math. Phys. 269 (2006) 107 [quant-ph/0512247] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  46. M. Berta, Single-shot quantum state merging, arXiv:0912.4495. · arXiv
  47. N. Bao and H. Ooguri, Distinguishability of black hole microstates, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 066017 [arXiv:1705.07943] [INSPIRE]. JHEP04(2021)062 · DOI
  48. P. Hayden and G. Penington, Approximate Quantum Error Correction Revisited: Introducing the Alpha-Bit, Commun. Math. Phys. 374 (2020) 369 [arXiv:1706.09434] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  49. A. Abeyesinghe, I. Devetak, P. Hayden and A. Winter, The mother of all protocols: Restructuring quantum information's family tree, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 465 (2009) 2537 [quant-ph/0606225]. · DOI
  50. N. Datta and M.-H. Hsieh, The apex of the family tree of protocols: optimal rates and resource inequalities, New J. Phys. 13 (2011) 093042. · DOI
  51. V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A Covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  52. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  53. A.C. Wall, Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy, Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 225007 [arXiv:1211.3494] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  54. C. Akers, N. Engelhardt, G. Penington and M. Usatyuk, Quantum Maximin Surfaces, JHEP 08 (2020) 140 [arXiv:1912.02799] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  55. A. Vitanov, F. Dupuis, M. Tomamichel and R. Renner, Chain rules for smooth min-and max-entropies, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 59 (2013) 2603. · DOI
  56. R.M. Wald, Black hole entropy is the Noether charge, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) R3427 [gr-qc/9307038] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  57. X. Dong, Holographic Entanglement Entropy for General Higher Derivative Gravity, JHEP 01 (2014) 044 [arXiv:1310.5713] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  58. A.C. Wall, A proof of the generalized second law for rapidly changing fields and arbitrary horizon slices, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 104049 [Erratum ibid. 87 (2013) 069904] [arXiv:1105.3445] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  59. R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Quantum focusing conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064044 [arXiv:1506.02669] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  60. R. Bousso, V. Chandrasekaran and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, From black hole entropy to energy-minimizing states in QFT, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 046001 [arXiv:1906.05299] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  61. M. Freedman and M. Headrick, Bit threads and holographic entanglement, Commun. Math. Phys. 352 (2017) 407 [arXiv:1604.00354] [INSPIRE]. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Akers, C., & Penington, G.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Akers, Chris
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
2021
Issue
4
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2008.03319
arXiv
2008.03319
OpenAlex
W3047625471
Cited by
86
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0019380, DESC0019127, DESC0018944)
  • Simons Foundation
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, FA9550-16-1-0082, FA9550-16, -16-1-, FA9550-16-1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
quantum extremal surfaces, generalized entropy, replica method, entanglement wedge reconstruction, quantum state merging, black hole information, holographic entanglement entropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review