The DOI matches its DataCite record; 71 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervision
Open accessAbstract
Pre-trained representations are becoming crucial for many NLP and perception tasks. While representation learning in NLP has transitioned to training on raw text without human annotations, visual and vision-language representations still rely heavily on curated training datasets that are expensive or require expert knowledge. For vision applications, representations are mostly learned using datasets with explicit class labels such as ImageNet or OpenImages. For vision-language, popular datasets like Conceptual Captions, MSCOCO, or CLIP all involve a non-trivial data collection (and cleaning) process. This costly curation process limits the size of datasets and hence hinders the scaling of trained models. In this paper, we leverage a noisy dataset of over one billion image alt-text pairs, obtained without expensive filtering or post-processing steps in the Conceptual Captions dataset. A simple dual-encoder architecture learns to align visual and language representations of the image and text pairs using a contrastive loss. We show that the scale of our corpus can make up for its noise and leads to state-of-the-art representations even with such a simple learning scheme. Our visual representation achieves strong performance when transferred to classification tasks such as ImageNet and VTAB. The aligned visual and language representations enables zero-shot image classification and also set new state-of-the-art results on Flickr30K and MSCOCO image-text retrieval benchmarks, even when compared with more sophisticated cross-attention models. The representations also enable cross-modality search with complex text and text + image queries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“VQ-VAE-2 [189] improves upon traditional VAE methods and excels in multimodal generation tasks, capable of generating high-quality images or other modality content.”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [189]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333 · cited 5×
“In the vision domain, pre-training on large-scale supervised data such as ImageNet (Deng et al., 2009), OpenImages (Kuznetsova et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation
Pennington, J., Socher, R., & Manning, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1162 · Cited by 34,071 · cited 1×
“…(Frome et al., 2013; Faghri et al., 2018) and improved versions (e.g., leveraging object detectors, dense feature maps, or multi-attention layers) (Socher et al., 2014; Karpathy et al., 2014; Kiros et al.; Nam et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019; Messina et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2020a) have been…”
BackgroundEfficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568 · cited 1×
“Previously word2vec (Mikolov et al., 2013a;b) shows that linear relationships between word vectors emerge as a result of training them to predict adjacent words in sentences and paragraphs.”
BackgroundDistributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1310.4546 · Cited by 24,533 · cited 1×
“Previously word2vec (Mikolov et al., 2013a;b) shows that linear relationships between word vectors emerge as a result of training them to predict adjacent words in sentences and paragraphs.”
BackgroundRoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293 · cited 5×
“, 2018), CLIP (Radford et al., 2021), BiT (Kolesnikov et al.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialMomentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learning
He, K., Fan, H., Wu, Y., Xie, S., & Girshick, R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00975 · Cited by 13,347
XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding
Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.08237 · Cited by 6,687 · cited 1×
“This is at least an order of magnitude smaller than their counterparts in the vision domain, and much smaller than large corpora of text from the internet for NLP pre-training (e.g., Devlin et al. (2019); Radford et al. (2019); Yang et al. (2019); Liu et al. (2019b); Raffel et al. (2020)).”
BackgroundSelf-citationVisual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations
Krishna, R., Zhu, Y., Groth, O., Johnson, J., Hata, K., Kravitz, J., Chen, S., Kalantidis, Y., Li, L.-J., Shamma, D. A., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-016-0981-7 · Cited by 5,107 · cited 1×
“However, vision-language pre-training datasets such as Conceptual Captions (Sharma et al., 2018), Visual Genome Dense Captions (Krishna et al., 2016), and ImageBERT (Qi et al., 2020) require even heavier work on human annotation, semantic parsing, cleaning and balancing.”
