CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1,088Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsAugmented Reality ApplicationsCultural Studies and Postmodernism

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

All One Needs to Know about Metaverse: A Complete Survey on Technological Singularity, Virtual Ecosystem, and Research Agenda

Open access
Lee, Lik-Hang, Braud, Tristan, Zhou, Pengyuan, Wang, Lin, Xu, Dianlei, Lin, Zijun, Kumar, Abhishek, Bermejo, Carlos, Hui, Pan·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2110.05352
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Since the popularisation of the Internet in the 1990s, the cyberspace has kept evolving. We have created various computer-mediated virtual environments including social networks, video conferencing, virtual 3D worlds (e.g., VR Chat), augmented reality applications (e.g., Pokemon Go), and Non-Fungible Token Games (e.g., Upland). Such virtual environments, albeit non-perpetual and unconnected, have bought us various degrees of digital transformation. The term `metaverse' has been coined to further facilitate the digital transformation in every aspect of our physical lives. At the core of the metaverse stands the vision of an immersive Internet as a gigantic, unified, persistent, and shared realm. While the metaverse may seem futuristic, catalysed by emerging technologies such as Extended Reality, 5G, and Artificial Intelligence, the digital `big bang' of our cyberspace is not far away. This survey paper presents the first effort to offer a comprehensive framework that examines the latest metaverse development under the dimensions of state-of-the-art technologies and metaverse ecosystems, and illustrates the possibility of the digital `big bang'. First, technologies are the enablers that drive the transition from the current Internet to the metaverse. We thus examine eight enabling technologies rigorously - Extended Reality, User Interactivity (Human-Computer Interaction), Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, Computer Vision, IoT and Robotics, Edge and Cloud computing, and Future Mobile Networks. In terms of applications, the metaverse ecosystem allows human users to live and play within a self-sustaining, persistent, and shared realm. Therefore, we discuss six user-centric factors -- Avatar, Content Creation, Virtual Economy, Social Acceptability, Security and Privacy, and Trust and Accountability. Finally, we propose a concrete research agenda for the development of the metaverse.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2110.05352

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [695][695] Haihan Duan, Jiaye Li, Sizheng Fan, Zhonghao Lin, Xiao Wu, and Wei Cai. Metaverse for social good: A university campus prototype. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.08985 , 2021. · arXiv
  2. [697][697] Davide Salanitri, Glyn Lawson, and Brian Waterfield. The relationship between presence and trust in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics , ECCE '16, New York, NY, USA, 2016. Association for Computing Machinery.
  3. [698][698] Chun-Cheng Chang, Rebecca A Grier, Jason Maynard, John Shutko, Mike Blommer, Radhakrishnan Swaminathan, and Reates Curry. Using a situational awareness display to improve rider trust and comfort with an av taxi. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting , volume 63, pages 2083-2087. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2019.
  4. [699][699] Abhishek Kumar, Tristan Braud, Young D. Kwon, and Pan Hui. Aquilis: Using contextual integrity for privacy protection on mobile devices. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. , 4(4), December 2020.
  5. [701][701] The IEEE Global Initiative on Ethics of Autonomous and Intelligent Systems. Extended Reality in A/IS, 2021. https://standards.ieee.org/content/dam/ieee-standards/standards/web/ documents/other/ead/EAD1e\_extended\_reality.pdf.
  6. [702][702] Brianna Dym and Casey Fiesler. Social norm vulnerability and its consequences for privacy and safety in an online community. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. , 4(CSCW2), October 2020.
  7. [703][703] Paritosh Bahirat, Yangyang He, Abhilash Menon, and Bart Knijnenburg. A data-driven approach to developing iot privacy-setting interfaces. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces , IUI '18, page 165-176, New York, NY, USA, 2018. Association for Computing Machinery.
  8. [704][704] Abhishek Kumar, Tristan Braud, Lik-Hang Lee, and Pan Hui. Theophany: Multimodal speech augmentation in instantaneous privacy channels. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '21), October 20-24, 2021, Virtual Event, China . Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2021.
  9. [705][705] Koki Nagano, Jaewoo Seo, Kyle San, Aaron Hong, Mclean Goldwhite, Jun Xing, Stuti Rastogi, Jiale Kuang, Aviral Agarwal, Hanwei Kung, et al. Deep learning-based photoreal avatars for online virtual worlds in ios. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2018 Real-Time Live! , pages 1-1. 2018.
  10. [706][706] Abhishek Kumar, Tristan Braud, Sasu Tarkoma, and Pan Hui. Trustworthy ai in the age of pervasive computing and big data. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops) , pages 1-6, 2020.
  11. [707][707] Abhishek Kumar, Benjamin Finley, Tristan Braud, Sasu Tarkoma, and Pan Hui. Sketching an ai marketplace: Tech, economic, and regulatory aspects. IEEE Access , 9:13761-13774, 2021.
  12. [708][708] Abhishek Kumar, Purva Grover, Arpan Kumar Kar, and Ashis K. Pani. It consulting: A systematic literature review. In Arpan Kumar Kar, P. Vigneswara Ilavarasan, M.P. Gupta, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Matti Mäntymäki, Marijn Janssen, Antonis Simintiras, and Salah Al-Sharhan, editors, Digital Nations - Smart Cities, Innovation, and Sustainability , pages 474-484, Cham, 2017. Springer International Publishing.
  13. [709][709] Richard Cloete, Chris Norval, and Jatinder Singh. A call for auditable virtual, augmented and mixed reality. In 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology , pages 1-6, 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lee, L.-H., Braud, T., Zhou, P., Wang, L., Xu, D., Lin, Z., Kumar, A., Bermejo, C., & Hui, P.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) (CN)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Oulu (FI)
Corresponding author
Lee, Lik-Hang
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
Volume
18
Issue
2-3
Pages
100-337
ISSN
1551-3955 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2110.05352
OpenAlex
W4404112583
Cited by
1,088
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 179 · 2024: 274 · 2023: 350 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 7
FWCI
156.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Augmented Reality Applications
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
Keywords
metaverse, extended reality, virtual worlds, persistent virtual worlds, human-computer interaction, artificial intelligence, blockchain, computer vision, Internet of Things, edge-cloud computing, cellular networks, avatars, virtual economy, content creation, privacy and security, trust and accountability, social acceptance, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review