PreprintCited by 17Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Prefix Conditioning Unifies Language and Label Supervision

Open access
Saito, Kuniaki, Sohn, Kihyuk, Zhang, Xiang, Li, Chun-Liang, Lee, Chen-Yu, Saenko, Kate, Pfister, Tomas·2022·arXiv

Abstract

Image-classification datasets have been used to pretrain image recognition models. Recently, web-scale image-caption datasets have emerged as a source of powerful pretraining alternative. Image-caption datasets are more ``open-domain'', containing a wider variety of scene types and vocabulary words than traditional classification datasets, and models trained on these datasets have demonstrated strong performance on few- and zero-shot recognition tasks. When naively unifying image-classification and -caption dataset, we show that such dataset biases negatively affect pre-training by reducing the generalizability of learned representations and thus jeopardizing zero-shot performance since the unification can tailor the model for the classification dataset, making it vulnerable to the distribution shift from the dataset. In this work, we address the problem by disentangling the dataset bias using prefix tokens that inform a language encoder of the type of the input dataset (e.g., image-classification or caption) at training time. This approach allows the language encoder to share the knowledge from two datasets as well as switch the mode of feature extraction, i.e., image-classification dataset or image-caption dataset tailored mode, where we use image-caption mode in the zero-shot evaluation. Our method is generic and can be easily integrated into existing VL pre-training objectives such as CLIP or UniCL. In experiments, we show that this simple technique improves the performance in zero-shot image recognition accuracy and robustness to the image-level distribution shift.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2206.01125

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Stephanie CY Chan, Adam Santoro, Andrew K Lampinen, Jane X Wang, Aaditya Singh, Pierre H Richemond, Jay Mc- Clelland, and Felix Hill. Data distributional properties drive emergent few-shot learning in transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.05055, 2022. 1 · arXiv
  2. Quan Cui, Boyan Zhou, Yu Guo, Weidong Yin, Hao Wu, and Osamu Yoshie. Zerovl: A strong baseline for align- ing vision-language representations with limited resources. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09331, 2021. 4, 5 · arXiv
  3. Menglin Jia, Luming Tang, Bor-Chun Chen, Claire Cardie, Serge Belongie, Bharath Hariharan, and Ser-Nam Lim. Vi- sual prompt tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.12119, 2022. 3 · arXiv
  4. Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. Decoupled weight de- cay regularization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019. 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saito, K., Sohn, K., Zhang, X., Li, C.-L., Lee, C.-Y., Saenko, K., & Pfister, T.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Pages
2861-2870
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386075949
Cited by
17
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
data bias, distribution shift, CLIP, multimodal pre-training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review