BackgroundDeep visual-semantic alignments for generating image descriptions
Karpathy, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298932 · Cited by 4,902
Bootstrap Your Own Latent: A New Approach to Self-Supervised Learning
Grill, J.-B., Strub, F., Altché, F., Tallec, C., Richemond, P. H., Buchatskaya, E., Doersch, C., Pires, B. A., Guo, Z. D., Azar, M. G., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07733 · Cited by 3,846 · cited 1×
“Recently, self-supervised (Chen et al., 2020b; Tian et al., 2020; He et al., 2020; Misra & Maaten, 2020; Li et al., 2021; Grill et al., 2020; Caron et al., 2020) and semi-supervised learning (Yalniz et al., 2019; Xie et al., 2020; Pham et al., 2020) have been studied as alternative paradigms.”
Background3D Object Representations for Fine-Grained Categorization
Krause, J., Stark, M. M., Deng, J., & Fei-Fei, L. (2013) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2013.77 · Cited by 3,666 · cited 1×
“, 2012), Stanford Cars (Krause et al., 2013), and Food101 (Bossard et al.”
BackgroundAutomated Flower Classification over a Large Number of Classes
Nilsback, M.-E., & Zisserman, A. (2008) · 2008 Sixth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icvgip.2008.47 · Cited by 3,442
Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignments
Caron, M., Misra, I., Mairal, J., Goyal, P., Bojanowski, P., & Joulin, A. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.09882 · Cited by 2,499 · cited 2×
“Recently, self-supervised (Hénaff et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020b; He et al., 2020; Misra & Maaten, 2020; Li et al., 2021; Grill et al., 2020; Caron et al., 2020) and semi-supervised learning (Yalniz et al.”
BackgroundRevisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Era
Sun, C., Shrivastava, A., Singh, S., & Gupta, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.97 · Cited by 2,484 · cited 2×
“In the vision domain, pre-training on large-scale supervised data such as ImageNet (Deng et al., 2009), OpenImages (Kuznetsova et al., 2020), and JFT-300M (Sun et al., 2017; Kolesnikov et al., 2020) has proven to be critical for improving performance on downstream tasks via transfer learning.”
BackgroundYoung, P., Lai, A., Hodosh, M., & Hockenmaier, J. (2014) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00166 · Cited by 2,439 · cited 1×
“The train/dev/test splits are defined in Young et al. (2014).”
Self-Training With Noisy Student Improves ImageNet Classification
Xie, Q., Luong, M.-T., Hovy, E., & Le, Q. V. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01070 · Cited by 2,393 · cited 4×
“, 2021), NoisyStudent (Xie et al., 2020), and Meta-Pseudo-Labels (Pham et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationKuznetsova, A., Rom, H., Alldrin, N., Uijlings, J., Krasin, I., Pont-Tuset, J., Kamali, S., Popov, S., Malloci, M., Kolesnikov, A., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.00982 · Cited by 2,194
Self-citationViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Tasks
Lu, J., Batra, D., Parikh, D., & Lee, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.02265 · Cited by 2,109
Food-101 – Mining Discriminative Components with Random Forests
Bossard, L., Guillaumin, M., & Gool, L. V. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10599-4_29 · Cited by 2,105
UNITER: UNiversal Image-TExt Representation Learning
Chen, Y.-C., Li, L., Yu, L., El Kholy, A., Ahmed, F., Gan, Z., Cheng, Y., & Liu, J. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58577-8_7 · Cited by 2,055 · cited 7×
“This is one of the most effective loss functions for both self-supervised (Chen et al., 2020b) and supervised (Zhai & Wu, 2019; Musgrave et al., 2020) representation learning.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationTian, Y., Krishnan, D., & Isola, P. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58621-8_45 · Cited by 1,997 · cited 2×
“Recently, self-supervised (Chen et al., 2020b; Tian et al., 2020; He et al., 2020; Misra & Maaten, 2020; Li et al., 2021; Grill et al., 2020; Caron et al., 2020) and semi-supervised learning (Yalniz et al.”
