CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 9Quantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum optics and atomic interactions

Measurement of entropy and quantum coherence properties of two type-I entangled photonic qubits

Open access
Motazedifard, Ali, Madani, Seyed Ahmad, Vayaghan, N. S.·2020·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2012.02658arXiv 2012.02658
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Using the type-I SPDC process in BBO nonlinear crystal (NLC), we generate a polarization-entangled state near to the maximally-entangled Bell-state with high-visibility (high-brightness) $ 98.50 \pm 1.33 ~ \% $ ($ 87.71 \pm 4.45 ~ \% $) for HV (DA) basis. We calculate the CHSH version of the Bell inequality, as a nonlocal realism test, and find a strong violation from the classical physics or any hidden variable theory (HVT), $ S= 2.71 \pm 0.10 $. Via measuring the coincidence count (CC) rate in the SPDC process, we obtain the quantum efficiency of single-photon detectors (SPDs) around $ (25.5\pm 3.4) \% $, which is in good agreement to their manufacturer company. As expected, we verify the linear dependency of the CC rate vs. pump power of input CW-laser, which may yield to find the effective second-order susceptibility crystal. Using the theory of the measurement of qubits, includes a tomographic reconstruction of quantum states due to the linear set of 16 polarization-measurement, together with a maximum-likelihood-technique (MLT), which is based on the numerical optimization, we calculate the physical non-negative definite density matrices, which implies on the non-separability and entanglement of prepared state. By having the maximum likelihood density operator, we calculate precisely the entanglement measures such as Concurrence, entanglement of formation, tangle, logarithmic negativity, and different entanglement entropies such as linear entropy, Von-Neumann entropy, and Renyi 2-entropy. Finally, this high-brightness and low-rate entangled photons source can be used for short-range quantum measurements in the Lab.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2012.02658

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A type-II periodically poled PPKTP source has the potential to generate a type-II polarization-entangled Bell state.

    “This type of NLC has potential to generate the type-II polarization-entangled Bell-state (for more details about the state of SPDC, see Refs. [2], [12], [13]).”

