PreprintCited by 127Advanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Training Vision Transformers for Image Retrieval

Open access
El-Nouby, Alaaeldin, Neverova, Natalia, Laptev, Ivan, Jégou, Hervé·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Transformers have shown outstanding results for natural language understanding and, more recently, for image classification. We here extend this work and propose a transformer-based approach for image retrieval: we adopt vision transformers for generating image descriptors and train the resulting model with a metric learning objective, which combines a contrastive loss with a differential entropy regularizer. Our results show consistent and significant improvements of transformers over convolution-based approaches. In particular, our method outperforms the state of the art on several public benchmarks for category-level retrieval, namely Stanford Online Product, In-Shop and CUB-200. Furthermore, our experiments on ROxford and RParis also show that, in comparable settings, transformers are competitive for particular object retrieval, especially in the regime of short vector representations and low-resolution images.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2102.05644

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bell, S., Liu, Y ., Alsheikh, S., Tang, Y ., Pizzi, E., Henning, M., Singh, K., Parkhi, O., and Borisyuk, F. Groknet: Unified computer vision model trunk and embeddings for commerce. In SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining , 2020.
  2. Opitz, M., Waltner, G., Possegger, H., and Bischof, H. Deep metric learning with bier: Boosting independent embeddings robustly. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 2018.
  3. Teh, E. W., DeVries, T., and Taylor, G. W. Proxynca++: Revisiting and revitalizing proxy neighborhood component analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.01113 , 2020. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 127

Metadata

Authors
El-Nouby, A., Neverova, N., Laptev, I., & Jégou, H.
Affiliations
  • École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR)
  • Meta (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128099838
Cited by
127
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 22
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
vision transformer, image retrieval, image descriptors, metric learning, contrastive loss, object retrieval, low-resolution images

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review