PreprintCited by 55Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationSpatial Cognition and Navigation

Learning to Set Waypoints for Audio-Visual Navigation

Open access
Chen, Changan, Majumder, Sagnik, Al-Halah, Ziad, Gao, Ruohan, Ramakrishnan, Santhosh Kumar, Grauman, Kristen·2020·arXiv

Abstract

In audio-visual navigation, an agent intelligently travels through a complex, unmapped 3D environment using both sights and sounds to find a sound source (e.g., a phone ringing in another room). Existing models learn to act at a fixed granularity of agent motion and rely on simple recurrent aggregations of the audio observations. We introduce a reinforcement learning approach to audio-visual navigation with two key novel elements: 1) waypoints that are dynamically set and learned end-to-end within the navigation policy, and 2) an acoustic memory that provides a structured, spatially grounded record of what the agent has heard as it moves. Both new ideas capitalize on the synergy of audio and visual data for revealing the geometry of an unmapped space. We demonstrate our approach on two challenging datasets of real-world 3D scenes, Replica and Matterport3D. Our model improves the state of the art by a substantial margin, and our experiments reveal that learning the links between sights, sounds, and space is essential for audio-visual navigation. Project: http://vision.cs.utexas.edu/projects/audio_visual_waypoints.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2008.09622

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under the Depth setting in the Unheard sound task on Replica, AGVP achieves relative improvements of 34.8% in SPL, 25.9% in SR, and 7.4% in SNA over AV-WaN.

    “under the Depth setting in the Unheard sound task, AGVP achieves relative improvements of 34.8% in SPL, 25.9% in SR, and 7.4% in SNA over AV-WaN [3].”

    From Audio-Guided Visual Perception for Audio-Visual Navigation (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

    Table 1 (4 Experiments, p. 8) reports AV-WaN’s SPL, SR, and SNA on Replica with unheard sounds, providing a baseline for comparison. It does not report AGVP results or the claimed 34.8%, 25.9%, and 7.4% relative improvements under a Depth setting. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In the Unheard sound task on Replica, AGVP surpasses AV-WaN across all metrics.

    “In the most challenging Unheard sound task, AGVP surpasses AVWaN [3] across all metrics.”

    From Audio-Guided Visual Perception for Audio-Visual Navigation (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

  • In the Unheard sound task under the Depth setting on Matterport3D, AGVP achieves a success rate of 60.8%, a 7.2% relative improvement over AV-WaN, with better path efficiency.

    “In the Unheard sound task under the Depth setting, AGVP achieves a success rate of 60.8%, a 7.2% relative improvement over AV-WaN [3], while also exhibiting better path efficiency.”

    From Audio-Guided Visual Perception for Audio-Visual Navigation (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Tao Chen, Saurabh Gupta, and Abhinav Gupta. Learning exploration policies for navigation. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2019. URL https://openreview. net/pdf?id=SyMWn05F7 .
  2. Chengshu Li, Fei Xia, Roberto Martin-Martin, and Silvio Savarese. Hrl4in: Hierarchical reinforcement learning for interactive navigation with mobile manipulators. In CoRL , 2019.
  3. Suraj Nair and Chelsea Finn. Hierarchical foresight: Self-supervised learning of long-horizon tasks via visual subgoal generation. In ICLR , 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, C., Majumder, S., Al-Halah, Z., Gao, R., Ramakrishnan, S. K., & Grauman, K.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Meta (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121780787
Cited by
53
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • International Conference on Learning Representations
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
Keywords
auditory memory, sound localization, reinforcement learning, 3D navigation, spatial grounding, multisensory perception, Matterport3D

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review