BackgroundConceptual Captions: A Cleaned, Hypernymed, Image Alt-text Dataset For Automatic Image Captioning
Sharma, P., Ding, N., Goodman, S., & Soricut, R. (2018) · Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1238 · Cited by 1,879
Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Tasks
Li, X., Yin, X. P., Li, C., Zhang, P., Hu, X., Zhang, L., Wang, L., Hu, H., Li, D., Wei, F., et al. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58577-8_8 · Cited by 1,791 · cited 1×
“Pre-training has also become the de-facto approach in vision-language modeling (Lu et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020c; Li et al., 2020).”
BackgroundParkhi, O., Vedaldi, A., Zisserman, A., & Jawahar, C. V. (2012) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2012.6248092 · Cited by 1,702
Microsoft COCO Captions: Data Collection and Evaluation Server
Chen, X., Fang, H., Lin, T.-Y., Vedantam, R., Gupta, S., Dollar, P., & Zitnick, C. L. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.00325 · Cited by 1,614 · cited 12×
“Image-text retrieval results on Flickr30K and MSCOCO datasets (zero-shot and fine-tuned).”
MethodInfluentialUnifying Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Multimodal Neural Language ModelsPreprint
Kiros, R., Salakhutdinov, R., & Zemel, R. S. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.2539 · Cited by 1,496
Flickr30k Entities: Collecting Region-to-Phrase Correspondences for Richer Image-to-Sentence Models
Plummer, B. A., Wang, L., Cervantes, C. M., Caicedo, J. C., Hockenmaier, J., & Lazebnik, S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.303 · Cited by 1,444
Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representations
Misra, I., & van der Maaten, L. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00674 · Cited by 1,435 · cited 1×
“Recently, self-supervised (Chen et al., 2020b; Tian et al., 2020; He et al., 2020; Misra & Maaten, 2020; Li et al., 2021; Grill et al., 2020; Caron et al., 2020) and semi-supervised learning (Yalniz et al., 2019; Xie et al., 2020; Pham et al., 2020) have been studied as alternative paradigms.”
BackgroundLearning Fine-Grained Image Similarity with Deep Ranking
Wang, J., Song, Y., Leung, T., Rosenberg, C., Wang, J., Philbin, J. F., Chen, B., & Wu, Y. N. (2014) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.180 · Cited by 1,317
The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalization
Hendrycks, D., Basart, S., Mu, N., Kadavath, S., Wang, F., Dorundo, E., Desai, R., Zhu, T., Parajuli, S., Guo, M., et al. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00823 · Cited by 1,250 · cited 2×
“, 2009) and its variants including ImageNet-R(endition) (Hendrycks et al., 2020) (non-natural images such as art, cartoons, sketches), ImageNet-A(dversarial) (Hendrycks et al.”
BackgroundSimLex-999: Evaluating Semantic Models With (Genuine) Similarity Estimation
Hill, F., Reichart, R., & Korhonen, A. (2015) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00237 · Cited by 1,230
Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretraining
Mahajan, D., Girshick, R., Ramanathan, V., He, K., Paluri, M., Li, Y., Bharambe, A., & van der Maaten, L. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01216-8_12 · Cited by 1,224
A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations
Chen, T. (2024) · TIB Data Manager · doi:10.57702/iuuvgtaz · Cited by 1,140
Hendrycks, D., Zhao, K., Basart, S., Steinhardt, J., & Song, D. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01501 · Cited by 1,090 · cited 1×
“…ILSVRC-2012 benchmark (Deng et al., 2009) and its variants including ImageNet-R(endition) (Hendrycks et al., 2020) (non-natural images such as art, cartoons, sketches), ImageNet-A(dversarial) (Hendrycks et al., 2021) (more challenging images for ML models), and ImageNet-V2 (Recht et al., 2019).”