    From Nonlocal realism tests and quantum state tomography in Sagnac-based type-II polarization-entanglement SPDC-source (2021) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Introduction and experimental-setup passages describe generating a polarization-entangled Bell state with paired type-I BBO crystals. Searches for PPKTP, periodically poled crystals, and type-II SPDC found no passage addressing whether a type-II PPKTP source can generate such a state. The different setup described in this paper does not contradict that possibility. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. R. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics, (Academic Press, 4th edition, 2020).
  2. Y. Shih, "Entangled biphoton source-property and prepara- tion," Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 1009 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  3. D. S. Simon, G. Jaeger, and A.r V. Sergienko, Quantum Metrol- ogy, Imaging, and Communication, (Springer, Quantum Sci- ence and Technology, 2017).
  4. J. C. Howell, R. S. Bennink, S. J. Bentley, and R. W. Boyd, "Realization of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Using Momentumand Position-Entangled Photons from Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion," Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 210403 (2004). · DOI
  5. P. G. Kwiat, K. Mattle, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, A. V. Sergienko, and Y. Shih, "New High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs," Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4337 (1995). · DOI · Paper page
  6. K. A. Forbes, J. S. Ford, and D. L. Andrews, "Nonlocalized Generation of Correlated Photon Pairs in Degenerate Down- Conversion," Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 133602 (2017). · DOI
  7. Y-H. Kim, S. P. Kulik, and Y. Shih, "Quantum Teleportation of a Polarization State with a Complete Bell State Measurement," Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1370 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
  8. K. C. Toussaint, G. Di Giuseppe, K. J. Bycenski, A. V. Sergienko, B. E. A. Saleh, and M. C. Teich, ''Quantum el- lipsometry using correlated-photon beams," Phys. Rev. A 70, 023801 (2004). · DOI
  9. A. Paterova, H. Yang, Ch. An, D. Kalashnikov and L. Kriv- itsky, "Measurement of infrared optical constants with visible photons," New J. Phys. 20, 043015 (2018).
  10. E. D. Lopaeva, I. Ruo Berchera, I. P. Degiovanni, S. Oli- vares, G. Brida, and M. Genovese, "Experimental Realization of Quantum Illumination," Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 153603 (2013). · DOI
  11. S. Lloyd, "Enhanced sensitivity of photodetection via quantum illumination," Science 321, 1463 (2008). · DOI
  12. K. Durak, N. Jam, C. Dindar, "Object Track- ing and Identification by Quantum Radar," hrefhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1908.06850v1arXiv:1908.06850v1 [quant-ph] (2019).
  13. D. G. England, B. Balaji, and B. J. Sussman, "Quantum- enhanced standoff detection using correlated photon pairs," Phys. Rev. A 99, 023828 (2019). · DOI
  14. R. A. Bowell, M. J. Brandsemab, B. M. Ahmeda, R. M. Narayanan, S. W. Howellc, and J. M. Dilger, "Electric Field Correlations in Quantum Radar and the Quantum Advantage," Proc. SPIE 11408, Radar Sensor Technology XXIV, 114080S (2020). · DOI
  15. M. J. Brandsema, R. M. Narayanan, and M. Lanzagorta, "Cor- relation properties of single photon binary waveforms used in quantum radar/lidar," Proc. SPIE 11408, Radar Sensor Tech- nology XXIV, 114080Q (2020). · DOI
  16. H. Liu, A. S. Helmy, "Enhancing classical target detection per- formance using nonclassical Light," IEEE Aerospace and Elec- tronic Systems Magazine 35(4), 36 (2020). · DOI
  17. H. Liu, D. Giovannini, H. He, D. England, B. J. Sussman, B. Balaji, and A. S. Helmy, "Enhancing LIDAR performance met- rics using continuous-wave photon-pair sources," Optica 6, 10, 1349 (2019). · DOI
  18. A. Yabushita and T. Kobayashi, "Spectroscopy by frequency- entangled photon pairs," Phys. Rev. A 69, 013806 (2004).
  19. A. A. Kalachev, D. A. Kalashnikov, A. A. Kalinkin, T. G. Mitrofanova, A. V. Shkalikov, and V. V. Samartsev "Bipho- ton spectroscopy in a strongly nondegenerate regime of SPDC," Laser Phys. Lett. 5, No. 8, 600 (2008). · DOI
  20. D. A. Kalashnikov, A. V. Paterova, S. P. Kulik, and L. Krivit- sky, "Infrared spectroscopy with visible light," Nat. Phot. 10, 98 (2016). · DOI
  21. K. E. Dorf man, F. Schlawin, and Sh. Mukamel, "Nonlinear op- tical signals and spectroscopy with quantum light," Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045008 (2016). · DOI
  22. T. Sh. Iskhakov, V. C. Usenko, U. L. Andersen, R. Filip, M. V. Chekhova, and G. Leuchs, "Heralded Source of Bright Multi- mode Mesoscopic Sub-Poissonian Light," Opt. Lett. 10, 2149 (2016). · DOI
  23. G. Brida, M. Genovese and I. R. Berchera, "Experimental re- alization of sub-shot-noise quantum imaging," Nat. Photon 4, 227 (2010). · DOI
  24. Sh. Asbana, K. E. Dorfmanc, and Sh. Mukamel, "Quantum phase-sensitive diffraction and imaging using entangled pho- tons," Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. (PNAS) 116, No. 24, 11673 (2019). · DOI
  25. Y. Shih,"The physics of ghost imaging," arXiv:0805.1166v5 [quant-ph] (2008). · arXiv
  26. M. J. Padgett and R. W. Boyd,"An introduction to ghost imag- ing: quantum and classical," Philo. Trans. Royal. Soc. A: Math., Phys. Engin. Sci. 375, 20160233 (2017) · DOI
  27. R. Aspden, Heralded quantum imaging, (PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, 2015).
  28. R. Ursin, F. Tiefenbacher, T. Schmitt-Manderbach, H. Weier, T. Scheidl, M. Lindenthal, B. Blauensteiner, T. Jennewein, J. Perdigues, P. Trojek, B. mer, M. Frst, M. Meyenburg, J. Rar- ity, Z. Sodnik, C. Barbieri, H. Weinfurter and A. Zeilinger, "Entanglement-based quantum communication over 144km," Nat. Phys. 3, 481 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Y. Cao, H. Liang, J. Yin, H.-L. Yong, F. Zhou, Y.-P. Wu, J.- G. Ren, Y.-H. Li, G.-Sh. Pan, T. Yang, X. Ma, Ch.-Z. Peng, and J.-Wei Pan,"Entanglement-based quantum key distribution with biased basis choice via free space," Opt. Exp. 21, Issue 22, 27260 (2013). · DOI
