Cited by 690Speech and Audio ProcessingSpeech Recognition and SynthesisMultimedia Communication and Technology

Out of Time: Automated Lip Sync in the Wild

Chung, Joon Son, Zisserman, Andrew·2017·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-54427-4_19

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chung, J. S., & Zisserman, A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Chung, Joon Son
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2017
Pages
251-263
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2604379605
Cited by
689
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 102 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
FWCI
23.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M013774/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Multimedia Communication and Technology
Keywords
lip synchronization, speech, two-stream convolutional neural network, unsupervised learning, active speaker detection, lip reading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review