BackgroundBig Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learning
Kolesnikov, A., Beyer, L., Zhai, X., Puigcerver, J., Yung, J., Gelly, S., & Houlsby, N. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58558-7_29 · Cited by 1,039 · cited 11×
“Table 6 reports the mean accuracy (including the breakdown results on each subgroup) with standard deviation from three fine-tuning runs and shows that ALIGN outperforms BiT-L (Kolesnikov et al., 2020) with similar hyper-parameter selection method applied.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialData-Efficient Image Recognition with Contrastive Predictive Coding
Hénaff, O. J., Srinivas, A., De Fauw, J., Razavi, A., Doersch, C., Eslami, S. M. A., & Oord, A. V. D. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.09272 · Cited by 1,014 · cited 1×
“Recently, self-supervised (Hénaff et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2020b; He et al., 2020; Misra & Maaten, 2020; Li et al., 2021; Grill et al., 2020; Caron et al., 2020) and semi-supervised learning (Yalniz et al.”
BackgroundLarge Batch Optimization for Deep Learning: Training BERT in 76 minutesPreprint
You, Y., Li, J., Reddi, S. J., Hseu, J., Kumar, S., Bhojanapalli, S., Song, X., Demmel, J. W., Keutzer, K., & Hsieh, C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.00962 · Cited by 890 · cited 2×
“We use LAMB optimizer (You et al., 2020)1 with weight decay ratio 1e-5.”
MethodDeep Fragment Embeddings for Bidirectional Image Sentence MappingPreprint
Karpathy, A., Joulin, A., & Fei-Fei, L. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.5679 · Cited by 825 · cited 2×
“…et al., 2013; Faghri et al., 2018) and improved versions (e.g., leveraging object detectors, dense feature maps, or multi-attention layers) (Socher et al., 2014; Karpathy et al., 2014; Kiros et al.; Nam et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019; Messina et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2020a) have been proposed.”
BackgroundMethodGrounded Compositional Semantics for Finding and Describing Images with Sentences
Socher, R., Karpathy, A., Le, Q. V., Manning, C. D., & Ng, A. Y. (2014) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00177 · Cited by 794 · cited 2×
“…(Frome et al., 2013; Faghri et al., 2018) and improved versions (e.g., leveraging object detectors, dense feature maps, or multi-attention layers) (Socher et al., 2014; Karpathy et al., 2014; Kiros et al.; Nam et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019; Messina et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2020a) have been…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationDo ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?
Recht, B., Roelofs, R., Schmidt, L., & Shankar, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.10811 · Cited by 790 · cited 3×
“We first apply zero-shot transfer of ALIGN to visual classifi-cation tasks on ImageNet ILSVRC-2012 benchmark (Deng et al., 2009) and its variants including ImageNet-R(endition) (Hendrycks et al., 2020) (non-natural images such as art, cartoons, sketches), ImageNet-A(dversarial) (Hendrycks et al., 2021) (more challenging…”
BackgroundDual Attention Networks for Multimodal Reasoning and Matching
Nam, H., Ha, J.-W., & Kim, J. (2017) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.232 · Cited by 760 · cited 2×
“, leveraging object detectors, dense feature maps, or multi-attention layers) (Socher et al., 2014; Karpathy et al., 2014; Kiros et al.; Nam et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019; Messina et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2020a) have been proposed.”
BackgroundVisual Semantic Reasoning for Image-Text Matching
Li, K., Zhang, Y., Li, K., Li, Y., & Fu, Y. (2019) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00475 · Cited by 642 · cited 5×
“R@1 R@5 R@10 R@1 R@5 R@10 R@1 R@5 R@10 R@1 R@5 R@10 Zero-shot (Faghri et al., 2018), VSRN (Li et al., 2019), DE I2T (Parekh et al., 2021), and DE T2T+I2T (Parekh et al., 2021). image R@1 R@5 R@10 R@1 R@5 R@10 R@1 R@5 R@10 R@1 R@5 R@10 VSE++ ERNIE-ViL (Yu et al., 2020), VILLA (Gan et al., 2020) and Oscar (Li et al., 20…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation BenchmarkPreprint
Zhai, X., Puigcerver, J., Kolesnikov, A., Ruyssen, P., Riquelme, C., Lučić, M., Djolonga, J., Pinto, A. S., Neumann, M., Dosovitskiy, A., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.04867 · Cited by 521
A Metric Learning Reality Check
Musgrave, K., Belongie, S., & Lim, S.-N. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58595-2_41 · Cited by 495 · cited 2×
“This is one of the most effective loss functions for both self-supervised (Chen et al., 2020b) and supervised (Zhai & Wu, 2019; Musgrave et al., 2020) representation learning.”
