PreprintCited by 156Speech and Audio ProcessingMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

Is Someone Speaking? Exploring Long-term Temporal Features for Audio-visual Active Speaker Detection

Open access
Tao, Ruijie, Pan, Zexu, Das, Rohan Kumar, Qian, Xinyuan, Shou, Mike Zheng, Li, Haizhou·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Active speaker detection (ASD) seeks to detect who is speaking in a visual scene of one or more speakers. The successful ASD depends on accurate interpretation of short-term and long-term audio and visual information, as well as audio-visual interaction. Unlike the prior work where systems make decision instantaneously using short-term features, we propose a novel framework, named TalkNet, that makes decision by taking both short-term and long-term features into consideration. TalkNet consists of audio and visual temporal encoders for feature representation, audio-visual cross-attention mechanism for inter-modality interaction, and a self-attention mechanism to capture long-term speaking evidence. The experiments demonstrate that TalkNet achieves 3.5% and 2.2% improvement over the state-of-the-art systems on the AVA-ActiveSpeaker dataset and Columbia ASD dataset, respectively. Code has been made available at: https://github.com/TaoRuijie/TalkNet_ASD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2107.06592

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Triantafyllos Afouras, Joon Son Chung, and Andrew Zisserman. 2018. The Conversation: deep audio-visual speech enhancement. Proc. Interspeech (2018), 3244-3248.
  2. D. Snyder, G. Chen, and D. Povey. 2015. MUSAN: A Music, Speech, and Noise Corpus. CoRR abs/1510.08484 (2015). http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.08484 · arXiv
  3. Shifeng Zhang, Xiangyu Zhu, Zhen Lei, Hailin Shi, Xiaobo Wang, and Stan Z Li. 2017. S3FD: Single shot scale-invariant face detector. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV). 192-201.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tao, R., Pan, Z., Das, R. K., Qian, X., Shou, M. Z., & Li, H.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
Pages
3927-3935
OpenAlex
W3206008172
Cited by
156
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 2
FWCI
15.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
active speaker detection, auditory-visual interaction, self-attention, temporal encoder, multimodal fusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review