  30. K.J. Resch, M. Lindenthal, B. Blauensteiner, H.R. Bhm, A. Fedrizzi, C. Kurtsiefer, A. Poppe, T. Schmitt-Manderbach, M. Taraba, R. Ursin, P. Walther, H. Weier, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, "Distributing entanglement and single photons through an intra-city, free-space quantum channel," Opt. Exp. 13, Issue 1, 202 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  31. W. T. Buttler, R. J. Hughes, P. G. Kwiat, S. K. Lamoreaux, G. G. Luther, G. L. Morgan, J. E. Nordholt, C. G. Peterson, and C. M. Simmons, "Practical Free-Space Quantum Key Distribution over 1 km," Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3283 (1998). · DOI
  32. R. J. Hughes, J. E. Nordholt, D. Derkacs and Ch. G. Peterson, "Practical free-space quantum key distribution over 10 km in daylight and at night," New J. Phys. 4, 43 (2002). · DOI
  33. Th. Jennewein, Ch. Simon, G. Weihs, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, "Quantum Cryptography with Entangled Photons," Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4729 (2000). · DOI
  34. I. Gerhardt1, Q. Liu, A. Lamas-Linares, J. Skaar, Ch. Kurtsiefer and V. Makarov, "Full-filed implementation of a perfect eaves- dropper on a quantum cryptography system," Nat Commun 2, 349 (2011). · DOI
  35. N. Gisin, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden, "Quantum cryptography," Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  36. L. Calderaro, C.o Agnesi, D. Dequal, F. Vedovato, M. Schi- avon, A. Santamato, V. Luceri, G. Bianco, G. Vallone, and P. Villoresi, "Towards Quantum Communication from Global Navigation Satellite System," Quantum Sci. Technol. 4 015012 (2019). · DOI
  37. J. E. Schneeloch, On Position-Momentum Entanglement, Non- locality, and Measurement, PhD thesis-University of Rochester, Department of Physics and Astronomy, 2015.
  38. T.z Paterek, A. Fedrizzi, S.n Grblacher, Th. Jennewein, M. Z., M. Aspelmeyer, and A. Zeilinger, "Experimental Test of Non- local Realistic Theories Without the Rotational Symmetry As- sumption," Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 210406 (2007). · DOI
  39. S. Grblacher, T. Paterek, R. Kaltenbaek, . Brukner, M. Åukowski, M. Aspelmeyer and A. Zeilinger, "An exp erimental test of nonlocal realism," Nature 446, 871 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  40. D. Dehlinger and M. W. Mitchell, "Entangled photons, nonlo- cality, and Bell inequalities in the undergraduate laboratory," Am. J. Phys. 70, 903 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  41. J. A. Carlson, M. D. Olmstead, and M. Beck, "Quantum mys- teries tested: An experiment implementing Hardys test of local realism," Am. J. Phys. 74, 180 (2005). · DOI
  42. D. F. V. James, P. G. Kwiat, W. J. Munro, and A. G. White, "Measurement of qubits," Phys. Rev. A 64, 052312 (2001). Also see site: http://research.physics.illinois.edu/QI/Photonics/Tomography/. · DOI · Paper page
  43. A. G. White, D. F. V. James, Ph. H. Eberhard, and P. G. Kwiat, "Nonmaximally Entangled States: Production, Characteriza- tion, and Utilization," Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3103 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  44. P. G. Kwiat, E. Waks, A. G. White, I. Appelbaum, and Ph. H. Eberhard, "Ultra-bright source of polarization-entangled pho- tons," Phys. Rev. A 60, R773(R) (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  45. R. Nehra, M. Eaton, C. Gonzalez-Arciniegas, M. S. Kim, T. Gerrits, A. Lita, S. W. Nam, and O. Pfister, "Generalized over- lap q uantum state tomography," arXiv:1911.00173v2 [quant- ph] (2020). · arXiv
  46. J. G. Titchener, M. Grfe, R. Heilmann, A. S. Solntsev, A. Sza- meit, and A. A. Sukhorukov, "Scalable on-chip quantum state tomography," npj Quantum Inf 4, 19 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  47. J. K. dynski, A. Mattar, P. Skrzypczyk, E. Woodhead, D. Cav- alcanti, K. Banaszek, and A. Acin, "Device-independent quan- tum key distribution with single-photon sources," Quantum 4, 260 (2020). · DOI
  48. J. S. Bell, "On the EinsteinPodolskyRosen paradox," Physics (Long Island City, N.Y.) 1, 195 (1964);
  49. A. Aspect and P. Grangier, "Experiments on EinsteinPodolsky- Rosentype correlations with pairs of visible photons," edited by R. Penrose and C. J. Isham, Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, (Oxford U.P., 1986, pp. 144).
  50. J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, "Pro- posed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories," Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 15, 880 (1969).
  51. L. Marini, L. G. Helt, Y. Lu, B. J. Eggleton, and S. Palomba, "Constraints on downconversion in atomically thick films," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. Vol. 35, No. 4, 672 (2018). · DOI
  52. M. B. Aguero, A. A. Hnilo, and M. G. Kovalsky , "Measuring entanglement of photons produced by a pulsed source," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. Vol. 31, No. 12, 3088 (2014). · DOI
  53. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and M. Horodecki, "Quantum- entropy inequalities: independent condition for local realism?," Phys. Lett. A 210, 377 (1996). · DOI
  54. K. Åyczkowski, P. Horodecki, A. Sanpera, and M. Lewenstein, "," Phys. Rev. A 58, 883 (1998). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Motazedifard, A., Madani, S. A., & Vayaghan, N. S.
Affiliations
Iranian Center for Quantum Technologies (IR)
Corresponding author
Motazedifard, Ali
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2020
Volume
53
Issue
7
ISSN
0306-8919 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2012.02658
arXiv
2012.02658
OpenAlex
W3112465474
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Optical and Quantum Electronics (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
Keywords
polarization-entangled photons, Bell states, coincidence count rate, quantum state tomography, maximum likelihood estimation, density matrix reconstruction, concurrence, entanglement of formation, tangles, logarithmic negativity, von Neumann entropy, Rényi entropy, quantum coherence, entanglement entropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review