BackgroundBillion-scale semi-supervised learning for image classificationPreprint
Yalnız, İ. Z., Jeǵou, H., Chen, K., Paluri, M., & Mahajan, D. K. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.00546 · Cited by 478
Contrastive Learning of Medical Visual Representations from Paired Images and TextPreprint
Zhang, Y., Jiang, H., Miura, Y., Manning, C. D., & Langlotz, C. P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.00747 · Cited by 465
(2021) · International Conference on Learning Representations · Cited by 449
Pixel-BERT: Aligning Image Pixels with Text by Deep Multi-Modal TransformersPreprint
Huang, Z., Zeng, Z., Liu, B., Fu, D., & Fu, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.00849 · Cited by 433 · cited 2×
“We evaluate the zero-shot model performance of ALIGN and compare it with M 3 P (Huang et al., 2020a) and UC2 (Zhou et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodVirTex: Learning Visual Representations from Textual Annotations
Desai, K., & Johnson, J. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01101 · Cited by 376 · cited 2×
“These works are however limited to small datasets such as Flickr (Joulin et al., 2015; Li et al., 2017) and COCO Captions (Desai & Johnson, 2020; Sariyildiz et al., 2020), and the resulting models don’t produce a vision-language representation that is needed for tasks like cross-modal retrieval.”
BackgroundLarge-Scale Adversarial Training for Vision-and-Language Representation LearningPreprint
Gan, Z., Chen, Y.-C., Li, L., Zhu, C., Cheng, Y., & Liu, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.06195 · Cited by 358
Self-citationLearning the Best Pooling Strategy for Visual Semantic Embedding
Chen, J., Hu, H., Wu, H., Jiang, Y., & Wang, C. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01553 · Cited by 318 · cited 7×
“This is one of the most effective loss functions for both self-supervised (Chen et al., 2020b) and supervised (Zhai & Wu, 2019; Musgrave et al., 2020) representation learning.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLearning Visual Features from Large Weakly Supervised Data
Joulin, A., van der Maaten, L. J. P., Jabri, A., & Vasilache, N. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46478-7_5 · Cited by 316 · cited 3×
“These works are however limited to small datasets such as Flickr (Joulin et al., 2015; Li et al., 2017) and COCO Captions (Desai & Johnson, 2020; Sariyildiz et al., 2020), and the resulting models don’t produce a vision-language representation that is needed for tasks like cross-modal retrieval.”
BackgroundImageBERT: Cross-modal Pre-training with Large-scale Weak-supervised Image-Text DataPreprint
Qi, D., Su, L., Song, J. L., Cui, E., Bharti, T., & Sacheti, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.07966 · Cited by 255 · cited 6×
“With fine-tuning, ALIGN outperforms all existing methods by a large margin, including those that employ more complex cross-modal attention layers such as ImageBERT (Qi et al., 2020), UNITER (Chen et al., 2020c), Table 1.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialClassification is a Strong Baseline for Deep Metric LearningPreprint
Zhai, A., & Wu, H. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.12649 · Cited by 227
VSE++: Improving Visual-Semantic Embeddings with Hard Negatives.
