The DOI matches its DataCite record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Models
Open accessAbstract
GPT-3 can perform numerous tasks when provided a natural language prompt that contains a few training examples. We show that this type of few-shot learning can be unstable: the choice of prompt format, training examples, and even the order of the training examples can cause accuracy to vary from near chance to near state-of-the-art. We demonstrate that this instability arises from the bias of language models towards predicting certain answers, e.g., those that are placed near the end of the prompt or are common in the pre-training data. To mitigate this, we first estimate the model's bias towards each answer by asking for its prediction when given the training prompt and a content-free test input such as "N/A". We then fit calibration parameters that cause the prediction for this input to be uniform across answers. On a diverse set of tasks, this contextual calibration procedure substantially improves GPT-3 and GPT-2's average accuracy (up to 30.0% absolute) and reduces variance across different choices of the prompt.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“using the demonstrations with gold labels significantly improves the performance over no demonstrations”
From Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work? (2022) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2021
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“Despite incontext learning consistently outperforming zeroshot inference on a wide range of tasks (Zhao et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021)”
From Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work? (2022) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2021
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We use contextual calibration (Zhao et al., 2021) and class-balanced sampling when these techniques improve performance on a validation set.”
From Adapting Language Models to Compress Contexts (2023) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2021
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This finding is consistent with the recency bias proposed by (Zhao et al., 2021): LMs are biased towards outputting answers that are towards the end of the prompt.”
From Understanding the Dark Side of LLMs' Intrinsic Self-Correction (2025) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2021
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“LLMs are shown to be sensitive to the prompt format (Zhao et al., 2021;Lu et al., 2021;Wei et al., 2023;Madaan & Yazdanbakhsh, 2022)”
From Large Language Models as Optimizers (2023) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2021
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For instance, simple modifications such as calibrating output probabilities (Zhao et al., 2021; Holtzman et al., 2021) or using a noisy channel (Min et al., 2022a) have improved performance on a range of tasks.”
From Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models (2022) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2021
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Zhong et al. [152] first define a template using a discrete search method such as AutoPrompt [125]'s, initialize virtual tokens based on this discovered prompt, and then fine-tune the embeddings to increase task accuracy.”
From Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing (2023) · cites this paper as [152]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality Over a Sentiment Treebank
Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C. D., Ng, A., & Potts, C. (2013) · Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1170 · Cited by 6,878
Probabilistic Outputs for Support vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods
Platt, J. C. (1999) · Cited by 4,834
Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text ClassificationPreprint
Zhang, X., Zhao, J., & LeCun, Y. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1509.01626 · Cited by 4,481
On calibration of modern neural networks
Guo, C., Pleiss, G., Sun, Y., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.04599 · Cited by 3,435
Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction
Lake, B. M., Salakhutdinov, R., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab3050 · Cited by 2,817 · cited 1×
“Few-shot learning—the ability to learn tasks with limited examples—is an important aspect of intelligence (Lake et al., 2015; Yogatama et al., 2019).”
BackgroundA Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Models
Li, J., Galley, M., Brockett, C., Gao, J., & Dolan, B. (2016) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1014 · Cited by 2,459
Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learners
Gao, T., Fisch, A., & Chen, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.295 · Cited by 1,380
Exploiting Cloze-Questions for Few-Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inference
Schick, T., & Schütze, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.20 · Cited by 1,305
AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated Prompts
Shin, T., Razeghi, Y., Logan IV, R. L., Wallace, E., & Singh, S. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.346 · Cited by 1,279
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., Hesse, C., Chen, M., Sigler, E., Litwin, M., Gray, S., Chess, B., Clark, J., Berner, C., McCandlish, S., Radford, A., Sutskever, I., and Amodei, D. Language models are few-shot learners. In NeurIPS , 2020.
- Schwartz, R., Sap, M., Konstas, I., Zilles, L., Choi, Y ., and Smith, N. A. The effect of different writing tasks on linguistic style: A case study of the ROC story cloze task. In ACL , 2017.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676
Chain-Of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q. V., & Zhou, D. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-1800 · Cited by 4,505
“The one exception is the coin flip task, for which exemplar orders have high standard deviation, likely for the reason cited in Zhao et al. (2021)—for classification, many exemplars of the same category in a row biases the model outputs).”
Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code
Chen, M., Tworek, J., Jun, H., Yuan, Q., Pinto, H. P. D. O., Kaplan, J., Edwards, H., Burda, Y., Joseph, N., Brockman, G., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.03374 · Cited by 1,436
“And research shows that so-called prompt engineering can enable stronger results from AI systems (Zhao et al., 2021).”
BackgroundEmergent Abilities of Large Language Models
Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., Yogatama, D., Bosma, M., Zhou, D., Metzler, D., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.07682 · Cited by 1,264
Liu, X., Zheng, Y., Du, Z., Ding, M., Qian, Y., Yang, Z., & Tang, J. (2023) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2023.08.012 · Cited by 1,428
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, T. Z., Wallace, E., Feng, S., Klein, D., & Singh, S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2102.09690
- OpenAlex
- W3132736064
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 206 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 33
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- few-shot learning, GPT-3, GPT-2, prediction variance, natural language prompts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
