PreprintCited by 1,014Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Data-Efficient Image Recognition with Contrastive Predictive Coding

Open access
Hénaff, Olivier J., Srinivas, Aravind, De Fauw, Jeffrey, Razavi, Ali, Doersch, Carl, Eslami, S. M. Ali, Oord, Aaron van den·2019·arXiv

Abstract

Human observers can learn to recognize new categories of images from a handful of examples, yet doing so with artificial ones remains an open challenge. We hypothesize that data-efficient recognition is enabled by representations which make the variability in natural signals more predictable. We therefore revisit and improve Contrastive Predictive Coding, an unsupervised objective for learning such representations. This new implementation produces features which support state-of-the-art linear classification accuracy on the ImageNet dataset. When used as input for non-linear classification with deep neural networks, this representation allows us to use 2-5x less labels than classifiers trained directly on image pixels. Finally, this unsupervised representation substantially improves transfer learning to object detection on the PASCAL VOC dataset, surpassing fully supervised pre-trained ImageNet classifiers.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1905.09272

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contrastive learning has resulted in excellent representation learning performance across domains such as computer vision, natural language, speech recognition, and time-series data.

    “This framework has resulted in excellent representation learning performance across domains such as computer vision [12, 33, 35], natural language [49], speech recognition [6, 58] and time-series data [39].”

    From Contrastive Predictive Coding for Human Activity Recognition (2021) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hénaff, O. J., Srinivas, A., De Fauw, J., Razavi, A., Doersch, C., Eslami, S. M. A., & Oord, A. V. D.
Affiliations
Google (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2944828972
Cited by
1,014
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 60 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 190 · 2022: 180 · 2021: 286 · 2020: 171 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
contrastive predictive coding, unsupervised feature learning, transfer learning, object detection, label efficiency, ImageNet, Pascal VOC, linear classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review