Faghri, F., Fleet, D. J., Kiros, J., & Fidler, S. (2018) · Cited by 184
Fine-Grained Visual Textual Alignment for Cross-Modal Retrieval Using Transformer Encoders
Messina, N., Amato, G. M., Esuli, A., Falchi, F., Gennaro, C., & Marchand‐Maillet, S. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3451390 · Cited by 163 · cited 2×
“, leveraging object detectors, dense feature maps, or multi-attention layers) (Socher et al., 2014; Karpathy et al., 2014; Kiros et al.; Nam et al., 2017; Li et al., 2019; Messina et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2020a) have been proposed.”
BackgroundFindings of the Third Shared Task on Multimodal Machine Translation
Barrault, L., Bougares, F., Specia, L., Lala, C., Elliott, D., & Frank, S. (2018) · Conference on Machine Translation (WMT) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-6402 · Cited by 142 · cited 1×
“We test the multilingual model on Multi30k, a multilingual image text retrieval dataset extends Flickr30K (Plum-mer et al., 2015) to German (de) (Elliott et al., 2016), French (fr) (Elliott et al., 2017) and Czech (cs) (Barrault et al., 2018).”
MethodLearning Visual Representations with Caption Annotations
Sarıyıldız, M. B., Pérez, J., & Larlus, D. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58598-3_10 · Cited by 128 · cited 3×
“These works are however limited to small datasets such as Flickr (Joulin et al., 2015; Li et al., 2017) and COCO Captions (Desai & Johnson, 2020; Sariyildiz et al., 2020), and the resulting models don’t produce a vision-language representation that is needed for tasks like cross-modal retrieval.”
BackgroundERNIE-ViL: Knowledge Enhanced Vision-Language Representations Through Scene GraphPreprint
Yu, F. R., Tang, J., Yin, W., Sun, Y., Tian, H., Wu, H. R., & Wang, H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.16934 · Cited by 106 · cited 4×
“, 2020c), ERNIE-ViL (Yu et al., 2020), VILLA (Gan et al.”
MethodInfluentialLearning Visual N-Grams from Web Data
Li, A., Jabri, A., Joulin, A., & van der Maaten, L. J. P. (2017) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.449 · Cited by 94 · cited 12×
“Image-text retrieval results on Flickr30K and MSCOCO datasets (zero-shot and fine-tuned).”
BackgroundInfluentialAligning Visual Regions and Textual Concepts for Semantic-Grounded Image RepresentationsPreprint
Liu, F., Liu, Y., Ren, X., He, X., & Sun, X. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.06139 · Cited by 66 · cited 2×
“This is at least an order of magnitude smaller than their counterparts in the vision domain, and much smaller than large corpora of text from the internet for NLP pre-training (e.g., Devlin et al. (2019); Radford et al. (2019); Yang et al. (2019); Liu et al. (2019b); Raffel et al. (2020)).”
BackgroundCrisscrossed Captions: Extended Intramodal and Intermodal Semantic Similarity Judgments for MS-COCO
Parekh, Z., Baldridge, J., Cer, D. M., Waters, A., & Yang, Y. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.249 · Cited by 65 · cited 7×
“We also evaluate ALIGN on Crisscrossed Captions (CxC) (Parekh et al., 2021), which is an extension of MSCOCO with additional human semantic similarity judgments for caption-caption, image-image, and image-caption pairs.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationPrototypical contrastive learning of unsupervised representationsPreprint
Li, J. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.57702/qpm0hks1 · Cited by 52
Illustrative Language Understanding: Large-Scale Visual Grounding with Image Search
Kiros, J., Chan, W., & Hinton, G. E. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1085 · Cited by 50
M3P: Learning Universal Representations via Multitask Multilingual Multimodal Pre-trainingPreprint
Ni, M., Huang, H., Su, L., Cui, E., Bharti, T., Wang, L., Gao, J., Zhang, D., & Duan, N. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.02635 · Cited by 40
Graph-RISE: Graph-Regularized Image Semantic EmbeddingPreprint
Juan, D.-C., Lu, C.-T., Li, Z., Peng, F., Timofeev, A., Chen, Y., Gao, Y., Duerig, T., Tomkins, A., & Ravi, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.10814 · Cited by 29 · cited 2×
“High-quality visual representations for classification or retrieval are usually pre-trained on large-scale labeled datasets (Mahajan et al., 2018; Kolesnikov et al., 2020; Dosovitskiy et al., 2021; Juan et al., 2020).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMeta Pseudo LabelsPreprint
Pham, H., Dai, Z., Xie, Q., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 19
Self-citationUC2: Universal Cross-lingual Cross-modal Vision-and-Language Pre-trainingPreprint
Zhou, M., Zhou, L., Wang, S., Yu, C., Li, L., Zhou, Y., & Liu, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.00332 · Cited by 7 · cited 2×
“We evaluate the zero-shot model performance of ALIGN and compare it with M 3 P (Huang et al., 2020a) and UC2 (Zhou et al., 2021).”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Elliott, D., Frank, S., Sima'an, K., and Specia, L. Multi30k: Multilingual english-german image descriptions. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Vision and Language , 2016.
- Elliott, D., Frank, S., Barrault, L., Bougares, F., and Specia, L. Findings of the second shared task on multimodal machine translation and multilingual image description. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Machine Translation, Volume 2: Shared Task Papers , September 2017.
- Foret, P., Kleiner, A., Mobahi, H., and Neyshabur, B. Sharpness-aware minimization for efficiently improving generalization. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021.
- Frome, A., Corrado, G. S., Shlens, J., Bengio, S., Dean, J., Ranzato, M. A., and Mikolov, T. Devise: A deep visualsemantic embedding model. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems , 2013.
- Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., and Liu, P. J. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 2020.
- Touvron, H., Vedaldi, A., Douze, M., and J´ egou, H. Fixing the train-test resolution discrepancy. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2019.
- Zoph, B., Ghiasi, G., Lin, T.-Y., Cui, Y., Liu, H., Cubuk, E. D., and Le, Q. V. Rethinking pre-training and selftraining. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2020.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models
Zhou, K., Yang, J., Loy, C. C., & Liu, Z. (2022) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-022-01653-1 · Cited by 3,304
“The target datasets are ImageNetV2 (Recht et al., 2019), ImageNet-Sketch (Wang et al., 2019), ImageNet-A (Hendrycks et al., 2021b) and ImageNetR (Hendrycks et al., 2021a), all of which have compatible class names with ImageNet allowing seamless transfer for the prompts learned by CoOp.”
BackgroundConditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models
Zhou, K., Yang, J., Loy, C. C., & Liu, Z. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01631 · Cited by 2,069
Li, J., Li, D., Xiong, C., & Hoi, S. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.12086 · Cited by 1,741
Scaling Up Your Kernels to 31×31: Revisiting Large Kernel Design in CNNs
Ding, X., Zhang, X., Han, J., & Ding, G. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01166 · Cited by 1,592
Sigmoid Loss for Language Image Pre-Training
Zhai, X., Mustafa, B., Kolesnikov, A., & Beyer, L. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01100 · Cited by 1,127
Metadata
- Authors
- Jia, C., Yang, Y., Xia, Y., Chen, Y.-T., Parekh, Z., Pham, H., Le, Q. V., Sung, Y., Li, Z., & Duerig, T.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 4904-4916
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2102.05918
- OpenAlex
- W3126337491
- Semantic Scholar
- 141a5033d9994242b18bb3b217e79582f1ee9306
- Cited by
- 1,977
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 392 · 2024: 765 · 2023: 581 · 2022: 159 · 2021: 64
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- International Conference on Machine Learning
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- vision-language representation learning, contrastive learning, dual-encoder architecture, visual representation learning, zero-shot image classification, image-text retrieval, data curation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
